OJ was the biggest, of course. It eclipsed all other stories
Casey Anthony was another big one; more shocking in that she was found not guilty. Her attorney (who went on to never lose a murder case), shocked everyone.
The Jodi Aries case was interesting because you saw her start with a plan on how to get away with the perfect murder; and watched it all fall to pieces because she made several really stupid mistakes. Her decision to take the stand was a mistake she regretted for several hours.
The Ezra McCandless murder trial was strange, as it was a on-again off-again trans murdering someone to cover her sexual past
The Grant Amato case was just sad. He killed his parents and brother to get money to send to an online thot. He had already gone through all of his money, and any money he could borrow. Right after the murder, she fled the country and kept the money
the QRD on the Jodi Aries trial, for those who missed it....
She wanted to kill her ex-boyfriend, who refused to get back together with him. Slashing his tires didn't work, peeking through the window didn't work, so she decided to kill him
Her pllan: > use a trip to visit her new boyfriend as cover > rent a car, turn the plates upside down so they can't be read > buy and fill a bunch of gas cans so you don't have to stop on the way > remove the battery from the phone before leaving > Drive from California to Arizona, then kill the ex boyfriend > Drive straight up to Utah, where the new boyfriend is, plug the phone, and act like you drove straight from Cali.
Where it went wrong: > she used a credit card to buy the gas cans and gas, and to rent the car > when she got to the ex's, she tried to get back with him again, having sex with him. > she took a bunch of photos together, just before the murder, and one photo accidently (she dropped the phone) AFTER the murder > not knowing how memory cards work, she threw the camera in the washing machine and ran it, thinking it would destroy the evidence. > she then started calling the police constantly to see if they had any new information on the poor ex who was murdered > oh, and she used a gun she stole from a relative, who reported the theft
And then she took the stand, thinking that she was going to talk her way out of it. She finally tried to play the "I killed him in self defense because he attacked me" line, but that didn't work because she couldn't explain where the knife came from
Had never heard this clip before now, but it's astonishing how she admitted to the most incriminating facts possible on the stand. Why not just plead the 5th? Anything else would have been better than what she did. Maybe she thought she was smarter than the prosecutor.
that too. But if you frick that up, microwave. The microwave also gets fricked in the process, but after that you through both the phone and the microwave in the deepest part of the ocean you can access
The reason you plan is because killing someone is a highly stressful event. The adrenaline rush makes you overlook a lot of blind spots. Which is precisely why you plan your murders, but at the same time you can't plan for everything. Which is why they make rookie mistakes when something they didn't account for happens.
Take the 2020 killing of the college students by some dude who was doing criminology. Meticously planned. But made the dumb rookie mistake of leaving his knife shealth at the scene of the crime.
oof, so close to the perfect crime and that one mistake ruined it
5 months ago
Anonymous
Yup. It was very well planned.
Did research on how rural cops operated. Cased the area. Had plans to switch his plates after the murder. Turn off his phone and everything. Picked random targets.
Then he fricked up leaving the shealth behind. And then he panicked and used the same car he used to drive to the scene of the murder to drive back to the scene of the murder to find the shealth.
Shows that there is also so much planning you can do.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Or maybe he just wasn’t that smart at all.
There are tons of unsolved murder cases, those are the real smart people.
5 months ago
Anonymous
in his case he would have 100% got away with it if he didn't leave the sheaf behind
5 months ago
Anonymous
Even smart people make mistakes.
All it takes is one mistake for you to frick it up.
Most women go their whole lives just doing what they want without thinking about the consequences and never having anyone seriously question them. They're usually really bad at planning out crimes or dealing with a serious interrogation because of this.
By definition the concept of thinking to yourself "i'm going to kill someone because [garbled static demon screaming sounds in head]" makes one a deviant so it shouldn't be surprising that they're not in a well place emotionally to make sound rational decisions.
The dude who questioned her put out a book with more details about her. A friend of mine read it and apparently right before Travis's murder Jodi was planning on going on a camping trip with a few guys. She had condoms and a pistol packed fir the trip. Also she had been fired from previous jobs because she always had problems interacting with women in the workplace and would go off on them.
IIRC the menedez brothers were before OJ. Two pieces of shit who murdered their wealthy parents so they could get their inheritance early. The defense tried to convince the jury they were sexually molested by the father and both of them sobbed on the stand about seeing daddies pee pee.
Why do we have to put up with people like this? The guy killed six white people celebrating Christmas when he was nigging out trying to get away from the police.
>Casey Anthony was another big one; more shocking in that she was found not guilty. Her attorney (who went on to never lose a murder case), shocked everyone.
the cops fricking up the case was another one, checked the wrong internet history......
A true story I remember from the time... > later, during his civil trial > the verdict is going to come in, people are waiting for them to gather and read it > but oops, it's happening just as the networks are going to switch to the State of the Union address > they try to run a split screen while waiting for POTUS, but their heart isn't into it.
So... (and to show you how bit it still was years later > The President delayed going out to give his speech until after the verdict was read
At the time it was 1 of most watched programs of all time >MJ Concert (1993) - 133,000,000 viewers >Mash Finale (1983) - 127,000,000 viewers >Moon Landing (1969) - 125,000,000 viewers >The Day After (1983) - 100,000,000 viewers >OJ Car Chase (1994) - 95,000,000 viewers >MJ Interview (1993) - 90,000,000 viewers
Rittenhouse because we got to see just how stupid prosecutors are and realize just how badly tilted the court system must be when idiots like Binger are getting 95% conviction rates.
When I was younger I used to hate slimy attorneys who would get obviously guilty criminals off the hook, but as I've aged and become more jaded I stopped caring about that because it bothers me less than almost every single prosecutor in existence, who's very job is to literally ruin the lives of innocent people and bend the limits of misconduct to achieve that purpose.
No. That decision was made by the District Attorney.
5 months ago
Anonymous
The DA chose not to prosecute. That would have been the end of it, but Binger took it anyway Presumably because he thought it would launch his career. Instead it got him quietly fired.
Scarier still they assumed he would be convicted without them even bothering to make a case. I was honestly surprised he wasn’t. For Chauvin as soon as it got iffy they had the POTUS step in and dictate what the verdict would be, with various other powerful politicians straight up threatening the jury with violence.
if there was no video footage of the incident he would 100% be in jail right now for life
5 months ago
Anonymous
All he had to do was take a wrong turn and get there a little later. I can't believe people still think he's guilty when
>floyd had a lethal amount of fent in his system >he literally did the same exact thing a while ago (swallowing drugs during an arrest, i can't breathe, goes to the hospital) >was already saying "i can't breathe" when he was sitting in the car >autopsy showed no injury to the neck >different angle showed he was more on his back then neck
That trial was a travesty and made me realize the final nail has been placed in this country's coffin.
5 months ago
Anonymous
imagine if the cup store dude didn't call the cops on floyd. he would've died in his car around the same time. do people even realise this?
5 months ago
Anonymous
They probably would have found some other cop to throw under the bus. When Floyd happened we already had two and half months of lockdowns. Summer was coming and people were antsy. People don't really care about the drugged up groid, it was just pent frustration from being under house arrest for so long.
With an election season coming up, I would be very careful to be a cop (they should just quit all together). Take your time getting to calls so whatever is happening has already resolved itself, especially if you're in a heavily melaninated area. I've heard of cops already doing that with domestic violence. They take their time so both sides have calmed down, passed out from drugs or alcohol, or they left.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Nah, Floyd was bugnuts high before trying to pass off the fake $20 and telling the clerk to frick off, but he didn't eat the rest of his stash till the cops showed up and he knew he was fricked. Even then, he could have just given his shit to one of the other people in the car and he'd have been fine, aside from the inevitable counterfeiting charge.
All he had to do was take a wrong turn and get there a little later. I can't believe people still think he's guilty when
>floyd had a lethal amount of fent in his system >he literally did the same exact thing a while ago (swallowing drugs during an arrest, i can't breathe, goes to the hospital) >was already saying "i can't breathe" when he was sitting in the car >autopsy showed no injury to the neck >different angle showed he was more on his back then neck
That trial was a travesty and made me realize the final nail has been placed in this country's coffin.
The only thing Chauvin is really guilty of is being a shitty cop. Something like gross misconduct or dereliction of duty or negligence. His job on the scene that day was to get Floyd into the cop car and go. Instead he let an obviously drugged up career criminal talk him into laying him on the ground, at which point he ignored even his own colleagues when they told him to check on Floyd. Now look where we are, him and all his fellow officers are gonna be in prison forever and multiple cities are still working towards paying off the over 2 billion dollars in damages the riots caused.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Some of the officers are getting 15-20 years. 15-20 years just for being near a od'ing groid. I know they are our Gods and all but it's excessive.
5 months ago
Anonymous
His SCOTUS appeal was denied, so at this point, barring new evidence, he's fricked. They even got some fricking ex-informant to make a pass at shanking him a few weeks ago.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>barring new evidence, he's fricked.
Thats the thing, there IS new evidence from various depositions over the summer from the DA's office. One of the women there is claiming harassment from the Black person that runs the DA's office, during her deposition she recounts a conversation with the Medical Examiner where he says talks about how he is totally fricked because the evidence does not bear out a death from any sort of thing linked to Chauvin, asphixiation or cardiac arrest. The Judge also tilted the scales by refusing to admit critical evidence like the training manual so the police chief could commit perjury and claim that the knee on neck technique wasn't department protocol.
5 months ago
Anonymous
The most obnoxious part is that all the Black folk have adopted "i can't breef" as their new magic words that they believe is a get out of jail free card.
There was a pair of black women who shoplifted a few thousands dollars worth of clothes and turned a smash and grab into a high speed pursuit that ended with clipping a semi and plowing into an SUV with a mother and her kid in it and as soon as the cop pulled one out of the car >I CAN'T BREEF! >I CAN'T BREEF! >Y YUS RESTIN ME!? >I CAN'T BREEF! >GET YO HANS OFFA ME! >I CAN'T BREEF!
They used a video as evidence that was different from the video they gave the defense. The boomer judge didn't understand technology so he believed them.
A witness also claimed that the prosecution revealed facts of the case to him and then asked him point blank to revise his previous statement based on the facts he was just told. He was so shaken that he immediately got a lawyer after leaving. Then they spent 20 minutes berating him on the stand.
also they corrupted the video footage by zooming into it to an extreme degree with a computer program which adds pixel artefacts and their case rested on these pixels in question. surprisingly the boomer judge understood this and called it out
They used a video as evidence that was different from the video they gave the defense. The boomer judge didn't understand technology so he believed them.
A witness also claimed that the prosecution revealed facts of the case to him and then asked him point blank to revise his previous statement based on the facts he was just told. He was so shaken that he immediately got a lawyer after leaving. Then they spent 20 minutes berating him on the stand.
He had a speech impediment so they tried to treat him like a moron. He ended up humiliating them.
Can play get a video
5 months ago
Anonymous
51:00
58:15
1:00:27
That's all I can find for now. It's worth watching the entire part of the prosecutor questioning.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Thanks amigo
5 months ago
Anonymous
This guy is such a fricking real human being. We should all support him by buying his photography.
5 months ago
Anonymous
This guy is such a fricking real human being. We should all support him by buying his photography.
Thanks amigo
I think the 42:00 timestamp is even more of a bomb shell. hahahaha that fat frick prosecutor thought he was in a movie
5 months ago
Anonymous
>They asked: Would you like to add that to your statement?
*shakes head* >I did not want to change my statement. >And as a result what did you do? >I hired an attorney.
Holy shit this is comedy gold.
remember the "bigfoot footage"? the really low res drone video in which they tried to claim Kyle pointed his gun at Rosenbaum? they made it shit quality on purpose for the jury, because Kyle didn't actually do that, so they had to make it ambiguous so they could put their own spin on it. they gave a different, high res video to the defense, whose creation date in the metadata was earlier than the one they showed the jury, so that was actually the original footage. and at one point in the trial, an anon noticed on Binger's laptop an icon for Handbrake, a video compression program.
tldr - they deliberately compressed video evidence and made it unclear so they could attempt to convince the jury Kyle was doing something he wasn't.
>do everything you can to put an innocent person in prison for life
It's so demoralizing there's people that evil in the world and we're expected to just sit back and let it happen. Binger will never face consequences but anyone who expresses discontent to him would get Chitwood'ed.
no no no no no NO. I'm quite certain part of their evidence was "specially created technological" video, which was just a zoomed-in interpolated video. With the judge criticising it for adding pixels that clearly weren't in the original video.
Imagine putting in all that work to win a trial when you lost it the very second the entire jury went home on day 1 and googled Joseph Rosenbaum and saw his history of criminal convictions.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I think they were hoping someone of the jury would be stubborn enough to convince the other to vote guilty. They did end up getting this middle aged white b***h who wore a mask the entire time. The defense said they were worried about her from the start and they were right. She appointed herself foreman of the jury, conversed with the judge like he was her equal, and actually ask to take home the jury instructions to see if she could israelite her way into a conviction.
It was nothing, even if in theory he took a weapon across state lines (which he didn’t) it doesn’t actually change the self defense explanation.
The whole HE CROSSED THE HECKIN STATE LINES thing just got pushed because it was something the media could say that sounded legally bad for people who are uneducated about the law
Also it meant they could push the idea he went out if his way to drive “all the way across state lines”. As if he was trying to find trouble. Ignoring the fact he lived on a state border and crossed state lines often multiple times a day for every day stuff
I think it was also a way to try to get a federal case going. as you said, MuH STATE LINES!! sounds scary and federal cases can suck for the defender I think
he literally pointed it at the jury. his argument was that he wanted them to feel what rosenbaum felt moments before he died and to convict based on that.
if the gun was loaded (he did not check it if it was or not) he would have pulled a baldwin and killed a juror.
He literally flagged the entire courtroom. Granted the whole point of his little theatrical performance was to scare people, since that's what state actors are trained to do.
Rittenhouse case was only fun in that the left were tying themselves into knots trying to portray him and his actions that night as eeeeviieeel.
It was obvious to any 3rd party viewer upon seeing the footage that he'd get off. One of the big pro-gun rights youtubers was saying he'd been groaning after the early reports thinking this would be another kick inna teeth for the 2s laws until he saw the footage and realised it was just an open and shut case of self-defence.
>saw the footage and realised it was just an open and shut case of self-defence.
True but also this came at time when it was becoming clear that the reality perceived by the left and the reality perceived by the sane world were utterly alien to one another, the very idea of a person simply OWNING a gun that was used in "self defense" was itself intolerable.
There is a case of Rittenhouse looking to pick a fight which is the entire point of the state lines meme. That however does not invalidate his right to self defense if he is not the aggressor.
>pick a fight
Yes, but you have to prove that (he was there to cause affray), and it is really fricking hard to do.
Like every second or third mugga there that night he was wandering around with medical gear on his person, pretending to be a 'medic'. Stupid-ass excuse that's flimsier than their dicks but it's enough in the eyes of the law.
Yep, he tried to say it was provocative. But what really but the prosecution’s case into new heights of absurdity was calling into question Rittenhouse’s exercising of his 5th amendment during the investigation. It is utter insanity for a lawyer to ask a defendant why they didn’t openly discuss a murder charge against them. It’s been a fundamental part of US law for over 200 years.
5 months ago
Anonymous
It was such a bizarre trial. He has the cleanest and most text book self defence footage ever recorded and still had the media acting like he was just a racist mass shooter. I have a friend that called me a boot licker for saying he was innocent, like he literally had to pull the msm boot out of his throat to gargle the words Boot Licker at me
5 months ago
Anonymous
>still had the media acting like he was just a racist mass shooter.
Can't take anything in a vacuum. This came during a time when the left was undergoing a massive coordinate assault to *burn down the entire country*. Kenosha wasn't the only place with riots, there was rioting, arson, mass vandalism, and destruction of statues in over 200 American cities that year. They were just WAITING for a Rittenhouse to happen. They wanted it. They wanted the absolute provocation of a White Boi shooting a poor innocent dindu to prove the "violence" of the right while they themselves annihilated the foundation of US society.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Yea was a miracle the only guy he missed was the Good Boi who booted him in the head
such a stupid case for prosecution to charge out, basically they did it for the outcry alone like the zimmerman prosecutor. and I'm saying this as a hillary voting liberal who thinks trump will destroy america
>pic
Yeah instead of all that it was literally just a racist Mexican who followed a teenager and then blasted him when he fought with him because he was being followed by some fat spic
that was in 2013? holy frick
I remember how back then it felt like the site went to the shitter and was a shadow of its former self
and somehow I managed to spend 10 more years on it?
Honestly, those gloves actually do look too small for his hands.
the prosecution in the OJ case was moronic. the point of getting him to put on the gloves was to leave some reasonable doubts that it was him because the prosecution relied so heavily on the gloves as evidence and it was a genius play by the defence
There have been some good ones recently. Darrel Brooks was a response to the Rittenhouse verdict, which was a response to George Floyd summer of unrest. Crazy chain of events
Im sure OJ was better but I didnt watch it. Of the ‘big 3’ (semi) recent trials (zimmerman, rittenhouse, chauvin) i did watch, Zimmerman was the best. Mark O’mara is best lawyer i have seen on tv
I have heard that the depp/heard trial was amazing if you were into that. The gossip was off the charts and i can totally see that.
I forgot, darrell brooks was insane. But it was too insane to watch the whole thing. I could only deal with clips from the law and crime youtube channel. He is a full tilt maniac, completely psychotically delusional, and a moronic sovcit to boot lol
This is one of those images that will never leave my brain. If the internet disappeared tomorrow I'd still think about Jaffa 20 years from now.
It's so perfect for the perfect meme moment in the perfect meme trial that had an entire nation fixated upon it. It's like this confluence of so so so many grand slam homeruns in terms of meme-ability, the kind of thing that comes around once every decade or so. Just like seeing some incredible legendary performance in a sport that you only get to see once every ten years.
Im sure OJ was better but I didnt watch it. Of the ‘big 3’ (semi) recent trials (zimmerman, rittenhouse, chauvin) i did watch, Zimmerman was the best. Mark O’mara is best lawyer i have seen on tv
I have heard that the depp/heard trial was amazing if you were into that. The gossip was off the charts and i can totally see that.
Depp's trial had really funny moments like referring to a pint he drank as a mega pint, and then there was the sexy woman on his legal team that triggered Amber Heard hardcore
Depp's trial was interesting because of the lack of Heard and her lawyers to be convinving at all during cross or direct. about 39020984 times Heard tried to use hearsay and got called out by Depp's attorneys. Seems very incompetent of her and her lawyers to try to constantly use hearsay evidence.
>Depp's trial was interesting because of the...
...complete lack of evidence Heard had to support ANY of her claims. She stood on the stand and told wild tales of "abuse", and yet couldn't produce a single photograph to back any of it up. Not a single person, besides her sister, claimed they ever saw Depp strike her. The cops showed up and didn't find shit. All the tape recordings clearly demonstrate that Heard was always the aggressor, and Depp was always trying leave the situation.
Her legal team had to know she was going to get btfo, as she provided them with zero evidence to support any of her abuse claims.
Reminder that Heard won her trial in UK where it was presided by a Judge instead of a Jury and the court case was not shown to the public. Shows you how much of a farce the UK system is.
>yeah here's two chicken thighs- I mean the remants of my son, his nail clippings are over there. gators must have got him. darn. anyways back to being disttict attorney
Chauvin was the most infuriating. I turned it when I heard someone the jury admitted to voting in that election just to get on the jury. In any other trial she would have never been let on and that is enough for a grounds for appeal.
It’s the most documented case of jury tampering in history. Millions watched Biden influence the jury, and the city independently determined him guilty by awarding the family money before the trial ended. We might’ve been on a deep decline for a while, but America after that trial is a failed state.
The worst part is how Eric Nelson had to bend over and take it up the ass. I think anyone who watched the whole thing knew that he was right about basically everything.
A lot of liberals who were confronted with the evidence had to back pedal a little and admit maybe the fentanyl had something to do with, they usually say "Well, he shouldn't have kneeled on his neck for that long." If that's the case then at best it's manslaughter, not murder 2 which the state didn't even try to prove.
I like how the prosecution literally did not even try to argue any mens rea at all. Then to top it off they gave up on the actus reus too and just started going for the emotional angle of muh poor nig crying for his mother brutally murdered, now look how many hours he's been dead, are you crying yet. And somehow it fricking worked. the jury in that trial are actually all like 80-100 iq. the prosecution in it was somehow worse than the prosecution in rittenhouse's trial, and those guys were some of the worst I've seen.
Yeah the defense fricked up big time in jury selection. they barely even removed anyone iirc. Its a shame because the defense was competent in the trial itself, he just fricked up horrifically with the jury, he just needed to get one white man who leans more conservative that isn't some easily misled 80 iq moron, who would smell the bullshit from the irish doctor talking about how taking a shit ton of fent and smoking a pack of cigs a day actually means your lungs are healthier than a normal person. one hold out would get it down to third degree.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>voted in hopes of getting jury summons to the chauvin trial
WTF, how was this allowed?
5 months ago
Anonymous
Lawyers get a set number of people they can remove from the jury for any reason at all without stating the reason, as well as they can ask for a motion to have someone removed on the basis of something they said being bad for the fairness of the trial. Yet somehow the defense didn't try either on her and just let her through lol.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>female >20s >mixed race >specifically voted so she could have a chance to send him to the gallows
why would you not immediately get rid of this b***h for someone else.
>female >white >single mother
another lost cause
you know its bad when your best hope for a holdout was one of the black men on the basis that there's a chance that he fricking hates Black person behaviour and would want floyd dead.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>why would you not immediately get rid of this b***h for someone else?
Because literally EVERYONE they could interview for a spot on the jury was some version of that or another. One of the guys on the jury was later outed publicly as a BLM activist who went to George Floyd rallies or some shit. Chauvin's case should have been thrown out the moment it became clear it was impossible for him to get a fair trial anywhere in the U.S.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I think it was the white frisbee playing wholesome big chungus redditor chemist that admitted to going to BLM riots and floyd memorials.
the forewoman also admitted to hating chauvin and wanting an excuse, and saying she found one with the irish moron who convinced everyone that he was 100% guilty and saint floyd had healthy lungs and a heart that were strengthened by copious amounts of fentanyl.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Juries are ridiculous and the Anglo "justice" system is a joke.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>no asians >no hispanics >no middle eastern
Surely this is just a coincidence.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I don't think there's any in the Minnesota area. Wouldn't have made a difference, middle eastern and asian are overwhelmingly liberal. Maybe a hispanic could be a staunch conservative but Chauvin stood no chance
5 months ago
Anonymous
Arabs and Asians can be very anti drug addict.
5 months ago
Anonymous
That's what everyone thought about some of the other jury members. Turns out they were all pozzed. They only chance he had was white male from a backwoods place, loves guns, and doesn't watch the news.
5 months ago
Anonymous
what would your ((description)) be?
5 months ago
Anonymous
White - Male - 28
Unemployed and lives with his parents. Very little history since high school graduation.
I have nothing to lose. If I was on that jury I would have voted not guilty and dug my feet in. I don't care if I get doxxed and have the entire country against me.
5 months ago
Anonymous
now she works with cardiac patients again because of the vaccine. lmfao
This isn't even the most offensive part of the trial. Before it even began the defense tried to get the venue changed, because by that point his chances of a fair trial in Wisconsin were in the negatives and still falling. The judge's actually real life fricking response? >"you can't get a fair trial anywhere"
Which should have been more than enough for a fricking mistrial. Imagine going ahead with a court case when you KNOW FOR A FRICKING FACT THERE'S NO POSSIBLE WAY TO CONDUCT IT FAIRLY.
5 months ago
Anonymous
The judge wasn't wrong though. You can't get a fair trial when the media is inflaming it to that extent.
The media tried with rittenhouse and zimzam but they never got even close to the state of saint floyd where over half the country wanted blood.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, exactly. But a man is entitled by law to a FAIR trial. If he cannot get one, then the trial does not happen and no conviction can be made.
When you learn about the story behind the glove testing part of the trial it’s even funnier
>OJ’s black lawyer Cochran was S tier and provoked black prosecution lawyer Darden into trying the gloves by calling him a house Black person in breaks >white prosecution lawyer Clarke explicitly forbid this from happening because the countless factors between the murder and the trial meant both the gloves could have shrank, and OJ’s hand could be bigger. And this turned out to be true >darden nigged out and tried to force the gloves on OJ when he couldn’t get them on
Cochran knows the Black person ways so he could bring out Darden’s inner Black person and force him to act irrationally
They legit didn’t fit. Clarke knew this was almost certainly the case since it has been a long time since the murder and OJ had fattened up since then. Plus forensic analysis of the gloves can lead to shrinking of the material
Darden just took the bait because he’s a moron who got provoked by Cochran and probably felt bad he was being bossed around by a white woman in a trial where blacks people overwhelmingly wanted OJ free as “revenge” for the Rodney king verdict leading to the cops going free
Trayvon Martin. OJ was more *entertaining*, but he was just a Hollywood celebrity doing Hollywood celebrity things. Traytray taught me how absolutely fricked this government and society are for real people. I felt rage boil inside me like I never felt before when I watched that absolute farce of a "judge" mishandle the entire debacle.
Zimzam went free though, luckily. The media did their best to make sure he was public enemy number one though.
still laughing at all the whitewashing pics and the dumb b***h on the jury that wrote a book about how she felt guilty acquitting him.
I thought Zimmerman was in trouble when the jury was all women. Apparently they all cried when they came to the verdict. Jesus fricking Christ, why did we give these people rights?
The Trayvon case is what both saved and destroyed my faith in American justice
>saved because he was found innocent in spite of an obvious witch hunt >destroyed because he was only charged (and could have been found guilty) solely for political reasons
I’m sure it’s happened plenty before but this was the first one I saw unfold before my eyes.
Worse yet, years later more and more revelations come out. The fat black chick who was trayvons “girlfriend” who testified about the phonecall in the trial turned out to not even be her. Completely fabricated, we still don’t know who the real person was. And that b***h got a free scholarship out of the deal
I knew that Jeantel b***h wasn't the person he was talking to. She was stupid but she genuinely didn't understand simple things that someone who was there would. And Trayvon wasn't exactly a 10 but I was wondering what he was doing with that fat ugly b***h.
the prosecutor did a good job saying shit like >this is where we found mom’s legs
because that shit still sticks with me. i can’t imagine treating your parents like that
One of the rare trials I've watched where the state prosecutors did a really good job. They totally dropped the ball with the girlfriend though. The way the lead attorney made it a point to explain to the court that she was a good girl who dindu nuffin right at the start made it obvious she was an integral part of both the killings and their case. b***h made a deal and we aren't allowed to know about the details. There isn't any fricking way in this world that she didn't know what was going on during their little sleepover.
>Detectives say Mellender would keep tabs on her boyfriend using a Snapchat feature that allows users to track a friend's location in real time. On July 3, she spotted Chandler on Snapchat near the Wisconsin River. Mellender had taken a screenshot of the location and saved it to her phone.
Jesus. What a fool.
Even normie legal analysts admit the outcome can rely on their emotions. Lawyers on both sides know they and go for emotional arguments instead of factual ones.
There’s many factors which are outright worrying when it comes to juries
>have to appeal to lowest common denominator when it comes to intelligence because jury members are literally the people too dumb to avoid jury duty >jury members becoming bored to the point of not paying attention is a serious factor in trials
It’s why good lawyers have to be very theatrical, and pick people to give statements or cross examine who will be seen as charismatic and trustworthy. Regardless of whether they’re actually that important
Also the use of forensic science has been a big difference
>DNA was largely still not well understood when OJ trial happened. So despite them having his DNA and knowing he was certainly the dude who wore the gloves, the jury didn’t understand this certainty because the scientist they had testify was too high level, they needed someone no was more of an educator/edutainment dude who could explain it was 100% accurate. Not leaving reasonable doubt >modern juries have spent their whole lives watching crime tv shows with DNA used constantly in cases. So now they expect to ALWAYS have it available in every case. Meaning obvious cases where someone was just smart enough to not piss on the crime scene can lead to a jury member having (un)reasonable doubt because no dna is used in evidence
I've always wondering about those trials where some high level financial or technical crime was committed. The average normie is not going to understand anything that is said.
True. Madoff only got into trouble because he defrauded other israelites. Makes you wonder why weinstein didn't get away with his bullshit.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Makes you wonder why weinstein didn't get away with his bullshit.
Every so often they sacrifice one of their own to the dogs and it absolves the rest.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Hollywood collectively agreed to throw him under the bus to show that #MeToo was "solved" >the other Weinstein wanted more control of their company >he stole a bigger producers frick doll and they dragged him into the light for revenge >was going to get busted hard for cheating on taxes or something worse and outed himself to distract people and get a lesser sentence >one of his former wienersockets sucked their way high enough up the food chain to get revenge
or it could be all three
5 months ago
Anonymous
Madoff got in trouble becuae his kids turned him in. They were taking over the business and when they found out what was going and realized they would be left holding the bag when the classic ponzu scene failed on its own during the next downturn
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Madoff only got into trouble
because his scam was moronicly simple, it was just backdating fake "trades" with shitty obscure software that let them fake actually making trades that made their clients money while shuffling money around. Madoff obviously did piss off *somebody* tho, he and his wife's suicide attempt seemed very legit and both his sons were dead of "heart attacks" within a year of his arrest. Most financial schemes never get prosecuted because they're simply too complex and spread across too many countries to ever be able to prove a case. Look at the Panama papers for an ongoing example.
>It’s why good lawyers have to be very theatrical, and pick people to give statements or cross examine who will be seen as charismatic and trustworthy. Regardless of whether they’re actually that important
It always kills me when I see people, especially on Cinemaphile, who don't "get" how the court system works and think that everything comes down to rote fact and technicalities >Yeah I might break the law in this theoretical conversation, but they can't do anything to me because [some trivial factoid]
It just don't be like that, the law is never about who's "right", it's about who has the more expensive law team, and it's rarely going to be the lone wolf downloading torrents or harassing people.
>watching crime drama thriller >suspect in custody is cool as a cucumber >asks for glass of water >takes a long calm sip >hands glass back to them >cops try to hide their giddiness >suspect says "Be careful washing it... DNA is very fragile!"
OJ was the biggest, of course. It eclipsed all other stories
Casey Anthony was another big one; more shocking in that she was found not guilty. Her attorney (who went on to never lose a murder case), shocked everyone.
The Jodi Aries case was interesting because you saw her start with a plan on how to get away with the perfect murder; and watched it all fall to pieces because she made several really stupid mistakes. Her decision to take the stand was a mistake she regretted for several hours.
The Ezra McCandless murder trial was strange, as it was a on-again off-again trans murdering someone to cover her sexual past
The Grant Amato case was just sad. He killed his parents and brother to get money to send to an online thot. He had already gone through all of his money, and any money he could borrow. Right after the murder, she fled the country and kept the money
the QRD on the Jodi Aries trial, for those who missed it....
She wanted to kill her ex-boyfriend, who refused to get back together with him. Slashing his tires didn't work, peeking through the window didn't work, so she decided to kill him
Her pllan:
> use a trip to visit her new boyfriend as cover
> rent a car, turn the plates upside down so they can't be read
> buy and fill a bunch of gas cans so you don't have to stop on the way
> remove the battery from the phone before leaving
> Drive from California to Arizona, then kill the ex boyfriend
> Drive straight up to Utah, where the new boyfriend is, plug the phone, and act like you drove straight from Cali.
Where it went wrong:
> she used a credit card to buy the gas cans and gas, and to rent the car
> when she got to the ex's, she tried to get back with him again, having sex with him.
> she took a bunch of photos together, just before the murder, and one photo accidently (she dropped the phone) AFTER the murder
> not knowing how memory cards work, she threw the camera in the washing machine and ran it, thinking it would destroy the evidence.
> she then started calling the police constantly to see if they had any new information on the poor ex who was murdered
> oh, and she used a gun she stole from a relative, who reported the theft
And then she took the stand, thinking that she was going to talk her way out of it. She finally tried to play the "I killed him in self defense because he attacked me" line, but that didn't work because she couldn't explain where the knife came from
It was like a Columbo trial
>Here's your yandere GF bro ...
According to the police, every friend of the victim they interviewed after the murder started with "Jodi did it"
You'll be happy to know that she bounced back. She won the prison Christmas carol contest, winning snacks for everyone in her cell block.
> and yes, I know far too much about televised trials of a certain era
>She won the prison Christmas carol contest, winning snacks for everyone in her cell block.
kek
looks cuter without the glasses
Can you imagine if females were stronger than males how violent this world would be?
the JCS interrogation of Arias is pretty good
Had never heard this clip before now, but it's astonishing how she admitted to the most incriminating facts possible on the stand. Why not just plead the 5th? Anything else would have been better than what she did. Maybe she thought she was smarter than the prosecutor.
>she threw the camera in the washing machine and ran it, thinking it would destroy the evidence
women
I know right? Might as well have thrown it in a sandwitch!
everyone knows its microwave it or do nothing at all
you shouldn't have a mobile on your person if you're planning on doing anything illegal
that too. But if you frick that up, microwave. The microwave also gets fricked in the process, but after that you through both the phone and the microwave in the deepest part of the ocean you can access
I don't understand how so many people plan and premeditate these murders and make such embarassing rookie mistakes
The reason you plan is because killing someone is a highly stressful event. The adrenaline rush makes you overlook a lot of blind spots. Which is precisely why you plan your murders, but at the same time you can't plan for everything. Which is why they make rookie mistakes when something they didn't account for happens.
Take the 2020 killing of the college students by some dude who was doing criminology. Meticously planned. But made the dumb rookie mistake of leaving his knife shealth at the scene of the crime.
>Take the 2020 killing of the college students by some dude who was doing criminology.
link to the case?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_University_of_Idaho_killings
oof, so close to the perfect crime and that one mistake ruined it
Yup. It was very well planned.
Did research on how rural cops operated. Cased the area. Had plans to switch his plates after the murder. Turn off his phone and everything. Picked random targets.
Then he fricked up leaving the shealth behind. And then he panicked and used the same car he used to drive to the scene of the murder to drive back to the scene of the murder to find the shealth.
Shows that there is also so much planning you can do.
Or maybe he just wasn’t that smart at all.
There are tons of unsolved murder cases, those are the real smart people.
in his case he would have 100% got away with it if he didn't leave the sheaf behind
Even smart people make mistakes.
All it takes is one mistake for you to frick it up.
Most women go their whole lives just doing what they want without thinking about the consequences and never having anyone seriously question them. They're usually really bad at planning out crimes or dealing with a serious interrogation because of this.
They think they're smarter than they really are so they overlook obvious shit.
By definition the concept of thinking to yourself "i'm going to kill someone because [garbled static demon screaming sounds in head]" makes one a deviant so it shouldn't be surprising that they're not in a well place emotionally to make sound rational decisions.
They read too much “true crime” fiction from before DNA testing and modern evidence gathering techniques and think they can still get away with it
The dude who questioned her put out a book with more details about her. A friend of mine read it and apparently right before Travis's murder Jodi was planning on going on a camping trip with a few guys. She had condoms and a pistol packed fir the trip. Also she had been fired from previous jobs because she always had problems interacting with women in the workplace and would go off on them.
https://i.shoosh.co/contents/albums/sources/174000/174641/43066.jpg
OH NO NO NO NO
>Casey Anthony
This any good?
No and I wish they wouldn't feed her ego and make movies about her while that c**t's still alive
IIRC the menedez brothers were before OJ. Two pieces of shit who murdered their wealthy parents so they could get their inheritance early. The defense tried to convince the jury they were sexually molested by the father and both of them sobbed on the stand about seeing daddies pee pee.
Two years after. And everyone knows they weren't molested. It got to a point people suspected they were incestuous homosexuals.
>they were incestuous gays
so they were molested?
Sometimes you really can just look at someone and see the nothingness in their eyes and know they're bad news.
What was the story there? Weren't their parents really abusive?
Oh yeah, these guys were the reason Fright Night 3 never happened. Their dad funded the 2nd one and was supposed to do the same for 3.
you're forgetting The Menendez Brothers. 2ns biggest trial of the decade. So big it was even a parody subplot in The Cable Guy.
Why do we have to put up with people like this? The guy killed six white people celebrating Christmas when he was nigging out trying to get away from the police.
>The guy killed six white people celebrating Christmas
And injured 62, most of them seriously.
No he didn't. It was an suv that killed them.
I hate them so much words cannot describe.
>Casey Anthony was another big one; more shocking in that she was found not guilty. Her attorney (who went on to never lose a murder case), shocked everyone.
the cops fricking up the case was another one, checked the wrong internet history......
for me, its johnny "megapint" depp V amber turd with trayvon "ground and pound" martin V "the spanish white supremacist" zimmerman a close second
What's this about?
I'm curious too! Talk to us Goose.
hes booing the white race reproducing without mutt mixing
How people are left that remember that this was webm was the ground zero for the modern useage of the word cuck?
You just posted it. His car chase had nearly the same viewership as the fricking superbowl.
Nothing could ever top it again although Zimmerman was a close second
A true story I remember from the time...
> later, during his civil trial
> the verdict is going to come in, people are waiting for them to gather and read it
> but oops, it's happening just as the networks are going to switch to the State of the Union address
> they try to run a split screen while waiting for POTUS, but their heart isn't into it.
So... (and to show you how bit it still was years later
> The President delayed going out to give his speech until after the verdict was read
At the time it was 1 of most watched programs of all time
>MJ Concert (1993) - 133,000,000 viewers
>Mash Finale (1983) - 127,000,000 viewers
>Moon Landing (1969) - 125,000,000 viewers
>The Day After (1983) - 100,000,000 viewers
>OJ Car Chase (1994) - 95,000,000 viewers
>MJ Interview (1993) - 90,000,000 viewers
>All the TV films / series
What happened?
>Jaffa calls
Rittenhouse because we got to see just how stupid prosecutors are and realize just how badly tilted the court system must be when idiots like Binger are getting 95% conviction rates.
This frick belongs in prison.
Most lawyers deserve worse than prison
Almost all state prosecutors deserve to be flayed alive and rolled in salt.
When I was younger I used to hate slimy attorneys who would get obviously guilty criminals off the hook, but as I've aged and become more jaded I stopped caring about that because it bothers me less than almost every single prosecutor in existence, who's very job is to literally ruin the lives of innocent people and bend the limits of misconduct to achieve that purpose.
They 100% threw that trial. There's no other plausible explanation for how bad their case was presented.
There's no case there.
The prosecution had no chance.
Wasn't it his decision to prosecute in the first place?
No. That decision was made by the District Attorney.
The DA chose not to prosecute. That would have been the end of it, but Binger took it anyway Presumably because he thought it would launch his career. Instead it got him quietly fired.
scary someone can get charged like this for political reasons.
Yes it is scary since most of the time (Chauvin, the rednecks who killed Armed Robbery) the innocent go to jail.
Scarier still they assumed he would be convicted without them even bothering to make a case. I was honestly surprised he wasn’t. For Chauvin as soon as it got iffy they had the POTUS step in and dictate what the verdict would be, with various other powerful politicians straight up threatening the jury with violence.
if there was no video footage of the incident he would 100% be in jail right now for life
All he had to do was take a wrong turn and get there a little later. I can't believe people still think he's guilty when
>floyd had a lethal amount of fent in his system
>he literally did the same exact thing a while ago (swallowing drugs during an arrest, i can't breathe, goes to the hospital)
>was already saying "i can't breathe" when he was sitting in the car
>autopsy showed no injury to the neck
>different angle showed he was more on his back then neck
That trial was a travesty and made me realize the final nail has been placed in this country's coffin.
imagine if the cup store dude didn't call the cops on floyd. he would've died in his car around the same time. do people even realise this?
They probably would have found some other cop to throw under the bus. When Floyd happened we already had two and half months of lockdowns. Summer was coming and people were antsy. People don't really care about the drugged up groid, it was just pent frustration from being under house arrest for so long.
With an election season coming up, I would be very careful to be a cop (they should just quit all together). Take your time getting to calls so whatever is happening has already resolved itself, especially if you're in a heavily melaninated area. I've heard of cops already doing that with domestic violence. They take their time so both sides have calmed down, passed out from drugs or alcohol, or they left.
Nah, Floyd was bugnuts high before trying to pass off the fake $20 and telling the clerk to frick off, but he didn't eat the rest of his stash till the cops showed up and he knew he was fricked. Even then, he could have just given his shit to one of the other people in the car and he'd have been fine, aside from the inevitable counterfeiting charge.
The only thing Chauvin is really guilty of is being a shitty cop. Something like gross misconduct or dereliction of duty or negligence. His job on the scene that day was to get Floyd into the cop car and go. Instead he let an obviously drugged up career criminal talk him into laying him on the ground, at which point he ignored even his own colleagues when they told him to check on Floyd. Now look where we are, him and all his fellow officers are gonna be in prison forever and multiple cities are still working towards paying off the over 2 billion dollars in damages the riots caused.
Some of the officers are getting 15-20 years. 15-20 years just for being near a od'ing groid. I know they are our Gods and all but it's excessive.
His SCOTUS appeal was denied, so at this point, barring new evidence, he's fricked. They even got some fricking ex-informant to make a pass at shanking him a few weeks ago.
>barring new evidence, he's fricked.
Thats the thing, there IS new evidence from various depositions over the summer from the DA's office. One of the women there is claiming harassment from the Black person that runs the DA's office, during her deposition she recounts a conversation with the Medical Examiner where he says talks about how he is totally fricked because the evidence does not bear out a death from any sort of thing linked to Chauvin, asphixiation or cardiac arrest. The Judge also tilted the scales by refusing to admit critical evidence like the training manual so the police chief could commit perjury and claim that the knee on neck technique wasn't department protocol.
The most obnoxious part is that all the Black folk have adopted "i can't breef" as their new magic words that they believe is a get out of jail free card.
There was a pair of black women who shoplifted a few thousands dollars worth of clothes and turned a smash and grab into a high speed pursuit that ended with clipping a semi and plowing into an SUV with a mother and her kid in it and as soon as the cop pulled one out of the car
>I CAN'T BREEF!
>I CAN'T BREEF!
>Y YUS RESTIN ME!?
>I CAN'T BREEF!
>GET YO HANS OFFA ME!
>I CAN'T BREEF!
he actually does, he got caught tampering with evidence and all the technologically illiterate boomer morons around him were too stupid to realise it
>he got caught tampering with evidence
What's this? Remind me.
They used a video as evidence that was different from the video they gave the defense. The boomer judge didn't understand technology so he believed them.
With new tech the way it is, boomer judges should be forced into retirement.
also they corrupted the video footage by zooming into it to an extreme degree with a computer program which adds pixel artefacts and their case rested on these pixels in question. surprisingly the boomer judge understood this and called it out
A witness also claimed that the prosecution revealed facts of the case to him and then asked him point blank to revise his previous statement based on the facts he was just told. He was so shaken that he immediately got a lawyer after leaving. Then they spent 20 minutes berating him on the stand.
He had a speech impediment so they tried to treat him like a moron. He ended up humiliating them.
Can play get a video
51:00
58:15
1:00:27
That's all I can find for now. It's worth watching the entire part of the prosecutor questioning.
Thanks amigo
This guy is such a fricking real human being. We should all support him by buying his photography.
I think the 42:00 timestamp is even more of a bomb shell. hahahaha that fat frick prosecutor thought he was in a movie
>They asked: Would you like to add that to your statement?
*shakes head*
>I did not want to change my statement.
>And as a result what did you do?
>I hired an attorney.
Holy shit this is comedy gold.
remember the "bigfoot footage"? the really low res drone video in which they tried to claim Kyle pointed his gun at Rosenbaum? they made it shit quality on purpose for the jury, because Kyle didn't actually do that, so they had to make it ambiguous so they could put their own spin on it. they gave a different, high res video to the defense, whose creation date in the metadata was earlier than the one they showed the jury, so that was actually the original footage. and at one point in the trial, an anon noticed on Binger's laptop an icon for Handbrake, a video compression program.
tldr - they deliberately compressed video evidence and made it unclear so they could attempt to convince the jury Kyle was doing something he wasn't.
>do everything you can to put an innocent person in prison for life
It's so demoralizing there's people that evil in the world and we're expected to just sit back and let it happen. Binger will never face consequences but anyone who expresses discontent to him would get Chitwood'ed.
no no no no no NO. I'm quite certain part of their evidence was "specially created technological" video, which was just a zoomed-in interpolated video. With the judge criticising it for adding pixels that clearly weren't in the original video.
Imagine putting in all that work to win a trial when you lost it the very second the entire jury went home on day 1 and googled Joseph Rosenbaum and saw his history of criminal convictions.
I think they were hoping someone of the jury would be stubborn enough to convince the other to vote guilty. They did end up getting this middle aged white b***h who wore a mask the entire time. The defense said they were worried about her from the start and they were right. She appointed herself foreman of the jury, conversed with the judge like he was her equal, and actually ask to take home the jury instructions to see if she could israelite her way into a conviction.
The whole 'zoomed in interpolated' video evidence was embarrassing. I wouldn't be surprised if the tv had motion smoothing turned on onto of all that.
I hated his catty homosexual voice the entire time he was questioning Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse deserves so much credit for standing under pressure.
So what was the state lines thing? Did he get in any trouble with the feds for that?
No, because the feds knew it would have come across as beyond petty and they never would have gotten a conviction.
It was nothing, even if in theory he took a weapon across state lines (which he didn’t) it doesn’t actually change the self defense explanation.
The whole HE CROSSED THE HECKIN STATE LINES thing just got pushed because it was something the media could say that sounded legally bad for people who are uneducated about the law
Also it meant they could push the idea he went out if his way to drive “all the way across state lines”. As if he was trying to find trouble. Ignoring the fact he lived on a state border and crossed state lines often multiple times a day for every day stuff
I think it was also a way to try to get a federal case going. as you said, MuH STATE LINES!! sounds scary and federal cases can suck for the defender I think
unless he repents that homosexual will most likely rot in hell for a long time
I’ll never forget the sheer amount of moronation from this dude
>finger on the trigger
I bet that gun is probably pointed in someone's direction.
It was pointed at the jury. You can’t make this shit up.
he literally pointed it at the jury. his argument was that he wanted them to feel what rosenbaum felt moments before he died and to convict based on that.
if the gun was loaded (he did not check it if it was or not) he would have pulled a baldwin and killed a juror.
He literally flagged the entire courtroom. Granted the whole point of his little theatrical performance was to scare people, since that's what state actors are trained to do.
>vaguely threatens the jury
very mafioso
this trial was also amazing for memeability
Is that a real quote..
Zimmerman, Johnny Depp, Kyle Rittenhouse, Derek Chauvin
Rittenhouse case was only fun in that the left were tying themselves into knots trying to portray him and his actions that night as eeeeviieeel.
It was obvious to any 3rd party viewer upon seeing the footage that he'd get off. One of the big pro-gun rights youtubers was saying he'd been groaning after the early reports thinking this would be another kick inna teeth for the 2s laws until he saw the footage and realised it was just an open and shut case of self-defence.
>saw the footage and realised it was just an open and shut case of self-defence.
True but also this came at time when it was becoming clear that the reality perceived by the left and the reality perceived by the sane world were utterly alien to one another, the very idea of a person simply OWNING a gun that was used in "self defense" was itself intolerable.
There is a case of Rittenhouse looking to pick a fight which is the entire point of the state lines meme. That however does not invalidate his right to self defense if he is not the aggressor.
>Rittenhouse looking to pick a fight
Except he didn't. So, you know, toodleoo with your schizo pedo defense.
I am not saying he did. I am saying that's the prosecutors argument
>pick a fight
Yes, but you have to prove that (he was there to cause affray), and it is really fricking hard to do.
Like every second or third mugga there that night he was wandering around with medical gear on his person, pretending to be a 'medic'. Stupid-ass excuse that's flimsier than their dicks but it's enough in the eyes of the law.
Enough to argue in court but not enough to convict as we can see.
Didn’t the prosecutor have a go at him for putting out a fire as if it was as bad as taking a shit in Grosskruetz’s cornflakes?
Yep, he tried to say it was provocative. But what really but the prosecution’s case into new heights of absurdity was calling into question Rittenhouse’s exercising of his 5th amendment during the investigation. It is utter insanity for a lawyer to ask a defendant why they didn’t openly discuss a murder charge against them. It’s been a fundamental part of US law for over 200 years.
It was such a bizarre trial. He has the cleanest and most text book self defence footage ever recorded and still had the media acting like he was just a racist mass shooter. I have a friend that called me a boot licker for saying he was innocent, like he literally had to pull the msm boot out of his throat to gargle the words Boot Licker at me
>still had the media acting like he was just a racist mass shooter.
Can't take anything in a vacuum. This came during a time when the left was undergoing a massive coordinate assault to *burn down the entire country*. Kenosha wasn't the only place with riots, there was rioting, arson, mass vandalism, and destruction of statues in over 200 American cities that year. They were just WAITING for a Rittenhouse to happen. They wanted it. They wanted the absolute provocation of a White Boi shooting a poor innocent dindu to prove the "violence" of the right while they themselves annihilated the foundation of US society.
Yea was a miracle the only guy he missed was the Good Boi who booted him in the head
Grounz was pretty good. Dah'rell was such a tremendous piece of shit.
UNDER WHAT LAWFUL LAW?
I watched this whole fricking thing on youtube. Felt like the Trial of Tim Heidecker.
Never forget Fort Brooks. No Girl Judges Allowed.
It got repetitive pretty quickly but seeing a narcissist having a complete meltdown was interesting
Possibly the Black personiest Black person to ever shuck and jive in a public setting. How do blacks survive bad PR like this?
Rittenhouse trial was immensely enjoyable.
Especially the verdict.
such a stupid case for prosecution to charge out, basically they did it for the outcry alone like the zimmerman prosecutor. and I'm saying this as a hillary voting liberal who thinks trump will destroy america
I hope a nig rapes you.
That said, you are correct.
Also nice digits.
checked
Bong here did they really televise the Zimmerman trial across the pond? That must have been bonkers.
>pic
Yeah instead of all that it was literally just a racist Mexican who followed a teenager and then blasted him when he fought with him because he was being followed by some fat spic
Hmm, sounds like you’re trying to flim flam the zim zam. Here’s a news flash, Tyrone… you can’t.
Why was the Mexican following the 227 pound teenager? There must have been a reason no?
Martin wasn’t that big.
Not in the old photos the media showed but he definitely was when he took the room temperature challenge.
Mexicans are vibrant people of color and therefore cant be racist you vile far right nazi.
that was in 2013? holy frick
I remember how back then it felt like the site went to the shitter and was a shadow of its former self
and somehow I managed to spend 10 more years on it?
Why didn't they make him put on the gloves without the wearing a glove under it?
the prosecution in the OJ case was moronic. the point of getting him to put on the gloves was to leave some reasonable doubts that it was him because the prosecution relied so heavily on the gloves as evidence and it was a genius play by the defence
Did it even matter though? The nogs on the jury already had their mind made up and even admitted so.
It will be the Delphi trial coming up some time next year.
Honestly, those gloves actually do look too small for his hands.
he was wearing another glove under it
And he purposefully didn't take his arthritis medication so that his hands would swell up.
Zimmerman trial was the GOAT, glad I got to experience that with /misc/ everyday
George Zimmerman because it showed the country how stupid Black folk really are
It also showed us how corporate media is a weapon used by the enemies of the people.
Didn't they try to make Zimmerman look white?
desperately
pic related is about how it was presented by the media
if this happened today Zimzam would 100% go to prison. Kyle only got off because there was so much footage completely proving his innocence
That's moronic sir.
Which one?
There have been some good ones recently. Darrel Brooks was a response to the Rittenhouse verdict, which was a response to George Floyd summer of unrest. Crazy chain of events
I forgot, darrell brooks was insane. But it was too insane to watch the whole thing. I could only deal with clips from the law and crime youtube channel. He is a full tilt maniac, completely psychotically delusional, and a moronic sovcit to boot lol
This is one of those images that will never leave my brain. If the internet disappeared tomorrow I'd still think about Jaffa 20 years from now.
It's so perfect for the perfect meme moment in the perfect meme trial that had an entire nation fixated upon it. It's like this confluence of so so so many grand slam homeruns in terms of meme-ability, the kind of thing that comes around once every decade or so. Just like seeing some incredible legendary performance in a sport that you only get to see once every ten years.
truth
it truly was /misc/'s golden age
Im sure OJ was better but I didnt watch it. Of the ‘big 3’ (semi) recent trials (zimmerman, rittenhouse, chauvin) i did watch, Zimmerman was the best. Mark O’mara is best lawyer i have seen on tv
I have heard that the depp/heard trial was amazing if you were into that. The gossip was off the charts and i can totally see that.
Depp's trial had really funny moments like referring to a pint he drank as a mega pint, and then there was the sexy woman on his legal team that triggered Amber Heard hardcore
Depp's trial was interesting because of the lack of Heard and her lawyers to be convinving at all during cross or direct. about 39020984 times Heard tried to use hearsay and got called out by Depp's attorneys. Seems very incompetent of her and her lawyers to try to constantly use hearsay evidence.
>Depp's trial was interesting because of the...
...complete lack of evidence Heard had to support ANY of her claims. She stood on the stand and told wild tales of "abuse", and yet couldn't produce a single photograph to back any of it up. Not a single person, besides her sister, claimed they ever saw Depp strike her. The cops showed up and didn't find shit. All the tape recordings clearly demonstrate that Heard was always the aggressor, and Depp was always trying leave the situation.
Her legal team had to know she was going to get btfo, as she provided them with zero evidence to support any of her abuse claims.
That was truly a ridiculous trial.
Reminder that Heard won her trial in UK where it was presided by a Judge instead of a Jury and the court case was not shown to the public. Shows you how much of a farce the UK system is.
Not a trial, but what is the big deal about Gaby Petito? Whats make that case special?
Young white woman.
That case was flavor of the week shit. It got completely memory holed after the guy turned up dead
>yeah here's two chicken thighs- I mean the remants of my son, his nail clippings are over there. gators must have got him. darn. anyways back to being disttict attorney
She was a QT. There was no trial though.
Chauvin was the most infuriating. I turned it when I heard someone the jury admitted to voting in that election just to get on the jury. In any other trial she would have never been let on and that is enough for a grounds for appeal.
It’s the most documented case of jury tampering in history. Millions watched Biden influence the jury, and the city independently determined him guilty by awarding the family money before the trial ended. We might’ve been on a deep decline for a while, but America after that trial is a failed state.
The worst part is how Eric Nelson had to bend over and take it up the ass. I think anyone who watched the whole thing knew that he was right about basically everything.
A lot of liberals who were confronted with the evidence had to back pedal a little and admit maybe the fentanyl had something to do with, they usually say "Well, he shouldn't have kneeled on his neck for that long." If that's the case then at best it's manslaughter, not murder 2 which the state didn't even try to prove.
I like how the prosecution literally did not even try to argue any mens rea at all. Then to top it off they gave up on the actus reus too and just started going for the emotional angle of muh poor nig crying for his mother brutally murdered, now look how many hours he's been dead, are you crying yet. And somehow it fricking worked. the jury in that trial are actually all like 80-100 iq. the prosecution in it was somehow worse than the prosecution in rittenhouse's trial, and those guys were some of the worst I've seen.
He had no chance.
Yeah the defense fricked up big time in jury selection. they barely even removed anyone iirc. Its a shame because the defense was competent in the trial itself, he just fricked up horrifically with the jury, he just needed to get one white man who leans more conservative that isn't some easily misled 80 iq moron, who would smell the bullshit from the irish doctor talking about how taking a shit ton of fent and smoking a pack of cigs a day actually means your lungs are healthier than a normal person. one hold out would get it down to third degree.
>voted in hopes of getting jury summons to the chauvin trial
WTF, how was this allowed?
Lawyers get a set number of people they can remove from the jury for any reason at all without stating the reason, as well as they can ask for a motion to have someone removed on the basis of something they said being bad for the fairness of the trial. Yet somehow the defense didn't try either on her and just let her through lol.
>female
>20s
>mixed race
>specifically voted so she could have a chance to send him to the gallows
why would you not immediately get rid of this b***h for someone else.
>female
>white
>single mother
another lost cause
you know its bad when your best hope for a holdout was one of the black men on the basis that there's a chance that he fricking hates Black person behaviour and would want floyd dead.
>why would you not immediately get rid of this b***h for someone else?
Because literally EVERYONE they could interview for a spot on the jury was some version of that or another. One of the guys on the jury was later outed publicly as a BLM activist who went to George Floyd rallies or some shit. Chauvin's case should have been thrown out the moment it became clear it was impossible for him to get a fair trial anywhere in the U.S.
I think it was the white frisbee playing wholesome big chungus redditor chemist that admitted to going to BLM riots and floyd memorials.
the forewoman also admitted to hating chauvin and wanting an excuse, and saying she found one with the irish moron who convinced everyone that he was 100% guilty and saint floyd had healthy lungs and a heart that were strengthened by copious amounts of fentanyl.
Juries are ridiculous and the Anglo "justice" system is a joke.
>no asians
>no hispanics
>no middle eastern
Surely this is just a coincidence.
I don't think there's any in the Minnesota area. Wouldn't have made a difference, middle eastern and asian are overwhelmingly liberal. Maybe a hispanic could be a staunch conservative but Chauvin stood no chance
Arabs and Asians can be very anti drug addict.
That's what everyone thought about some of the other jury members. Turns out they were all pozzed. They only chance he had was white male from a backwoods place, loves guns, and doesn't watch the news.
what would your ((description)) be?
White - Male - 28
Unemployed and lives with his parents. Very little history since high school graduation.
I have nothing to lose. If I was on that jury I would have voted not guilty and dug my feet in. I don't care if I get doxxed and have the entire country against me.
now she works with cardiac patients again because of the vaccine. lmfao
This isn't even the most offensive part of the trial. Before it even began the defense tried to get the venue changed, because by that point his chances of a fair trial in Wisconsin were in the negatives and still falling. The judge's actually real life fricking response?
>"you can't get a fair trial anywhere"
Which should have been more than enough for a fricking mistrial. Imagine going ahead with a court case when you KNOW FOR A FRICKING FACT THERE'S NO POSSIBLE WAY TO CONDUCT IT FAIRLY.
The judge wasn't wrong though. You can't get a fair trial when the media is inflaming it to that extent.
The media tried with rittenhouse and zimzam but they never got even close to the state of saint floyd where over half the country wanted blood.
Yes, exactly. But a man is entitled by law to a FAIR trial. If he cannot get one, then the trial does not happen and no conviction can be made.
grounz
When you learn about the story behind the glove testing part of the trial it’s even funnier
>OJ’s black lawyer Cochran was S tier and provoked black prosecution lawyer Darden into trying the gloves by calling him a house Black person in breaks
>white prosecution lawyer Clarke explicitly forbid this from happening because the countless factors between the murder and the trial meant both the gloves could have shrank, and OJ’s hand could be bigger. And this turned out to be true
>darden nigged out and tried to force the gloves on OJ when he couldn’t get them on
Cochran knows the Black person ways so he could bring out Darden’s inner Black person and force him to act irrationally
>Watch closely... you're about to witness, a 'Black person lawyer moment'...
Darden fricked up by allowing OJ to put the gloves on himself, and pretend as if they didn't fit, while also wearing rubber gloves.
They legit didn’t fit. Clarke knew this was almost certainly the case since it has been a long time since the murder and OJ had fattened up since then. Plus forensic analysis of the gloves can lead to shrinking of the material
Darden just took the bait because he’s a moron who got provoked by Cochran and probably felt bad he was being bossed around by a white woman in a trial where blacks people overwhelmingly wanted OJ free as “revenge” for the Rodney king verdict leading to the cops going free
WHO TOLD YOU TO TRY THE BRA ON
Where can I see those parts with the edited Rittenhouse videos? Can't remember where to find em
Removed for promoting whites supremacist and mass shootings
Trayvon Martin. OJ was more *entertaining*, but he was just a Hollywood celebrity doing Hollywood celebrity things. Traytray taught me how absolutely fricked this government and society are for real people. I felt rage boil inside me like I never felt before when I watched that absolute farce of a "judge" mishandle the entire debacle.
Zimzam went free though, luckily. The media did their best to make sure he was public enemy number one though.
still laughing at all the whitewashing pics and the dumb b***h on the jury that wrote a book about how she felt guilty acquitting him.
I thought Zimmerman was in trouble when the jury was all women. Apparently they all cried when they came to the verdict. Jesus fricking Christ, why did we give these people rights?
The Trayvon case is what both saved and destroyed my faith in American justice
>saved because he was found innocent in spite of an obvious witch hunt
>destroyed because he was only charged (and could have been found guilty) solely for political reasons
I’m sure it’s happened plenty before but this was the first one I saw unfold before my eyes.
Worse yet, years later more and more revelations come out. The fat black chick who was trayvons “girlfriend” who testified about the phonecall in the trial turned out to not even be her. Completely fabricated, we still don’t know who the real person was. And that b***h got a free scholarship out of the deal
I knew that Jeantel b***h wasn't the person he was talking to. She was stupid but she genuinely didn't understand simple things that someone who was there would. And Trayvon wasn't exactly a 10 but I was wondering what he was doing with that fat ugly b***h.
The funniest was the George Zimmerman trial
The chandler halderson case was fricked up beyond belief
He totally took a bite or two. And his girlfriend was 100% in on it from the get go.
the prosecutor did a good job saying shit like
>this is where we found mom’s legs
because that shit still sticks with me. i can’t imagine treating your parents like that
One of the rare trials I've watched where the state prosecutors did a really good job. They totally dropped the ball with the girlfriend though. The way the lead attorney made it a point to explain to the court that she was a good girl who dindu nuffin right at the start made it obvious she was an integral part of both the killings and their case. b***h made a deal and we aren't allowed to know about the details. There isn't any fricking way in this world that she didn't know what was going on during their little sleepover.
>Detectives say Mellender would keep tabs on her boyfriend using a Snapchat feature that allows users to track a friend's location in real time. On July 3, she spotted Chandler on Snapchat near the Wisconsin River. Mellender had taken a screenshot of the location and saved it to her phone.
Jesus. What a fool.
Rittenhouse's trial was fantastic.
Better than any TV show.
putting women in juries sounds like an awful idea, even worse than letting them vote
Let people who don't understand or care about logic decide on what is real and what is not. genius idea.
Even normie legal analysts admit the outcome can rely on their emotions. Lawyers on both sides know they and go for emotional arguments instead of factual ones.
There’s many factors which are outright worrying when it comes to juries
>have to appeal to lowest common denominator when it comes to intelligence because jury members are literally the people too dumb to avoid jury duty
>jury members becoming bored to the point of not paying attention is a serious factor in trials
It’s why good lawyers have to be very theatrical, and pick people to give statements or cross examine who will be seen as charismatic and trustworthy. Regardless of whether they’re actually that important
Also the use of forensic science has been a big difference
>DNA was largely still not well understood when OJ trial happened. So despite them having his DNA and knowing he was certainly the dude who wore the gloves, the jury didn’t understand this certainty because the scientist they had testify was too high level, they needed someone no was more of an educator/edutainment dude who could explain it was 100% accurate. Not leaving reasonable doubt
>modern juries have spent their whole lives watching crime tv shows with DNA used constantly in cases. So now they expect to ALWAYS have it available in every case. Meaning obvious cases where someone was just smart enough to not piss on the crime scene can lead to a jury member having (un)reasonable doubt because no dna is used in evidence
I've always wondering about those trials where some high level financial or technical crime was committed. The average normie is not going to understand anything that is said.
>those trials where some high level financial or technical crime was committed
Those crimes are not prosecuted, lol. Unless someone really really fricks up or someone gets fricked over and wants revenge.
True. Madoff only got into trouble because he defrauded other israelites. Makes you wonder why weinstein didn't get away with his bullshit.
>Makes you wonder why weinstein didn't get away with his bullshit.
Every so often they sacrifice one of their own to the dogs and it absolves the rest.
>Hollywood collectively agreed to throw him under the bus to show that #MeToo was "solved"
>the other Weinstein wanted more control of their company
>he stole a bigger producers frick doll and they dragged him into the light for revenge
>was going to get busted hard for cheating on taxes or something worse and outed himself to distract people and get a lesser sentence
>one of his former wienersockets sucked their way high enough up the food chain to get revenge
or it could be all three
Madoff got in trouble becuae his kids turned him in. They were taking over the business and when they found out what was going and realized they would be left holding the bag when the classic ponzu scene failed on its own during the next downturn
>Madoff only got into trouble
because his scam was moronicly simple, it was just backdating fake "trades" with shitty obscure software that let them fake actually making trades that made their clients money while shuffling money around. Madoff obviously did piss off *somebody* tho, he and his wife's suicide attempt seemed very legit and both his sons were dead of "heart attacks" within a year of his arrest. Most financial schemes never get prosecuted because they're simply too complex and spread across too many countries to ever be able to prove a case. Look at the Panama papers for an ongoing example.
>It’s why good lawyers have to be very theatrical, and pick people to give statements or cross examine who will be seen as charismatic and trustworthy. Regardless of whether they’re actually that important
It always kills me when I see people, especially on Cinemaphile, who don't "get" how the court system works and think that everything comes down to rote fact and technicalities
>Yeah I might break the law in this theoretical conversation, but they can't do anything to me because [some trivial factoid]
It just don't be like that, the law is never about who's "right", it's about who has the more expensive law team, and it's rarely going to be the lone wolf downloading torrents or harassing people.
western society is mostly decided by the whims of the femoid menstruation cycle these days
That's true.
>try to look for a job
>i have to get by a roastie who understand very little about the position she's hiring for
This was something out of Ace Attorney. The sheer incompetence and stupidity of it all.
Btk killer sentencing statement is pretty wild
?si=nD2Pw2D2xWu9pdL6
I always thought the Sam Sweet trial should’ve been bigger. I suppose it was overshadowed by OJ
Such an underrated movie.
why did he do it?
Do what? Isn't that the small business owner from the end of this Rittenhouse video?
>that feel when I lost my Nelson folder
Who remembers Amy and how they put a table cloth to hide her feet after the livechat on Hannah's news report?
>watching crime drama thriller
>suspect in custody is cool as a cucumber
>asks for glass of water
>takes a long calm sip
>hands glass back to them
>cops try to hide their giddiness
>suspect says "Be careful washing it... DNA is very fragile!"
Could you have saved her, Cinemaphile?