She was genuinely good in the first HP because she was just a kid with no experience and wasn't trying to 'act'. The moment she started actually attempting to create a performance instead of reading her lines naturally, she got incredibly stiff and unnatural.
Anyway say what you will about her I'd still drink her bathwater
>never went beyond what she needed to act for HP >only did some Disney shit >went full feminist >never apologized
To be fair, HP makes still so much money she can life off royalties and never lift a single finger ever again.
Radcliffe still acting is more to show that he cares about the job itself and Rupert is an ice-cream man who doesn't care about anything anyway.
kinda funny how one of the biggest celeb feminists on the fricking planet was as quiet as a church mouse when allegations were flying. she was criticized and hastily wore a fake "Times Up" tattoo at a premiere. not exactly #MeToo though, now is it.
Because she wasted her good years on indie films and her last decent ones being an activist. Now, her girl next door looks have faded and all that’s left is mediocrity not worthy for the screen.
Very few child actor go on to be successful actor in adulthood. The expectation of a child actor is much lower. They have enough talent for a child, but don't meet the talent requirement for an adult when they frow up. They may also be chosen purely because they're cute or have a certain look about them, which as a child is in demand, but as an adult is not.
Emma was smart and well managed enough to realise this somewhat and made sure she got a good education and entered into politics as a secondary career. Good for her.
>cute face but otherwise a plain Jane, with small breasts and an almost hank hill ass >pair that with a stuck up im better than you personality >no need to better her looks or try to be a better person because she has Harry Potter money
I was watching "this is the end" last weekend, and Emma wad out acted by: Seth Rogan, Jonah Hill, James Franco, Danny McBride, Jay Brushel and Craig Robertson. That's why she never made it big after potter.
When are we going to get to see her breasts?
we saw them anon.. we just saw them 20 years too late
it's because she's plain, boring and forgettable in every role she was in
there's nothing to see really. She's built like a 13 year old boy
begone, bug chaser
>She's built like a 13 year old
🙂
>boy
🙁
U sicko perverts need to leave!
HAHAHAAHA DID YOU SEE WHAT HE DID THERE GUYS? AHAHAHAHAHAHAH
We have
didn't want to frick harvey
oh she did
but not well enough
Refused to apologize for her car. She's finished.
Lost
Because she's not a very good actor. She doesn't look as good as she used to, so she probably won't have a late career renaissance either.
She was genuinely good in the first HP because she was just a kid with no experience and wasn't trying to 'act'. The moment she started actually attempting to create a performance instead of reading her lines naturally, she got incredibly stiff and unnatural.
Anyway say what you will about her I'd still drink her bathwater
>never went beyond what she needed to act for HP
>only did some Disney shit
>went full feminist
>never apologized
To be fair, HP makes still so much money she can life off royalties and never lift a single finger ever again.
Radcliffe still acting is more to show that he cares about the job itself and Rupert is an ice-cream man who doesn't care about anything anyway.
and don't forget
>HARVESTED
kinda funny how one of the biggest celeb feminists on the fricking planet was as quiet as a church mouse when allegations were flying. she was criticized and hastily wore a fake "Times Up" tattoo at a premiere. not exactly #MeToo though, now is it.
probably that car
Because she aged like shit.
the bug is wearing plastic 'lenses' to seem to have nice sized eyes. really her irises are little weird black dots so she isn't actually hot.
Weird cope. Narrow eyes are cute too.
Body of an eight year old boy
You can still see the shadow where she plucks her monobrow.
Harvey tried, but there was only so far a good Marchesa dress could take her.
Because she wasted her good years on indie films and her last decent ones being an activist. Now, her girl next door looks have faded and all that’s left is mediocrity not worthy for the screen.
she peaked at the chair photoshoot
you know the one
also the red shirt smile
you know the one
also the candid beach/festival shots
you know the one
and the brother swing set shoot
you know the one
>looks like a GDP set with make-up similar to what the girls had on
I'm rock hard
Very few child actor go on to be successful actor in adulthood. The expectation of a child actor is much lower. They have enough talent for a child, but don't meet the talent requirement for an adult when they frow up. They may also be chosen purely because they're cute or have a certain look about them, which as a child is in demand, but as an adult is not.
Emma was smart and well managed enough to realise this somewhat and made sure she got a good education and entered into politics as a secondary career. Good for her.
Probably because she refused to show a lot of skin and take on that sort of roles because she's a feminist and sees them as objectifying or whatever.
>cute face but otherwise a plain Jane, with small breasts and an almost hank hill ass
>pair that with a stuck up im better than you personality
>no need to better her looks or try to be a better person because she has Harry Potter money
>>pair that with a stuck up im better than you personality
Yep. She's a woman.
Disdainful blowjob tier.
>there, i swallowed. happy? now frick off!
I was watching "this is the end" last weekend, and Emma wad out acted by: Seth Rogan, Jonah Hill, James Franco, Danny McBride, Jay Brushel and Craig Robertson. That's why she never made it big after potter.
Unattractive and was featured in a israeli child molestion device.