Unironically it's a humiliation ritual. Joker 1 was too popular with the "wrong" kind of person so they're making a sequel that is intentionally alienating to chuds.
>Unironically it's a humiliation ritual. Joker 1 was too popular with the "wrong" kind of person so they're making a sequel that is intentionally alienating to chuds.
This.i just couldn't put this thought into words anon, well said.
if I remember correctly, Hollywood hated Joker from the get go
don't you remember how they tried to get all media suggesting that there will be a mass shooting at Joker movie showing because Joker is popular with incels?
I appreciate any attempt to be unique. Nobody's done anything like this. This could be a catastrophe or it could be a stone cold kino. It's a big swing by someone who basically has the all clear to do whatever they want with a movie. Not unlike Burton with Batman Returns. A sequel to Joker is something nobody was asking for, let alone a musical featuring Lady Gaga. But like, maybe it's weird enough to work? We'll see how it plays out.
This is my take. Even though i'm a CHUD I didn't like Joker that much, it had a lot of memorable lines and moments but the overall movie felt disjointed and ugly. A weirdo villainous psycho musical with Harley Quinn is so crazy it just might work, or it could be fricking awful. Who knows?
I’ve never seen so much wrong in one post presented as fact. > Nobody's done anything like this.
Yeah, they have. Serious musical thrillers exist. > A sequel to Joker is something nobody was asking for
People were asking for one as soon as Joker was released. Todd Phillips was literally asked about it and he said he didn’t want to do one.
A big Hollywood studio made shitloads of money. All the associated crews and people made money. It's Warner Bros not some tiny arthouse studio. WB then uses this money to fund other movies
>you seem to forget how many movies get made for negative profits just push an agenda, ever heard of Disney for example?
No, you're underestimating how stupid people are. They push the "agenda" because they think the woke stuff is popular. Not to spread their ideas, but because they think people actually want to see it
Raimi did the best he could and still made a movie with more heart and soul and sincerity than any capeshit that's come since except TDK. He was very much on board with making Spider-Man 4 and Sony kept fricking with him.
>Lady Gaga when Gentleman Googoo enters.
Give your review of my meme in five words or less below thanks
its pretty good
Thanks
Not yours, 2+ years old.
Unironically it's a humiliation ritual. Joker 1 was too popular with the "wrong" kind of person so they're making a sequel that is intentionally alienating to chuds.
>Unironically it's a humiliation ritual. Joker 1 was too popular with the "wrong" kind of person so they're making a sequel that is intentionally alienating to chuds.
This.i just couldn't put this thought into words anon, well said.
Joke's on them, I like musicals.
My Dad thinks I'm gay just because I liked La La Land
He thinks you’re gay cause he saw you kissing another man on the street, he’s just too ashamed to bring it up
And that, kids, was how i met your father
>Pa pa pa pa, pa pa pa pa...
pa pa, da da da da, da da da da da
I couldn't have said it better.
to rightfully spite morons who got to attached to the character from the first joker movie
for once i got to take hollywood's side here
if I remember correctly, Hollywood hated Joker from the get go
don't you remember how they tried to get all media suggesting that there will be a mass shooting at Joker movie showing because Joker is popular with incels?
Because they ate afraid of the political climate?
Idk. Shits gay bro
Joker 2 is Dune Messiah
gays, it's all about the gays now. We are being phased out.
unironically looking forward to it and hiding all the seething chud threads
If you're not a chud you're in the wrong place.
I appreciate any attempt to be unique. Nobody's done anything like this. This could be a catastrophe or it could be a stone cold kino. It's a big swing by someone who basically has the all clear to do whatever they want with a movie. Not unlike Burton with Batman Returns. A sequel to Joker is something nobody was asking for, let alone a musical featuring Lady Gaga. But like, maybe it's weird enough to work? We'll see how it plays out.
This is my take. Even though i'm a CHUD I didn't like Joker that much, it had a lot of memorable lines and moments but the overall movie felt disjointed and ugly. A weirdo villainous psycho musical with Harley Quinn is so crazy it just might work, or it could be fricking awful. Who knows?
I’ve never seen so much wrong in one post presented as fact.
> Nobody's done anything like this.
Yeah, they have. Serious musical thrillers exist.
> A sequel to Joker is something nobody was asking for
People were asking for one as soon as Joker was released. Todd Phillips was literally asked about it and he said he didn’t want to do one.
Way to announce you're a fricking homo
>A sequel to Joker is something nobody was asking for
Wtf are you talking about?
Reminds me of how Raimi just set out to make Spiderman 3 as goofy as possible because he didn't want to do them anymore.
Yeah but the director liked Joker, Wackeem liked Joker, everyone respects the movie. It's Phillips' "homage" to Taxi Driver
And now a musical? Kinda weird. Having said that Baby Driver by Wright was pretty good considering it was a long music video
Hollywood hated joker. They were absolutely desperate for a mass shooting to happen so they could shitcan the movie for good.
>Why are they making Joker 2 a musical?
Maximum humiliation. Because this
They didn't get their mass shooting, they were made to look foolish.
>Enjoy your musical, chuds.
I don't believe that for a second (that Hollywood hated Joker)
Joker made 20x its budget. It made shitloads of money. Therefore Hollywood loved Joker
https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Joker-(2019)#tab=box-office
>Hollywood equally shares all the profit made from every film!
Jesus
A big Hollywood studio made shitloads of money. All the associated crews and people made money. It's Warner Bros not some tiny arthouse studio. WB then uses this money to fund other movies
you seem to forget how many movies get made for negative profits just push an agenda, ever heard of Disney for example?
>you seem to forget how many movies get made for negative profits just push an agenda, ever heard of Disney for example?
No, you're underestimating how stupid people are. They push the "agenda" because they think the woke stuff is popular. Not to spread their ideas, but because they think people actually want to see it
Raimi did the best he could and still made a movie with more heart and soul and sincerity than any capeshit that's come since except TDK. He was very much on board with making Spider-Man 4 and Sony kept fricking with him.
>mom said i get to use your action figures for my tea party
Joker is a schizo drama to capture the male audience
Joker 2 is a musical drama to capture the female audience
it's really that simple
Women enjoyed Joker
Trannies aren't women. No woman could understand Jokers incel ideology.
Its kino
I think they’re trying to go for Wicker Man vibes. Hopefully Gaga sings a banger like Willow’s Song.
humiliation ritual