[...]
Comic still falls flat because New Guy seemed genuinely happy to make a possible friend. If it didn't have the last two panels and had a different punchline it *might* have worked, but in this case it makes >her look like a turboc**t.
Comic still falls flat because New Guy seemed genuinely happy to make a possible friend. If it didn't have the last two panels and had a different punchline it *might* have worked, but in this case it makes >her look like a turboc**t.
The guy is bad because he just immediately assumed the worst case scenario, where she was enjoying the misfortune of someone who was just hurt, and not really considering the circumstance or a more likely outcome. He was then positioning as the moral high ground, trying to whine that somebody isn't a nice perfect carebear 24/7 and complaining that they might have a non-positive opinion at any point.
On the other hand, she was a b***h who was clearly interested in sharing how great it was that somebody got robbed and then treated anybody who wasn't intimately familiar with the full details as a complete moron for not immediately sharing her opinion.
Overall, the guy is less offensive and just needs more life experience, while the girl is a b***h who misjudges people regularly and gets upset when they don't conform to her immediate worldview. So the ultimate conclusion is that OP is wrong for assuming that everything is a cut-and-dry situation where one person must be objectively right and the other objectively wrong.
the guy because he has an unassuming wagecuck mindset and comes off as patronizingly moralistic, as if he has any reason to care about some egotistical e-celeb he's never met before. besides its doubtful said millionaire getting robbed has any real impact on his financial status since he probably can afford good insurance for being rich.
and while no, obviously nobody wants to be robbed, there's lit no reason to defend some rando you never met like that other than to be argumentative.
i'm not sure i understand what you're meaning to convey, i'm anti-establishment and not guided by the same moral values everyone else seems to be. i am narcissistic but i don't care to contribute to society or be seen as a good person. thus i have no moral high ground to claim and believe you simply fail to comprehend my point.
if it doesn't affect me then i don't care period. its like that jerusalem vs palestine or israel shit that people pretend to care about to appear holier than thou but really, i'm american so like why should i give a shit?
What's the point of millionaire douchebags getting robbed if they can bounce right back like nothing? I want them to become permanently destitute and end up having to do the same soul-crushing demeaning work I have to do every day. Now THAT would make me cum
>gets off on any amount of suffering that people she disagrees with get >normie naively asks her to display any level of basic compassion >responds with sarcasm before basically telling him to frick off while not actually giving an actual counterargument
this chick is just the average Cinemaphile user
Remember those news reports recently about women getting randomly punched in the face in NY and then complaining "where's the good men? Why aren't they protecting us?" Lol.
has wokeism gone so far that black people are allowed to freely assault others on the street without repercussion? because lemme guess, arresting them would be "racist"? tell me more.
Cinemaphile only says she's in the wrong because they either are, or look up to, certain types of rich douchebags such as scalpers. Everyone knows on a rational level that robbery is unacceptable but it's nonsensical to expect the people that the rich douchebag just laughed in the faces of to feel sympathy for him when he gets fricked over after the fact.
>it's nonsensical to expect the people that the rich douchebag just laughed in the faces of to feel sympathy for him when he gets fricked over after the fact.
Elaborate.
I don't know shit about the rich dude.
My point still stands. Just flip the characters around so that the guy is expressing schadenfreude and change "millionaire gamer-bro douchebag" which is a group that Cinemaphile is protective of to an acceptable target like Melee players or feminists and the general consensus over the comic would immediately flip. Everyone on Cinemaphile likes to laugh at the misery of people they hate but only switched to being "muh decent human bean" moralgayging redditors when a pink-haired troony emulated that same mentality just to be contrarian.
Nah, I laugh only when it is ironic, like anyone who proudly spouts ACAB/Defund the police then complains police aren't doing their job, or when an urionic commie has their stuff "redistributed".
The cartoonist for creating it in the first place. Seriously, what exactly is the point of this cartoon strip? “People have different opinions” is not a funny or insightful observation.
her, everyone knows that you must be discreet when you make fun of an innocent person's misfortune, otherwise everyone thinks you are an idiot.
Weakness and passive-aggression masquerading as politeness is for homosexuals.
This board is so fricking boring
Hahaha
Culture war! Culture war! You're here forever!
>This person I don't like deserves to get robbed and assaulted and if you don't agree you are an idiot
You are a sociopath.
>rational posts get deleted
But why?
Comic still falls flat because New Guy seemed genuinely happy to make a possible friend. If it didn't have the last two panels and had a different punchline it *might* have worked, but in this case it makes >her look like a turboc**t.
PewDiePie is rich and I envy him so she was in the right. He deserved to get robbed for happening to get luckier in life than me.
I made it better.
the women, two wrongs don't make a right.
Both are bad.
The guy is bad because he just immediately assumed the worst case scenario, where she was enjoying the misfortune of someone who was just hurt, and not really considering the circumstance or a more likely outcome. He was then positioning as the moral high ground, trying to whine that somebody isn't a nice perfect carebear 24/7 and complaining that they might have a non-positive opinion at any point.
On the other hand, she was a b***h who was clearly interested in sharing how great it was that somebody got robbed and then treated anybody who wasn't intimately familiar with the full details as a complete moron for not immediately sharing her opinion.
Overall, the guy is less offensive and just needs more life experience, while the girl is a b***h who misjudges people regularly and gets upset when they don't conform to her immediate worldview. So the ultimate conclusion is that OP is wrong for assuming that everything is a cut-and-dry situation where one person must be objectively right and the other objectively wrong.
You are a sociopath.
Max
For being a new guy
the guy because he has an unassuming wagecuck mindset and comes off as patronizingly moralistic, as if he has any reason to care about some egotistical e-celeb he's never met before. besides its doubtful said millionaire getting robbed has any real impact on his financial status since he probably can afford good insurance for being rich.
and while no, obviously nobody wants to be robbed, there's lit no reason to defend some rando you never met like that other than to be argumentative.
and just what am i projecting, exactly?
>the guy because he has an unassuming wagecuck mindset and comes off as patronizingly moralistic
i'm not sure i understand what you're meaning to convey, i'm anti-establishment and not guided by the same moral values everyone else seems to be. i am narcissistic but i don't care to contribute to society or be seen as a good person. thus i have no moral high ground to claim and believe you simply fail to comprehend my point.
if it doesn't affect me then i don't care period. its like that jerusalem vs palestine or israel shit that people pretend to care about to appear holier than thou but really, i'm american so like why should i give a shit?
>Transwoman
>Bald guy
Is this an intro to a porn comic?
unfortunately it is not.
new guy is right because he has a good point and she didn't give any counterargument.
What's the point of millionaire douchebags getting robbed if they can bounce right back like nothing? I want them to become permanently destitute and end up having to do the same soul-crushing demeaning work I have to do every day. Now THAT would make me cum
This will surprise you, but this has nothing to do with you. You are not the center of the world and your opinion does not matter.
Oh and lemme guess, women don't owe me sex? lmao yes they do.
/thread
Oh this oldie
I think the creator of this is STILL hiding on Twitter after the backlash 'she' got.
The trannies are always wrong
The dude with purple(violet?) hair.
Sorry no sympathy for multi millionaires
>gets off on any amount of suffering that people she disagrees with get
>normie naively asks her to display any level of basic compassion
>responds with sarcasm before basically telling him to frick off while not actually giving an actual counterargument
this chick is just the average Cinemaphile user
degenerates who think they are entitled to the world for being freaks and the world calls them out for it
Remember those news reports recently about women getting randomly punched in the face in NY and then complaining "where's the good men? Why aren't they protecting us?" Lol.
has wokeism gone so far that black people are allowed to freely assault others on the street without repercussion? because lemme guess, arresting them would be "racist"? tell me more.
I guess "they can't arrest all of us" applies to actual crime too.
>jannies delete comic mocking prog women but not Andrea fondling a fat pair of horse nuts
Based?
It's a horse, so if we report it under GR15 it'll be gone. Despite all the shit that flies that obsolete rule is still enforced to the letter.
don't blame me, i simply seem to have an effect on some of you.
Cinemaphile only says she's in the wrong because they either are, or look up to, certain types of rich douchebags such as scalpers. Everyone knows on a rational level that robbery is unacceptable but it's nonsensical to expect the people that the rich douchebag just laughed in the faces of to feel sympathy for him when he gets fricked over after the fact.
>it's nonsensical to expect the people that the rich douchebag just laughed in the faces of to feel sympathy for him when he gets fricked over after the fact.
Elaborate.
I don't know shit about the rich dude.
This was literally about pewdiepie, you are MTF.
My point still stands. Just flip the characters around so that the guy is expressing schadenfreude and change "millionaire gamer-bro douchebag" which is a group that Cinemaphile is protective of to an acceptable target like Melee players or feminists and the general consensus over the comic would immediately flip. Everyone on Cinemaphile likes to laugh at the misery of people they hate but only switched to being "muh decent human bean" moralgayging redditors when a pink-haired troony emulated that same mentality just to be contrarian.
Nah, I laugh only when it is ironic, like anyone who proudly spouts ACAB/Defund the police then complains police aren't doing their job, or when an urionic commie has their stuff "redistributed".
The cartoonist for creating it in the first place. Seriously, what exactly is the point of this cartoon strip? “People have different opinions” is not a funny or insightful observation.