You can create your own anti-woke movies and compete with Hollywood from the comfort of your own home with digital actors and any setpiece you can imagine by using PC hardware and your own imagination. You can even make money doing this, the same way book writers do by self-publishing on Amazon or whatever.
How is AI bad again?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
I don't want to create movies from my own home. I pay the electricity bill. I want to watch movies.
No it won't
>i-i-it will NEVER be able to do hands- OH NO IT'S DOING THEM AHHHHHHH ESG-MAN HEEEEELLLLLLPPPP!!!!
pedowood dying will be glorious
im gonna make so many porn movies with AI it'll be crazy
that graph implies AGI will never be achieved
AI can't do hands.
neither can 99% of people
You know it absolutely can, though, right? And you know you're moronic?
>And you know you're moronic?
You completely misunderstood the post, and now you're upset and less likely to admit you misunderstood it.
>You completely misunderstood the post
Wrong.
>and now you're upset
Double wrong.
>less likely to admit you misunderstood it.
Correct but only on a technicality, because I did not misunderstand it. Not a good thing to be correct on, so really? Triple wrong.
I was aware the "AI can't do hands" argument was outdated, which is why I chose to post it as a humorous dig at the idea that AGI will never be achieved.
Are you Nathan Fielder?
Are you the anon who was upset about misunderstanding my post?
That's not a no!!
Anyways, you're not funny and you can't even make people upset (which is comically easy), robo-sperg. Bad luck out there.
>!!
oof, cringe, etc.
AI IS GOING TO STOP IMPROVING ANY SECOND NOW. ITS STARTING TO BE TRAINED ON AI ART WHICH MEANS THAT IT WILL CREATE A DEATH SPIRAL AND KILL ALL AI ART HAHAHAHFHAHFA
>Ai art keeps improving, as does AI music, AI films etc etc
WHHYYYYYYYYY???!! WHY IS AI STILL IMPROVING? I POSTED 4 GRAPHS THAT SAID WE HAD REACHED PEAK AI! ITS SUPPOSED TO STOP IMPROVING! WHY IS PROGRESS OCCURING I'M SCARED!!!!
This is you.
~~*artist*~~homosexuals btfo
Why are anti art gays so happy about people not being able to make a living doing art anymore?
>Dude ai art is beating humans we're winning.
Why are you glad about this? You will never be able to make a living creating passionate art. Content creation will be handed over to corporations and prompt typer jeets, over passionate dedicated artists with a skill that requires (or used to) monetary compensation. Before anybody could make a living making whatever art they wanted if they had the dedication or passion. Now in a lost ai-world those "classical artists" who spent 10k hours perfecting their craft will have no purpose. Now ai sloppers are glad said people will be working at mcdonalds while aome jeet in Afghanistan makes 2 dollars a day to make prompts for hollywood.
I cannot speak for all of them, but I think most of them are specifically talking about "plumber" artists, not "real" artists. They are actually probably just using "artist" as a proxy for "blue haired lefty queer person" if we're being completely honest. If I only speak for myself, and as someone who likes to draw and model and animate I have nothing but excutement for the AI revolution, although I'm in a position where art was never my actual source of income, so I guess I'm coming at it from a different perspective. For me having a tool that just eliminates all my technical constraints and givea me instant output is incredibly exciting because for me the purpose of creating something is really not about the process itself, it's just about the act of creating and actualizing your vision, regardless of the methods by which you make it happen. As for working artists, I honestly don't feel too bad for them either for a couple of reasons; 1. to the degree they are being displaced by the technology, they are not uniquely under pressure from the AI revolution. Most other professional activities are will be similarly affected by it, so it's not it's "unfair" 2. like I alluded to before, I'm not really a romantic for the artform, to me the art is all that matters, more even than the artist himself, so definitely more than the process. Also, like I said, most currently working artists are not "real" artists, they are essentially plumbers. They are basically to their comissioners/employers/patrons what AI is for everyone. They are not actually creating anything new or original, and often theyr output would actual be better done by an AI that blindly followed the requester's prompts. So in essence all that's being lost is the artist's fare, no value is actually being lost.
Now as for "real" artists, thise aren't going anywhere and they are basically unaffected by AI penetration into the market, because theae are the actual creative people.
>>I cannot speak for all of them, but I think most of them are specifically talking about "plumber" artists, not "real" artists.
Unless you're well connected and have a rich family and don't need to work in the first place, you're a "plumber" artist and a "real" artist at the same time because what else would you live from?
The real artist will not need to do plumbing anymore to finance his actual art because now he will too have access to AI which will allow him to realize his vision a lot faster and close to 0 cost. If anything, AI will just make the real artists even more proficient and impactful.
are you ok friend?
>>The real artist will not need to do plumbing anymore to finance his actual art because now he will too have access to AI which will allow him to realize his vision a lot faster and close to 0 cost.
Yes and he'll get 0 money for it while not actually doing art which he wants to do because he's an artist, while the guy at the grocery store will still demand money for food?
Real artists do not and have never done art for the money. Money is not the currency artists traffic in. This is where you're fricked up in your view of things. To the degree the great artists of the present and past have ever chased money was entirely so that they could finance they're big ambitious projects. If the cost of such projects both in time and material resources approaches 0 there's no need to chase money.
I am not interested or am I looking at this at all in relation to money. The only people worried about money are the plumbers, which I have no care for because I don't think their work will be a real loss and I don't feel particularly sorry for them when everyone else, including people in my particular professional field are under the same amount of pressure. Get over yourselves.
Ok so you only want the nepo babies to make art i.e. you support the banana-taped-to-the-wall "art" which we already established in
so either stop trolling or frick off.
At this point you're either baiting or you're for too dumb to care to argue with: how would a software that is open to anyone who has a basic internet connection with the power to fully realize any audiovisual vision of even people lacking formal education or technical ability benefit the elites and the people with access to resources over the dirt poor disadvantaged plebeian? Are you legitimately moronic?
Yes, to some extent, because up to now there has always been a cost associated with the production of art, thus full time artists have always had to chase money to some degree or another, but as I said, as that cost is reduced, the need to chase money decreases. But don't get it twisted, the artist is not making art to chase the money, the artist makes money to chase the art.
>At this point you're either baiting or you're for too dumb to care to argue with: how would a software that is open to anyone who has a basic internet connection with the power to fully realize any audiovisual vision of even people lacking formal education or technical ability benefit the elites and the people with access to resources over the dirt poor disadvantaged plebeian? Are you legitimately moronic?
Because the only "artists" who will be able to make shitloads of money from art are the nepo babies who already have money. I don't know why you like this, instead of artists being able to make money from art like they have been for thousands of years. Will you give them your money so that they have something to live on instead?
Ok, you are a fricking idiot and this is my last (You)
anon, the pipeline that was laid out for you was
>passionate artist has ambition
>ambition is costly
>artist seeks money to fulfill ambition
This is the only reason a passionate artist seeks money. But with AI, ambition doesn't cost. Meaning the passionate are free from the shackles of money.
Somehow you got this flipped around in your head and convinced yourself someone said "only the currently rich should be passionate," because you're incredibly stupid.
>But with AI, ambition doesn't cost.
But life still does and you can't get money for art anymore, moron.
This. You can't just set up a prompt and go to work and then come home to your finished gen. You have to be able to afford sitting in front of the screen watching it render.
>he still doesn't get it
The only reason an artist seeks money is to fulfill ambition.
What does he eat moron?
>he's never heard of a starving artist
stop biting
its not bait, he's really that stupid. thus, I am amused.
>Real artists do not and have never done art for the money.
Bullshit. It's ALWAYS about the money.
that's not real art, that's capitalist commissioned crap like whatever that fascist church shit painted on a ceiling or that one painting artgays like with all the laughing slavic people signing the declaration of independence
>all the laughing slavic people signing the declaration of independence
lmao
>that one painting artgays like with all the laughing slavic people signing the declaration of independence
> O Sultan, Turkish devil and damned devil’s kith and kin, assistant to Lucifer himself. What the Devil kind of knight are thou, that canst not slay a hedgehog with your naked arse? The devil shits, and your army eats. Thou shalt not, thou son of a prostitute, make subjects of Christian sons; we have no fear of your army, by land and by sea we will battle with thee. Frick thy mother.
> Thou Babylonian scullion, Macedonian wheelwright, brewer of Jerusalem, goat-fricker of Alexandria, swineherd of Greater and Lesser Egypt, pig of Armenia, Podolian thief, catamite of Tartary, hangman of Kamyanets, and fool of all the world and underworld, an idiot before God, grandson of the Serpent, and the crick in our dick. Pig’s snout, mare’s arse, slaughterhouse cur, unchristened brow, screw thine own mother!
> So the Zaporozhians declare you to be a lowlife. You won’t even be herding pigs for Christians. Now we’ll conclude, for we don’t know the date and don’t own a calendar; the moon’s in the sky, the year with the Lord, the day’s the same over here as it is over there; for this kiss our arse!
> – Koshovyi otaman Ivan Sirko, and the entire Zaporozhian Host.
What prompt/style?
>Now as for "real" artists, thise aren't going anywhere and they are basically unaffected by AI penetration into the market, because theae are the actual creative people.
Complete bullshit, but you've now shown your hand and we know you're a black lesbian trans Californian commie American shithead with a family from Pakistani mafia who is funneling their slave money to politicians through your "art" so frick off.
99% of what users spit out will be trash and most will use it to make a movie where their favourite Cinemaphile waifus will have lesbian sex for two hours anyway.
>99% of what users spit out will be trash
1% will be kino
This so much! Current hit rate is prolly the same, 99% kosher 1% Watchable.
Made up numbers. In reality this technology is closer to tiktok than to movie industry. Did tiktok improve entertainment? Made it more sophisticated and intellectual?
The same will happen with more advanced AI. Internet will be flooded by short AI videos made by third worlders.
>did tiktok improve entertainment
unironically yes
you know it to be true. more eyeballs on tiktok than film or tv. you might not consider it "good" or "entertaining" but people vote with their clicks. they voted for tiktok. they'd rather watch makeup tutorials or shitty dancing than a marvel film.
it has already won. you're just old and you don't get it.
>more eyeballs on tiktok than film
How is that improving entertainment
Is it making it more widespread? Yes
Is it making it of higher quality? Not a chance
quality is subjective. people watching tiktok think its more entertaining than hollywood.
this says more about hollywood than tiktok. slop sequels and reboots and agenda-driven bullshit that nobody likes. hollywood had everything and threw it away.
you might think tiktok is "low quality" but relative to hollywood, it's wagyu steak. the proof is people prefer watching tiktok.
high quality doesn't mean what you think is high quality. you're a pretentious dickhead. you don't represent the normal person.
this is what I mean about more good content. it's not what *you* think is good. it's more content that people want. and AI will make that happen.
Call it by its real name then, its not "good content", its just more "Mass appealing content".
Idk about you but some girl lipsyncing amadela six times does not count as quality content even if it gets half a billion views
>libcucks scared of cinema that criticizes them
>has no idea what he's talking about and can't refute anything so resorts to the canned response that we're scared
Do the one about hands next
You lost, woke.
Criticize me all you want, at least be tasteful about it and make a good film
99% of what the film industry already spits out is trash
And the absolute worst of that trash will still be better than the best AI "art"
I guess it's a bad thing to give this power to the masses then
we better leave it only in the hands of Hollywood.
>everything is trash
>therefore more trash is good
artroony cope
Everything hollywood produces is trash but it makes trillions of dollars for israelites. AIslop will make money for very few and not a lot of it while completely destroying hollywood
if you really think aislop is going to burn hollywood, I half expect you to believe the world is flat. Hollywood is just gonna make worse slop powered by AI, put the hollywood stamp on it and ship it off to all the Hollywoodgays that suckle every drop of shit that comes out of that place
>99% of what users spit out will be trash
still better odds than netflix / disney / holllywood
Do you genuinely believe that? You can already use AI to make something good. What people make? Memes, funny pictures, fakes and porn. That's it.
I agree with anon here, the potential is there but its being wasted on coomers, and techgays who think sending ai memes will get people to like them
tv and film today all has the same problem. good production values, terrible scriptwriting.
AI lowers the playing field for production values. some teenager in their bedroom is going to be able to make content that's visually comparable to modern studios. the barrier to entry is gone. they don't need millions of dollars and producers to greenlight their ideas. they just need time.
we're going to see an explosion in content. most bad. some good. but most importantly, different. we're going to see a diversity of ideas never seen before. and the crap scriptwriting we see today, most of it agenda-driven propaganda, will be only a tiny drop in a sea of content.
terrible scriptwriting will never go away. but it be drowned out by quality content.
and we know this will happen because it already happened to music. a kid with a macbook and garageband can make content today that only a few decades ago required studios and experts and lots of money. the barrier to entry was what held them back. not a lack of imagination or talent.
that's going to happen to the visual medium. and it's already happening. netflix / disney / hollywood are fricked.
>netflix / disney / hollywood are fricked.
They will be as soon as I figure out how stable video diffusion works.
>it will be drowned out by quality content
do you forget that people watch the most dogshit film and defend its worth, Marvel being an example of a company that produces turboshit but makes more bank than anyone.
even if, the amount of AIslop being produced by teens in their basement will be proportional to the amount of slop being produced by big time studios and completely negate the quality content
most content will be bad, same as it ever was.
but the amount of quality content will explode. in total numbers. not as a percentage. maybe as a percentage even lower, because so much bad content being made. but 1000s of people with great ideas but previously impossible to make, because they weren't rich, because they didn't have the correct political views, because they weren't sucking some producer's dick. they now have the tools to get their ideas into the visual medium.
more good content. more diverse content. more ideas. more people empowered to make content, both good and bad, but overall the amount of good will increase.
If you volunteer as tribute to scour the thousands of new daily uploads to find something thats not slop, please, be my guest. If you're not willing to actively watch through the hundreds of shit films currently being produced to find one gem, you will not when there are a thousand fold options to choose from.
stupid moron, how do you think an upvoting system works
Stupid moron, you think people are gonna upvote quality film?
They're gonna upvote slop like spider-man and blended
>quality content will explode
Yeah, like with current AI that flooded pixiv, deviantart and every other art website. It all look the same, it's all shit.
No. You're wrong. The thing is creative people with AI will be able to make amazing things that were impossible to make alone just a few years ago. But the problem is who's distributing things.
Self publishing exploded these past few decades, but literature right now is a complete shit show. Publishers control the bookstores, they control the literary awards, they control the algorithms. If someone self publishes something of actual quality, it gets buried under an avalanche of LGBTQ bullshit that publishers push to the forefront. It'll be the same way with AI movies.
AI movies will not receive any award nominations, they will not be distributed in stores, they will be buried under advertisements for Avengers 8 and Dune 5.
You can already use cameras and crews to make something good. What people make? Woke shit, reboots, restarts, stretching and milking dead series. That's it.
>make a movie where their favourite Cinemaphile waifus will have lesbian sex for two hours
Literally me
and how will that be my problem
iits better than studios catering to those morons by making shitfilms
And Reddit will make it the gayest thing possible, the obstructions put in the way will censor actual creativity just like Hollywood, and then Hollywood will start using it and all movies are going to be AI garbage. Anyone who thinks this will be a net positive are moronic. Hollywood is already using AI to write scripts. You can't sit there are tell me the Fallout Script and a lot of these movies are not completely written by AI or at least largely written by
Which is why a new wave of artists will have to be even more tech literate, like each generation before them
Open source AI and uncensored social platforms are the future of unfettered creative expression
>ai will be used for *gasp*... PORN?!?
child porn specifically
>their favourite Cinemaphile waifus will have lesbian sex for two hours anyway.
David?
>their favourite Cinemaphile waifus will have lesbian sex for two hours
Couldn't you just put you and your waifu in the movie and watch yourself take her to pound town?
What will matter is the first critically acclaimed fully AI movie and the first series to air on TV.
bruh you're going to be generating content on your own machine.
>bruh you're going to be making videos at home!!!
>youtube
you really just need to admit to yourself that you have no idea what you're talking about.
thinking out loud, good for you.
>no u
pathetic.
No it won't. Even if it's ever able to produce a coherent 2-hour feature film(and it is if, not when), you aren't considering the computational cost. It'll be prohibitively expensive for the average person.
ai's main use will be to create an ever increasing report on you by tracking your internet usage, social media presence, communications, gps phone location, banking and travel combining that with camera surveillance and then coming up with a "yes or no" answer to whether it is essential for you to be alive or not at this current stage.
that's gunna be it's job mate not making fanfiction movies for you
>internet usage
>just shitposting and porn
>social media presence
>zero
>communications
>zero
>gps phone location
>home, work, sometimes the shops
>banking
>open to the government anyway
>travel
>zero
Wow I'm a waste of compute cycles.
you fella's seem to be forgetting your porn history bro?
Government officials crank it to far worse things than I do
>AI will compile all your Cinemaphile posts and create a public profile
>people will be able to browse through all your posts and every image you've uploaded just by googling your name
how fricked are you?
>Behold! The great anti-woke movie that competes with Hollywood...
This is months old, which is basically decades old with how fast AI development is flying, leaving you either dishonest or moronic. Pick your poison, dunce.
And still no one cares about anything AI generated.
>And still no one cares about anything AI generated.
except we talk about AI every day on Cinemaphile now
Sure, we talk about the theory and speculate about it.
Nobody actually posts anything AI generated and if they do, no one cares about it or replies to it except maybe to make fun of its flaws.
>Nobody actually posts anything AI generated
only because the tech is so new.
wait until you see what people come up with in a matter of years. you'll see Cinemaphile users post short films here.
>makes threads everyday about “scientists predict one day in the future we will be able to”
seems kind of reddit
there's reddit users making big money from short stories they post on reddit so don't be shocked if you see them making actual movies someday for money.
there is nothing that will stop their work getting stolen and reworked.
god bless AI.
>open source kinos turning into even better kinos by contributors
The future is bright
it was/is a dark time when all OC content gets stolen and posted on youtube for money.
be careful what you wish for.
monkey's hand. etc. etc.
's reddit users making big money from short stories they post on reddit
How does that translate into money?
they read them on youtube like audiobooks or something, I think.
Here's the AI art "art" cycle
>new breakthrough
>everyone gets excited and oohs and ahhs at how advanced it is now
>people play with it for a while
>some time passes and everyone realizes that everything AI makes is boring samey slop and it's still very limited
>no one cares
>repeat every 6 months or so
I see no reason to believe this will ever change.
this for sure. I don't give a flying frick what other gays make with AI, I only care about what *I* make. Speculation about the subject as a whole and talking about it is the only topic anyone can get out of this, no one is sharing shit and for good reason because it turns out anything anyone makes in general is just generic trash. it turns out that even if you cut out the middle man, there's no saving bad ideas and dull prompts
People were scared of cameras at one point, too. They had nothing on paintings.
Keep investing in carriages, my man, those "car" things are so stupid, you're totally right.
Do you actually believe you're making a good point here? Do you sit back in your chair and say "heh, got him"?
Cars and horse-drawn carriages have absolutely no relevance here. Cars have nothing in common with LLMs, except that they are both human inventions. There is no grounds for an analogy here. You are not saying anything of substance. Think hard and come up with something better.
Actually, they do. They're just tools, just as AI is a tool. To say AI will never be a relevant tool is beyond moronic, especially if your argument is "Well that Will Smith eating pasta video was ugly!" which yours seems to be.
If your calcified brain needs a movie comparison, you're the guy panicking because people are using computers to generate images of dinosaurs instead of making puppets and telling me the computers will never catch on. It's just nonsense.
Heh, got him.
>To say AI will never be a relevant tool
No one is saying this. AI already IS a relevant tool and will continue to be. If you need a reminder of what we're talking about, look at the OP image. moron.
God, your only purpose is making useless noise, huh? Sad existence. Be better.
>>And still no one cares about anything AI generated.
Can you read, my son?
Oh I get it. You're trying to prove me wrong that "no one cares about anything AI generated" by using ChatGPT to generate your responses. That's very clever
I accept your concession. I wish I could say it's been fun but you're quite dull.
>This is months old, which is basically decades old with how fast AI development is flying
lmao no this shit has already plateaued, it'll be years before we see any significant improvements again.
Demonstrably incorrect. Thank you, next question?
One year ago you would be posting a badly rendered image of a character with 3 fricked up hands.
I know that some(especially very young) people have a hard time grasping the concept of improving a technology due to their lack of experience but with the pace it's happening in AI development you must be fricking moronic not being able to see where this is moving towards.
>you must be fricking moronic not being able to see where this is moving towards.
all i see is poor people grasping for that AI nickel whilst being a drain on their power grid(s)
Still more entertaining that every single wokeslop
looks amazing compared to a year ago
sirs this looks better than real life you have to admit the technology of AI has improved significantly over the past year
past sirs thought the car was a fad or cinema woul never replace theatre but we proved them wrong many kisses and love from Pimpri-Chinchwad
t. Praveed
It's surreal to realize this isn't actually real, that "real" is just a perception on your brain
Problem is normies actually think a machine is producing humans mocaps and cloth physics and iray light casting at unreal engine 8 levels, when in fact, this is a machine simply outputting pixels in a place that you expect them to be
Like, you give a person 2 white squares, and you give them 100 pictures of similarly colored squares, and make them choose two expected colors on those squares based on the pictures and that's it, times 5 million
Lynchian, beats anything modern Hollywood has made
>AI movies kill Hollywood
WE'RE BACK BABY
̶>̶A̶I̶ ̶c̶a̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶d̶o̶ ̶f̶a̶c̶e̶s̶
̶>̶A̶I̶ ̶c̶a̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶d̶o̶ ̶h̶a̶n̶d̶s̶
>AI can't do a perfect 2 hour movie
This is definitely the last time AI advances.
They're so terrified. Four years ago A.I. could barely manage to create images, now, with a mere sentence, A.I. could generate a near flawless video clip. Imagine 18 months from now! Hollywood is dead!
And Not Soon Enough It Was!
I do think AI will run up against a processing wall pretty soon. It's improving faster than we can make better hardware for it. More computers can only compensate so much.
>ask ai how to make faster comptuters
ezpz
That clip of a yeti and some kind of stolen child tumbling down a hill in the forest is a more impressive display of confusing AI slop kino.
come home white man
>halcyon days
>e-girls
lmao
>e-girls
huh? I'm not sure you know what that word means
flat chested, youthful girl.
>woman suggestively taking down her top
>wholesome
shame on you
where was that implied?
There were times when actual movies, animation, computers, internet, blah blah didn't exist.
Now look how far we've come from no AI to this. Why so smug when proven wrong so many times?
>How is AI bad again?
The movies you are going to be allowed to create, while technically impressive, will lack the ephemerality of manmade work
This isn't inherent to AI, it's just how supply and demand works.
If you could only create ONE ai pic, and it's looks great, you can show it to people and they'll praise you. Now, if you show them 100 pics, the praise will be diminished. If you keep churning out 1 million pics, your AI will have no value.
AI gays thinks they can infinitely capitalize on people's awe because their pics look good, and this is just not sustainable, not when I can create also similar pics and eventually they can do it too.
You can live in your own personal AI heaven, but it'll also be a charade, as you'll know the heaven next door is the same as yours, with a slight variation, and you'll treasure that variation.
Which puts you back at the start of extracting more pleasure from the difference, than from the technical impressiveness
>ephemerality
So much for "film is forever", huh?
"AI" won't be you sitting there making pictures, that screams you have such a limited knowledge of what AI is currently and where people are trying to take it.
In your supply/demand argument, it's like you're trying to say there's a difference between hastily shitted out noise versus something created with passion. Why do you believe that creators using AI won't have followings, just as YouTubers currently do? That there won't be varying levels of quality in AI works?
Creating something with AI is about knowing how to manipulate the system into getting the image you want. There's absolutely a skill to getting the image(s) you desire and this skill will be coveted whether you like it or not.
>AI gays thinks they can infinitely capitalize on people's awe because their pics look good, and this is just not sustainable, not when I can create also similar pics and eventually they can do it too.
There's a billion cameras in the world yet not everyone can take an award winning photo. Same with AI pics or movies, billion people can churn out garbage, people will still recognise quality
good
hollywood hasnt made any good media in over 10 years
AI has made thousands of kinos already
yeah man can't wait for millions of pajeets to post their AI movies online
Asked my AI girlfriend to pitch a movie idea.
AI will be KINO. I can finally make my own Joker movie.
>make my own joker movie
YOU ain't making shit, the semi sentient robot that's tracking your location and sending it to the company you shill out is, and even then its gonna be the most plain, plastic piece of garbage film humanity has ever seen
AI in the hands of actual filmmakers and writers might result in something worthwhile. Scripts that were shelved could be made into finished movies with a very small budget.
But why would I ever want to see what the average pleb shits out? Is there any reason to believe AI won't do for filmmaking what smartphones did for photography? As in, flooded the internet with endless low quality crap from people who never picked up a camera before and do not understand the basics.
Let's be realistic. Even if an AI capable of moviemaking was available to the masses, all it would create would be an endless flood, thousands upon thousands of shit every midwit thinking himself an artist would put out. There would be so many, it would not be humanly possible to watch all of them to see if there's any merit in them and you'd most likely be tired of AI films after watching the first three. And there would be thousands to go. I can see it ending up as a meme creation tool, like AI images, but nothing else. The idiots that are a majority of every population ruin every little thing they become interested in.
>but how will you get shekels!?!?
These people have no understanding of human beings.
the israelite fears the AI
yeah i really want one second in between cuts with each shot being disconnected from the next and obvious visual errors and noncomplexity in each one
>t-the AI will never get better....
>y-you will not be able to prompt entire scenes and then just edit the footage yourself
Inundating the visually illiterate with "detail" doesn't make those details less shit anon
artroony having a melty, not able to even form coherent sentences that follow the conversation
>thing is shit
>"NO I WILL BE ABLE TO EDIT IT UNSHIT"
>no it'll still be shit
>"YOU CANT FOLLOW CONVO"
We'll get a version of this that isn't complete trash around the same time they figure out warp speed. For everyone alive today, it's complete fantasy.
>We'll get a version of this
by then the software cracking scene will be AI and decide not to crack..the software for the hardware.
>y-you will not be able to prompt entire scenes and then just edit the footage yourself
See right here you're demonstrating your lack of understanding of this technology. The whole point is you can input the same prompt 1000 times and get 1000 different results.
So how the frick are you going to generate 40 scenes separately and have them be consistent with each other and lack continuity errors and clearly be part of the same vision as if there's a human director?
low IQ artroony post
AI art is the only good thing to look forward to in the future. While it sucks that regular jobs get taken by robots and automation because these people actually provide something to society, the ''artists'' don't provide anything of value and get paid more than anyone except CEOs. These people don't deserve the positions they hold. Sewer workers have more humility and respect for the people they give a service to than ''artists'' who are the most entitled talentless lazy scum alive.
You hear them screech ''reeee, of course all the hard jobs should be automated, but art was supposed to be what we all do for fun'' but you will still be able to make your own art for fun. I can still draw, I can sing, I can play instruments. No one is stopping me. You just won't get paid millions and you will not get a platform to spew anti-white trash.
You yourself don't even believe that.
List of AIpajeet arguments
>you're just scared
>look how much better it got at hands
>remember when people naysayed this other unrelated technology? It's exactly like that
What am I missing?
artroony still seething about muh hands when this hasn't even been a topic for a year and got fixed the same month artrannies whined about it
There's only really one argument
>TWO MORE YEARS SIRS
you're missing variations of
>luddite
>they took our jobs
>learn to code
>ai art has more soul
Cant think of anything else but its usually the same shit over and over like they're all reading from the same script
there are people in this thread that think they are going to own AI content
if only you knew how AI things really are
You can already AI generate animated movies and control every aspect that it generates to change it manually
As soon as Sora is out you can filter it through Sora to get cinematic looking film while easily AI generating or manually editing it
I went to the "short" videos tab
Which is supposedly the meat. The face. The selling point, your behemoth product.
There's 33 shorts there.
You watch 3, and you abandon the page, there's no reason to watch any of the other 30
It all reduces itself to infinite samey slop.
Meanwhile, this shit has 100 shorts, and I fricking can't stop watching
I don't get it, looks like they're AI shorts to me.
I think once it becomes normal to make movies with it and zoomers start popping them out, the standard of quality will drop so much that anyone with even a little knowledge of cinema will be able to draw attention to their works. So yes, that's the right time to learn cinema bros. I also have the same opinion about surgeons.
none of you will admit to supporting this technology in a decade when its only use has been to increase man-made horrors.
No doubt, as soon the technology is advanced and accessible enough we will see some really cool (and disturbing) stuff.
As your image demonstrates, it'll most likely be meme crap over and over and over.
Not that cinema isn't turning into that already, anyway.
>you now remember the ending of Free Guy
I haven't seen that, but if i think about most commercial successes in the last few years, it was viral marketing meme campaigns, like the Berbienehimer shit.
Videogames seem to operate similarly, so it's not just Hollywood either.
It’s one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen. Do you want me to tell you about it?
AI is mostly a pipe dream. all of these empty promises... I've heard them all before with other technologies in the past.
Listen to this:
If AI can create good music in under a minute from one sentence, it will be able to make movie scenes soon enough. Sora with audio and that's it!
>someone releases a public AI
>people use it to generate terrible generic Black person music
the world really does revolve around Black folk
there's billions of them and that wasn't enough, now we need to generate them with AI
>You can create your own anti-woke movies and compete with Hollywood
Conservatives and people on Cinemaphile could've been that ages ago, like historically when mainstream art (or really mainstream anything) isn't working for a big enough community they will create their own independent art scenes, in a more creative world the right would be developing low budget but high soul indie films that cater to their beliefs and would have been doing so for at least the past decade probably creating their own genres and tropes and so on.
But they didn't because modern rightoids can't for the life of them create art, I know I'll probably get a few responses talking about the exceptions and they do exist, but the point is that you (the person reading this) couldn't make good art even if you had every resource at your disposal, you have no soul to express through art and a large chunk of you secretly despise those who do which is why the techbros who create ai typically also fall into the right sphere of culture.
Tl:dr: you are all the Black folk of art
low IQ troony cope
Yeah conservatives more or less don’t have a drive to make art and it is even actually discouraged in some circles in favor of getting a real job tm. When they do it’s obviously conservative and pandering to a market segment like lady ballers or gods not dead
You're terrified aren't you, Hollywood! Don't you get it? Its OVER! You're like those idiots claiming the internet's just a passing fad!
As I said, you obviously petrified ne'er-do-well simpletons, we have Dall-E threads all over the place!
I’m not Hollywood I’m just somebody who likes kino. I make sketches with my friends on the weekends. It’s so much fun to sit there and bounce ideas off of each other then shoot a video based on that. I can’t imagine the inane drivel that would come out if everybody just typed words into a computer. Filming is fun
3/10 for the effort
>effort
Listen you, mong, your very reciprocation to me, as simple as it was, within 18 months, will be able to Generate Kino! Your time is at an end, Hollywood!!!
Of course you'll have mountains of garbage, and, instances of Kino!
Yes and no. I am in the art world and its not as clean cut as that. There are A LOT of very good artists I know who are what you would call right wing and their art represents it. What you are thinking of is basic b***h American conservatives attempting to make art/comedy/what not by appealing to the American Right Wing which co opted, Zionist garbage. Of course nothing creative will come out of a literal genocidal death machine. Same with the left wing shit, nothing creative is coming out of that because its all owned by the same israelites.
I don't want shitty auto-generated movies. That's gen alpha brainrot youtube videos-esque.
can't wait until these anti-woke conservative "kinos" start getting made and turn out to be even worse than current hollywood slop.
the right can't art
and you think the left can?
the slop coming out of hollywood is so bad even the normies are giving up. you think the left has a monopoly on art? the left wouldn't know what art was if it pissed on their face.
what the left does have a monopoly on is having the hugest egos and thinking they're "better". they're as awful as the right but they're too full of themselves to realize.
>and you think the left can?
No, only based centrists should be allowed to create art
almost true
left and right are both the same. they are agenda driven. their politics clouds their minds. so their "art" is just propaganda trying to influence, but all it really does is appeal to their own base.
to make true art you need to transcend the petty politics and tribalism. say something deeper and more meaningful. capture an idea, an emotion, a feeling. neither left nor right can do that because they're slaves to their own ideology.
centrist is not quite right though. a centrist is still a political position. a based artist isn't even a centrist. they operate on a different level.
lefttards and rightoids wouldn't understand. they both believe they're "correct" and the other is "wrong". they never notice they're not even in the game.
Pompt
[lonely adult male]
[little girl]
[romance]
We know this is what every Cinemaphile user would generate
I'm currently toying with making synthwave and lo-fi hiphop.
Can't wait to use this to make music videoes for those tracks.
i could see myself wasting a lot of time doing this
Of course it won't, corporations own AI and will dictate what you can generate and how, they'll set a time limit or whatever.
No its not moron.
The average person has no idea how to write a story that they will actually enjoy. All they can do is say yes or no.
The AI slop flood will just make fanfictions, tumblr and wattpad stories seem like they were produced be mid end studios.
Will there be kinos? Yeah no shit, but no one is going to sift through 1000+ of AI generated content to find it.
still have yet to see someone actually do something more than post a shitty picture of something they generated. no one is using it to its potential or ai is severely overrated
>b-but the publicly available ones are just toys! you’ll see! in a couple years ai will be super powerful!
tell that to vrgays who thought they were gonna take over gaming
It all depends on the availability and limits of AI. I doubt anyone in the public would know 100% what LLM's are capable of so all anyone can do is guess.
Despite that, still gonna say this AI shit is already beginning to burst. The development isn't as exponential as they hyped it up to be 2 years ago.
Tesla still can't get full self driving to work.
ChatGPT can't do college level mathematics. If you doubt me, try making it solve proof by induction. It will fail 90% of the time.
Not only that but it hallucinates a frick ton more than what they say in their research papers.
Image diffusion are still getting a shit ton of artifacts and can't get extremely specific prompts correctly.
you now remember when touch screen tablets were developed by microsoft in the 90's.... they never caught on right?
i'm not tying a touch screen, let alone two of them to my head. I'm not doing that with a tv screen either. i'm just based like that. also, I was brought up that if you sit to close to the tv you'll go blind/glow in the dark.
buttons are still superior. i hate having to fight with my phone when i want to highlight something or select a word when i type.
>No I never ever tried directing anything, filming anything, acting in anything, editing anything, writing anything or animating anything, but with this tool I'll make kino from home!!
Passionless talentless people won't make anything worth watching regardless of how good AI gets
>Sorry, this prompt is deemed harmful and has been blocked
what now moron
not that guy but I remember the glorious days of x-raying in PS and it would let you freely alter images of (US) currency.
I'd rather watch something made by the biggest sperg on Cinemaphile than give my time and money to money grabbign israelites, idiots and prostitutes.
That's what the shills and prostitutes of Hollywood doesn't understand, we've got Dall-E threads all over the place!
Not only is Kino becoming Decentralized but everyone, from Grandmas to Grandpas and all in between has the potential to be Spielberg!
>t. midwit
I have yet to see a single piece of “ai art” that I prefer to any decent hand drawn or painted art. I’m sure something as complex as kino will be even worse
If you think this then you’ve never made anything in your life
You obviously don't have a clue what you're on about! Within a few months A sentence, A few paragraphs at best would be able to generate the likes of the French Connection, China Town, Jaws!
>How is AI bad again?
Because you're fricking moronic. It will be great for about 6 months before true ai emerges and starts culling the useless humans.
>unleashing the creative potential of the masses
thus far Cinemaphile only used AI to make images of george costanza
not even original images, just recreations of stills from seinfeld
Obviously, you too don't know what yours talking about!
We're talking about Chatgpt 5's level of creativity.
Which is at least 18 months off for the massses.
>You can create your own anti-woke movies
No one is talking about corporate controlled A.I.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_(chatbot)
Grok is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot developed by xAI, based on a large language model (LLM). It was developed as an initiative by Elon Musk as a direct response to the rise of OpenAI's ChatGPT which Musk co-founded.[4] The chatbot is advertised as "having a sense of humor" and direct access to Twitter (X).[5][6] It is currently under beta testing for those with the premium version of X.
Musk has some pretty good life successes, like Tesla or Space X, but I don't know for the life of me how does he not kill himself over his failures, like buying an overpriced impossible to de-bot social media and losing the OpenAI train and now having to fight for scraps with every other losing LLM provider
chat gpt got gutted so much, now can't even do basic tasks. when tell him do to something it answers
>"here how YOU can do it"
yeah but you should do it
>"okay, here is an outline, fill out the rest, have fun!"
i cancelled my subscription. gonna use one of those local models.
>new AI
>immediately becomes sexist and racist
>"I-it's just because of the internet trolls!"
I never realized how much control chuds have over the world until fairly recently.
if the autists on this site would spend half the energy they use to make shitpost on something useful, the entire world would be unrecognizible in a year.
Capitalism will never allow that to happen. If OpenAI stayed nonprofit, this thing would have become so much more than a nerd fad.
It will just be porn. Anyone saying otherwise is lying
>because all videos made are porn!
You're being dishonest. Yes there will be porn, but there will also be mountains of attempts at Kino! And yes, most of that WILL BE GARBAGE! But, In that EVEREST of GARBAGE you'll find diamonds and pearls aplenty!
>it will produce le kino
No it won't. It will be subliminal advertising from start to finish and after watching your own personal a.i movie you will be overcome by the sudden urge to buy kfc and jerk off to gay furry porn and not have slightest hint as to why. Capitalism operates on a profit 100% of the time and shits on anything that can't be turned into a money making machine
It will be what Dall-E threads are, instances of awesome mixed in with the generic!
And gooners are gonna goon! So gooners uses /b/ /gif/ et al, Whereas Creators frequent /3/ Cinemaphile/p//po//ic/!
Yes, gooners gonna goon, BUT Creators gonna Create!!!!
I think the studios shill for threads like these
Hollywood is terrified! They're dying, you see, and we collectively say, Good Riddance To Bad Rubbish!
Love me some slop.
>wants to get into a good finishing school but can't pass the drool test
Just a short while ago such an image would have been impossible! Now, virtually a stone throw away later and we're entering an Undiscovered Country of home made excellence that WILL SURPASS anything Hollywood has EVER done.
>How is AI bad again?
Normies are scared it will take away their jobs. The wage slave fears freedom.
And some corporations/governments have started cottoning on to realising that ai will be their downfall
i can already create movies from my home by closing my eyes and imagine them
99.9999% of people are painfully untalented. So you want the net flooded with MORE cringe as frick shit???
Killing the internet will only be a benefit to the entire human race, so yeah
>99.9999% of Hollywood israelites are painfully untalented. So you want people outside of Hollywood to have the tools needed to make movies???
You guys are exaggerating to absurd degrees it is probably more like 40% watchable and 10% kino.
Hulu:
Kino: The Bear, Shogun
Watchable: Death and Other Details, Culprits, Life & Beth
Rest of trash: 5/12 40% good stuff and 18% kino.
you have the taste of a sheltered middleaged cat lady
the cream will rise to the top
>cream
>rise
>top
why are you so gay coded?
Ai sloppers don't trust people who spent years trying to draw and make their internal creative visions a reality but they want 3rd worlders ro be given a tool that lets them flood the internet with no personal dedication or passion. Ai slop is the death of art. It personally gave me more motivation to practice but i imagine thiusands of passionaye artists will give up now that some unread redneck in arkansas can make his "anti-woke" movie with no personal dacrifice, dedication or passion required.
tons of artists have sacrificed, dedicated themselves, and passionately produced shit.
And ai sloppers have spent minutes typing up slop before flooding the internet with it. Everybody is trying to make a quick buck with hastily generated ai slop content. Oh how i wish we could go back to just having cringe deviant artists with bad perspective.
they're hastily trying to make quick bucks because they're only going to be able to monetize AI content generation for a few years
I'm only interested if it's completely uncensored & unrestricted.
I'm fine with censorship about the stuff that's publicly posted but what I do in my own home with my own computer is my business and no one else's.
It'll be so oversaturated that they will be a novelty at best. The standouts would be stuff made by people who can actually write and skillfully work with the visuals in a way that will most likely need hands on high quality editing still. Sure, some amateurs working from home will be able to make decent stuff, but more likely it will enable big studios to spit out more slop than ever at a faster pace.
For years we've had music production software that gave people the ability to make things that could only previously done in multi-million dollar studios, as well as distribution platforms to easily publish your work for free. It mostly lead to a vast wasteland of stuff people will never listen to, even for free, regardless of quality. When there's just so much stuff to dig through, despite a lot of it being crap, the good stuff loses value too as it's just so saturated it's hard for anything to stand out. That is something that takes more effort than AI generation as well, so I imagine that will suffer for the same reasons even more.
It's definitely great technology, but the utility and actual results have a lot of problems easy to foresee. Money for marketing campaigns or a well known studio being attached to a project is likely to be the thing that gets people interested in watching stuff when AI TV/movies are everywhere.
>asks AI to create another AI to peruse the vast wasteland for me and only harvest the stuff it knows I'll enjoy
Wow, another problem solved thanks to AI.
>For years we've had music production software that gave people the ability to make things that could only previously done in multi-million dollar studios, as well as distribution platforms to easily publish your work for free. It mostly lead to a vast wasteland of stuff people will never listen to, even for free, regardless of quality. When there's just so much stuff to dig through, despite a lot of it being crap, the good stuff loses value too as it's just so saturated it's hard for anything to stand out.
Very true, yes. In many scenes of electronic music, the situation got much worse when the barrier for entry disappeared. Of course there's still great music coming out, but it takes far more time and effort to find it, even if you rely at least partially on other curators with whom you match in taste.
I want to be able to take short stories and novels and feed them into an A.I. movie generator and see what happens!!!FACT!!!
No one wants to admit it but the only conceivable way for that to happen is to have lots of training data and the only source for that will be the light novel to manga to anime pipeline. Upscaling the animatics to photorealistic doesn’t even require “””AI”””, so that’s the only path and there’s only maybe three teams even looking at it, sadly
The only legitimate use for AI is digital restoration of lost media. Everything else is humans wanting to revert back into being animals. The Butlerian Jihad will happen.
Ai will never allow you to recreate your minds eye truly and just settle for what ai makes for you it's not truly your vision. Also it is just used for slop. anybody passionate about a story to tell would have picked up a lencil years ago. This will just allow more content creators to make slop. Anybody passionate will have picked up a pencil years ago. It's ironic you people want to be content creators now that 99% of the work can be done for you. This is why tik tok and YouTube aren't being flooded with anything ground breaking just slop.
Also i will say being an artist requires you to be inherently left wing aince tou are dedicating hours of your life on a story/ enjoyment of other people even though it might not pay aswell as construction.
>Ai will never allow you to recreate your minds eye truly
Just like a paintbrush, or a camera, or an actor being given a script...
Do you actuyall have aphasia? You don't see images and pictures in your imagination you want to recreate? When you tell a prompt to make it for you they can never truly get it right. Heck too many variables or descriptors and the ai will shit itself. It will never be used to recreate a truly human experience. When i smoke and listen to music i see detailed animation in my minds eye i want to recreats and no amount of prompts will be able to do it except learning how to draw myself. The difference is with pencils and a canvas it is blank for you to recreate in your own image. Ai recycles other peoples art and imagination. You could type in 200 prompts and it still won't compare with human made art wven if it doesn't shit itself in the process. Ai cannot innovate it recycles.
>doesn't know what img2img is
>doesn't even know what inpainting is
>still thinks AI is a gatcha game of hoping and praying for something remotely resembling your goal
Just keep repeating how AI can't do hands.
Sorry i don't register you making a stick man and having ai do 99% of the work as you actually having creative control over the end product. If you actually cared about making art you could have picked up a pencil but now here you are mr passion project now that robots do 99% of the work for them. Like i said mr aphasia you aren't truly recreating your minds eye all that is slop garbage sorry.
Yeah it's very sad. Say what you want about sbort form content like tik tok or youtube shorts but ai sloppers have renderered these pointless now. It's just an exercise of swiping ai generated slop content jntil something worthwhile. It will be a sad day when this expands to long dorm content and media as a whole.
the core of your anger seems to be the idea that no one cares about (you)r minds eye. that all your passion, sacrifice, and dedication means nothing to anyone else.
My anger reaide ain how anti human, anti passion and hard work ai sloppers are where they want all content to be fogettable hastily made ai slop over art that requires aomebody to have passion and hard work. Soon everything will be ai alop garbage made by jeets. Ai sloppers killed creativity and art.
>B-but now everybody will be able to make slop!
And that's the problem. Maybe you people who couldn't pick up a pencil in the last 20 years because you were too busy posting on Cinemaphile and jerking off shouldn't be makeing art.
no one cares about your hard work. no one ever will.
>no one cares about your hard work. no one ever will.
Same applies to you. Why are you such a pathetic cuck to delude yourself into liking it though?
>no u
pathetic.
Didn't read.
It's ironic the ai slopper who couldn't spend an hour a day learning how to draw won't read a paragraph. You people want an easy alternative to everything even if it means settling for half baked ai prompts over your true intention and creativity.
Just post a wojak and go back to waiting for ai to get good enough to make ypur dream movie pussy. I know making a response to other posters is also bard work.
>he's still shouting at me
Not reading your blog, dude.
Did you tag me at the end by mistake? I don't think it follows my post in any way.
>>Do you actuyall have aphasia? You don't see images and pictures in your imagination you want to recreate? When you tell a prompt to make it for you they can never truly get it right.
Did you just recently discover this? Yes, people using AI are literal morons who don't see an apple, so it's amazing to them to see a computer think for them and think it's actually themselves doing it.
>everyone who uses AI is a dummy
lmao stroking out in real time
Why are all your replies "witty retorts" from black twitter?
Please backlink to all my replies, schizo.
I'll make a version of Robin Hood where I rescue Maid Marian from her castle, then we get married and have kids (not hybrids, just a mix of foxes and humans)
That sounds like a dream, anon. Let's hope they can one day get that animated 70s style down.
You going to make the movie have an in depth sex scene too?
Cool man, will be great I'm sure.
>You can create your own anti-woke movies and compete with Hollywood from the comfort of your own home with digital actors and any setpiece you can imagine by using PC hardware and your own imagination.
This videogame is called The Movies and was released in 2005.
i will create a movie with my favorite movie stars, such as tom cruise and chrisitan bale, and it will be an action movie, but every ten or so minutes all the actors will turn to the screen and tell me how cool i am, and how they really appreciate me watching the movie and it means a lot to them
this just made a artgay have a stroke itt you cant post that shit
It honestly sounds like slop garbage but whatever ai sloppers want i guess.
>I need a movie where sigma man claps at me every 15 minutes
Yeah it gives me an aneurysm people as simple minded as you two exist.
Basically I'll do as I please, create and consume drom wherever I please and the best you can do about it is seethe (And That's A Good Thing)
>b-b-but muh soul, slop etc
Don't care
>but artists won't get jobs
Not my problem
>b-b-but muh soul, slop etc
>Don't care
Imagine bragging about being a soulless slop pig
I can't believe everyone will create something and never show anyone. what a genius idea
I'm not a pajeet so generative AI isn't interesting to me.
I've studied art history for a long time and I can say with utmost certainty that a good 80-90% of humans on this earth don't deserve art, they're soulless NPCs and letting them know about art and them inevitably doing shit like AI is one of the worst mistakes of humanity
Finally, an anti-AI stance that at least makes sense.
Everyone deserves art .the problems Is education
knowing about something won't make you understand it, and most people will be resistant to education
They are already cobbling AI to make sure it doesn't make pictures that offend the snowflake. Do you really think they are going to let you recreate Birth of a Nation?
Luddites ITT the most laughable posters on Cinemaphile right now
>uhh this mechanized charriot will never replace a good horse!!
OK but this made me think of a potentially stupid question
In a super short race of 100 meters (not even a quarter mile), who would win - a race horse or a modern streetracing car?
Obviously the car has far more top speed, but it seems to me that horses accelerate from zero much quicker so they should be ahead for at least a couple seconds?
>woke
Obsessed
75% will be porn. Probably 90% at first.
the other 10-25% will be new seasons of firefly and people trying to create better endings for game of thrones
Why would I wanna make my own movies? Literally just close your eyes and imagine whatever you want, and you will get it more correctly than AI each time, or do your best to have better dreams.
Movies exist as a medium only to communicate something to others or to have ideas communicated to you, I cant imagine anything more useless than just making movies for yourself.
But who will sift through the 99.99% of garbage that most stupids here will create so I can find something worth watching?
"Popular"? Haha
"Kino"? N'yuck N'yuck
>But who will sift through the 99.99% of garbage
An AI.
AI has no concept of quality.
Most are trained via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
The only reason you can use 'weird hands' or other negative prompts to tune the output is cause humans tagged thousands of examples of AI-generated images.
Behind every LLM is a human's training, which is why Google's Bard has a heavy left-wing bias.
Can they be pornographic?
Computer, give me porn gifs.
Lesbians 69ing while cartwheeling.
You guys got really mad at AI and typed a lot of words but I'm still using it.
>low IQ grugs like OP are clapping and cheering for the total death of art because >HURRRRRRRRRR ME CAN PROMPT BOOBY
Reminder that he bumped the thread from page 7 to post this.
Hollywood is dying! Glorious day! Die Hollywood Die!
Ai gays honestly think ai will overtake Hollywood in the next two weeks. There are massive hurdles to overcome before anything remotely coherent will come out using ai and it's going to be a much more involved process than simple generating a prompt. It's going to take 20 years before we get ai generated movies and it's still going to take a team of people to pull off.
Until we get true agi that is. Which is gong to take a lot longer than people think. There is so little we know about consciousness and the mind that it's going to take a massive leap forward in tech to figure out.
>Ai gays honestly think ai will overtake Hollywood in the next two weeks.
nobody thinks that, but you will see things change in 2030 when AI is doing some crazy stuff.
>It's going to take 20 years before we get ai generated movies
In fewer than five years, we've gone from psychedelic dog-shapes to actual video clips indistinguishable from reality.
The videos have barely any movement to them other than basic walk cycles and even then there is tons of morphing going on. The ai can't remember objects, characters, sets, or lighting from scene to scene. It is not aware of 3d space or repeating designs at all. It generates a completely different character and scene every time. It's going to take a completely new technology to pull that kind of shit off.
It takes a thinking machine to make everything coherent and put together.
Someone is going to figure out that it'd be easier to train one to use Blender and/or a game engine rather than rely on generated stuff.
It's going to have to be some kind of 3d generated output because the current tech just can't recreate scenes at all. Like you never see the interior of the spaceship twice in the sora astronaut video and the closest we get to a camera change is when there is a zoom on the Asian lady in the city.
You also have no control at all in these generated videos. You can't change lighting or props or their locations. You can't really tell the actors what to do especially if there is more than one. The best ai short is the balloon man and those are non coherent scenes tied together with a loose voice over narrator. The only thing the scenes have in common is a guy with a balloon head. His actions are random, the locations are random, and it visually tells no story at all. It's the voice over that ties them together.
It's not just a few years of advancement, it's decades. The most we'll get during that time are incoherent music videos equal to noise visualizers.
And the best 3d ai generated content are just blobs in the rough shape of objects. They are absolutely worthless.
Sure, it's all still probably a ways away until the "I can make a billion dollar movie in my bedroom" point, but I think it's more a matter of "when", not of "if". Also, you don't really need AGI at all for this and I have no idea why you brought consciousness into the fold. None of this has anything to do with consciousness.
Die Hollywood Die! Please Die, Hollywood! I hate you so much, Hollywood!
Why do pakistanis have this delusion that india can even access AI tools with their shit internet? 99% of the people that space are white boomers.
Though that also begs the question of how one pakistani bot finds every thread on the subject site-wide...
This board is full of failed filmmakers who thought they would strike it big and be the next big unique talent and now A.I. has shown up to hit the final nail in that coffin. That's why everyone here is so anti A.I.
is it possible? can it happen?
Seeing as they're now making just the creation of deepfakes a crime, there's no way this won't be classified as some kind of piracy or copyright infringement.