Movie was the first to actually get the star wars formula right, so any plinkett review would inevitably just become contrarian nitpicking and deliberate misunderstanding of the plot/characters. He recognized this would be the case so wisely called it off
8 was clearly made by a director who wanted to use star wars to tell his own story. 9 was made by someone who actually understood a star wars story needs to build and expand on STAR WARS, but admittedly does have some weak points that are largely caused by 8's frickups and trying to repair them
Movie was the first to actually get the star wars formula right, so any plinkett review would inevitably just become contrarian nitpicking and deliberate misunderstanding of the plot/characters. He recognized this would be the case so wisely called it off
9 is so hilariously bad ig beggars belief. You might want to watch it just because it might give you hope, because even massive powerful corporations like Disney can frick up so spectacularly and are not invincible
Titanic or whatever was the last review they did before the long hiatus was their last good video. Everything after was them failing to recapture the magic. Haaaaaaaaaacks.
They did a 70-minute long Half in the Bag on it, how is that not sufficient?
Rise of Skywalker is such a shallow piece of junk movie that there's not much to dig into and discuss, most people saw it just the once in the theater and were left with no desire to touch it ever again
All I want in this world is a Mr. Plinkett review of "Dial Of Destiny"
Half In the bag was good but they need to disect the trainwreck like a dead baby piglet corpse in a high school bilogy class. Peel it open and see where the organs shut down.
>Professional athletes >Supposed to be some of the most fit humans on the planet >Needs a 4 minute commerical break 5 times a period so they don't pull a muscle
Movie was the first to actually get the star wars formula right, so any plinkett review would inevitably just become contrarian nitpicking and deliberate misunderstanding of the plot/characters. He recognized this would be the case so wisely called it off
I gave up on the entire franchise after whatever #8 is called. Is #9 worth watching?
8 was clearly made by a director who wanted to use star wars to tell his own story. 9 was made by someone who actually understood a star wars story needs to build and expand on STAR WARS, but admittedly does have some weak points that are largely caused by 8's frickups and trying to repair them
4/10
They’re both terrible for different reasons. One is a terrible Star Wars movie, the other is just a terrible movie.
Nah you can skip it. The movie is a mess of fetch quests
9 is so hilariously bad ig beggars belief. You might want to watch it just because it might give you hope, because even massive powerful corporations like Disney can frick up so spectacularly and are not invincible
>somehow palpatine returned
Who cares, I want more star trek videos.
He can't make a Plinkett review on a movie he produced and helped write. It would be a conflict on interest.
Didn't stop him for TFA.
Did he review TFA in the Plinkett TFA review? Or did he talk about Star Wars Ring Theory for two hours?
What's the difference?
Star Wars Ring Theory relates entirely to the prequels and has nothing to do with TFA.
morelike Cope Theory
Do you have anything to say?
ring theory was the ultimate attempt at trying to pretend the prequels were good, aka Cope Theory
is he gooning?
>is he gooning?
yes
And?
You're a gay.
You're both really butthurt
>those hands
>the size of that chip
>that hair
>only one had is even holding a chip
AI will NEVER work.
>this meme again
The prequels sucked
We're talking about Star Wars, not Space Cop.
richy richy wanna lick sum dicky
Rise of Skywalker was so bad it doesn't even warrant a review.
they haven't reviewed Andor either though...
So he's a fat character that goes to star wars films and it's suppose to mirror society? And the funny voice
Titanic or whatever was the last review they did before the long hiatus was their last good video. Everything after was them failing to recapture the magic. Haaaaaaaaaacks.
The Plinkett shtick is worn out. Even in the latest Star Trek one, Mike's alcoholic nihilist ass couldn't even bother to stay in character.
RLM fandom is a house of cards based on the predicate that the prequels are bad. They're not
She won.
What is the thing R2D2 is setting on fire?
Cthulhu, it's a mascot. It's stupid.
lmao, time marches on, and he's still wrong.
>what did he see?
A case of the notgays.
Jay is a top, my twink friend hooked up with him after matching on grindr.
You don't "match" on Grinder.
He should do shit like Cop Dog and Baby's Day Out again
They're too busy being boring old farts.
10/10 ending copied obscure video game Wonderful 101
They did a 70-minute long Half in the Bag on it, how is that not sufficient?
Rise of Skywalker is such a shallow piece of junk movie that there's not much to dig into and discuss, most people saw it just the once in the theater and were left with no desire to touch it ever again
All I want in this world is a Mr. Plinkett review of "Dial Of Destiny"
Half In the bag was good but they need to disect the trainwreck like a dead baby piglet corpse in a high school bilogy class. Peel it open and see where the organs shut down.
Why did this homosexual try so hard to rip Mr. Plinkett off?
who?
He's Civvie11. Youtuber who makes some funny videos I sometimes quote but is also everything Cinemaphile hates wrapped up in a porky package.
thanks, i wanna watch some cringe
Best way I can describe him is he's a redditor, who plays doomer shooters like a Cinemaphilener, but tries hard to relate to people on twitter users.
Again, has some funny videos, but mainly it's going to be groan worthy shit and takes. His older content like Bad Day L.A was better imo
>Professional athletes
>Supposed to be some of the most fit humans on the planet
>Needs a 4 minute commerical break 5 times a period so they don't pull a muscle
Beardfat made me appreciate aidsmoby