Cruise, easily
No one cares about those other two homosexuals
toss up between Cruise and Pitt
You realize all those Cruise action movies like Mission Impossible or Jack Reacher will look funny in 50 years from now
People in that time will look back only to see timeless movies which Leo dominates in that department
Cruise is at least as talented as Leo given his acting roles in dramatic movies, which makes me question how he never won an Oscar, he was only nominated for Magnolia but no other movie. The guy literally spent 2 years learning Bushido and Japanese for Last Samurai and a year learning billiard for Color of Money, Cruise is more of a method actor than 99% of Hollywood and is only known as "that action guy"
Oh, you're right and for Jerry Maquire aswell.
Point is that Cruise usually shows some of the best performances of any given year. Even with Mission Impossible he does more than required for a simple action role.
>Point is that Cruise usually shows some of the best performances of any given year.
Agree 100%, including some very fine subtle, minimalist acting as in Collateral and Eyes Wide Shut
>Cruise usually shows some of the best performances of any given year.
Not according to nominations. Never won an oscar, only nominated 3 times. That's the OPPOSITE of Usual.
You can blame Cruise himself for not taking dramatic roles anymore. Since the late 2000s his priority is just making action movies that keep theaters filled.
Why do people keep forgetting Brad Pitt was in Inglourious Basterds? I know his acting sucked in that movie, but it's still a pretty iconic performance.
because the only tarantula movie that people remember is pulp fiction. if we didn't have constant braddu pittuuu nooooo asian seethe threads, we would have already forgotten about it.
>Why do people keep forgetting Brad Pitt was in Inglourious Basterds? I know his acting sucked in that movie
Idk, as someone who speaks Italian, him imitating Vito Corleone while saying Italian words with that accent is the highlight of that movie, also coupled with saying "Good Morning" while it's evening time premiere.
fight club, troy, mr and mrs smith, they are all pretty beloved. and leo has stuff like the wolf of wall street and titanic.
Cruise is known and will be remember for being in mission impossible but that's about it. most of the other stuff he does like obvilion are just off brand mission impossible movies. He has top gun and vanillah sky but people don't care for that as much as the best movies that brad and leo have been in, so ..
>Cruise is known and will be remember for being in mission impossible but that's about it
Imagine being such a pleb that you consider films like the color of money, rainman, jerry maguire, risky business, magnolia, eyes wide shut or a few good men obscure cult films
>Inb4 people my age never saw those films, therefore they flopped and are forgotten failures
I'm hope you're fricking joking. Seven, Twelve Monkeys, and Fight Club alone would rank Brad Pitt above Leo and Cruise's filmography. Cruise only does popcorn flicks, Leo dabbles in making more meaningful entertainment, but Pitt has been in multiple artistically engaging and spiritually satisfying films. That's what remains after an actor dies.
Threads like this just make me disappointed at how stupid the average Cinemaphile poster is.
>Brap Pitt has?
You do realize that his character in "Legends of the Fall" was responsible for the boom of baby boys being named Tristen in the mid to late 90's.
Pitt still has more interest if you filter for worldwide results, but if you go past 5 years he ends up much closer to the other two. Pitt needs to do something big to keep up with Cruise; all his good stuff is in the past.
>leo di CRAPio >tom SNOOZE
no one cares about these losers
brad pitt was in movies with the goat (pic related) so he will at least be remebered for that
Clooney acts circles around them despite the trail of angry Batman nerds always following him. For what it was, I liked it - it was never ashamed of being a campy homage to the classic 60s Adam West / Burt Ward TV series and movie. Too bad Schumacher felt he had to apologize for his vision and Clooney believed (wrongfully) that he too had to make a mea culpa for his portrayal. The majority of comic book nerds may bitterly shit on it for not being 'grounded' - whatever the frick that means - but it remains, to this day, the greatest Batman movie.
Clooney acts circles around them despite the trail of angry Batman nerds always following him. For what it was, I liked it - it was never ashamed of being a campy homage to the classic 60s Adam West / Burt Ward TV series and movie. Too bad Schumacher felt he had to apologize for his vision and Clooney believed (wrongfully) that he too had to make a mea culpa for his portrayal. The majority of comic book nerds may bitterly shit on it for not being 'grounded' - whatever the frick that means - but it remains, to this day, the greatest Batman movie.
>clooney
Does this shitter still do movies or did they finally get tired of all the money he cost them with his box office bombs?
He directed and starred in the science fiction film The Midnight Sky two years ago, and has a supporting role in the romantic comedy Ticket to Paradise which is currently in post-production.
None of them. Actors burn bright and fast and are then forgotten. James Dean scenarios are because of mythologies built around them that have little to do with acting. None of these three have any mystique.
>James Dean scenarios are because of mythologies built around them that have little to do with acting
in that case, Cruise will be the one remembered the longest. He's the only one of the three who has genuinely built up this mythological image of himself and does a great job maintaining it to the point that people start to wonder if he's just genuinely like that all the time and its not an act
I agree with you on him being the brightest of the three, but James Dean's death turned him into a tragic character following one good movie and a half. Cruise is a great stuntman but did he design his own stunts? Movie legends like Chaplin and Hitchwiener exhibit full control over their works and have unique personalities. I don't know if Tom has that. Just my two pennies. I like all three actors, I just don't think actor legacies survive as long as a musician or writer's, even if they're more famous/successful in their own time.
>Crowe told website Film School Rejects: "Clint Eastwood said, '100 years from now and more, people will look back on this generation of films, and the guy who will standout more than anyone else will be Tom Cruise.'
They'll all fade in to obscurity. Leo or Pitt will probably be the most watched in the long run because of Titanic and Fight Club. People like to rewatch those movies for some reason.
I consider Depp to be the greatest movie star of the era. He had a great track record until he started with all the Pirate movies and CGI fests. Pitt is the weak link in a number of classic 90s movies. I despise DiCrapio. A number of notable directors filmographies went to shit once they started casting him. Cruise? Underwhelming star personality, but I agree with Eastwood’s assessment.
>Eastwood’s opinion
Damn I thought it was going to be Clint dabbing on Tom for being a manlet but he actually believes Tom will be the top movie star people will remember in 100 years. Cool
depp's career trajectory is absolutely fascinating. his 90's lineup is hit after hit but then it falls off immediately after the new millenium. i think he was just too successful for his own good, he could've kept getting interesting roles but he had zero pressure to go outside his emo comfort zone once the pirates checks started rolling in. if tim burton had died in a car accident in 2000 we'd probably still lump depp in with leo and pitt, their best movie together is still ed wood
Nobody remembers shit hollywood this and superbowl # 65 that its not history we are not witnessing history constantly we are just being goy Black folk while israelites continue on all histrionic like God I hate Americans and their israelite handlers
Leo. He gets prime puss to this day because of Titanic. He's controlled like three generations of women coming to age because of that film. That movie is always going to be a girls first favorite movie. Like others said, the other thing is how you look in the future. Leo has the most distinct name of the three. Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt sound like generic chad names. Leonardo DiCaprio is exotic as frick.
It’s between Tom and Brad. Iconic actors like Jimmy Stewart,Cary Grant, and Robert Redford weren’t chameleons like Leo. They had distinct mannerisms and charm that they kept consistent from role to role. Tom’s probably the easiest to do an impression of so my bet is on him, but Brad Pitt has more women lusting after him so maybe him.
dicaprio = the titanic guy, if he's lucky. nobody cares about his nolan film anymore. once upon a time in hollywood might become a cult classic (good luck), but that's basically it
tom cruise = stands out as a leading man in a ton of movies, has eyes wide shut and vanilla sky as well as a bunch of other stuff.
braddu pittu = also has a ton of leading man movies, has se7en and fight club
while I was leaning pitt, cruise might actually end up taking it in the end.
I'm semi-inclined to agree. Of the three in the OP, Tom Cruise has the longest career and the most amount of hits. But Brad Pitt and Leo are still really famous. I think there was a time where Brad was like the most well-known actor in the world.
departed and django have had zero staying power outside of facebook memes. in the end, I think he was just too picky with his roles, both pitt and cruise have always been in something.
leo seems more down to earth than other two
get the same creepy vibes from brad pitt as you do from tom cruise except in his case it's adopting Black folk instead of i'm a cult leader
Clooney and Depp could've been included here had they not stumbled so much in their careers from about 2000 on. Though they have some bright spots throughout.
Scarface is the one movie everyone knows, I know 18 year old club prostitutes who quote Scarface. They don't even know Godfather or any movie De Niro did.
Probably Cruise based on the longevity of his career. Everyone fades eventually, though, young people don't really know much about Burt Reynolds, for instance, and he was the biggest movie star on the planet for around five years straight in the late 70s.
Zoomers can't remember what happened yesterday. Unless there's an algorithm in 50 years that reminds them, they won't even be able to name those 3 actors.
they make a product that i consume/use and get paid unreasonably money for it, they produce a thing i occasionally use, like some ramen noodles i eat sometimes or toilet paper.
I stop caring about these products after i used them in fact i dont even care about these products while i use them, i never ask myself who made this toilet paper and if its famous in 50 years because i am not a deluded chld that thinks this toilet paper is somehow special or has any significance in my life after i am done wiping my butthole with it. It is a manufactured product, i exchange money for it and use it, its not some life altering thing i remember even a day after using it, freaking 50 years lmao get frick outta here child.
no, you don't get it, longevity of something is determined by how much it's gonna appeal to teen girls, so it forms their perspective on things for the rest of their lives, they're gonna tell their daughters about it. Males will just follow because they want to get in their panties.
Leo has the Titanic moisturizer( imdb rating's went from 7.4 to almost 8.0 in the past 8 years based on female teen ratings alone). The other two is a coin toss.
Cruise by far. Leo and Brad Pitt will be like Tyrone Power, for instance, whereas Cruise will be a character in itself, a larger than life persona whose movies have a consistent average quality both in terms of action and production values. Tom Cruise is the greatest action movie star of all time.
Arnie and Stallone have 1)done too many mediocre movies and 2)fell quality and acting-wise at the latter part of their careers. Cruise is more consistent all the way, he cares about his filmography more than the paycheck-- and he's a better, more versatile actor.
in 50 years most of you will be at least 75 years old and have forgotten most of your private relationships you ever had.. if you remember any of these 3 c**ts at that point in time i will personally visit your 75 year old ass and punch you in the face.
You guys are really underestimating Titanic. You might not like it, but that's babys first romance. And Hollywood today is never going to blow as much as Cameron did on it. Titanic is going to be watched for generations by little girls until Leo gets his hands on them when they're 20.
Probably Leo. His lead should be bigger than it is though, his choice in roles hasn't been great. He got such a massive jump with Titanic, just an unreal boost in popularity at the time, but it feels like he should've done way more. Too many weird roles, not enough taking advantage of his charisma.
Cruise is second. He's easily the king of the summer blockbuster from this group, but he never had the bang Leo did at his peak. His movies also aren't as iconic in general.
Pitt is third, which he should be because he's the worst actor of the 3. That's why his best movies typically involve him in an ensemble cast or paired with 1-2 superstars. He isn't on that Leo-tier of acting to carry a movie alone.
The big exception is Moneyball, great in that movie. He's also the best producer of the cast and I think the best at picking roles/scripts in general, Leo should take some tips. Pitt also I think is the most likely to have a great "old guy" career, so the order might change depending on what these guys do post-60. If he finds the right role/franchise (which he's been great at), I think there's a chance he jumps up ahead of both guys.
So hard to top Leo's peak though. Arguably the highest peak of any actor/actress.
Nah, Cruise will have a superior career, he knows his action times are over, Top Gun Maverick and the back to back filmed MI movies are his last hooray.
He also proved himself as a character actor and got some recognition, he obviously also doesn't fear to be ugly on screen (his very visible crying in Magnolia and a fat balding manlet in Tropic Thunder)
Oh and the entire plot of Vanilla Sky obviously aswell. Cruise is kinda blackpilled now when I think about it. The entire story of Vanilla Sky is about how powerful the Halo effect is.
Cruise.
In 50 years time, Scientology will have become the largest religion in the world. dwarfing both Christianity and Islam. Cruise will be one of the major saints, like Santa Clause.
Considering Top Gun is still rele, Cruise has more staying power. Plus he's got the MI franchise. It's no contest, really. Leo is a forgettable actor and Brad hasn't done anything as epic as Tom.
Cruise absolutely mogs both >Saved action movies >Doesn't pathetically oscarbait >Doesn't go along with "The Message" >IRL actually takes stand in things like psychiatry as opposed to Leo's "Good things are good, bad things are bad" non-position >Doesn't do capeshits >Refuses to do phoney CGI fests >Taught a bunch of Hollywood actors how to fly military jets >Grabbed onto side of the plane and flew that way
And most importantly he does it not for the stupid clout or brownie points with the Academy (like Leo with his liver-eating-glass-breaking nonsense) but for the raw realism of his movies. And it shows on screen.
AI technology and transhumanism will render celebreties obsolete.
No one will give a frick because there will be simulation technology where you can insert yourself or friends into existing films and rewrite the scripts.
Look at the deepfake tech along with AI voice synthesizers and tell me this isnt true.
You will have people doing shit like inserting themselves into batman or putting a young Marlon Brando into the Dark Knight trilogy.
At best celebrity personalities and their performances will be looked at like stock images or sound effects.
The Social Credit system will reward people for rewritng past movies with modern day political commentary like Batman is good because he used mass surveilance tech to hunt down corrupt officials.
Shit like the youtube alogorthym and echo chambers will be dialed up to 11 where groups of people will be looking to create messages like trust the government or dont go past your carbon limit
Agreed. I thought what would be worse and more self-aggrandizing than tiktok preening and the answer was obvious: >Let people star themselves in movies and then show it to their friends
it's because they're too busy making fun of his height. But I do agree that they both have comparably nice faces, maybe Cruise is even pulling ahead with age. On the other hand Leo looks like shit now and has for years
Dicaprio has the better roles and peak quality films (titanic, catch me if you can, departed, inception, wolf wall street, the aviator... ).
After that it's Cruise who has the better and more consistent career, and last is brad pit who has the most social media/magazine interest (which is the most fickle).
Leo
cruise
You realize all those Cruise action movies like Mission Impossible or Jack Reacher will look funny in 50 years from now
People in that time will look back only to see timeless movies which Leo dominates in that department
Vanilla Sky, McGuire, and Eyes Wide Shut are all kino and theyre not action
>action movies bad
Imagine being this low on testosterone
Rain man
Jerry McGuire
A few good men
Cruise is at least as talented as Leo given his acting roles in dramatic movies, which makes me question how he never won an Oscar, he was only nominated for Magnolia but no other movie. The guy literally spent 2 years learning Bushido and Japanese for Last Samurai and a year learning billiard for Color of Money, Cruise is more of a method actor than 99% of Hollywood and is only known as "that action guy"
>he was only nominated for Magnolia but no other movie.
Also for Born on the 4th of July?
Oh, you're right and for Jerry Maquire aswell.
Point is that Cruise usually shows some of the best performances of any given year. Even with Mission Impossible he does more than required for a simple action role.
>Point is that Cruise usually shows some of the best performances of any given year.
Agree 100%, including some very fine subtle, minimalist acting as in Collateral and Eyes Wide Shut
>Cruise usually shows some of the best performances of any given year.
Not according to nominations. Never won an oscar, only nominated 3 times. That's the OPPOSITE of Usual.
You can blame Cruise himself for not taking dramatic roles anymore. Since the late 2000s his priority is just making action movies that keep theaters filled.
>timeless kino
Name one that isn't directed by Tarantino
/thread I don't even know the other 2
Last samurai is the definition of kino.
Nobody ever cares about Cruise movies after like a month
MI:Fallout is constantly brought up as the gold standard of how an action movie should look.
Live Die Repeat was amazing.
Cruise, easily
No one cares about those other two homosexuals
Pitt
toss up between Cruise and Pitt
Leo has Titanic
Cruise has MI,Top Gun etc
Brap Pitt has?
fight club
se7en
once upon a time in hollywood
Leo and Brad Pitt both will be remembered for having pretty stellar roles in Tarantino movies. Pitt also has Fight Club
They only had 1 movie with Tarantino and its already forgotten by normies
Brad was also in Inglourious Basterds
Yeah and he was unironically the worst part about it. The Landa/Shosanna parts were kino.
Why do people keep forgetting Brad Pitt was in Inglourious Basterds? I know his acting sucked in that movie, but it's still a pretty iconic performance.
because the only tarantula movie that people remember is pulp fiction. if we didn't have constant braddu pittuuu nooooo asian seethe threads, we would have already forgotten about it.
>Why do people keep forgetting Brad Pitt was in Inglourious Basterds? I know his acting sucked in that movie
Idk, as someone who speaks Italian, him imitating Vito Corleone while saying Italian words with that accent is the highlight of that movie, also coupled with saying "Good Morning" while it's evening time premiere.
yeah that scene had me cracking up so hard
Calvin Candie is the best
Fight Club
Fight club and moneyball, other stuff I'm just blanking on
Troy
Brad Pitt will be remembered as one of the most handsome men alive
the heart of every woman on the planet
fight club, troy, mr and mrs smith, they are all pretty beloved. and leo has stuff like the wolf of wall street and titanic.
Cruise is known and will be remember for being in mission impossible but that's about it. most of the other stuff he does like obvilion are just off brand mission impossible movies. He has top gun and vanillah sky but people don't care for that as much as the best movies that brad and leo have been in, so ..
Twelve monkeys is an underrated scifi classic with a real remomable side role performance from Pitt.
Its good, but Pitt had the "IM ACTING" exaggerated fake feel in it
>mr and mrs smith
>troy
>beloved
el o el
Mr and Mrs Smith is total dogshit
>eyes wide shut
>war of the worlds
>minority report
>collateral
>the last samurai
>edge of tomorrow
all classics
you failed to mention any mission impossible or oblivion or tropic thunder
Tom Cruise wasn't in Oblivion. You're thinking of Patrick Stewart.
Lmao there's a movie called oblivion gotta lay off the skooma brah
>Cruise is known and will be remember for being in mission impossible but that's about it
Imagine being such a pleb that you consider films like the color of money, rainman, jerry maguire, risky business, magnolia, eyes wide shut or a few good men obscure cult films
>Inb4 people my age never saw those films, therefore they flopped and are forgotten failures
The Tree of Life is the most kino thing any of the three has done
Gonna sit there and act like Snatch wasn't complete kino
Pitt, obviously.
I'm hope you're fricking joking. Seven, Twelve Monkeys, and Fight Club alone would rank Brad Pitt above Leo and Cruise's filmography. Cruise only does popcorn flicks, Leo dabbles in making more meaningful entertainment, but Pitt has been in multiple artistically engaging and spiritually satisfying films. That's what remains after an actor dies.
Threads like this just make me disappointed at how stupid the average Cinemaphile poster is.
agree. without a cult movie i don't think any of them will be remembered in 50 years.
Pitt has fight club, so he wins. also, being one of the most attractive males ever helps
Seven, not even zodiac
>Brap Pitt has?
You do realize that his character in "Legends of the Fall" was responsible for the boom of baby boys being named Tristen in the mid to late 90's.
Cruise most likely.
Kevin Hart
hmm whats that tom cruise spike in 2008 for
This big spike around 2005 is probably the Oprah couch incident. The small spike around 2008 is probably Tropic Thunder.
Leobros.. we lost.. bigly..
Brad Pitt is really big in the US but smaller outside of it. Leo, Cruise and Depp are the 3 biggest stars world wide
Pitt still has more interest if you filter for worldwide results, but if you go past 5 years he ends up much closer to the other two. Pitt needs to do something big to keep up with Cruise; all his good stuff is in the past.
>The acting
Leo
>The looks
Pitt
>The hits
Cruise
>leo di CRAPio
>tom SNOOZE
no one cares about these losers
brad pitt was in movies with the goat (pic related) so he will at least be remebered for that
nobody remembers this grandpa now
Mr. Box Office Poison?
Clooney acts circles around them despite the trail of angry Batman nerds always following him. For what it was, I liked it - it was never ashamed of being a campy homage to the classic 60s Adam West / Burt Ward TV series and movie. Too bad Schumacher felt he had to apologize for his vision and Clooney believed (wrongfully) that he too had to make a mea culpa for his portrayal. The majority of comic book nerds may bitterly shit on it for not being 'grounded' - whatever the frick that means - but it remains, to this day, the greatest Batman movie.
>clooney
Does this shitter still do movies or did they finally get tired of all the money he cost them with his box office bombs?
He directed and starred in the science fiction film The Midnight Sky two years ago, and has a supporting role in the romantic comedy Ticket to Paradise which is currently in post-production.
None of them. Actors burn bright and fast and are then forgotten. James Dean scenarios are because of mythologies built around them that have little to do with acting. None of these three have any mystique.
>James Dean scenarios are because of mythologies built around them that have little to do with acting
in that case, Cruise will be the one remembered the longest. He's the only one of the three who has genuinely built up this mythological image of himself and does a great job maintaining it to the point that people start to wonder if he's just genuinely like that all the time and its not an act
I agree with you on him being the brightest of the three, but James Dean's death turned him into a tragic character following one good movie and a half. Cruise is a great stuntman but did he design his own stunts? Movie legends like Chaplin and Hitchwiener exhibit full control over their works and have unique personalities. I don't know if Tom has that. Just my two pennies. I like all three actors, I just don't think actor legacies survive as long as a musician or writer's, even if they're more famous/successful in their own time.
homie these guys have been household names longer than you've been alive
Who cares, they will be dead, it won’t matter to them and it is as if it never mattered, all amounts to nothing.
tip fedora
fifty years from now most people won't even know movies ever existed
Do zoomers remember Fatty Arbuckle?
>remember
He died in the fricking 1930s, how the frick do you expect people who are 25 at the oldest to "remember" him?
>OH N-
I see Ray Liotta's spirit found someone to possess
>Crowe told website Film School Rejects: "Clint Eastwood said, '100 years from now and more, people will look back on this generation of films, and the guy who will standout more than anyone else will be Tom Cruise.'
They'll all fade in to obscurity. Leo or Pitt will probably be the most watched in the long run because of Titanic and Fight Club. People like to rewatch those movies for some reason.
Tom ofc
Cruise. Leo is good but doesn't have his own brand in the same way and I can already barely remember why Brad Pitt roles
They will be on par. The vast majority won't give a shit and the few people who care will be familiar with the three
Brad outshined Leo in One Upon a Time in Hollywood and Tom outshined Brad in Interview With The Vampire so Tom wins.
Cruise is the biggest actor in the world
Cruise is legit the last movie star
Leo = Paul Newman
Tom = Burt Lancaster
Brad = Gregory Peck
>Leo
He's cute! 😉
>Tom
He's confident B-)
>Pitt
He's edgy >:D
I consider Depp to be the greatest movie star of the era. He had a great track record until he started with all the Pirate movies and CGI fests. Pitt is the weak link in a number of classic 90s movies. I despise DiCrapio. A number of notable directors filmographies went to shit once they started casting him. Cruise? Underwhelming star personality, but I agree with Eastwood’s assessment.
>Eastwood’s opinion
Damn I thought it was going to be Clint dabbing on Tom for being a manlet but he actually believes Tom will be the top movie star people will remember in 100 years. Cool
Lmao at depp
depp's career trajectory is absolutely fascinating. his 90's lineup is hit after hit but then it falls off immediately after the new millenium. i think he was just too successful for his own good, he could've kept getting interesting roles but he had zero pressure to go outside his emo comfort zone once the pirates checks started rolling in. if tim burton had died in a car accident in 2000 we'd probably still lump depp in with leo and pitt, their best movie together is still ed wood
Based on roles in movies: DiCaprio>Cruise>Pitt
All three, just in different ways.
But the most, probably Leo.
Do YOU remember Cary Grant?
Whatevah happun'd ta' Gary Coopah? Da' strawng, soilent type?!
I remember my uncle molesting me while doing impressions of him. I was never the same again after that
Nobody remembers shit hollywood this and superbowl # 65 that its not history we are not witnessing history constantly we are just being goy Black folk while israelites continue on all histrionic like God I hate Americans and their israelite handlers
Leo. He gets prime puss to this day because of Titanic. He's controlled like three generations of women coming to age because of that film. That movie is always going to be a girls first favorite movie. Like others said, the other thing is how you look in the future. Leo has the most distinct name of the three. Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt sound like generic chad names. Leonardo DiCaprio is exotic as frick.
It’s between Tom and Brad. Iconic actors like Jimmy Stewart,Cary Grant, and Robert Redford weren’t chameleons like Leo. They had distinct mannerisms and charm that they kept consistent from role to role. Tom’s probably the easiest to do an impression of so my bet is on him, but Brad Pitt has more women lusting after him so maybe him.
Leo is good but isn't a chameleon, Pitt has more range. Cruise has the least but has the most intensity.
dicaprio = the titanic guy, if he's lucky. nobody cares about his nolan film anymore. once upon a time in hollywood might become a cult classic (good luck), but that's basically it
tom cruise = stands out as a leading man in a ton of movies, has eyes wide shut and vanilla sky as well as a bunch of other stuff.
braddu pittu = also has a ton of leading man movies, has se7en and fight club
while I was leaning pitt, cruise might actually end up taking it in the end.
Tom Cruise is one of the few celebrities who will still be remembered in 2072. Almost everyone else will be forgotten
I'm semi-inclined to agree. Of the three in the OP, Tom Cruise has the longest career and the most amount of hits. But Brad Pitt and Leo are still really famous. I think there was a time where Brad was like the most well-known actor in the world.
Will probably be hate campaigns against them in order to embolden and energize the less-white youth of that time.
Don't forget Leo is 10 years younger than the other two and still hasn't peak.
He peaked in Departed. Fatboy's career is done
Likely Leo both on filmography and star power.
>Titanic
>Departed
>Django
Plus the guy will be 90 and still have 19 year old model actresses on his yacht and filtering them out at 25.
departed and django have had zero staying power outside of facebook memes. in the end, I think he was just too picky with his roles, both pitt and cruise have always been in something.
Leo. He will still be fricking 18-24 year olds
neither just bruce lee but not even through his movies just urban legends that will get more and more ridiculous with time
leo seems more down to earth than other two
get the same creepy vibes from brad pitt as you do from tom cruise except in his case it's adopting Black folk instead of i'm a cult leader
Only real men will be remembered
i like number 4
Holy shit
Biggest star: Tom
Best filmography: Brad
Leo: ???
most pussy
Best females
Tom has more kino than both of them combined
Tom Cruise probably
Who are the other two guys?
Clooney and Depp could've been included here had they not stumbled so much in their careers from about 2000 on. Though they have some bright spots throughout.
who will be remembered the most of these three?
Robert DeNiro definitely
Who is the one in the middle? Steve Buscemi? Stanley Tucci?
Roberto Pasquale
al
Scarface is the one movie everyone knows, I know 18 year old club prostitutes who quote Scarface. They don't even know Godfather or any movie De Niro did.
DeNiro. They're all great actors but ironically Pesci is the best of all three.
cruise is midget
leo is fatty
brad is kino
some savage that lives in the woods probably knows who tom cruise is
Probably Cruise based on the longevity of his career. Everyone fades eventually, though, young people don't really know much about Burt Reynolds, for instance, and he was the biggest movie star on the planet for around five years straight in the late 70s.
Jake Gyllenhaal
Zoomers can't remember what happened yesterday. Unless there's an algorithm in 50 years that reminds them, they won't even be able to name those 3 actors.
Cruise. The idea of Leo being a great generational actor is marketing.
Cruise. Hell, Cruise will probably still be ALIVE in 50 years. The man is an unstoppable force of kino.
they make a product that i consume/use and get paid unreasonably money for it, they produce a thing i occasionally use, like some ramen noodles i eat sometimes or toilet paper.
I stop caring about these products after i used them in fact i dont even care about these products while i use them, i never ask myself who made this toilet paper and if its famous in 50 years because i am not a deluded chld that thinks this toilet paper is somehow special or has any significance in my life after i am done wiping my butthole with it. It is a manufactured product, i exchange money for it and use it, its not some life altering thing i remember even a day after using it, freaking 50 years lmao get frick outta here child.
Pitt and Cruise
I don't think people will be able to remember Matt Damon's name
Leo because of Titanic moisturizing every teen girl's panties.
Pitt maybe because of the cult status of Fight Club
Cruise will be forgotten outside the Scientology circles.
You don't get it
Because he's in those Scientology circles, people won't forget him - they'll make sure of it
no, you don't get it, longevity of something is determined by how much it's gonna appeal to teen girls, so it forms their perspective on things for the rest of their lives, they're gonna tell their daughters about it. Males will just follow because they want to get in their panties.
Leo has the Titanic moisturizer( imdb rating's went from 7.4 to almost 8.0 in the past 8 years based on female teen ratings alone). The other two is a coin toss.
these two are your target audience
Cruise by far. Leo and Brad Pitt will be like Tyrone Power, for instance, whereas Cruise will be a character in itself, a larger than life persona whose movies have a consistent average quality both in terms of action and production values. Tom Cruise is the greatest action movie star of all time.
I was with you til greatest action star cause that is bullshit when Arnie exists
Arnie and Stallone have 1)done too many mediocre movies and 2)fell quality and acting-wise at the latter part of their careers. Cruise is more consistent all the way, he cares about his filmography more than the paycheck-- and he's a better, more versatile actor.
in 50 years most of you will be at least 75 years old and have forgotten most of your private relationships you ever had.. if you remember any of these 3 c**ts at that point in time i will personally visit your 75 year old ass and punch you in the face.
At 75 years old, I'll be glad for the human contact.
🙁
*hug*
You guys are really underestimating Titanic. You might not like it, but that's babys first romance. And Hollywood today is never going to blow as much as Cameron did on it. Titanic is going to be watched for generations by little girls until Leo gets his hands on them when they're 20.
Probably Leo. His lead should be bigger than it is though, his choice in roles hasn't been great. He got such a massive jump with Titanic, just an unreal boost in popularity at the time, but it feels like he should've done way more. Too many weird roles, not enough taking advantage of his charisma.
Cruise is second. He's easily the king of the summer blockbuster from this group, but he never had the bang Leo did at his peak. His movies also aren't as iconic in general.
Pitt is third, which he should be because he's the worst actor of the 3. That's why his best movies typically involve him in an ensemble cast or paired with 1-2 superstars. He isn't on that Leo-tier of acting to carry a movie alone.
The big exception is Moneyball, great in that movie. He's also the best producer of the cast and I think the best at picking roles/scripts in general, Leo should take some tips. Pitt also I think is the most likely to have a great "old guy" career, so the order might change depending on what these guys do post-60. If he finds the right role/franchise (which he's been great at), I think there's a chance he jumps up ahead of both guys.
So hard to top Leo's peak though. Arguably the highest peak of any actor/actress.
>So hard to top Leo's peak though.
Titanic. He didn't carry the other box-office hits he starred in except maybe for Wolf of Wall Street
Nah, Cruise will have a superior career, he knows his action times are over, Top Gun Maverick and the back to back filmed MI movies are his last hooray.
He also proved himself as a character actor and got some recognition, he obviously also doesn't fear to be ugly on screen (his very visible crying in Magnolia and a fat balding manlet in Tropic Thunder)
Oh and the entire plot of Vanilla Sky obviously aswell. Cruise is kinda blackpilled now when I think about it. The entire story of Vanilla Sky is about how powerful the Halo effect is.
none, they are all egoists who haven't ascended
i've never met anybody irl that actually still cares about tom cruise, don't understand why this board is so hyped about him
plenty of people know and love leo and brad tho
Anecdotal evidence. Look it up moron
Johnny Depp is above all 3
pitt>cruise>leo in ability and relevance
this guy is a bigger star, way more talented and was a heartthrob to women in their prime
Cruise.
In 50 years time, Scientology will have become the largest religion in the world. dwarfing both Christianity and Islam. Cruise will be one of the major saints, like Santa Clause.
Considering Top Gun is still rele, Cruise has more staying power. Plus he's got the MI franchise. It's no contest, really. Leo is a forgettable actor and Brad hasn't done anything as epic as Tom.
Cruise absolutely mogs both
>Saved action movies
>Doesn't pathetically oscarbait
>Doesn't go along with "The Message"
>IRL actually takes stand in things like psychiatry as opposed to Leo's "Good things are good, bad things are bad" non-position
>Doesn't do capeshits
>Refuses to do phoney CGI fests
>Taught a bunch of Hollywood actors how to fly military jets
>Grabbed onto side of the plane and flew that way
And most importantly he does it not for the stupid clout or brownie points with the Academy (like Leo with his liver-eating-glass-breaking nonsense) but for the raw realism of his movies. And it shows on screen.
He’s so cool bros. This pic is already becoming iconic
That manlet doesnt mog anyone
recommend me some edward norton movies
American History X
Death to Smoochy
The People vs Larry Flint
The Score
ty senpai, already watched american history x
what about fight club? I left that off, cause I assumed you saw it too. I also left out Rounders by accident
didn't know about rounders, appreciated
AI technology and transhumanism will render celebreties obsolete.
No one will give a frick because there will be simulation technology where you can insert yourself or friends into existing films and rewrite the scripts.
Look at the deepfake tech along with AI voice synthesizers and tell me this isnt true.
You will have people doing shit like inserting themselves into batman or putting a young Marlon Brando into the Dark Knight trilogy.
At best celebrity personalities and their performances will be looked at like stock images or sound effects.
The Social Credit system will reward people for rewritng past movies with modern day political commentary like Batman is good because he used mass surveilance tech to hunt down corrupt officials.
Shit like the youtube alogorthym and echo chambers will be dialed up to 11 where groups of people will be looking to create messages like trust the government or dont go past your carbon limit
Agreed. I thought what would be worse and more self-aggrandizing than tiktok preening and the answer was obvious:
>Let people star themselves in movies and then show it to their friends
MI2
Why don't people talk about Tom Cruise's handsomeness like they do about Brad Pitt? I think that they're both comparably handsome.
it's because they're too busy making fun of his height. But I do agree that they both have comparably nice faces, maybe Cruise is even pulling ahead with age. On the other hand Leo looks like shit now and has for years
no, pitt mogs cruise
looking back, cruise was always a bit funny looking but nobody really noticed because he's insanely charismatic
Cruise looks gorgeous in this interview.
Cruise because he will still be alive. Somehow.
You laugh you lose
Dicaprio has the better roles and peak quality films (titanic, catch me if you can, departed, inception, wolf wall street, the aviator... ).
After that it's Cruise who has the better and more consistent career, and last is brad pit who has the most social media/magazine interest (which is the most fickle).
Crusie will be remembered, but Leo’s filmography is better. if Pitt marries Anniston and has blonde babies, probably wouldve went to american royalty
Scorsese and Tarantino have turned Leo into a modern De Niro. So probably him.
Not Brad