What? You've never run into the ghost of your ex-lover 60 years after they've died posessing some random other guy's body? It's easy just tell a relatable story like that.
one time doctor crusher ran into the ghost of her dead grandma's lover because every woman in the crusher family kept fricking the same ghost but it was really a noncorporeal alien
>What about Joel Schumacher
Technically that was still Burton's franchise. Everyone knew then as they do now that it was the same canon. Only the flash movie thinks otherwise. >and Zack Snyder?
Making garbage isn't groundbreaking. Also, as
Zack didn't make any Batman movies, he just used him in crossover films.
>Joel
Fair nuff
pointed out, Schneider never technically made a Batman movie.
Because Superman fans and Wonder Woman fans are terrible fans that are constantly b***hing about the portrayal of their favorite character across various medias. Batman fans just consume regardless.
Wonder Woman's relevance died with Lynda Carter's career and Superman stopped being great after the second film. They could've elevated any of their other properties while Marvel was doing The Incredible Hulk, but chose not to for whatever reason.
Not sure how the latest movie is groundbreaking in any sense. Burton movies were basically the first time people started taking cape movies somewhat seriously. Nolan movies were basically the culmination of this trend, actually winning awards and becoming a pop culture totem pole for its era. The latest one is almost entirely forgotten by most people already, and it came out, what, like a year ago?
Batman is a martial artist so you can have villains who are normal people with guns/bombs/etc. This makes it easy to add more of them in sequels as they require little explanation.
Superman and Wonderman have a huge number of superpowers so you also need a supervillain for them to fight. This makes it hard to add more of them in sequels as you have to explain where they came from and why they weren't in earlier movies.
Honestly, it would have been better if each movie was their own character instead of all of them being Batman. Reusing the same name so much despite the wildly different portrayals dilutes the brand.
batman is uniquely positioned as to where the tone of a franchise can be anywhere on the spectrum from comedy to tragedy to popcorn action to cerebral thriller and it not being out of character
I'm not sure there's any other character with that amount of range and so it makes sense that this one is able to have so many different franchises with different visions and all of them work
What? You've never run into the ghost of your ex-lover 60 years after they've died posessing some random other guy's body? It's easy just tell a relatable story like that.
one time doctor crusher ran into the ghost of her dead grandma's lover because every woman in the crusher family kept fricking the same ghost but it was really a noncorporeal alien
>Taking sloppy 88ths
Crusher got no respect for prostituteself.
that was a magic lamp, frick you
>three groundbreaking franchises
What about Joel Schumacher and Zack Snyder?
>THOSE DON'T COUNT, OKAY!!!!?
Zack didn't make any Batman movies, he just used him in crossover films.
>Joel
Fair nuff
>What about Joel Schumacher
Technically that was still Burton's franchise. Everyone knew then as they do now that it was the same canon. Only the flash movie thinks otherwise.
>and Zack Snyder?
Making garbage isn't groundbreaking. Also, as
pointed out, Schneider never technically made a Batman movie.
Because Superman fans and Wonder Woman fans are terrible fans that are constantly b***hing about the portrayal of their favorite character across various medias. Batman fans just consume regardless.
>Wonder Woman fans
No such thing. People that fap to her, sure. But not fans.
Batman overall seems to have better success both critically and financially compared to other single characters over the decades.
Wonder Woman's relevance died with Lynda Carter's career and Superman stopped being great after the second film. They could've elevated any of their other properties while Marvel was doing The Incredible Hulk, but chose not to for whatever reason.
>Justice League, Aquaman, Green Lantern, Flash
All tainted with the stank of The Superfriends.
Did the Aquaman movie help Aquaman has a character whatsoever?
wonder woman really needs a cartoon
They gave her another solo animated movie, but it was the worst selling animated movie since Catwoman Hunted.
>not snarky, foulmouthed, cynical, or lgbtq+ like Harley Quinn
Next.
>lgbtq+
But she is
Look at the guys making Superman hate threads to find the answer
Are we ever gonna get a wonder woman who can actually fight like the animated movies?
what the frick are you talking about?
Not sure how the latest movie is groundbreaking in any sense. Burton movies were basically the first time people started taking cape movies somewhat seriously. Nolan movies were basically the culmination of this trend, actually winning awards and becoming a pop culture totem pole for its era. The latest one is almost entirely forgotten by most people already, and it came out, what, like a year ago?
The Batman really is just Ok.
Snyder was doing it but morons b***hed about him.
Batman is a martial artist so you can have villains who are normal people with guns/bombs/etc. This makes it easy to add more of them in sequels as they require little explanation.
Superman and Wonderman have a huge number of superpowers so you also need a supervillain for them to fight. This makes it hard to add more of them in sequels as you have to explain where they came from and why they weren't in earlier movies.
WW could be a household name if 64 wasnt a thing
what the FRICK they were thinking
WW will never be a household name because as a character she's boring as frick.
Gunn is doing that with Superman.
Why do you insist on watching the live action versions? The animated movies and cartoons have been on model and on brand for the last century.
Honestly, it would have been better if each movie was their own character instead of all of them being Batman. Reusing the same name so much despite the wildly different portrayals dilutes the brand.
>Batman fans have no taste, thats why they're Batman fans.
This. There are people out there who think Hush and Death in the Family are good stories.
batman is uniquely positioned as to where the tone of a franchise can be anywhere on the spectrum from comedy to tragedy to popcorn action to cerebral thriller and it not being out of character
I'm not sure there's any other character with that amount of range and so it makes sense that this one is able to have so many different franchises with different visions and all of them work
I only liked the Tim Burton movies
I didn't see the Pattinson movie, what was so "innovative" about it?
only film nerds would say that because of the shooting techniques used
aside from that it was a pretty standard affair
Sounds boring.
I guess it's criticisms of Batman as a concept makes it stand out from the other movies