I'm not. I can find things cute without being a woman, are you the anon that gets triggered when people say the word cute or something?
Oh excuse me sirs I never meant to misgender you.
In that case you're homosexuals. You're massive wiener gargling homosexuals. No one and I mean no one likes the right. Only furgays that wants sleazy ugly rats to frick them with a anatomically incorrect wiener like the right over the left.
>Only furgays that wants sleazy ugly rats to frick them with a anatomically incorrect wiener like the right over the left.
are you projecting much?
I like the silly, mischiveous personality in the design of the one of the right, as the left is too cutesy and sterile. what is genuinely wrong with you? why the hostility? who hurt you?
In western literature canon a wrasel is an underhanded sneaky character, so features that accentuate untrustworthiness (beady eyes, unkempt hair, snaggly teeth, big crooked nose) are exaggerated i hope this helps you to understand and enjoy neurotypical western media
Of course the homosexual has to make it out to be some /misc/ defend muh europa bullshit.
Go jack off to Greek paintings of men being buttfricked homosexual.
>Only furgays that wants sleazy ugly rats to frick them with a anatomically incorrect wiener like the right over the left.
are you projecting much?
I like the silly, mischiveous personality in the design of the one of the right, as the left is too cutesy and sterile. what is genuinely wrong with you? why the hostility? who hurt you?
You like sex with men and yelling projection will not save you.
3 months ago
Anonymous
People aren’t afraid to call you a homosexual here unlike Twitter, sorry about that.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I wouldn't know that as I don't use twitter, clearly you do though since you would know. I bet you only do so to follow the gay groups on there huh?
3 months ago
Anonymous
You are obsessed with gay men and gay thoughts.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Its not really /misc/itical my burly bewig-ed swarthy young lady thats just how it is. In western canon weasels are sneaky, chickens are cowardly, pigs are greedy, owls are wise, and snakes smell like fish. None of these except the fishy smell are really true to the animal, owls are functionally moronic compared to other birds for example, but that's just how we came to view them as literary symbols. If you want a stubborn character you use a goat.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>snakes smell like fish
I don't remember this coming up in the fables
3 months ago
Anonymous
>If you want a stubborn character you use a goat.
Or a donkey
Yeah ok Cinemaphile is the epic gay board it's le epic 50% women 40% gay men 5% hetero board haha.
But I just want them to admit only women and gay men like the right.
counterpoint
Keep in mind most westerners have never met a real hippo.
Its not really /misc/itical my burly bewig-ed swarthy young lady thats just how it is. In western canon weasels are sneaky, chickens are cowardly, pigs are greedy, owls are wise, and snakes smell like fish. None of these except the fishy smell are really true to the animal, owls are functionally moronic compared to other birds for example, but that's just how we came to view them as literary symbols. If you want a stubborn character you use a goat.
>muh western canon >not /misc/
Like I said go jack off to statues of muscular men homosexual ass fascist.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>le
Man, you take me back to 2008
3 months ago
Anonymous
Did you know there is also an eastern canon and it is not really racist to distinguish the two and in fact you can even break them down further and it is quite usual to discuss them that way
3 months ago
Anonymous
Did you know this is a troll thread and he's deliberately misrepresenting your posts to keep your attention?
3 months ago
Anonymous
This is a forum for genuine good-faith discussions about comics and cartoons only a real psycho would do something like that
3 months ago
Anonymous
>most westerners have never met a real hippo.
Most westerners have been to a Walmart, though.
can't wait until the day we can shoot furgays and end their zoophile tendencies
>saying a character looks "appealing" means I want to frick it
you guys are not only genuine moronic, but also fricking coombrains to think "appealing" = "i'd frick it".
the right has more character to it and is just more interesting the look at from a cartoon standpoint. cartoons are supposed to be sexaggerations of real life rather than just fricking copies of it? are you all just so fricking dumb? are you mad at stylization?!
Cinemaphile is genuinely one of the stupidest boards on Cinemaphile, filled with the most artistically illiterate morons who think they know how comics and cartoons go, but they know jack shit, draw jack shit and just wanna jack off to it.
It's gotten to the point where I can't even get through my daily search for e-girl futa unbirthing porn without some disgusting furhomosexualry cropping up.
Because he’s a weeb. The left is stylized moe garbage. That twitter post is like posting a generic moe anime girl on the left and a family guy character on the right and complaining about depiction of humans in animation.
Is everyone blind and moronic today it says western in op's image. Its the second word in the righthand caption, it starts with the funny looking letter that looks kinda like two us or vs next to each other.
I think what they were trying to say is that she’s not an actual cat in the sense that she’s this type of four legged feral creature.
Reminds me of how one guy working on Sonic described him as a 'fairy' or something. Lost in translation I feel.
Earlier animators for the most part would have only had exposure to weasels through fur. Check out this weasel* stole from the 1920s-30s. It doesn't really look like the living animal, but it resembles the cartoon.
Older animations such as Looney Tunes featuring weasels that look like this made that the default for drawing them. It may not be accurate, but it's an interesting look-back to the times.
(*"weasel" would also include sables and martens. )
People in the '30s knew what living weasels looked like you silly billy, they weren't mystic gremlins that couldn't be properly photographed.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Well, what is an average animator living in a city at the time more likely to have access to: a common fashion item, or weasels/weasel photographs?
There are actually VERY autistic rules on this shit, and it makes a difference.
Article related. It's about the US goverment debating on whether the X men are human or not for tax purposes.
https://comicsalliance.com/xmen-human-real-life-radiolab/
3 months ago
Anonymous
But according to the article, humanoid toys (dolls/action figures) are more heavily taxed than non-humans. So why would they classify her as a human, meaning they would have to pay more taxes?
3 months ago
Anonymous
They're optimizing for a completely different set of rules. Usually Hello Kitty doesn't want to be defined as toys or dolls at all. All their stores are stationary stories.
I. R. Better than Weasel.
This are baboon thread now
You mean something you alone have spammed a lot to generate fake outrage because of your compulsionary need for responses since you have to come here instead of staying on your Shroommeister twitter.
>weasel is a shorthand for someone untrustworthy and dastardly >draw character in an appropriate way instead of appealing to your weird freakish zoophile interests >this is bad somehow
Weasels are opportunistic predators with s negative reputation, anyone choosing to make their character one tends to do so for this reason. When you call someone a weasel in real life you're not calling them cute.
Right has way more personality. Left is too "real, but exaggerated cutesy" also it's odd to single out "western cartoonists" because a good deal of JP cartoonists would rather draw a weasel like the one on the right.
That's like coyotes.
They should be medium size with narrow snouts. But people give them big noses. Or make them look like a cross between a fox and a lynx.
Generative AI will draw them as generic grey/brown canines. Or with tiger stripes and Shiba Inu eyebrow circles things. And like, the size of a bear!
The remake is alright (starts too fast, Gamba is introduced way too fast), but it is tricky to enjoy (yes, I said enjoy) since a good and faithful English dub was produced in-house, but only released in Sweden. Gotta import a swedish DVD or Bluray to get a good dub.
don't even get the point of these. they're just pointless observations but worded as if they're some big callout. used to see them on blogs all the time and the poster was always some furry bugfricker that just learned the word tarsis. maybe i dont want to have to animate a photo realistic weasel dropping an anvil on a photo realistic pig, ever think of that?
oh gee golly woe is me i mispelled a word egads frick off homosexual. every midwit with a blog in the mid 2000s wanted you to know that a praying mantis acshually has a clawed tarsus extending past the RAPTORIAL LIMB didja know that??????? didja???? didja know your drawing is WRONG???????????
Well I considered tarsus, as in metatarsus, but was stymied by the complete lack of obvious relevance. A misspelling doesn't make you look dumb but this flip-out kinda does.
Unrelatid funny observations? In the same template as the original? Within the same target topic? Framed as a reduction to the absurd of the original? Within the timeframe on which the original image was related?!
Most of the replies are calling you a homosexual and moronic but I actually know exactly what you're talking about. I always felt it was the most tumblrshitter thing to do (then it moved to twitter like all tumblrhomosexualry did)
The answer is always israelites. israelites always project their disgusting aggressive personalities and love subverting cute stuff into irradiated contaminated eldritch abominations like themselves while enjoying portraying genuinely disgusting and fricked up creatures such as hippos as cutesy wootsie safe to be around. It's in their DNA to lie, not just in their blood, but in their very cancerous DNA to lie so they can infect you and undermine the healthy DNA, it's not enough to infect you, the israelite must infect the whole planet and make sure you never live a happy life. A israelite is like a woman, it cannot allow a man to have nice things. Communism is just like a paranoid woman, it feel the need to infect you. Except this woman doesn't wait around for you to approach her, this woman goes after you like the infectious predator cancer cell that it is. israelites are natural born divas and sociopaths like all cancer cells and mammals suffering from heatstroke. You really think it's sane to mutilate one's own body? only the mentally insane do that. No other mammal mutilates themselves, not even insects. israelites and Africans are below insects, they're below chinks.
>subtlety
I guess lying just isn't my thing. Tell me; what is a vocation where you naturally have to tell the truth? don't say journalists or judges, that'll make me laugh.
paranoid schizophrenia.
Some of the effects is for the schizophrenic believes they are privy to some grand knowledge about the world and they have a compulsion to tell everybody.
Like old dude at the corner of the street telling everyone that the world is about to end. Or the fat dude on the javanese bambu knitting forum telling everyone that everything is to blame on israelites.
The answer is always israelites. israelites always project their disgusting aggressive personalities and love subverting cute stuff into irradiated contaminated eldritch abominations like themselves while enjoying portraying genuinely disgusting and fricked up creatures such as hippos as cutesy wootsie safe to be around. It's in their DNA to lie, not just in their blood, but in their very cancerous DNA to lie so they can infect you and undermine the healthy DNA, it's not enough to infect you, the israelite must infect the whole planet and make sure you never live a happy life. A israelite is like a woman, it cannot allow a man to have nice things. Communism is just like a paranoid woman, it feel the need to infect you. Except this woman doesn't wait around for you to approach her, this woman goes after you like the infectious predator cancer cell that it is. israelites are natural born divas and sociopaths like all cancer cells and mammals suffering from heatstroke. You really think it's sane to mutilate one's own body? only the mentally insane do that. No other mammal mutilates themselves, not even insects. israelites and Africans are below insects, they're below chinks.
Sly! The rats are putting chemicals in the water to turn Murray freakin' gay! You gotta steal their treasure keys to gain entry to their underground tunnel system, and sneak your way into the heart of their operation to stop them!
I always hated the shrinkwrapping argument because it's fairly valid to "shrinkwrap" dinosaur bones when a lot of reptiles do look just like their skeletons. Hippos are not like dinosaurs.
I always hated the shrinkwrapping argument because it's fairly valid to "shrinkwrap" dinosaur bones when a lot of reptiles do look just like their skeletons. Hippos are not like dinosaurs.
in fact, i'd even say it's even more terrifying. now that we found out it doesn't roar but emmits deep sonar growls.
i don't think the 2010s chicken design could compete with that shit.
The remake is alright (starts too fast, Gamba is introduced way too fast), but it is tricky to enjoy (yes, I said enjoy) since a good and faithful English dub was produced in-house, but only released in Sweden. Gotta import a swedish DVD or Bluray to get a good dub.
>the western mind.
The western mind only likes comedy carton number 4664364 so they shouldn't be recommended anything considering how low standards they have. Most cartoongays watch family guy and that's it.
Earlier animators for the most part would have only had exposure to weasels through fur. Check out this weasel* stole from the 1920s-30s. It doesn't really look like the living animal, but it resembles the cartoon.
Older animations such as Looney Tunes featuring weasels that look like this made that the default for drawing them. It may not be accurate, but it's an interesting look-back to the times.
(*"weasel" would also include sables and martens. )
Back in the before-times, before photography was invented, all animators had to go off were medieval bestiaries. The Bugs Bunny/Elmer Fudd dynamic actually evolved from the weasel-basilisk fights of early 18th century cartoons.
Obviously animal photography has existed since ancient times, but it wasn't fully legalised until 1978. Prior to that it was considered a form of bestiality. You really didn't want to be caught leaving the back room of your local "private shop" with a roll of weasel photographs under your arm.
I don't like it much either, the changed design is almost always not as interesting as the real thing. Always hated roadrunner for example as actual roadrunners look way cooler.
Okay so this thread is: >People baiting >People taking bait >'People' who want to frick weasels
And one guy who might actually be a weasel and wants to set the record straight.
Not when you realize Cinemaphile exists as Cinemaphile‘s public shitting street. They’re raiding multiple threads at once, the public domain heroes thread is suddenly full of them.
>nooooo this brown ground cuckooroni is perfect and smol you have to draw it exactly as it looks in real life or ill leave a b***hy spergout in your mentions
I don't know. When I was a kid this kind of design made me fantasize about holding them by the ears and torturing them.
Well mostly it was about the rabbit from bambi, but this kind of rabbit too.
It's the same thing with a lot of "realistic" Pokemon designs that make them look like hideous abominations, as if cute or beautiful animals don't exist
>weasel is a shorthand for someone untrustworthy and dastardly >draw character in an appropriate way instead of appealing to your weird freakish zoophile interests >this is bad somehow
This whole thread operates on the premise that western artists can't draw realistic animals, as opposed to artists draw characters and objects in the style that befits the tone of the story they're working on. Film at 11.
>This whole thread operates on the premise that western artists can't draw realistic animals
But that's the point. People whose art uses a "goofy" or "toony" style usually isn't that way because they consciously chose that particular style out of anything else they could've drawn, but because that's literally the only way they know how to draw. They really don't know how to draw realistic animals.
Because cartoon characters are often drawn in a way to convey the personality they have, and general vibe or role they have within the show.
Weasels are often shown as mischievous and hyperactive, so having them drawn with a mischievous and crooked appearance is appropriate.
But it depends on the show. Like, if the show is more cutesy in nature, like some Steven Universe shit and stuff, they'd probably draw something closer to the one on the left.
>left is bland, working better as background character >Right has a personality just from one glance, he could be a logo, he could be a main antagonist, he can even be a devious scamp who steals
You and anyone else have my full permission to expand on/draw the characters. If I have time I would like to draw them more. For names- no clue sorry, I'm horrible with coming up with them
whats wrong with right side?
the big cartoony eyes lend themselves to expression better
the exposed teeth add a bit more complexity to the mouth, so it isnt just a line, while also making it more "wild"
the large exaggerated whiskers just look cool, almost like a moustache
and when all the elements are combined, you have a weasel that looks just a little off-kilter and up to no good
How the hell does this nothing of a thread have so many replies and posters? All over a bait image that is just…pointing out something cartoons do?
It’s like this board somehow gets more moronic by the second.
Because you live in a modern world where stories about those little frickers killing livestock and eating egg aren’t as common so you just see them as cute and not vermin.
I think a lot animals are cute, but I always wondered the cost of us adopting animals as pets when they naturally conflict with human interests. Not saying it can tame or even domesticate them over a long time, but I still wonder.
not even a tumbler level post nor shitpost this post is just shit.
as my actual response, because its fun? kids and adults wouldn't watch a irl fish tank for like 20 minutes but they sure as hell love spongebob
No shit. Given that the twitter user calls out "western cartoonists" it's likely he's a weeb who thinks everything should be shapeless featureless moeblobs.
I can understand not evrybody went to art school but, did you homosexuals dont even know wha a cartoon is? cartoons are about exaggerate features, also the left part is not even realistic, fricking weebs
i would gladly pop that weasel like a balloon. give me a table and a conveyor belt and i'll make sure it looks like she swallowed a beach ball in no time
Reminder that weebanon is actually some turd worlder Asian who physically can't even eat his vegetables and thus takes his impotent rage at this out on Americans across all of Cinemaphile because we have healthy food unlike his shit country of Sri-fricka or Malaria
Right is unironically more appealing
I can tell you're a woman. Please have a nice day.
I will never be a woman and you can't make me.
Oh excuse me sirs I never meant to misgender you.
In that case you're homosexuals. You're massive wiener gargling homosexuals. No one and I mean no one likes the right. Only furgays that wants sleazy ugly rats to frick them with a anatomically incorrect wiener like the right over the left.
>Only furgays that wants sleazy ugly rats to frick them with a anatomically incorrect wiener like the right over the left.
are you projecting much?
I like the silly, mischiveous personality in the design of the one of the right, as the left is too cutesy and sterile. what is genuinely wrong with you? why the hostility? who hurt you?
In western literature canon a wrasel is an underhanded sneaky character, so features that accentuate untrustworthiness (beady eyes, unkempt hair, snaggly teeth, big crooked nose) are exaggerated i hope this helps you to understand and enjoy neurotypical western media
Of course the homosexual has to make it out to be some /misc/ defend muh europa bullshit.
Go jack off to Greek paintings of men being buttfricked homosexual.
You like sex with men and yelling projection will not save you.
People aren’t afraid to call you a homosexual here unlike Twitter, sorry about that.
I wouldn't know that as I don't use twitter, clearly you do though since you would know. I bet you only do so to follow the gay groups on there huh?
You are obsessed with gay men and gay thoughts.
Its not really /misc/itical my burly bewig-ed swarthy young lady thats just how it is. In western canon weasels are sneaky, chickens are cowardly, pigs are greedy, owls are wise, and snakes smell like fish. None of these except the fishy smell are really true to the animal, owls are functionally moronic compared to other birds for example, but that's just how we came to view them as literary symbols. If you want a stubborn character you use a goat.
>snakes smell like fish
I don't remember this coming up in the fables
>If you want a stubborn character you use a goat.
Or a donkey
Looky here, we got ourselves a tourist. homosexual/gay is an honorific in these parts, fella. Has been for years.
Yeah ok Cinemaphile is the epic gay board it's le epic 50% women 40% gay men 5% hetero board haha.
But I just want them to admit only women and gay men like the right.
Keep in mind most westerners have never met a real hippo.
>muh western canon
>not /misc/
Like I said go jack off to statues of muscular men homosexual ass fascist.
>le
Man, you take me back to 2008
Did you know there is also an eastern canon and it is not really racist to distinguish the two and in fact you can even break them down further and it is quite usual to discuss them that way
Did you know this is a troll thread and he's deliberately misrepresenting your posts to keep your attention?
This is a forum for genuine good-faith discussions about comics and cartoons only a real psycho would do something like that
>most westerners have never met a real hippo.
Most westerners have been to a Walmart, though.
Man, does lil anon need a time out?
you might need to take stock of where you are, buddy
NTA and I prefer the left too, but if the artist put eyelashes on the right, all the guys on here would be AWOOOOOGAing over the design
Why are westerners like this?
Appealing doesn’t inherently mean sexy or attractive, it literally means it is interesting or attracts attention.
That reminds me of this documentary about market research and how they measure people's "arousal".
And the interviewer was like "wat?"
Superior aesthetic sense
>saying a character looks "appealing" means I want to frick it
you guys are not only genuine moronic, but also fricking coombrains to think "appealing" = "i'd frick it".
the right has more character to it and is just more interesting the look at from a cartoon standpoint. cartoons are supposed to be sexaggerations of real life rather than just fricking copies of it? are you all just so fricking dumb? are you mad at stylization?!
Cinemaphile is genuinely one of the stupidest boards on Cinemaphile, filled with the most artistically illiterate morons who think they know how comics and cartoons go, but they know jack shit, draw jack shit and just wanna jack off to it.
Never implied that the anon wanted to frick it
you're 12
and I fricked your dad
can't wait until the day we can shoot furgays and end their zoophile tendencies
It's gotten to the point where I can't even get through my daily search for e-girl futa unbirthing porn without some disgusting furhomosexualry cropping up.
because weasels are complete buttholes?
just look at their lifestyle and you will understand everything.
Right if you want an anthropomorphic talking character
Left if you want a mute pet character that's secretly diabolic and bites cables
It’s the same with cats
Why did your tumblr post made by a man in a wig specify western as if asian cartoonists dont also caricaturize animals
It doesn't actually specify.
Cats really do look like that.
anon, that's a blue tanuki
Thanks for reminding me to trim my cat's propeller.
Because he’s a weeb. The left is stylized moe garbage. That twitter post is like posting a generic moe anime girl on the left and a family guy character on the right and complaining about depiction of humans in animation.
Lol you made your own imaginary scenario in your head k.
How do people as dumb as you even carry on day to day conversations when you're busy tackling arguments that haven't been made?
Is everyone blind and moronic today it says western in op's image. Its the second word in the righthand caption, it starts with the funny looking letter that looks kinda like two us or vs next to each other.
I will edit that image so it doesn't say western anymore and then spam it on Cinemaphile for the next month. I hope you are happy 🙂
It’s Valentine’s Day, all the anons who can hold down stable relationships and/or are compo mentis to ask someone for a date are out.
>calls someone else dumb
>is clearly dumb himself
I dont' understant your logic, but you should know that Doraemon and doramichan are NOT animals, but robots from the future.
Kitty White is a human English schoolgirl.
Or so she SAYS, but we all know that's just to evade tarrifs, and immigration laws.
I think what they were trying to say is that she’s not an actual cat in the sense that she’s this type of four legged feral creature.
Why did they have to specify it? Like who was saying Hello Kitty was a real cat?
Reminds me of how one guy working on Sonic described him as a 'fairy' or something. Lost in translation I feel.
People in the '30s knew what living weasels looked like you silly billy, they weren't mystic gremlins that couldn't be properly photographed.
Well, what is an average animator living in a city at the time more likely to have access to: a common fashion item, or weasels/weasel photographs?
National Geographic was a thing back then.
Was there a weasel issue?
There are actually VERY autistic rules on this shit, and it makes a difference.
Article related. It's about the US goverment debating on whether the X men are human or not for tax purposes.
https://comicsalliance.com/xmen-human-real-life-radiolab/
But according to the article, humanoid toys (dolls/action figures) are more heavily taxed than non-humans. So why would they classify her as a human, meaning they would have to pay more taxes?
They're optimizing for a completely different set of rules. Usually Hello Kitty doesn't want to be defined as toys or dolls at all. All their stores are stationary stories.
They're robot cats.
>BUT JAPAN!!1!
Obsessed and mad
You mean something you alone have spammed a lot to generate fake outrage because of your compulsionary need for responses since you have to come here instead of staying on your Shroommeister twitter.
>Moeshit
Leave
Moe? Like from the simpsons? What's that got to do with anything?
Right is more visually interesting, left is just generic weasel/mink/ferret.
Good that we follow the same Twitter accounts anon but I'm usually getting shit for reposting that trash...
They are both cute
>Cartoon humans are cuter than cartoon animals while it is the opposite irl
I just noticed this
>"NO NO NO NO, YOU HAVR TO MAKE THE ANIMAL FRICKABLE"
>Anon sees left pic and immediately thinks of sex
Do you also find beanie babies frickable?
Right is more frickable tho
Right is unironically cuter.
You can see a glimpse into the weasel's soul through his exaggerated traits whereas the left is just a blank face.
I'm not. I can find things cute without being a woman, are you the anon that gets triggered when people say the word cute or something?
Weasels are opportunistic predators with s negative reputation, anyone choosing to make their character one tends to do so for this reason. When you call someone a weasel in real life you're not calling them cute.
>weasel thread
I dare say it's time to frick shit up.
I love that one live action movie where the Weasels were basically Nazis
What the frick was Toad's problem?
Right has way more personality. Left is too "real, but exaggerated cutesy" also it's odd to single out "western cartoonists" because a good deal of JP cartoonists would rather draw a weasel like the one on the right.
>when the cartoon is cartoony
I swear there's a whole generation of twittergays that just don't understand what a cartoon is.
I blamd Calarts for that shit
Bad Kunfaluci-tier take.
It's just weebs being morons like usual.
That's like coyotes.
They should be medium size with narrow snouts. But people give them big noses. Or make them look like a cross between a fox and a lynx.
Generative AI will draw them as generic grey/brown canines. Or with tiger stripes and Shiba Inu eyebrow circles things. And like, the size of a bear!
The coyotes in House Broken weren't bad, I guess.
I'm surprised a "coyote and poodle" prompt wouldn't just end up looking like a wolf and sheep.
The Westerner cannot draw something this sweet
That’s a stoat
It's a subspecies of weasel that closely resembles a stoat and it is a mighty rabbit-btfo'er
Kind of crazy to think something this cute can BTFO so many rabbits
rabbits are prey animals, they're literally made to be killed
You never seen the original Gamba
The remake is alright (starts too fast, Gamba is introduced way too fast), but it is tricky to enjoy (yes, I said enjoy) since a good and faithful English dub was produced in-house, but only released in Sweden. Gotta import a swedish DVD or Bluray to get a good dub.
que es
You could cut a cheek on those hipbones.
That thing is scary
Is there a shitty dub?
counterpoint
Thanks, I just suddenly remembered Hip Flask.
don't even get the point of these. they're just pointless observations but worded as if they're some big callout. used to see them on blogs all the time and the poster was always some furry bugfricker that just learned the word tarsis. maybe i dont want to have to animate a photo realistic weasel dropping an anvil on a photo realistic pig, ever think of that?
It's called bait when ironic, and cherrypicking when unironic.
>just learned the word tarsis
What did he mean by this?
oh gee golly woe is me i mispelled a word egads frick off homosexual. every midwit with a blog in the mid 2000s wanted you to know that a praying mantis acshually has a clawed tarsus extending past the RAPTORIAL LIMB didja know that??????? didja???? didja know your drawing is WRONG???????????
Well I considered tarsus, as in metatarsus, but was stymied by the complete lack of obvious relevance. A misspelling doesn't make you look dumb but this flip-out kinda does.
you should write a book about your struggles
Comebacks also should be relevant. I'll give you a do-over if you like.
They're just funny observations about cartoons. Cinemaphile is the one thinking it's a "callout" attacking cartoons and getting defensive over them.
Unrelatid funny observations? In the same template as the original? Within the same target topic? Framed as a reduction to the absurd of the original? Within the timeframe on which the original image was related?!
Most of the replies are calling you a homosexual and moronic but I actually know exactly what you're talking about. I always felt it was the most tumblrshitter thing to do (then it moved to twitter like all tumblrhomosexualry did)
>hurr, ima burr
Hur hur hur har har har har har har
Har har har har
Har har har har
>Holy shit guys it's freddy fazbear
It's because they're each a "hot take" with minimal effort that gains a reward: attention
The answer is always israelites. israelites always project their disgusting aggressive personalities and love subverting cute stuff into irradiated contaminated eldritch abominations like themselves while enjoying portraying genuinely disgusting and fricked up creatures such as hippos as cutesy wootsie safe to be around. It's in their DNA to lie, not just in their blood, but in their very cancerous DNA to lie so they can infect you and undermine the healthy DNA, it's not enough to infect you, the israelite must infect the whole planet and make sure you never live a happy life. A israelite is like a woman, it cannot allow a man to have nice things. Communism is just like a paranoid woman, it feel the need to infect you. Except this woman doesn't wait around for you to approach her, this woman goes after you like the infectious predator cancer cell that it is. israelites are natural born divas and sociopaths like all cancer cells and mammals suffering from heatstroke. You really think it's sane to mutilate one's own body? only the mentally insane do that. No other mammal mutilates themselves, not even insects. israelites and Africans are below insects, they're below chinks.
The art of trolling is to start subtly and ramp up. When you start a long paragraph with "the answer is israelites" we just skip past the rest.
>subtlety
I guess lying just isn't my thing. Tell me; what is a vocation where you naturally have to tell the truth? don't say journalists or judges, that'll make me laugh.
A compulsion to confess, coined by the great Robert Crumb.
Doctors, like the one who told you to take your meds.
>doctors
>truth tellers
Anon, the man is begging for a straight answer.
paranoid schizophrenia.
Some of the effects is for the schizophrenic believes they are privy to some grand knowledge about the world and they have a compulsion to tell everybody.
Like old dude at the corner of the street telling everyone that the world is about to end. Or the fat dude on the javanese bambu knitting forum telling everyone that everything is to blame on israelites.
Being a schizo is not a vocation, no matter how big your disability cheque.
Make way for... THE MURRAY.
not Cinemaphile but very much Cinemaphile inspired.
Sly! The rats are putting chemicals in the water to turn Murray freakin' gay! You gotta steal their treasure keys to gain entry to their underground tunnel system, and sneak your way into the heart of their operation to stop them!
You are a funny, original, weirdo!
I always hated the shrinkwrapping argument because it's fairly valid to "shrinkwrap" dinosaur bones when a lot of reptiles do look just like their skeletons. Hippos are not like dinosaurs.
And dinosaurs are not like modern reptiles.
That's not accurate either and the JP trex is pretty damn close to what we currently think is how trex looked
in fact, i'd even say it's even more terrifying. now that we found out it doesn't roar but emmits deep sonar growls.
i don't think the 2010s chicken design could compete with that shit.
we finally found it, 3DCG anime.
>que es
una cosa, que es
Sonar Growls? What are those?
>Real T-rex sounds
Well I'm convinced
Slow down bird calls, add reverb. Yup.
Though, if I DID hear something like this outdoors, i would probably shit myself regardless.
Thats just a giant bird
>da westenerzzz
How come I've never heard of this anime before in my life, weebs should recommend shit like this instead, it's more appealing to the western mind.
>weebs should recommend shit like this instead
You're expecting too much from these people.
Weebs are nothing if not shallow as frick.
>the western mind.
The western mind only likes comedy carton number 4664364 so they shouldn't be recommended anything considering how low standards they have. Most cartoongays watch family guy and that's it.
You're not getting recommended shit.
cringe
westerners are too babies for even the middest non offe sive anime that's not twitter/crunchyroll approved
>oh frick somebody beat me up too
[...]
You never seen the original Gamba
I watched this fuxking show during early mornings on Saturdays and Sundays before the big shows like NintendoMania and Rayearth aired in Caritele.
Don't tell OP what animal is Arthur supposed to be
Or Binky
>meanwhile Japan draws raccoon dogs with giant testicles
If Japan jumped off a cliff would you do the same?
yeah
Banzai!
I hope to one day restore honor to my clan, yes.
Regrettably, yes. And I would be screaming
天皇陛下万歳!!! at the top of my lungs.
You understand Japan is the most suicidal nation since about 700 AD?
t. 日本人
I'd suck her breasts dry
Is it a Japanese cliff?
look at those magumbos
Too be fair you can see some pretty bizarre shit on Rule 34 or Paheal.
>Not knowing the difference between a tanuki and a Bake-danuki in Japanese lore.
I guess North Korea is technically west of japan.
OUGH POLAR BEAR
Hamster
OUGH ALPACA
She’s pretty damn cute.
Miho is sex.
But that's a human
And the ending was shit by the way.
best girl
Left looks like a sexy otter. Right looks like it has more personality.
What's this?
>draw a walrus, call it an egg man
What a fricking joke.
KOOKOKACHOOK
Erm, ackshually his name is Dr. Robotonic
Robotonic is the scientist, that's Robotonic's Monster.
Yeah, that's his name. His species is Egg man, read the manual.
Tube mammals best mammals.
My gripe
K'nuckles was a seal?
No, he was an echidna.
Reference to the episode where Flapjack mind controlled him with candy.
East
West
Young
Old
We're all perverts in the end.
I demand to know bottom left and left of top right.
Charlotte from Interspecies Reviewers and Gila from Spider-Man TAS
>check msg
>4 results
>7 results
Ugh.
No one said being into scalie girls was easy.
No. It sucks. It sucks so much I'm never listening to anyone that b***hes about AI.
OUGH
what's this from
Odd Taxi
Fixed.
Earlier animators for the most part would have only had exposure to weasels through fur. Check out this weasel* stole from the 1920s-30s. It doesn't really look like the living animal, but it resembles the cartoon.
Older animations such as Looney Tunes featuring weasels that look like this made that the default for drawing them. It may not be accurate, but it's an interesting look-back to the times.
(*"weasel" would also include sables and martens. )
Back in the before-times, before photography was invented, all animators had to go off were medieval bestiaries. The Bugs Bunny/Elmer Fudd dynamic actually evolved from the weasel-basilisk fights of early 18th century cartoons.
You tell me, there was no Animal photography since the 30s up until the 70s?
Obviously animal photography has existed since ancient times, but it wasn't fully legalised until 1978. Prior to that it was considered a form of bestiality. You really didn't want to be caught leaving the back room of your local "private shop" with a roll of weasel photographs under your arm.
Because they're talented?
You'll need to read the good book.
Frick outcast of redwall, filthy ferret/weasel slander
Mossflower was better.
>east vs. west thread
Do you ever get tired of this shit
It's way better than /misc/ vs trannies.
That's a wall of matchboxes to vault, it's borderline Twitter screencap threads. However it has reminded me of this classic.
How bout dem /LULZ/ vs femanon threads
>inb4 """fem"""anons
Because weasels kill chickens and are a threat to farmers therefore their designs in media are negative
Surely this must be bait
It pretty much is, just like that moronic "Calarts" image/gif so many people spam on here.
>draw a hexagon
>call it a weasel
I don't like it much either, the changed design is almost always not as interesting as the real thing. Always hated roadrunner for example as actual roadrunners look way cooler.
Okay so this thread is:
>People baiting
>People taking bait
>'People' who want to frick weasels
And one guy who might actually be a weasel and wants to set the record straight.
>Stylization is... le bad!!
Weird opinion on Cinemaphile of all places
Moeshitters won't be happy until every single fiction character look like this
Not when you realize Cinemaphile exists as Cinemaphile‘s public shitting street. They’re raiding multiple threads at once, the public domain heroes thread is suddenly full of them.
Thank you sir.
You win the thread.
Nice
And Road runners arent blue, but cartoons dont need to be realistic
>nooooo this brown ground cuckooroni is perfect and smol you have to draw it exactly as it looks in real life or ill leave a b***hy spergout in your mentions
But he said cartoons don't need to be realistic.
Can't you read?
Bullshit, it's absolutely identical, down to it being the size of an ostrich.
I posit that the road runner, the coyote, the rabbit and the duck are all normal sized and Fudd and Yosemite Sam are just very small.
What if weasels looked like this?
They do in the gay furry comics i read
Ayo
Then you should go back to furaffinity, dogfricker tourist.
I would cum
I dunno, why the frick do they make raccoons brown when they're gray?
Why do they make anteaters pink when they're clearly grey?
WHY DOES IT LOOK LIKE VEGAS>
Oh, I always thought those were tapirs.
The wiki/s states them as being aardvarks and have never watched the show I don't know who to believe now
Not too fond of how they handle rabbits either.
What even is the problem here
The frick do they want
Me on the right
I don't know. When I was a kid this kind of design made me fantasize about holding them by the ears and torturing them.
Well mostly it was about the rabbit from bambi, but this kind of rabbit too.
So I don't think it's a good design
Talk to a doctor, freak.
Should I read/watch Peter rabbit?
Yes.
Left looks like a stuffed animal. 10/10
kinda unrelated but only recently I found out that these characters are meant to be dung beetles
>why do cartoonists try to convey character traits through designs instead of making all animals moeblobs
because it's a cartoon
So does he fall on the right?
That's am alien, theyre not held to the same standards as earthlings.
because they draw them like ferrets.
why are minks so fat?
They're semiaquatic.
Right is a bad guy and left is a good guy.
Weasel paws typed that.
Lots of cartoonists are hacks. This image is right and the seethe it caused is hilarious.
I bet you liked the lion king remake
It's the same thing with a lot of "realistic" Pokemon designs that make them look like hideous abominations, as if cute or beautiful animals don't exist
I feel like you could replace the text with "female character is designed vs male character is designed" and the same effect happens.
Same shit different day etc.
The >filename folder grows.
>weasel is a shorthand for someone untrustworthy and dastardly
>draw character in an appropriate way instead of appealing to your weird freakish zoophile interests
>this is bad somehow
>a realistic depiction of a weasel is "appealing to your weird freakish zoophile interests"
Whole lotta projection in this thread.
>weird freakish zoophile interests
????
This whole thread operates on the premise that western artists can't draw realistic animals, as opposed to artists draw characters and objects in the style that befits the tone of the story they're working on. Film at 11.
>This whole thread operates on the premise that western artists can't draw realistic animals
But that's the point. People whose art uses a "goofy" or "toony" style usually isn't that way because they consciously chose that particular style out of anything else they could've drawn, but because that's literally the only way they know how to draw. They really don't know how to draw realistic animals.
That's an assumption on your part.
Takes me back
>weasels ripped my flesh
Its funny and thats what matters
If you add eyelashes and breasts to the right one that's wife material roight there
?t=3
FRICK YOU, I SAVED THIS IMAGE 2 DAYS AGO AND I WAS WAITING FOR THE WEEKEND TO MAKE A THREAD. FRICK YOU.
Posting twitter bait on Cinemaphile like usual
Twitter exists, anon. Sometimes an image is posted to Twitter first, anon. Sometimes (you) go to Twitter, shocking I know, and save an image there.
>Sometimes I like to eat my own shit, shocking I know
good
I'm glad your adhdBlack person brain didn't receive that dopamine from making a shitty twitter bait thread
I remember when it used to be the other way around. Good times...
kek, thanks for the metadata
i got this kid's credit card info n shit
LOL
Why were you waiting for the weekend to begin with?
Because cartoon characters are often drawn in a way to convey the personality they have, and general vibe or role they have within the show.
Weasels are often shown as mischievous and hyperactive, so having them drawn with a mischievous and crooked appearance is appropriate.
But it depends on the show. Like, if the show is more cutesy in nature, like some Steven Universe shit and stuff, they'd probably draw something closer to the one on the left.
>Steven Universe
>cutesy
Those designs are all fugly and not in an endearing way, you picked the worst possible example.
Yeah it was a bad example, but you got the idea
It's funny
Real Weasels don’t look stylized like on the left.
Right is better if you want to make a weasel character. Though it is a little generic.
>Though it is a little generic
that's the point of the drawing
Don't you want you characters to be drawn like that?
>left is bland, working better as background character
>Right has a personality just from one glance, he could be a logo, he could be a main antagonist, he can even be a devious scamp who steals
There, now they can be together in a show.
I will now watch your show
ok now we've got something
The idea got stuck in my head
Nice
I love you.
Awesoime!
I'm glad something good came from all this bullshit.
THREAD STATUS: SAVED
WE ARE SO BACK
WEST STATUS: RISEN
TOTAL Cinemaphile VICTORY HAS BEEN ACHIEVED
Thanks for the laugh
That show was awesome.
big woman
wide hips
good
woah mama
Thank you all for the kind words, tried to do something more with them
Very cute.
U FUKER
Unironically love this. It NEEDS to be a thing. Like part of the Cinemaphile originals canon. They need names. I want to draw them too now.
Do it, anon. You have the power to keep them alive.
You and anyone else have my full permission to expand on/draw the characters. If I have time I would like to draw them more. For names- no clue sorry, I'm horrible with coming up with them
The worst thing to me is when they try way too hard to humanize the face shape while still leaving them mostly animalistic.
I. R. Better than Weasel.
This are baboon thread now
whats wrong with right side?
the big cartoony eyes lend themselves to expression better
the exposed teeth add a bit more complexity to the mouth, so it isnt just a line, while also making it more "wild"
the large exaggerated whiskers just look cool, almost like a moustache
and when all the elements are combined, you have a weasel that looks just a little off-kilter and up to no good
Nothing. Some anons or artists cant into character design. They would say that pic related is how human faces look like! But not Lysop!
This thing isn't even close to panther colored, how did they miss that???? Westoids what are we doign here??
They came up with the title first and said "shit, a black panther doesn't make any sense now, does it"
>black panther = manly and dominant
>pink panther = girlish and gay like a white boy
dayum rite!
Anon, he’s pink, not white…
the entire point of cartoons is that they are exaggerated reality
you fricking soulless six piece chicken mcBlack person
Cute is always better than ugly.
If reality is ugly make it cute.
If reality is cute keep it cute.
Simple as that.
Cute is for pussies. It's round and simplified, easy. Making things purposefully ugly requires skill and perseverance.
Based. "Cute" feels like a refuge for ugly minds. People should embrace ugly design, instead!
What if I find ugly things cute?
How the hell does this nothing of a thread have so many replies and posters? All over a bait image that is just…pointing out something cartoons do?
It’s like this board somehow gets more moronic by the second.
Never mind, I retract my statement. Because
made all of this worth it.
Because you live in a modern world where stories about those little frickers killing livestock and eating egg aren’t as common so you just see them as cute and not vermin.
You can be cute AND evil, you know.
I think a lot animals are cute, but I always wondered the cost of us adopting animals as pets when they naturally conflict with human interests. Not saying it can tame or even domesticate them over a long time, but I still wonder.
not even a tumbler level post nor shitpost this post is just shit.
as my actual response, because its fun? kids and adults wouldn't watch a irl fish tank for like 20 minutes but they sure as hell love spongebob
>what weasels look like
that's not a weasel, that's a pokemon
Weasels don't look like either.
No shit. Given that the twitter user calls out "western cartoonists" it's likely he's a weeb who thinks everything should be shapeless featureless moeblobs.
I can understand not evrybody went to art school but, did you homosexuals dont even know wha a cartoon is? cartoons are about exaggerate features, also the left part is not even realistic, fricking weebs
There it is!
i didn't know i needed this til now..
top waifu material
i would gladly pop that weasel like a balloon. give me a table and a conveyor belt and i'll make sure it looks like she swallowed a beach ball in no time
Anon tripping over his own feet as always.
Weasel thread? Guess I can post these. Hope a jannie don't get mad.
awooga
someone should give both of them eyelashes
>not pictured: Steve Buscemi
Right is sexier.
Columbo - Shinigami:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/16CKjELxHhg?feature=share
Wrong thread
A lack of israeli DNA in their veins
Would, WOULD, would, would, would.
I thought that the weasel from Garfield was adorable and I always rooted for him to get the chickens
Reminder that weebanon is actually some turd worlder Asian who physically can't even eat his vegetables and thus takes his impotent rage at this out on Americans across all of Cinemaphile because we have healthy food unlike his shit country of Sri-fricka or Malaria
>molly mongoose
>wally weasel
>frank the ferret
>mikey mink
>fran the ferret
>sasha stout
>melody mink
>etc
>weebhomosexual discovers what an actual cartoon is
Thoughts on how to draw owls?