Or are movie stars soon to be extinct?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Who are the movie stars of Gen Z?
Or are movie stars soon to be extinct?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
that one scrawny androgynous israelite kid
This is a specific answer, and that's why I like it
I thought those had already been replaced with YouTube/TikTok stars.
So far it's Chalamet, Sydney Sweeney, Jenna Ortega and that's it. The others are inorganic or failed industry plants.
None of these people have been in a successful movie.
Chalamet has been in arthouse bullshit and financially meh stuff like Dune.
Sweeney and Ortega have been in... What successful, cinematically released stuff?
'Reality' was arthouse, and 'Babysitter: Killer Queen' was released on Netflix.
tl;dr - what a dumb answer
Dune and Scream are successful franchises. Wednesday and X made Jenna additionally famous among 2 different demographics. Chalamet's Wonka will have a major December release.
Sydney has become Euphoria's biggest star despite attempts to push Zendaya and the troony. All three of them are ubiquitous in ads, mag covers etc and have many mainstream projects lined up.
Don't mistake your ignorance for an opinion, get informed beforehand
>What is a movie star?
>Movie
>Star
Don't mistake your moronation for an opinion, kys beforehand
Autistic literalism. Never mind the fact that all of them have done well-known movies (w/Sydney having worked w Tarantino with a Marvel movie tbr)
>Been in a movie = MOVIE STAR!
>No?
>Been on a TV show = MOVIE STAR!
Stop talking anon.
Your opinion is trash and you need to stop and feel bad about it.
Kek. So your embarrassingly moronic rationale is that Jenna/Sydney are not movie stars bc they've done successful tv series? Just like Clooney and Bruce Willis before them?
No autizmo pls.
>Madame Webis an upcoming Americansuperhero filmbased on theMarvel Comicscharacterof the same name,
Madame Web is not a Marvel movie, anon.
>Falls for Sony's marketing
>Is moronic
Checks out
Anon, by these standards, Anthony Mackie and John David Washington are probably the biggest stars in the world today.
A part in a pushed franchise and media bullshit is not what makes a movie star
does chalemet count as gen z? florence pugh in this case
hunter schafer is the next big star
Pugh too. Very good call
No bc neither of them are marketable on the same level of celebrity these three have. A movie star is made by a certain sexual aura which in turn makes them appealing to arthouse and mainstream directors/luxury brands and the fashion world/ and coomers.
Those aren't stars
lmao cope
They are stars and you're evidently out of touch
Evidently you don't know what a star is. Like you don't know what an actual movies is. Or a woman
movie stars were a specific cultural phenomenon that does not exist anymore. the last person ever to become a movie star was leonardo dicaprio. you can still act in movies, you can still play guitar, you can still get rich and famous in the process but you can't be a "movie star" or a "rock star" because those were 20th century phenomena and the industries that produced them no longer operate that way. calling chalamet a movie star is like calling the president of egypt a pharaoh.
The star system has shrunk. Still, within the group of more recent stars some have more personal appeal than others, and this is a structure that's still being consolidated.
ATJ for instance had a couple of misses and Furiosa could be a defining moment in her career. But some others took the forefront and will remain there if they play their cards right. They won't be massive box office draws as before but will be popular enough
>more recent stars some have more personal appeal than others,
Yeah, in a way Michael Dudikoff had more appea than Jeff Speakman.
point still stand. No actual stars
No. In the way that Chalamet has more appeal than, say, Finn Wolfhard
which is nowhere on the star radar
you don't get it at all. it's not about how much money they make, it's about how people relate to them. do you think the difference between a pharaoh and a president is income?
Who are you to say people don't relate and/or don't deam about being or dating/fricking Jenna Ortega for instance?
jesus christ you're dense. it's precisely because jenna ortega is your imaginary girlfriend that she is not and can never be a "movie star." marilyn monroe wasn't some chick you imagined fricking, she was sex itself, she was larger than life. a peasant couldn't imagine becoming a pharaoh but anyone can imagine getting elected president. you don't get it because you were raised on the 21st century parasocial model of celebrity and you don't know anything else.
Forget it autist. You missed the boat and are trying to hold on to a system that no longer exists on the same scale but still persists in the same way it always did: magnetism, charisma, marketability. Go be stupid somewhere else
>a system that no longer exist
finally you agree homosexual. There are o modern stars
I'll quote myself:
>a star system that no longer exists on the same scale
It still remains but not as massively, but you're obviously too undersocialized to grasp that so you cling to the low IQ cope that the entire star system is over.
These upcoming stars are paid millions of dollars to star in movies whose publicity campaigns/ pressers etc heavily rely on them. Their draw is smaller than Cruise's, but it still exists in an economically significant way
your little idiot brain is going in circles. i already told you the difference isn't money, i already told you the difference isn't scale. what is the difference between a president and a pharaoh, anon? think before you answer.
The difference is that you're an autist and your president/pharaoh analogy is moronic, not least because actors nowadays command much more power and influence because of socia media which they use for publicity, career/image placement, campaigning and opining on various subjects
never mind any of that, just answer the question. what's the difference between a pharaoh and a president?
again, the difference between a pharaoh and a president isn't "scale." you're stupid as frick. ask a parent to walk you through my posts.
There's no proper men anymore. Zoomers have even less testosterone than millennials, which had less than Gen X, have you seen 25 year old guys these days? They look like they're like 15 years old.
Frankly I don"t even consider them human
There are no gen z stars because gen z fundamentally do not understand movies as a medium. If you have any integrity, you would blacklist anyone born late 90s onwards from the industry until the babies that are being born today can take over, zoomers excluded of course.
They're gone. Tom Cruise is the last of a dying breed. A white dwarf heading for a black hole.
It's all about movie franchises now.
The have no actua men, nor actual women, nor actual movies
How could they have movies stars?
you’ll get surprised how gen z and younger generations have absolutely no interest in other than TikTok and video games. I’m part time tutor
Movies these days are just one type of video people "consume". Movie stars are competing with social media influencers and streamers. However you still have music stars (eg. Taylor Swift)
Hollywood got mogged by a bunch of ecelebs and it's hilarious that a once powerful corporation was brought down to its knees by losers.
There’s none, thank god. Celebrity worship is cancer