>Clayface but only his face changes shape and he can't hold it for long
That's the best I can see them doing. They should get some john carpenter style effects and do something like they did with swamp thing a couple of years ago to make it a horror movie.
Too fantastical for the tone and universe they set up. Im not saying taht they shouldnt try to introduce mlre fantastical elements so they can do the crazisr villain, but they wont
I didnt think it was terrible, it was just mediocre. It was very similar to the Nolan Batman wich was the most sucessful Batman adaptation to date. I can picture a bunch of studio execs going "What if we just did that again" and noding. I just didnt really see all that passion people were talking about.
I think it would be cool if the overall arc of battinson is for him to go from vigilante, to hero to superhero. Imagine if they introduce more outlandish and supernatural foes and show how this batman has to adapt to them. Like him fighting crazy shit like Mr freeze, clay face, Solomon Grundy, poison ivy or a guild of villains taking over the city like the end of the long Halloween. Of course Reeves is a hack and he'll end up doing more grimdark realistic batman.
Anon...just watch the 66 show...Maybe Gunn will give us a more lighthearted Batman but he better kick that fricker Muschietti out of the directors chair.
You'd be surprised at how many themes in his rogues gallery actually do intersect. One of the most famous serial killers in Batman mythos (Holiday) has almost the same gimmick as another (Calendar Man), and they actually work this into the plot.
>(Holiday)
lol >(Calendar Man)
lmao
there's no way he has a bad guy named calendar man
I hope the next spiderman movie has him fighting microsoft outlook
In Hush's original story, which is the only one people remember because he's a shit character, he was being manipulated by Riddler who was behind everything. Hush is a shitter who got upstaged in his "best" story and his own origin.
We all know why critics gave it favorable reviews. And posers and zoomers liked the movie, not actual comic fans. I lol every time some snot-nosed homosexual claims this is the most "comic accurate" Batman, as if they've read beyond Hush or Court of Owls.
>be a character that has existed for nearly 100 years >introduce him a childhood best friend who Bruce supposedly greatly cares about
Hush was stupid. Not as stupid as the Court of Owls (irrespective of being the world’s greatest detective, I mean how wouldn’t Bruce Wayne not know of an elite secret society controlling Gotham when he’s from the richest Gotham family) but still stupid.
CoO irritated me. It was kind of a dumb fun, movie-like read through him going in that maze and getting attacked. Then he just leaves and beats them all up and it's over. Felt like they didn't really have an idea aside from secret society.
>do your own Cataclysm, a deluge of water hitting Gotham instead of an earthquake >promise to do No Man's Land, in closing monologue about how all the nuts and psychos are loose in the decimated remains of Gotham and that things are going to get worse before they get better >"Ehhhhh, what if we move tf on from all of that and just pick another lone bad guy to focus on?"
Classic Hollywood creativity
Just do Clayface already, you cucks.
Huh, now that I think about it, Clayface would work really well with Hush. I mean I bet you could fuse the two characters together.
>Clayface but only his face changes shape and he can't hold it for long
That's the best I can see them doing. They should get some john carpenter style effects and do something like they did with swamp thing a couple of years ago to make it a horror movie.
Did the first Batman have supernatural elements?
And how does Clayface last a whole movie when special batgoggles reveal him.
Clayface is the villian of Batman II, it's been confirmed long ago
Dude their budget is so shit that the entire movie is closeups, and you think they can afford the CGI needed for clayface?
>we will never get a good Mr. Freeze
Too fantastical for the tone and universe they set up. Im not saying taht they shouldnt try to introduce mlre fantastical elements so they can do the crazisr villain, but they wont
SOLOMON GRUNDY and then he goes MRAAAAA and charges at Pattinson. The hellboy moron should be given that role
Ayy lil donny
i pissed my pants donny boy how does that make you feel
Pearlman can be Clayface but he's covered in his own feces
>YO LIL DONNIE I TURNED MYSELF BLACK
YO LIL BRUCIE, WANNA KNOW HOW I GOT THESE STAINS?
His new name, Shitfaced.
Why do that always have to make him "realistic"? He's a fricking schitzo dressed like a bat fighting Halloween characters for Christ's sake
Batman is at it's coolest when it's grounded and edgy. The second you introduce dumb magical clay monsters and Lazarus pits it goes to shit.
>Batman is at it's coolest when it's grounded and edgy.
he's not wrong tho
But The Batman was terrible. Explain that.
but you posted the best scene
It was the only memorable scene of this cringe kino, I'll give it that. The rest of the movie was a snooze fest.
I didnt think it was terrible, it was just mediocre. It was very similar to the Nolan Batman wich was the most sucessful Batman adaptation to date. I can picture a bunch of studio execs going "What if we just did that again" and noding. I just didnt really see all that passion people were talking about.
>Batman is at it's coolest when it's grounded and edgy
way to out yourself as an ignorant moron, Batman's best when it's overwrought and hysterical
I think it would be cool if the overall arc of battinson is for him to go from vigilante, to hero to superhero. Imagine if they introduce more outlandish and supernatural foes and show how this batman has to adapt to them. Like him fighting crazy shit like Mr freeze, clay face, Solomon Grundy, poison ivy or a guild of villains taking over the city like the end of the long Halloween. Of course Reeves is a hack and he'll end up doing more grimdark realistic batman.
Will we ever get a Batman in the tone of 66 or brave and the bold ?
Anon...just watch the 66 show...Maybe Gunn will give us a more lighthearted Batman but he better kick that fricker Muschietti out of the directors chair.
light hearted batman sucks
brooding superman sucks
They should do arkham city the movie. Gotham is flooded (perfect for killer croc) do cops ditched the city and penguin is running shit
You'd be surprised at how many themes in his rogues gallery actually do intersect. One of the most famous serial killers in Batman mythos (Holiday) has almost the same gimmick as another (Calendar Man), and they actually work this into the plot.
?si=BbWdBm08AhES4FaQ
This is missing Killer Frost though.
>(Holiday)
lol
>(Calendar Man)
lmao
there's no way he has a bad guy named calendar man
I hope the next spiderman movie has him fighting microsoft outlook
Wait
Wasnt the Hush the Riddler in that one Batman movie?
In Hush's original story, which is the only one people remember because he's a shit character, he was being manipulated by Riddler who was behind everything. Hush is a shitter who got upstaged in his "best" story and his own origin.
Why didn't people just go upstairs in one of their big tall buildings when the city flooded?
Guys did you hear who is gonna be the bad guy in the next cape slop?
If it's half as good as the last one, it's going to be a piece of shit. Because the first one is fricking garbage.
>This movie was shit, no I won't explain why
Bunch of gays
>Likes a movie about a gay emo dressed up in a gimp suit
And yet despite that, critics seem to love it and so do fans.
We all know why critics gave it favorable reviews. And posers and zoomers liked the movie, not actual comic fans. I lol every time some snot-nosed homosexual claims this is the most "comic accurate" Batman, as if they've read beyond Hush or Court of Owls.
nta, but as a Batman fan, I found the movie to be lackluster and kind of dumb in parts.
Hush is selling comics
The riddler is a boomer villain and that's why
I wish we got a Batman movie where Scarecrow was the main villain
>But what about Batman Begi-
He's not the main villain of that movie
>be a character that has existed for nearly 100 years
>introduce him a childhood best friend who Bruce supposedly greatly cares about
Hush was stupid. Not as stupid as the Court of Owls (irrespective of being the world’s greatest detective, I mean how wouldn’t Bruce Wayne not know of an elite secret society controlling Gotham when he’s from the richest Gotham family) but still stupid.
CoO irritated me. It was kind of a dumb fun, movie-like read through him going in that maze and getting attacked. Then he just leaves and beats them all up and it's over. Felt like they didn't really have an idea aside from secret society.
What’s the point of the riddler? Who actually likes him? Literally just a shitter version of the joker
>not Calendar Man
Garbage.
>do your own Cataclysm, a deluge of water hitting Gotham instead of an earthquake
>promise to do No Man's Land, in closing monologue about how all the nuts and psychos are loose in the decimated remains of Gotham and that things are going to get worse before they get better
>"Ehhhhh, what if we move tf on from all of that and just pick another lone bad guy to focus on?"
Classic Hollywood creativity
If any of you go see this, you’re worse than leftists in my book
Battinson should face off against Killer Moth.