Why are 1:1 adaptations of comic books very few unlike with manga?

Why are 1:1 adaptations of comic books very few unlike with manga?

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well, if we're talking comics that span DECADES, most adaptations will try their best to mix, match and simplify everything into a single, cohesive narrative.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Even still, one shots that require absolutely no other info like Killing Joke or Red Son(Which got absolutely BUTCHERED) still get massive changes that often degrade or outright go against the original narrative.

      The real reason is that while japan often likes to capture the original because they want the fans to keep buying the manga, which is why a lot of adaptations are essentially trailers for the original light novel or manga which keep on going and sometimes are outpaced by the anime, leading to either massive fillers like Bleach or anime only endings like Full Metal Alchemist, writers in the west don't give a shit about who liked the original work are often nepotism hires who feel they can do better than the original writer and want to "Make it their own" because they feel that they'll be getting in assured fans just because the original work was popular, but feel they can make it better by "Updating" it. Adaption writers are more often than not as deluded and bad at their jobs as localization teams.

      TLDR western writers suck and somehow feel like they can outdo a story that more often than not survived the test of time their entire lifetimes twice over, because they're stupid.

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well with Scott Pilgrim the creator likes to mix things up for each adaptation. But in general I don't know. They are also rarely animated.

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you want the actual reason instead of the delusions the moron homosexual wrote above is that creative heads outside of Japan think making a 1:1 adaptation will just make the comic book irrelevant and no one will even bother to check (most people already dont bother to check but still)

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      I bothered man

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >He thinks anime is 1:1 with manga

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is.
      Sometimes to a pretty insane degree, where they just copy manga panels and stick them in the show.
      Like with Kamikatsu, but that one gets a pass since the original mangaka also worked on the anime and they had negative budget.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    DC made a few of them, like Batman Superman Public Enemies, and it's dogshit

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    your pic isn't even 1:1 with itself

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      The only 1:1 adaptation I can think of is The Maxx and IIRC Persepolis is 1:1 as well

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        There's also Zack Snyder's Watchmen and 300, and Robert Rodriguez's Sin City.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          I was thinking animation but yeah Sin City is a good example with Miller himself heavily involved
          >Watchmen
          Didn't they remove the squid?
          Also, the guy who made Amelia Rules got a page from an issue animated 1:1

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Snyder
          >1:1 adaptation
          Have you just never read any of these books at all?

          I was thinking animation but yeah Sin City is a good example with Miller himself heavily involved
          >Watchmen
          Didn't they remove the squid?
          Also, the guy who made Amelia Rules got a page from an issue animated 1:1

          Not only did he remove the squid he vastly changed many of the scenes tones and missed the point completely on the stuff he did keep in. Zack Snyder has never ONCE understood the material he was working with and instead just focuses on visual spectacle.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Zack Snyder's Watchmen
          No.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          I was thinking animation but yeah Sin City is a good example with Miller himself heavily involved
          >Watchmen
          Didn't they remove the squid?
          Also, the guy who made Amelia Rules got a page from an issue animated 1:1

          >Snyder
          >1:1 adaptation
          Have you just never read any of these books at all?
          [...]
          Not only did he remove the squid he vastly changed many of the scenes tones and missed the point completely on the stuff he did keep in. Zack Snyder has never ONCE understood the material he was working with and instead just focuses on visual spectacle.

          >Zack Snyder's Watchmen
          No.

          Watchmen is one of those weird cases where it's technically a very faithful, almost 1:1 adaptation of the comic yet it feels different because the tone of the original was altered.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            That happens with manga occasionally, too. A good example is Violinist of Hamlet, where the anime is TECHNICALLY a very faithful adaption, but it sucks a lot of the humor out of the show in favor of playing it as a serious drama most of the time.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's not just the tone or the abridgement or the ending, it was also a lot of little tweaks, mostly of characters. It all adds up.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Persepolis had a few scenes taken out and the animated film had new scenes exclusively for the film.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, that was largely his point.

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you're talking about animation, ask yourself this question
    Would AMC have greenlit an Invincible animated series back when The Walking Dead's show was still a hit?
    That's your answer

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      TWD sucked when it started veering off the plot.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        I meant how back then no major network would even greenlight an animated series like Invincible period strictly because its animated

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        TWD was only good for the first couple episodes.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >TWD sucked when it started veering off the plot.
        So like immediately then

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        TWD sucked after season 1 because they replaced most of their writing staff for season 2 which led to that boring farm season from which the show never really recovered.

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Manga adaptions are made to push sales of the manga. Comic adaptions are made to sell everything other then the comic.

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    the female characters look very cute in this artstyle

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      I agree and kim pine is the best girl maybe lisa as well

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Cultural subversion

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It’s because Bryan based Ramona and Scott off himself and his ex wife. He’s too bitter about the divorce and let it ruin the anime.

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Adaptations shouldn't be 1:1 but they should at least keep the moments you wanted to see adapted period
    Invincible ISN'T 1:1 but everything that made Mark vs Nolan so effective was kept in right down to the "What will you have after 500 years?" exchange

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think the show actually improved that bit

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    a week ago

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most anime are never 1:1 adaptations if you count stuff like censorship and some dialogue getting cut to condense it. I guess usually the plot beats are the same but most times I find myself surprised at how different the manga feels.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      sad.

  15. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    HOLY SHIT IS TRASH

  16. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Damned if I know. It's annoying as FRICK. We keep getting writers making up new shit with in-name-only versions of characters, and acting shocked when their new creation flops.
    Birds of Prey I'm looking at you.

  17. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I NEED A RAMONA VICTORIA FLOWERS GF RIGHT NOW AAAAAAAAAAAH BROS HELP ME

  18. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because
    1) 90% of the time the manga has already finished its publication run. It's for that reason that you have garbage like FMA 2003 and filler episodes like Goku getting a driver's license, which all wildly deviate from the source material, kept to a minimum.
    2) 100% of the time Manga authors are just done with the work and don't care to fiddle with it anymore after devoting years of their lives to it. That's why the new Scott Pilgrim thing isn't an adaptation, the author of the original wanted to frick around with the setting some more.

  19. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    1:1 adaptations don't exist

  20. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shows have only recently (since the mid-to-late 2000s or so) pushed to be more 1:1, there was a lot more creatively liberty taken with anime adaptations back in the day, for better and worse.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *