You have to realize that gays are a minority. So the target audience isn't going to generate a large box office.
For some reason this concept seems to be lost on studios.
White women love homosexuals and homosexualry. They're unironically the target audience for all of this gay shit, not the actual homosexuals themselves. Women control the spending usually
>this cringe homosexual for some reason appears in your youtube feed >you don't immediately cancel his channel from ever appearing again
the frick is wrong with you?
Hollywood doesn’t realize that the majority of people don’t actually give a flying frick about this stuff besides keeping marriage legal and having one pride flag at work.
I have a few buddies that are gay, they hated this movie. I have never seen it though, not my thing. In fact it probably isn't anyones thing outside of the writers.
You had the lead actor (angry yelling homosexual from Parks and Rec) passively-aggressively accusing everyone who gave the movie negative reviews and didn't go see it of being homophobes.
Also it didn't have a talented gay like John Waters directing and writing.
some gays have deluded themselves into thinking that their lifestyle is interesting/quirky/exciting just by itself
But people don't want to watch a raunchy movie if they can't relate to the raunchy content
Also I'm sure the movie was shit aside from that too
No, not at all. Even gay married couples are only nominally married to kids off straights and Christians (whom they hate). Every gay dude has unprotected sex with dozens of sexual partners (most of them complete strangers) every week. It’s a completely loveless subculture, that lives purely to be “sexual” and “dirty”- and due to their nonstop sex, it gets boring so they have to constantly level up to increasingly depraved and extreme sex acts, hence the small children and dogs getting monkeypox.
Flamboyant gays just watch Golden Girls or some stupid shit like that so I dont know who the target audience was except the directors and producers pockets.
The poster makes it seem like a sex comedy when the marketing was trying to sell a romcom. Romcoms are not the same as sex comedies. I love You Philip Morris was like 15 years ago and had a comparable box office, not even adjusting for inflation. Why? That movie poster made it clear it was about love and not lust.
who wants to watch other gays except other gays and they're only 2% of the population
>From the Producer of Trainwreck and Bridesmaids
This
>From the same guy that brought you that shitty movie with lecuck and the pig
You have to realize that gays are a minority. So the target audience isn't going to generate a large box office.
For some reason this concept seems to be lost on studios.
White women love homosexuals and homosexualry. They're unironically the target audience for all of this gay shit, not the actual homosexuals themselves. Women control the spending usually
Women like the idea of gays, but they don’t want to see them being lewd
>Women control the spending usually
Not really, men are just lazy and don't want to deal with spending and give women that power.
Too icky for everyone who isn't a gay man, too sanitized for those gay men. Movie for whomst?
>So you have a movie for us, let's hear it
Yeah, it's about a gay couple.
>Ok, and..?
And what?
>What's the plot? What happens in it?
Huh?
The guy in your pic would be all over a movie made by homosexuals for homosexuals.
nah, he's surprisingly based for a söy-looking guy who reviews goyslop
>this cringe homosexual for some reason appears in your youtube feed
>you don't immediately cancel his channel from ever appearing again
the frick is wrong with you?
man ass is tight
>Haha this is a movie mocking straight men and glorifying gay degenerates
>Why didn't straight men show up for this gay comedy we don't understand
It insisted upon itself.
Nobody wants to watch a movie where they mix the peepee in the poopoo
Would you wanna watch that? Diseased groups (AIDS Monkeypox) are biologically repulsive to the human mind
Billy Eicher is only appealing to 30-year old fat white women. Nobody else likes him. Gay people don't like him.
Because gays know they could be fricking and sucking without dinner and a movie
many people thought it was about 2 brothers. they should have instead named it “gays”
Hollywood doesn’t realize that the majority of people don’t actually give a flying frick about this stuff besides keeping marriage legal and having one pride flag at work.
>Eichner
>Apatow
Automatic writeoff, and I'm gay. I'm not watching anything that these two have touched.
A gay who’s redpilled on the JQ? You don’t see that every day.
>I’m gay
At what age were you molested?
Because it turns out all this fricking "acceptance" is surface level schlock normies do
Behind closed doors everyone still hates homosexuals
I have a few buddies that are gay, they hated this movie. I have never seen it though, not my thing. In fact it probably isn't anyones thing outside of the writers.
BALD IM KINO
You had the lead actor (angry yelling homosexual from Parks and Rec) passively-aggressively accusing everyone who gave the movie negative reviews and didn't go see it of being homophobes.
Also it didn't have a talented gay like John Waters directing and writing.
some gays have deluded themselves into thinking that their lifestyle is interesting/quirky/exciting just by itself
But people don't want to watch a raunchy movie if they can't relate to the raunchy content
Also I'm sure the movie was shit aside from that too
Vanity project for the annoying 1 trick pony that is Eichner
This movie would have been better if it was a body horror about two gay guys getting AIDS in the mid-80s.
Do gays even have relationships?
No, not at all. Even gay married couples are only nominally married to kids off straights and Christians (whom they hate). Every gay dude has unprotected sex with dozens of sexual partners (most of them complete strangers) every week. It’s a completely loveless subculture, that lives purely to be “sexual” and “dirty”- and due to their nonstop sex, it gets boring so they have to constantly level up to increasingly depraved and extreme sex acts, hence the small children and dogs getting monkeypox.
>Why
There's nothing rom-com about anal fisting or urine drinking or pup play.
It was not gay enough.
>watch the trailer
>it's all "OH SASSY GAY, WE'RE ALL GAY OHHHH ALL THESE GAY STEREOTYPES LOL GAY GAY GAY GAY"
Do actual gay people enjoy this stuff?
Flamboyant gays just watch Golden Girls or some stupid shit like that so I dont know who the target audience was except the directors and producers pockets.
The poster makes it seem like a sex comedy when the marketing was trying to sell a romcom. Romcoms are not the same as sex comedies. I love You Philip Morris was like 15 years ago and had a comparable box office, not even adjusting for inflation. Why? That movie poster made it clear it was about love and not lust.
>Romcoms are not the same as sex comedies.
they kinda ate though
ALL homosexuals are pedophiles. homosexuals reproduce by raping children.