he was literally me and nobody likes me. they should have made him a normie with lots of friends and gfs if they wanted this movie to do well. true solation is something 90% of normalgays can't relate to
it's just not very good. it's style over substance, it doesn't make a great deal of sense, the characters aren't very compelling, and jared leto is weird
I loved it on my first viewing but after a rewatch I felt that the middle was uninteresting and it was mostly carried by the final act. Then again that's also true of the original
Did it actually flop? I watched it, enjoyed it. It's up there as a classic. I hate all his other movies though, and I think the casting choices for Dune were terrible.
The first one was a much bigger flop, and 2049 has had a large cultural impact with young men. Ryan Gosling from that movie is literally everywhere on Tiktok
Bringing back Ford from the dead was the biggest mistake of this movie. Shouldve been a standalone story
[...]
I was somewhat enjoying the movie until Ford showed up. Nice atmosphere and visuals. I wasn't really engrossed or following the story too much until Ford started to blabber and then I lost all interest. Really should have gone with something, anything, else that did not involve digging up the two dead characters from the last film. Not that I think they're sacred and that they shouldn't be touched. They just weren't that interesting for a follow up story.
I just hate that Harrison Ford just refuses to act in anything after the year 1982
He legit phones in almost all his performances now, like why on Earth does he keep getting cast?
He's shit in literally everything but still gets cast. He even openly admits to hating acting but still gets cast. It's just another one of those moronic Hollywood choices.
BR2049 is the first film in literal decades where Harrison Ford actually legitimately openly loves the film he's in.
Go watch any star wars press shit and he's shitting all over it while everyone thinks it's "sarcasm", in BR2049 interviews he does nothing but unironic direct praise, calling it a "cathedral of a film"
The Rachael scene is the only bit of acting Ford has done in a good while. But it also just shows that Ford really isn't that much of a true actor, he was always just the low effort guy playing himself really so it's not like he's capable of a masterful emotional performance.
I was somewhat enjoying the movie until Ford showed up. Nice atmosphere and visuals. I wasn't really engrossed or following the story too much until Ford started to blabber and then I lost all interest. Really should have gone with something, anything, else that did not involve digging up the two dead characters from the last film. Not that I think they're sacred and that they shouldn't be touched. They just weren't that interesting for a follow up story.
I've read VALIS (a long time ago admittedly) and I don't see much of a connection to this
it has nothing to do with either the original blade runner was based on DADOES very very loosely. He even removed the Deuteragonist John Isodore to make it more of a pulp flick for hollywood smooth brains.
It themes are literally the same exact thing as the first movie, except muh long lost child for Deckard. There's nothing interesting compared to the first movie to really think about and admire. The visuals and themes of Blade Runner were not shallow, BR2049 looks great but that's about it.
>What is Deckard's motivation?
For what? He's a Blade Runner, his motivation is to retire replicants until he falls in love with one that's cute and acts human enough to him.
As a character, motivation is a key part of a character. The lead not having motivation shows it is an empty shit movie. >He's a Blade Runner, his motivation is to retire replicants
That's not motivation, that's a job. What does he want?
>Why did it flop?
Normies are moronic >Why no cultural impact like the first one?
It has a much more powerful impact than VFX the flick, without an improvised monologue at the end og Bladerunner is just a boring detective with caricature villains in a night world of cool props
ponderous, thoughtful scifi has only ever been appreciated when it was done in star trek the next generation.
and the makers of that knew they had to dumb it down and beef up the action for the movies so the average normie moron considered paying to see.
Blade Runner was a mix of audiovisual cinema and poetic dialogue. That is literally the reason why the movie became such a hit. People talking about Ford and being 'boring' was never really relevant, at least not for me.
was it really a flop though?
has the same amount of votes and reviews like Star Wars Last Jedi.
I think the biggest problem, unironically, is that only a male audience can really connect with this movie. Ask any normal woman what she thinks about this film and she will be disinterested or have no clue whats going on
he was literally me and nobody likes me. they should have made him a normie with lots of friends and gfs if they wanted this movie to do well. true solation is something 90% of normalgays can't relate to
The first one flopped too. Rentals saved it later.
Saying 2049 has no cultural impact in Cinemaphile is either very bold or incredibly stupid. And to give you a hint, it's the latter.
Not enough action or tongue in cheek jokes. First one was always a cult movie, how you gonna give the sequel a 150 million dollar budget lmao.
it was boring, just like the first one
Ask me how I know you're a fat female
>fat males can't have shit taste either
You look like a good Troll
First one flopped too. It had cultural impact a decade later when became a cult movie.
American audiences were too stupid to understand it.
it's just not very good. it's style over substance, it doesn't make a great deal of sense, the characters aren't very compelling, and jared leto is weird
Because it was fricking trash. Watching it back to back with the original really puts into perspective how meandering and lifeless it is.
I loved it on my first viewing but after a rewatch I felt that the middle was uninteresting and it was mostly carried by the final act. Then again that's also true of the original
stupid ass Ford wearing a plain $1 t-shirt from walmart
just like you he has no job
>What went wrong?
Jared Leto
Did it actually flop? I watched it, enjoyed it. It's up there as a classic. I hate all his other movies though, and I think the casting choices for Dune were terrible.
It didn’t captivate the The Beach audience since we like the young leo literally me self insert and not the gosling literally me self insert
Jesus, The Beach audience. What a delightful non sequitur.
The first one was a much bigger flop, and 2049 has had a large cultural impact with young men. Ryan Gosling from that movie is literally everywhere on Tiktok
The story isn't interesting enough to justify the runtime.
First one was a flop too, moron
First one was a culture bomb though and directors routinely cite is as an inspiration. This one had funny goose reactions and that's about it.
no superpowered shooting lasers out of your ass to dramatic music at greenscreened cgislop monsters
Bringing back Ford from the dead was the biggest mistake of this movie. Shouldve been a standalone story
Yeah his scenes are really jarring
I just hate that Harrison Ford just refuses to act in anything after the year 1982
He legit phones in almost all his performances now, like why on Earth does he keep getting cast?
The feedback loop of him being a huge star and draw.
He's shit in literally everything but still gets cast. He even openly admits to hating acting but still gets cast. It's just another one of those moronic Hollywood choices.
he's at the point in his life where he does it for the money. it really seems that way to me
BR2049 is the first film in literal decades where Harrison Ford actually legitimately openly loves the film he's in.
Go watch any star wars press shit and he's shitting all over it while everyone thinks it's "sarcasm", in BR2049 interviews he does nothing but unironic direct praise, calling it a "cathedral of a film"
The Rachael scene is the only bit of acting Ford has done in a good while. But it also just shows that Ford really isn't that much of a true actor, he was always just the low effort guy playing himself really so it's not like he's capable of a masterful emotional performance.
I was somewhat enjoying the movie until Ford showed up. Nice atmosphere and visuals. I wasn't really engrossed or following the story too much until Ford started to blabber and then I lost all interest. Really should have gone with something, anything, else that did not involve digging up the two dead characters from the last film. Not that I think they're sacred and that they shouldn't be touched. They just weren't that interesting for a follow up story.
is based on the last philip k dick novel Valis
and not based on the Do robots dream on electric sheep novel
thats what i heard
not idea why
the Dadoes novel its much better and there was a lot of material not adapted in the first.
I've read VALIS (a long time ago admittedly) and I don't see much of a connection to this
the connection is the everpresent and pink colored JOI
she is valis in nu bladerunner
it has nothing to do with either the original blade runner was based on DADOES very very loosely. He even removed the Deuteragonist John Isodore to make it more of a pulp flick for hollywood smooth brains.
It themes are literally the same exact thing as the first movie, except muh long lost child for Deckard. There's nothing interesting compared to the first movie to really think about and admire. The visuals and themes of Blade Runner were not shallow, BR2049 looks great but that's about it.
>The visuals and themes of Blade Runner were not shallow
Yes, they were. The visuals are ugly and it doesn't have any theme
>Yes, they were. The visuals are ugly and it doesn't have any theme
I suggest watching marvel then, homosexual
or perhaps some christopher nolan
Okay, what is Deckard's motivation?
Blade Runner is pure popcorn garbage loved by drooling illiterate morons
>What is Deckard's motivation?
For what? He's a Blade Runner, his motivation is to retire replicants until he falls in love with one that's cute and acts human enough to him.
As a character, motivation is a key part of a character. The lead not having motivation shows it is an empty shit movie.
>He's a Blade Runner, his motivation is to retire replicants
That's not motivation, that's a job. What does he want?
to kill the replicants because it's his job
Denis Villeneuve is a master at making sleep inducing movies.
Yet he still is 10000000x more preferrable to direct anything than Chrisopher exposition is my name and shit audio is my game Nolan
Christopher Nolan is a dishonest filmmaker. At least Villeneuve makes visually interesting flicks. Nolan just makes slop.
Go back to tiktok, zoomer homosexual
He's right though Dune is snoozecore.
Cyberpunk is an artistically dead genre.
You can thank male gamers and gamer culture for that. Fricking cancerous shit.
Nah, just almost 50 years of stories written around its concepts and ideas.
>make 100m
>flop
¿
I think it was either the dishonest cinematography or the overuse of videogame iconography
left 4 dead 3 is starfield when???
>why no cultural impact
It's legitimately everywhere, it's diffused into the cultural sphere at a level the previous BR could only dream of
No it isn't why do you lie. The original has maximum soul compared to the sequel.
>Why did it flop?
Normies are moronic
>Why no cultural impact like the first one?
It has a much more powerful impact than VFX the flick, without an improvised monologue at the end og Bladerunner is just a boring detective with caricature villains in a night world of cool props
Harrison Fart
you don't need to ask, or even form your own opinion, because E;R will tell you
>sequel to a shitty old movie
>now starring a flaming homosexual
>how could it fail?
because it's a sequel that came out 35 years after the original
The film tanked only in braindead capeshit markets like America or China. It did more than well in Europe.
Literally made more money in Germany alone than all of China
>europe is sophisticated because...it just IS
Name a good film to come out of Europe in the last 10 years.
Fallen Leaves
Druk
La grande bellezza
Zimna Wojna
Hollow imagery and bad writing with no Rutger to carry it.
It was too long. Scott said he would have cut 30 minutes from it and revealed Decker was a replicant
huge cultural impact for zoomers tbh
cult classic
>zoomers
>culture
Anon
ponderous, thoughtful scifi has only ever been appreciated when it was done in star trek the next generation.
and the makers of that knew they had to dumb it down and beef up the action for the movies so the average normie moron considered paying to see.
girls don't like goose, not even baiting
wow i wonder how they will try and achieve the heights set by Vangellis's music....
oh
oh god my ears
Hans Zimmer wishes he was Vangelis and Herrmann so badly. Vangelis' Blade Runner soundtrack is outstanding.
I know this is a bait thread but it's hilarious to see the banished redditors trying to fit in
The same cultural impact twice? How?
it spawned two very well known memes which gives it more cultural impact than any movie in the past 10 years
Too long for zoomers, coomers, boomers...
No cultural impact?
It lives on in meme
the core plot point is that he's a hybrid cyber-organism from the coupling of a human male and a female replicant?
no thanks, there's ordinary stupid and then there's this kind of stupid which is something else entirely
Blade Runner was a mix of audiovisual cinema and poetic dialogue. That is literally the reason why the movie became such a hit. People talking about Ford and being 'boring' was never really relevant, at least not for me.
they shouldn't have given ford's role so much time for what was essentially a cameo. the movie takes a light dive by the second half
The sequel that burns twice a bright lasts in the zeitgeist half as long, and 2049 burned so very brightly.
was it really a flop though?
has the same amount of votes and reviews like Star Wars Last Jedi.
I think the biggest problem, unironically, is that only a male audience can really connect with this movie. Ask any normal woman what she thinks about this film and she will be disinterested or have no clue whats going on