autistic zoomers who can't pay attention for more then 10 seconds have to watch youtube videos of reactions to know how to mimic what their reactions should be, followed by a 'xxxxxx explained' video to explain what they watched, and then how to feel about it
The current xxxxx explained videos are all saying they feel uncomfortable so zoomies are saying it trying to fit in
>It's just unnecessary most of the time
Nothing is "necessary" in a movie. >then you can't watch it with your grandma
I wouldn't watch half the shit I watch with family members, sex aside.
whites are abandoning the entertainment industry and might start having children again, can't have that when they solely exist to demoralize whites and try to get them to kill themselves by destroying every piece of legacy media that exists by remaking it into commie propaganda forcing women and blacks into roles better suited for whites
They seem to think an actress or actor being paid millions of dollars for a role, is debasing themselves by showing their naked body on camera.
This of course, is objectifying the human body. But porn is fine, and sex work is real work. However, being paid millions of dollars to be objectified in a movie is wrong. Unless it's porn, and you're being paid thousands of dollars instead.
>This of course, is objectifying the human body. But porn is fine, and sex work is real work. However, being paid millions of dollars to be objectified in a movie is wrong. Unless it's porn, and you're being paid thousands of dollars instead.
What if they're both wrong, and I'm offended by the idea that actors think they're better than prostitutes? What if I think that if you're going to simulate sex in your movie and grind your snatch on some random actor's junk as he fights an erection (just kidding he's a gay), you might as well just go all the way and go for the full insertion.
>No, no, no, it only LOOKS like we're having sex it's different.
Perception is reality. If you're going to commit the image of you fricking someone into perpetuity, you might as well just actually fricking do it. Seriously imagine being married to an actor. >I'm going to spend five hours making out with my co-star and grinding on their crotch for money, you don't have a problem with that do you honey?
Actors are prostitutes and there's a reason they were traditionally held in disdain and occupied the same social strata as prostitutes for thousands of years.
>If you're going to commit the image of you fricking someone into perpetuity, you might as well just actually fricking do it
You could say the same thing about any part of a movie >If you're going to make it look like you're shooting someone in a movie you might as well just actually fricking shoot them
And that's why Alec Baldwin is the greatest actor of all time.
I don't know if this is all a big troll, but as a zoomer I don't mind sex scenes at all, the only time I cringed at those was while watching the masterpiece The Room by aeuteur Tommy Wiseau
Lost Highway was good, it was hot, and also the wife patting her husband on the back which is in the script shows how pitiable their marriage has become so it was a functional, necessary scene for the plot
The Hazbin Hotel writer is a middle-aged woman who thinks swearing makes her a badass, so she writes "frick" as every second word hoping it makes her cool.
If you grew up using Cinemaphile and try watching Hazbin Hotel you'll cringe because youve been swearing since you were a kid and it isn't a big deal to you.
Zoomers and young millenials feel the same about sex scenes. Boomers think adding a sex scene makes shit more mature when zoomers are watching wondering why the movie stopped to air a porno for a few minutes.
>Boomers think adding a sex scene makes shit more mature when zoomers are watching wondering why the movie stopped to air a porno for a few minutes.
*BAD porn
Ftfy
I think it's time the rhetorical accusation of pearl clutching should be put out to pasture. It only ever gets used by edge lords trying to shame people who don't let them get their way.
For me it's because they're never made to titillate any more. I just want to see some hot naked babes but no, our film is "mature" and that means you're not allowed to enjoy the sex scene so they don't show breasts and they have a man grunting and groaning and taking up most of the shot. Either show some eye candy or get back to the plot because this shit serves neither purpose.
This shit about zoomers boomers oomers whatever crap not wanting sex scenes is manufactured media crap. Manufactured statistics, bots on Twitter and a couple of genuine moron outliers. Touch grass and you'll see it's fake shit.
>Yes, we all know how much white men hate sex and sexuality, and want a men only society focused
Voyeurism is not sex.
It is not normal watch other people have sex, and people who pretend otherwise are gross weirdos.
It's just a big ~~*mystery*~~ why hollywood keeps including sex scenes in movies.
Actors hate doing them.
Audiences don't want them.
So why do they keep putting them in movies?
Who the frick wants to sit there and watch softcore pornography next to their mom and dad?
Do filmmakers just want to pad their slop out because they're out of ideas and good writing, or is there a more sinister reasoning
behind it?
Every single one of my favorite movie has graphic sex scenes in it. Most of them have rape scenes. I don't how you can create art without sexuality and violence being a part of it
americans, and this applies to all americanized westerners who consume our media, are still fundamentally puritan. american leftists, and 'wokeness', share the same DNA as the temperance movement. zoomers in particular are having less sex than previous generations, they probably grew up with less physical contact with their peers because everybody is on a tablet, they are not as well socialized, they all have anxiety problems + a culture that loves scolding and scandal
Sex scenes and nudity are fricking weird and only moronic hippies think otherwise. Would you accept an invitation from a stranger to go watch them frick their girlfriend? No, that would be an incredibly bizarre thing to do. But apparently saying I don't want to be involved in the directors weird sex performance means I'm a freak. I wouldn't say it's immoral, but making shitty movies in general isn't immoral.
Why would it being fake even matter? Also would being uncomfortable watching to people simulate sex in front of you be weird? If yes, do you just have a problem with the unique status of sex and nudity in society in general?
>Why would it being fake even matter?
The same reason the violence and drama being fake in a movie matters, moron. What kind of question is that? Why does the movie being fake matter???
The violence and drama being fake matters because it would be morally wrong to actually kill and hurt people anon. Sex isn't immoral either way, and the morality of sex doesn't have anything to do with why people are uncomfortable with it.
There are many instances where it's not morally wrong to hurt people. MMA fighters do it live on TV for money.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Ok and in that instance the violence not being fake also doesn't matter, most people aren't going to view an mma fight as being something dramatically more inappropriate than a violent movie, in fact they might have the opposite view.
I feel like its real just more polarized, there used to be random and less explicit sex scenes in a huge number of movies. Now either a movie has nothing or it has graphic attention grabbing sex (that is, compared to completely under the sheets sex scenes that used to be typical).
Bullshit
Every film nowadays has a 10 minute sex scene. Same with TV, every other episode has a 5 minute sex scene
It is impossible to name one television series released in the past 2 years that doesn't have a sex scene.
You're right. Here is the website being referenced by all these articles.
https://stephenfollows.com/why-is-sex-in-movies-declining/#comments
It's not a peer reviewed article, it's just basically a blog post. The guy doesn't really explain his methodology at all aside from this: >Today’s research looks at the top 250 highest-grossing live-action fiction feature films of each year, by Domestic box office. The raw data from a variety of sources including OMDb, IMDb, Wikipedia, Common Sense Media, Dove.org, MPAA and BBFC. I used these signals to build my own measures of sexual content in each movie.
The second sentence there isn't even a sentence.
But hey, he's got lots of charts, so it's heckin science!
It's also riddled with typos, which doesn't necessarily mean anything. But like, the guy was contacted by someone from The Economist to put his turd together. You would think he would at least take the five seconds to run it through a fricking spell checker. There are also a lot of mistakes that a dumb person would make, like
>objectional material >movies which eskew any scenes of a sexual nature
I have never seen a movie with a sex scene that added anything enjoyable to what I was watching. Do what you want in art, but doesn't mean I need to enjoy it. I can't be convinced that any nudity in films is just horny israelite goblins trying to get actresses to show their breasts and is never done for art's sake.
pre code hollywood was a better time that we need to return to.
You could appreciate beauty in women from those films without all the unnecessary sex scenes added later.
If zoomies are going to pressure current day israelitewood into a similar mindset as it once was, I will be happy.
Porn is easily accessed now, I don't want to see people have sex and get horny unless I'm jerking off.
Being teased without release is pointless and frustrating.
Notice the boomers who like sex scenes are the same moron boomers who went to strip clubs.
>moloch's name literally means child sacrifice. >the worst thing baal ever did was fail to dry up some squeezed towels in a rigged test to prove who has the cooler god
Amazingly the meme is so accurate that I still find myself listening Republican.
I don't like sex scenes myself, unless the movie is heavily about romance and sex, but I'm sure the reason zoomers have a problem with it is some gay feminist compartmentalization where it's only okay if its on OF and you're paying out the ass to see blown-out pussy.
Zoomers have gooned so much to friday night at freddy's funkin furry inflation porn that normal naked people are now "gross" to them
FPBP the frame of reference is lost. Violence is still popular because there's not enough killing in society to satisfy our urges.
not gonna lie, it's hard for me to find bipeds sexually attractive at this point.
Nudity and fictional violence terrify zoomers for some reason despite them all being porn addicts with violent fantasies.
autistic zoomers who can't pay attention for more then 10 seconds have to watch youtube videos of reactions to know how to mimic what their reactions should be, followed by a 'xxxxxx explained' video to explain what they watched, and then how to feel about it
The current xxxxx explained videos are all saying they feel uncomfortable so zoomies are saying it trying to fit in
People don't understand the difference between love/nudity and porn anymore
They're use to watching porn ALONE, seeing sex in a social context is akin to being CAUGHT.
This unironically sounds like the most plausible explanation
It's just unnecessary most of the time, and then you can't watch it with your grandma
why? You think you and the ol gal might just start fricking? Thats in you kid. Keep it out of gran
>It's just unnecessary most of the time
Nothing is "necessary" in a movie.
>then you can't watch it with your grandma
I wouldn't watch half the shit I watch with family members, sex aside.
grandma likes guns and knives
grandma likes sex too
>Nothing is "necessary" in a movie.
It should easy for you to stop watching unnecessary things then.
>Nothing is necessary
Wrong. An all Aryan ("white") cast is super necessary.
Simple as.
whites are abandoning the entertainment industry and might start having children again, can't have that when they solely exist to demoralize whites and try to get them to kill themselves by destroying every piece of legacy media that exists by remaking it into commie propaganda forcing women and blacks into roles better suited for whites
Do any movies with sex scenes deserves to be in the top 10 of the best films ever made?
Lost Highway
Videodrome
They seem to think an actress or actor being paid millions of dollars for a role, is debasing themselves by showing their naked body on camera.
This of course, is objectifying the human body. But porn is fine, and sex work is real work. However, being paid millions of dollars to be objectified in a movie is wrong. Unless it's porn, and you're being paid thousands of dollars instead.
>This of course, is objectifying the human body. But porn is fine, and sex work is real work. However, being paid millions of dollars to be objectified in a movie is wrong. Unless it's porn, and you're being paid thousands of dollars instead.
What if they're both wrong, and I'm offended by the idea that actors think they're better than prostitutes? What if I think that if you're going to simulate sex in your movie and grind your snatch on some random actor's junk as he fights an erection (just kidding he's a gay), you might as well just go all the way and go for the full insertion.
>No, no, no, it only LOOKS like we're having sex it's different.
Perception is reality. If you're going to commit the image of you fricking someone into perpetuity, you might as well just actually fricking do it. Seriously imagine being married to an actor.
>I'm going to spend five hours making out with my co-star and grinding on their crotch for money, you don't have a problem with that do you honey?
Actors are prostitutes and there's a reason they were traditionally held in disdain and occupied the same social strata as prostitutes for thousands of years.
>If you're going to commit the image of you fricking someone into perpetuity, you might as well just actually fricking do it
You could say the same thing about any part of a movie
>If you're going to make it look like you're shooting someone in a movie you might as well just actually fricking shoot them
And that's why Alec Baldwin is the greatest actor of all time.
I don't know if this is all a big troll, but as a zoomer I don't mind sex scenes at all, the only time I cringed at those was while watching the masterpiece The Room by aeuteur Tommy Wiseau
The real reason is that not a single movie with sex scenes is good. Not one. At best they're mediocre.
Good movies with nudity? Plenty of them. But none with sex scenes.
Weak bait.
>not a single film was mentioned in this post
Enlighten me then.
Possession has sex scenes.
Lost Highway was good, it was hot, and also the wife patting her husband on the back which is in the script shows how pitiable their marriage has become so it was a functional, necessary scene for the plot
They're sex starved and terrified of inappropriate power imbalances and shit from feminist propaganda.
The Hazbin Hotel writer is a middle-aged woman who thinks swearing makes her a badass, so she writes "frick" as every second word hoping it makes her cool.
If you grew up using Cinemaphile and try watching Hazbin Hotel you'll cringe because youve been swearing since you were a kid and it isn't a big deal to you.
Zoomers and young millenials feel the same about sex scenes. Boomers think adding a sex scene makes shit more mature when zoomers are watching wondering why the movie stopped to air a porno for a few minutes.
>Boomers think adding a sex scene makes shit more mature when zoomers are watching wondering why the movie stopped to air a porno for a few minutes.
*BAD porn
Ftfy
I think it's time the rhetorical accusation of pearl clutching should be put out to pasture. It only ever gets used by edge lords trying to shame people who don't let them get their way.
For me it's because they're never made to titillate any more. I just want to see some hot naked babes but no, our film is "mature" and that means you're not allowed to enjoy the sex scene so they don't show breasts and they have a man grunting and groaning and taking up most of the shot. Either show some eye candy or get back to the plot because this shit serves neither purpose.
This shit about zoomers boomers oomers whatever crap not wanting sex scenes is manufactured media crap. Manufactured statistics, bots on Twitter and a couple of genuine moron outliers. Touch grass and you'll see it's fake shit.
So if I go outside I'll see boomers aren't terrified of having to see sex scenes
true, you talk to flesh and blood zoomers and they don't watch movies period
Islamic Marxism.
Younger people have been desensitized to sex from porn, so sex scenes no longer sell movies and are seen as pointless filler.
>and are seen as pointless filler.
As they should be.
israeli Neoliberalism.
Yes, we all know how much white men hate sex and sexuality, and want a men only society focused
>Yes, we all know how much white men hate sex and sexuality, and want a men only society focused
Voyeurism is not sex.
It is not normal watch other people have sex, and people who pretend otherwise are gross weirdos.
I'm sure you only consume morally pure content, as you're posting on Cinemaphile
It's just a big ~~*mystery*~~ why hollywood keeps including sex scenes in movies.
Actors hate doing them.
Audiences don't want them.
So why do they keep putting them in movies?
Who the frick wants to sit there and watch softcore pornography next to their mom and dad?
Do filmmakers just want to pad their slop out because they're out of ideas and good writing, or is there a more sinister reasoning
behind it?
It's just manchild writers thinking they're mature and grown up for putting a sex scene in their movie.
Opposed to you, who has grown up mature taste in family friendly films
Why is having a family synonymous with immaturity in your mind?
You don't have a family like that, you just only like family friendly entertainment
Stop projecting, not everyone is a gay like you.
Every single one of my favorite movie has graphic sex scenes in it. Most of them have rape scenes. I don't how you can create art without sexuality and violence being a part of it
Just like ecchi manga: If I wanna watch 2 people fricking I will just watch porn, man.
Women are fully chad sexual, so I'm not getting any.
Why would I want to be confronted with this shame during a movie? Movies are escapism. End of story.
americans, and this applies to all americanized westerners who consume our media, are still fundamentally puritan. american leftists, and 'wokeness', share the same DNA as the temperance movement. zoomers in particular are having less sex than previous generations, they probably grew up with less physical contact with their peers because everybody is on a tablet, they are not as well socialized, they all have anxiety problems + a culture that loves scolding and scandal
i dunno. getting laid regularly right now and it rules, being touched by a girl feels amazing, i don't mind seeing it in movies
All sex before 2014 was rape.
Redditors hate sex
Sex scenes and nudity are fricking weird and only moronic hippies think otherwise. Would you accept an invitation from a stranger to go watch them frick their girlfriend? No, that would be an incredibly bizarre thing to do. But apparently saying I don't want to be involved in the directors weird sex performance means I'm a freak. I wouldn't say it's immoral, but making shitty movies in general isn't immoral.
Getting upset about a fake sex scene in a movie is a sign you're moronic.
Why do you think it's moronic not to want to watch two people pretend to have sex?
Sex is a part of the human experience and part of story telling whether you have it or not
I think it's moronic to get upset about fake sex in a movie. There's no excuse unless you're a child.
Why would it being fake even matter? Also would being uncomfortable watching to people simulate sex in front of you be weird? If yes, do you just have a problem with the unique status of sex and nudity in society in general?
>Why would it being fake even matter?
The same reason the violence and drama being fake in a movie matters, moron. What kind of question is that? Why does the movie being fake matter???
The violence and drama being fake matters because it would be morally wrong to actually kill and hurt people anon. Sex isn't immoral either way, and the morality of sex doesn't have anything to do with why people are uncomfortable with it.
There are many instances where it's not morally wrong to hurt people. MMA fighters do it live on TV for money.
Ok and in that instance the violence not being fake also doesn't matter, most people aren't going to view an mma fight as being something dramatically more inappropriate than a violent movie, in fact they might have the opposite view.
I feel like its real just more polarized, there used to be random and less explicit sex scenes in a huge number of movies. Now either a movie has nothing or it has graphic attention grabbing sex (that is, compared to completely under the sheets sex scenes that used to be typical).
Name some
Bullshit
Every film nowadays has a 10 minute sex scene. Same with TV, every other episode has a 5 minute sex scene
It is impossible to name one television series released in the past 2 years that doesn't have a sex scene.
>very film nowadays has a 10 minute sex scene
Lmao they do not, modern movies feel like they're afraid of nudity.
It's post-truth bullshit. Literally lying to our faces.
I fricking hate women.
You're right. Here is the website being referenced by all these articles.
https://stephenfollows.com/why-is-sex-in-movies-declining/#comments
It's not a peer reviewed article, it's just basically a blog post. The guy doesn't really explain his methodology at all aside from this:
>Today’s research looks at the top 250 highest-grossing live-action fiction feature films of each year, by Domestic box office. The raw data from a variety of sources including OMDb, IMDb, Wikipedia, Common Sense Media, Dove.org, MPAA and BBFC. I used these signals to build my own measures of sexual content in each movie.
The second sentence there isn't even a sentence.
But hey, he's got lots of charts, so it's heckin science!
It's also riddled with typos, which doesn't necessarily mean anything. But like, the guy was contacted by someone from The Economist to put his turd together. You would think he would at least take the five seconds to run it through a fricking spell checker. There are also a lot of mistakes that a dumb person would make, like
>objectional material
>movies which eskew any scenes of a sexual nature
You literally see anons in this thread, actual Cinemaphile degenerates talking about how they hate sex scenes and how they make them feel bad
normalize sexlessness to death spiral population growth.
I have never seen a movie with a sex scene that added anything enjoyable to what I was watching. Do what you want in art, but doesn't mean I need to enjoy it. I can't be convinced that any nudity in films is just horny israelite goblins trying to get actresses to show their breasts and is never done for art's sake.
pre code hollywood was a better time that we need to return to.
You could appreciate beauty in women from those films without all the unnecessary sex scenes added later.
If zoomies are going to pressure current day israelitewood into a similar mindset as it once was, I will be happy.
Why do you want to be a sexless mr Rogers type of man who only consumes sanitized family entertainment while you're posting on Cinemaphile?
Very israeli post
I think you're just a sexually stunted homosexual
Very cool Rabbi
Everyone who likes sex and women is israeli. True white men only like other men and hate sex
Because he needs to be le contrarian.
>clutching their pearls
i just don't want to fricking see it
i don't care about it
it's not interesting at all
Agreed. Sex makes me so anxious and scared
>LE PEARL CLUTCHING
Porn is easily accessed now, I don't want to see people have sex and get horny unless I'm jerking off.
Being teased without release is pointless and frustrating.
Notice the boomers who like sex scenes are the same moron boomers who went to strip clubs.
>moloch's name literally means child sacrifice.
>the worst thing baal ever did was fail to dry up some squeezed towels in a rigged test to prove who has the cooler god
Amazingly the meme is so accurate that I still find myself listening Republican.
Is there any basis for this other than one study that twitter morons cry over
Name one (1) thing sex scenes add to a movie.
Deeper levels of human experience for the characters
They cast nothing but goblins now, and always has to push a "message".
Sex scenes used to be fun to watch.
I don't like sex scenes myself, unless the movie is heavily about romance and sex, but I'm sure the reason zoomers have a problem with it is some gay feminist compartmentalization where it's only okay if its on OF and you're paying out the ass to see blown-out pussy.