/tg/here, depends on the system.
If we're talking dnd, it works as long as you don't have spells that rely on dice or saves. It'll be mostly support and you should try to take advantage of your STR using feats since the multiclass would make you competent to cast using armor.
Crusher >destroy kid's faith through violence
Mayor of maybe >make kids question & doubt their faith in the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Both of these are what israelites are doing around the world today so probably both of these
Not that anon, but you clearly don't know how self destructive the israelites are. Especially in the face of their hatred of the goyim. They are like parasites that have no interest in keeping their host alive.
Is funny how on your post israelites are somehow hyper competent masterminds controlling the world and goofy frick ups at the same time. Like they can be anything you need them to be at any given time.
The term is what's "canon" or not, and it was argued over for centuries by the early church (and, arguably, still going on today). Some of the books toward the end of the New Testament are considered of dubious "canonicity" due to haven been written later, but have been included anyway because reasons. They're accepted as true, but not as reliable a testimony as the earlier works (the letters of Paul & the Gospels).
2 years ago
Anonymous
The article does go into why some of the letters from Paul and Peter are almost definitely fakes. Basically using language and referring to things that didn't show up until 200 years after those guys died.
Now let’s see these experts tell israelites and Muslims that their holy texts are fakes.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They did. There are no records of israelites being anywhere near Egypt, for example.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That indirectly shits on christianity too so it's bad actually
The article does go into why some of the letters from Paul and Peter are almost definitely fakes. Basically using language and referring to things that didn't show up until 200 years after those guys died.
>muh fake Peter 2
St. Jerome posits that they were written by two different scribes who were hired by Peter to record what he had to say, both capturing the essence of the message intended by Peter but adapted to different conventions for different audiences. But of course this moronic article leaves that part out.
Yes I'm sure Paul just used his holy time machine to pay some guy in the third century to write his letters for him.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>third century
The biggest argument made against Pauline authorship is it going against Gnosticism which was popularized in the 2nd century but still had roots in the 1st century anyway (see Cerinthus). The article relies on Marcion for validation against certain books even though Marcion was a literal Gnostic who had an agenda against certain interpretations of Paul.
Even ignoring these, this idea of certain followers or devotees of a tradition writing pseudepigraphical content in the footsteps of their forerunners wasn't seen as some kind of fraudulent deception in the ancient world. Dionysius/Pseudo-Dionysius is probably the best example of this.
They did. There are no records of israelites being anywhere near Egypt, for example.
>There are no records of israelites being anywhere near Egypt
There's literally an Egyptian source that talks about Semitic foreigners who found the city of Jerusalem, who start an uprising backed by an Egyptian noble who literally changes his name to Moses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osarseph
Another Egyptian papyrus talks about foreigners being bad and the Nile River turning to blood
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipuwer_Papyrus
I'm not even fully convinced that either of these are reliable sources for a historical understanding of the Exodus. I'm just saying they're there.
Only protestants reject the idea of magic wholesale. Catholics and Orthodox acknowledge it as real, but attribute it as being divine in nature at the source, as in only holiness can create *true* magic. All else is simply tricks and illusions by demons .
Catholics had the briefest period in the witch-craze, before and after it they insisted that Witches were just crazy morons or criminals, and actually punished people for claiming others were magical witches. And even during the Witch scare they basically just said "If people are using strange powers to do harm, let them be turned over to the local authorities and dealt with in the way those authorities see fit".
I just want to point out that most of these weapons are metaphysical or concept based to attack kids' faith.
Whereas the Ronin of Wrong and the Master of Mean are just, "swords and missiles."
Like - the other villains will try to mess with kids heads or make them act out. Those other two stand out in that they'll just fricking make you dead. Just funny to me is all.
Yeah, it's silly. I don't know if that means they really ran out of ideas or if they remembered that sometimes physical means can shake faith. I sort of enjoy those little bit of character these profiles have though. Likes and dislikes and even hobbies and fears. Someone seemed to be having fun making these characters.
Master of Mean legit looks cool though - or at least more visually interesting than the other vilains.I guess it only takes a mean-looking visor to get me hyped up though.
Dr Fear, Master of Mean, Crusher, Mayor of Maybe and Ronin of Wrong are legit good designs. You know, I'm in the mood for christian Cinemaphile, any recs?
Do we know how the usual henchman in this universe is supposed to look like? Are they just nondescript goons or would each villain that has them would have their own unique goon?
How strong is Crusher's violence wave? Does it only work on kids? If so, how young? Would it work on superpowered kids? Is it one of those lame mind controls you can be talked down from?
If Crusher sucks, then Master of Mean. He's got military grade shit.
So does Bibleman have an animated series or something going on? I know it had a few series that came and went but I have no idea what he has going on now.
It's actually quite ingenious, because it shows kids that the one eternal truth about the human condition is that violence reigns supreme above all. No matter what philosophy, ideology, or moral people subscribe to, ALL is rendered moot in the face of violence.
Larry Boy, we meet again. This time however, i will not be defeated so easily. Let's just say that i composed a "victory song" that surely will help me on our battle.
please lord, let my enemies be ridiculous
Sparlock the warrior Wizzard, he's more powerful thna Jeovah and ain't afraid of anything, thought he's more of an anti-hero than a villain
>Double build
Trully a villain.
>warrior wizard
dumbass multiclassing noob
/tg/here, depends on the system.
If we're talking dnd, it works as long as you don't have spells that rely on dice or saves. It'll be mostly support and you should try to take advantage of your STR using feats since the multiclass would make you competent to cast using armor.
Mayor of Maybe since Hell is real and there are maybe one or two openly Christian heroes who could defeat him.
>Mayor of Maybe
>Trivia: Hates being asked if he's a Holocaust survivor
What does this even mean
It means she doesn't need henchman because she's just an socialite.
>mayor of maybe
Crusher
>destroy kid's faith through violence
Mayor of maybe
>make kids question & doubt their faith in the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Both of these are what israelites are doing around the world today so probably both of these
Yeah I'm sure israelites are desperate to impede their best allies.
Not that anon, but you clearly don't know how self destructive the israelites are. Especially in the face of their hatred of the goyim. They are like parasites that have no interest in keeping their host alive.
Is funny how on your post israelites are somehow hyper competent masterminds controlling the world and goofy frick ups at the same time. Like they can be anything you need them to be at any given time.
Jews care not for only themselves
Don't come to Cinemaphile expecting anything reasonable to be said about people who aren't white Christian males.
So is shit like the conflict crystal and the seed of fear bible canon? Is magic real here?
Sure why not. It's not like there aren't documented frauds in canon anyway, might as well just throw in whatever fanfiction you want.
>t. Mayor of Maybe
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/keithgiles/2019/03/sorry-christians-our-bible-contains-fake-letters-from-paul-and-peter/
Very ironic how Peter 2 starts out talking about false prophets.
So how do these scholars decide what’s real and what isn’t in the Bible?
The term is what's "canon" or not, and it was argued over for centuries by the early church (and, arguably, still going on today). Some of the books toward the end of the New Testament are considered of dubious "canonicity" due to haven been written later, but have been included anyway because reasons. They're accepted as true, but not as reliable a testimony as the earlier works (the letters of Paul & the Gospels).
Now let’s see these experts tell israelites and Muslims that their holy texts are fakes.
They did. There are no records of israelites being anywhere near Egypt, for example.
That indirectly shits on christianity too so it's bad actually
The article does go into why some of the letters from Paul and Peter are almost definitely fakes. Basically using language and referring to things that didn't show up until 200 years after those guys died.
>muh fake Peter 2
St. Jerome posits that they were written by two different scribes who were hired by Peter to record what he had to say, both capturing the essence of the message intended by Peter but adapted to different conventions for different audiences. But of course this moronic article leaves that part out.
Yes I'm sure Paul just used his holy time machine to pay some guy in the third century to write his letters for him.
>third century
The biggest argument made against Pauline authorship is it going against Gnosticism which was popularized in the 2nd century but still had roots in the 1st century anyway (see Cerinthus). The article relies on Marcion for validation against certain books even though Marcion was a literal Gnostic who had an agenda against certain interpretations of Paul.
Even ignoring these, this idea of certain followers or devotees of a tradition writing pseudepigraphical content in the footsteps of their forerunners wasn't seen as some kind of fraudulent deception in the ancient world. Dionysius/Pseudo-Dionysius is probably the best example of this.
>There are no records of israelites being anywhere near Egypt
There's literally an Egyptian source that talks about Semitic foreigners who found the city of Jerusalem, who start an uprising backed by an Egyptian noble who literally changes his name to Moses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osarseph
Another Egyptian papyrus talks about foreigners being bad and the Nile River turning to blood
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipuwer_Papyrus
I'm not even fully convinced that either of these are reliable sources for a historical understanding of the Exodus. I'm just saying they're there.
>California
Only protestants reject the idea of magic wholesale. Catholics and Orthodox acknowledge it as real, but attribute it as being divine in nature at the source, as in only holiness can create *true* magic. All else is simply tricks and illusions by demons .
Or something like that.
t. Not a theologian.
Catholics had the briefest period in the witch-craze, before and after it they insisted that Witches were just crazy morons or criminals, and actually punished people for claiming others were magical witches. And even during the Witch scare they basically just said "If people are using strange powers to do harm, let them be turned over to the local authorities and dealt with in the way those authorities see fit".
I just want to point out that most of these weapons are metaphysical or concept based to attack kids' faith.
Whereas the Ronin of Wrong and the Master of Mean are just, "swords and missiles."
Like - the other villains will try to mess with kids heads or make them act out. Those other two stand out in that they'll just fricking make you dead. Just funny to me is all.
Right? All these silly weapon names and then suddenly
>fricking dual Wakizashi light swords
He sounds like a reject villain from a different franchise altogether
He's also the only one with somewhat funny trivia.
Yeah, it's silly. I don't know if that means they really ran out of ideas or if they remembered that sometimes physical means can shake faith. I sort of enjoy those little bit of character these profiles have though. Likes and dislikes and even hobbies and fears. Someone seemed to be having fun making these characters.
>fave weapon: missiles
every time
Men will literally do this instead of going to therapy
the master of mean, I guess. or crusher, assuming he could use his violence wave generator to start hero vs hero type conflicts
Baroness has clearly been running the American education system for a while.
>get kids to disobey parents and teachers
You can tell how old this is because devout Christians today hate teachers
Master of Mean legit looks cool though - or at least more visually interesting than the other vilains.I guess it only takes a mean-looking visor to get me hyped up though.
Dr Fear, Master of Mean, Crusher, Mayor of Maybe and Ronin of Wrong are legit good designs. You know, I'm in the mood for christian Cinemaphile, any recs?
321 Penguins
Serenity
Unironically, how would Bible man fare In the marvel universe?
Brutal
Crusher=Luxor Spawndroth>Ronin>Master Of Mean>Dr Fear> Baroness>Mayor of Maybe.
What's the point in listing henchmen if the majority don't use any?
Do we know how the usual henchman in this universe is supposed to look like? Are they just nondescript goons or would each villain that has them would have their own unique goon?
I would totally do the Baroness.
>the rest of them have weapons that just make kids do naughty stuff
>master of mean just has tactical missiles
chad?
>talks to himself
>uses military grade weapons
>afraid of bunny rabbits
absolutely and utterly based schizo
Mayor of Maybe, he's pretty much every industrygay in the last 10 years.
So Crusher gets all the henchmen that are left over, but none of the other villains use henchmen except one guy who uses the same two every time?
Doesn't that mean Crusher gets all henchmen in the world except those two dumb guys?
How strong is Crusher's violence wave? Does it only work on kids? If so, how young? Would it work on superpowered kids? Is it one of those lame mind controls you can be talked down from?
If Crusher sucks, then Master of Mean. He's got military grade shit.
So does Bibleman have an animated series or something going on? I know it had a few series that came and went but I have no idea what he has going on now.
>Crusher
>GOAL: destroy kids' faith through violence
Jesus, that's metal.
It's actually quite ingenious, because it shows kids that the one eternal truth about the human condition is that violence reigns supreme above all. No matter what philosophy, ideology, or moral people subscribe to, ALL is rendered moot in the face of violence.
Violence reigns supreme above all.
OK Crusher.
>five out of seven don't use henchmen
>Luxor has two henchmen
>Crusher gets every other henchman
How big of an army does this guy have?
The NIV Nibbler
>cuts out and modifies parts of the Bible he doesn’t like
>defeated by the KJV 1611
>forgiveness
>in the Marvel universe
Baroness is busted af
I would pay $100.00 for a prestige one shot graphic novel of Magick dealing with them and Bibleman. Written by Grant Morrison and art by Arthur Adams
Luxor, because he's always adopting a new villain identity every week.
Yeah I'm not up to date on my Bibleman lore but aren't most of the villains canonically just one guy changing costume?
>Bibleman
Pathetic.
Larry Boy, we meet again. This time however, i will not be defeated so easily. Let's just say that i composed a "victory song" that surely will help me on our battle.
It's always funny to me that the Abrahamic religions all fricking hate each other.
We hate each but we also hate Atheists and satanists even moreso. One of the few moments where we bond
It's like earlier feminists hating newer ones, and gays of all colors hating trannies.
Disobey ray?
What does it do, Disobey you to death?
Ray is the manager at the fast food joint he works at on the weekends.
Monkepox. 99% of the MU is gay, so that would take them all out.
Baroness and Mayor of Maybe could work.