the three types of anti-arrative cinema >"Tarkovsky ring"
the limit where people will stop paying for a movie
outside it, there's no traditional audiences, just festival crowds
This. Once you realize film's conception was a messy one and the standards established are not authoritative, you can easily discard the scam that is the "film canon".
[...]
Most of the directors are baby's first arthouse film types. Are you really being filtered by them?
literally dont know a single one of this gays lol
none of you ever post about them either
watching movies is the gayest fricking hobby ever lol you all act like you have refined amazing taste but then you post marvel threads and talk about star wars all day
If you have a decent attention span, check out Terrence Malick (Tree of Life, A Hidden Life), Alexander Sokurov (Russian Ark), Andrei Tarkovsky (Andrei Rublev, The Sacrifice), Carl Theodor Dreyer (The Passion of Joan of Arc, Ordet) and Robert Bresson (Pickpocket). Rest I don't find very interesting.
inside the Tarkovsky ring, no doubt about it
where would Dziga Vertov and other state-sponsored filmmakers would sit in that diagram?
Georges Melies? I don't know. Where's the kino section?
it's about slow cinema flicks, movies that use boredom as an aesthetic tool
Ah, he's not there then, kek. Not much scope for that in the 1890s
So what are the three sections and what is the "Tarkovsky ring"?
the three types of anti-arrative cinema
>"Tarkovsky ring"
the limit where people will stop paying for a movie
outside it, there's no traditional audiences, just festival crowds
*anti-narrative
>anti-narrative
Haha, just like my goon trips.
The Mandala: Meditative cinema attempting to induce some sort of trance effect in the audience
Surveillance Camera: Filmmakers focused on capturing day-to-day reality.
Art Gallery: The cinema of pure imagery, whether abstract or dream-like
>Meditative cinema attempting to induce some sort of trans effect in the audience
Of course.
Why is this post causing you to seethe so much?
1) I hate boomer Schrader
2) I hate shitty film canon
3) I hate estrocucks who worship this trash
>no Massivo Titti
If this is the schizo autism needed to write so many great movies then so be it
>your favorite directors
Most of them are not on it because that diagram was made by some low-T midwit.
Most of the directors are baby's first arthouse film types. Are you really being filtered by them?
Arthouse movies suck and are boring pretentious trash that gays like you pretend to enjoy to seem more cultured
This place is unfortunately for capeshit and getting mad over black people, not discussing film
Don’t watch nobodies whose movies have only been seen by twelve pretentious film students
This. Once you realize film's conception was a messy one and the standards established are not authoritative, you can easily discard the scam that is the "film canon".
Shut up, nerd.
literally dont know a single one of this gays lol
none of you ever post about them either
watching movies is the gayest fricking hobby ever lol you all act like you have refined amazing taste but then you post marvel threads and talk about star wars all day
You don't know Andy Warhol? Or Tony Conrad?
If you have a decent attention span, check out Terrence Malick (Tree of Life, A Hidden Life), Alexander Sokurov (Russian Ark), Andrei Tarkovsky (Andrei Rublev, The Sacrifice), Carl Theodor Dreyer (The Passion of Joan of Arc, Ordet) and Robert Bresson (Pickpocket). Rest I don't find very interesting.
Take it to /film/ you pretentious virgins
Roy Anderson should be inside, he was a popular director of commercials
Zack Snyder would be at somewhere bottom left
Film study is so fricking pointless. Produces nothing of value. Literal pseudoscience.
What does the 'N' stand for?
>Wang Bing the Tarkovsky ring
What level of fricking pseud-homosexualry is this?
Which one is the bigger hack?