>it isn't a problem for Superman or The Flash
Flash just bombed and Gunn's Peacemaker like Superman is going to bomb too, though that one bombing is probably unrelated to the tv show.
>putting the flash in films while they do a flash tv series with a different actor
But that even sounds moronic when you say it. Why even do it? What's the point? When was Flash ever a character that was anywhere near popular enough to warrant both at once?
Not to mention that the tv shows are horrible, and with Batman you wind up with hot garbage like Gotham.
>you want a batman series? >like gotham a series that didn't have batman?
you're a special kind of stupid
11 months ago
Anonymous
>says it's not going to have Batman >turns into Batman the show minus Batman
It was a moronic concept from the beginning.
"Gotham: the comic book about everything in the city besides Batman" would not sell.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>if you want a batman show you want a moronic show that removed batman
are you trolling now or just stupid?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>this company has the ability to make decent, non moronic shows
I'm in a delusional thread, so.
11 months ago
Anonymous
taking the core character out of the work means it can never be good
this does not speak to the ability to make decent material with that core character
11 months ago
Anonymous
>this does not speak to the ability to make decent material with that core character
Could a good Batman show exist? Yes. Could it exist in this reality? No. Executives are allergic to good decisions and never make them intentionally.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Yes it can exist. Look at the Daredevil and Punisher tv series.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>a good series >Punisher
Wait am I trolling or are you?
I think they're afraid of damaging the brand with a mediocre product. Batwoman is something, for example, that can take the hit. She's not even Batgirl.
Batman though, if you get it wrong you never hear the end of it.
>Batwoman is something, for example, that can take the hit. She's not even Batgirl.
Yes, nobody complains when it's an unpopular character nobody gives a frick about, like the diversity addition of the gay batwoman.
>I think they're afraid of damaging the brand with a mediocre product.
The Justice League fiasco
WW84
Captain Marvel 2
And now it looks like Flash and Aquaman 2
>people who know and understand and appreciate the characters
But those kind of people don't make diverse and inclusionary decisions since all of this source material predates the world going fricking insane.
>you can't have any black characters without the entire thing being woke as frick
See, this is the problem. We always had them, they just weren't SPECIAL. And any characters that spouted anything resembling these modern ideologies were portrayed satirically.
this wouldn't happen if they put in charge people who know and understand and appreciate the characters and have a proven record
anyone got the screencap of the interview with a producer saying they only wanted to hire writers familiar with and fans of the material after a bad experience on The Witcher where the people in charge actively disliked it?
>a show from 57 years ago is good enough
>grandpa just woke up from his coma after 60 years
Chad
Incels
Having a tv series with a totally different actor while they're making unconnected movies is fricking moronic, though.
they're making TWO seperate movies now
Brave and the Bold AND a sequel to The Batman
and it isn't a problem for Superman or The Flash
>it isn't a problem for Superman or The Flash
Flash just bombed and Gunn's Peacemaker like Superman is going to bomb too, though that one bombing is probably unrelated to the tv show.
thats got nothing to do with them putting the flash in films while they do a flash tv series with a different actor
>putting the flash in films while they do a flash tv series with a different actor
But that even sounds moronic when you say it. Why even do it? What's the point? When was Flash ever a character that was anywhere near popular enough to warrant both at once?
Not to mention that the tv shows are horrible, and with Batman you wind up with hot garbage like Gotham.
>you want a batman series?
>like gotham a series that didn't have batman?
you're a special kind of stupid
>says it's not going to have Batman
>turns into Batman the show minus Batman
It was a moronic concept from the beginning.
"Gotham: the comic book about everything in the city besides Batman" would not sell.
>if you want a batman show you want a moronic show that removed batman
are you trolling now or just stupid?
>this company has the ability to make decent, non moronic shows
I'm in a delusional thread, so.
taking the core character out of the work means it can never be good
this does not speak to the ability to make decent material with that core character
>this does not speak to the ability to make decent material with that core character
Could a good Batman show exist? Yes. Could it exist in this reality? No. Executives are allergic to good decisions and never make them intentionally.
Yes it can exist. Look at the Daredevil and Punisher tv series.
>a good series
>Punisher
Wait am I trolling or are you?
Batman deserves kino that the media cannot provide in it's current shitty state. I'd rather they leave Batman alone than make some garbage.
What a fricking pathetic consoomer OP is.
I think they're afraid of damaging the brand with a mediocre product. Batwoman is something, for example, that can take the hit. She's not even Batgirl.
Batman though, if you get it wrong you never hear the end of it.
>Batwoman is something, for example, that can take the hit. She's not even Batgirl.
Yes, nobody complains when it's an unpopular character nobody gives a frick about, like the diversity addition of the gay batwoman.
>I think they're afraid of damaging the brand with a mediocre product.
The Justice League fiasco
WW84
Captain Marvel 2
And now it looks like Flash and Aquaman 2
this wouldn't happen if they put in charge people who know and understand and appreciate the characters and have a proven record
>people who know and understand and appreciate the characters
But those kind of people don't make diverse and inclusionary decisions since all of this source material predates the world going fricking insane.
Detectives Bock and Montoya
>you can't have any black characters without the entire thing being woke as frick
See, this is the problem. We always had them, they just weren't SPECIAL. And any characters that spouted anything resembling these modern ideologies were portrayed satirically.
>characters that spouted anything resembling these modern ideologies
Haha totally gottem with that chudjak greentext, enjoy that minor dopamine hit, junkie.
anyone got the screencap of the interview with a producer saying they only wanted to hire writers familiar with and fans of the material after a bad experience on The Witcher where the people in charge actively disliked it?