Why did one succeed where the other failed?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Why did one succeed where the other failed?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
fatty mike bent the knee to the woke mob, while based drinker stayed true to his ideals and the teachings of our lord and savior Jesus Christ
Drinker sounds like a fricking broken record
>"THE MESSAGE!"
I removed him from my youtube suggestions because he attracts other homosexuals who make daily videos about "DISNEY IS GOING BANKRUPT! KATHLEEN KENNEDY IS GETTING FIRED! TWO MORE WEEKS!"
if you look at disney stock you will see they are hurting. keep in mind the market is up 20% this year.
Yeah but do you need 20 different youtube homosexuals remind you about every day?
Yes I do
>OK it's true but but but can you PLEASE stop saying it?!?!
Holy shit, cry more, Mouse-shill.
Suck youtubers wiener some more, homosexual. I couldnt care less what happens to Disney
>Point out that you're a whiney b***h
>"Y-Y-YOU'RE engaging in gay sex-acts with YouTubers in the fanfiction I am writing about you in my head!!!"
I bet your dumb ass thought this was an actual counter-argument, too.
Broccolihead getting uppity I see
>I couldnt care less what happens to Disney
The 'I don't care' act is getting old.
>I couldnt care less what happens to Disney
Well your main point of grievance was that MORE THAN ONE YouTuber has the utter gall to talk about how Disney is losing money and how that apprently upsets you, so no, I'm not really buying your claim that you "don't care" about Disney.
lmao you fricking dyslexic ESL. I just wonder how moron you have to be to watch 20 mins or more of such low effort slop by multiple creators. The absolute state of zoomers
Who's forcing you to watch their videos?
Why are you Subscribed to them all if you hate them so much?
I dont. I just laugh at you morons who cannot even have an opinion without it getting validated by some youtuber
PANIC! DISNEY IS PANICKING!!!
Kek always funny when lefties take off the mask and reveal the corporate boot they've always been licking
“MODERN AUDIENCES”
>talk about movies
>say what you don't like
>every movie does it
>have to say it in every video
Lol he's just a vague grifter.
>grifter
sure, Mr. Sherman. EVERYTHING'S a grift
RLM has become insanely self-conscious about not being seen as rightwing since they are generally politically incorrect. The increase in insincere lefty sympathy makes them look so pathetic. I'm not a huge fan of Drinker's repetitive outrage bait content, but frick at least he's true to himself.
>increase in lefty sympathy
yes anon that's why the entirety of the covid years was spent relentlessly making fun of mask-wearers and covid policies (which were put in effect to placate the leftist masses scared to death of catching a cold) for 5+ minutes at the beginning of practically every fricking half in the bag.
Bro, a virus is not a partisan issue. Why are you people so moronic?
Maybe not, but the government's reaction to it is.
No, those intros are all line-toeing like they typical do. They've become way more pathetic and obsequious towards leftist ideas lately.
only uneducated chuds are afraid of the virus
Haha holy shit that really takes me back. I remember when this site fearmongered about how bad corona is but then as soon as libs started to change their tune they went ahead and pretended it was a nothingburger the entire time.
bet you think all the people trying to make Aliens real right now are from "that Cinemaphile guy" too, huh? dumbass.
Because we didn't know what we were dealing with.
Then we found out it was absolutely nothing, but since everything in American politics is us vs them, the libs started demanding for lockdowns.
It killed a bunch of people. Im not sure why you homosexual have to constantly deny reality like the troonys you hate
It killed about as much as Influenza does on a regular winter. We got fleeced and jabbed with some mystery juice. The rich got richer and the rest got fricked
(citation needed)
>but then as soon as libs started to change their tune
You mean on June 2020? When the virus suddenly stopped existing for several months?
Are there more white people in these protests than black?
Early concern on Cinemaphile was based on not knowing exactly what it was and knowing where it came from, (close to a BSL4 lab) and how china handled it internally.
So Cinemaphile /misc/ at the beginning recommended lock down/travel ban we don't want it over here, buy N100/FFP3 masks it's the minimum for airborne viruses.
While the media told everyone to go party in Chinatown.
It only turned into an official nothingburger around march when we learned it doesn't replicate in the lymphocytes and only deactivates them. If it did we had basically been faced with airborne aids and any response including nuking airports of affected countries appropriate.
Therefor /misc/ recommendation changed to treat it like a normal flu based on the available data. .. and the media switched to lock-down and recommending masks that don't work.
In the US is was treated as partisan on e.g. early travel bans.
The vaccine production policy is based on unelected parts of the government
https://www.c-span.org/video/?465845-1/universal-flu-vaccine
and mostly non-partisan except for a difference in extend of mandates.
What the frick are you talking about? They almost never talk about or reference politics, and when they do, it's the same as it's always been; Jay comes across somewhat left-leaning, Rich comes across somewhat right-leaning, and Mike comes across as the apathetic nihilist he is.
>Rich right leaning
What??
>True to himself
His voice is fake and he's pretending to be drunk to cope for his lack of knowledge on absolutely any subject, he's fake and gay, like all grifters on anti anxiety medication (99% of all youtubers)
>true to himself
the guy is the most obvious grifter out there
Tell is who isn't a grifter from your perspective?
Devoutly religious people that actually talk about things that matter not these empty boomerisms such as muh socialism is the root of all evil, muh wokeness, critical race theory, etc.
Fair enough, while that is too broad of a definition for me to agree with, I can understand that perspective.
it'd be nice if we could combine RLMs talent with drinker's attitude
dont be a fat loser
NuSW exposed them as uberhacks
Pretty much
Disney followed their wish list to the letter and it resulted in the most derivative, forgettable event movie of our lifetimes and now they can't shake the stigma. The fact that it makes the prequels look BETTER only compounds their failure to read the room.
They never said Jar Jar Abrams should WRITE them.
Abrams script is by no means the only problem TFA has. His direction was completely unsuitable for a Star Wars movie, proving RLM's lack of insight.
It looks like she has a third arm
>Star Wars shouldn't focus on worldbuilding
>Star Wars is too limited in scope to do anything but repeat the same story over and over again
>Anakin is too emotional. The need a simpler protagonist with wooden brick acting
>Prequels created too many rules around the Force. The Force is supposed to be mystical and just make up new powers on the spot
>Too much cgi, go back to the puppets no matter how dogshit and cringy puppet yoda looks in TLJ
>The choreography needs to be bad on purpose
Saying JJ Abrams should have directed the prequels is just the icing on the cake. He had a lot of bad and really weird suggestions that Disney followed. So many so that you have to be willfully ignoring the similarities. We already know for a fact several people in the staff watched the RLM reviews. Disney marketed the ST as washing away the stain of the prequels. They spent a lot of time making it clear this would be a return to form. Why the frick do you Black folk think Disney didn't watch the RLM reviews? Wven if their weren't any evidence and several of the crew didn't outright confirm that they did, it would still be obvious they did just from how perfectly they follow Pinkett's suggestions, almost to the letter.
mike's #1 thing above all else is STRUCTURE. disney reached new heights in structurelessness with the sequel trilogy.
>read the room.
homosexual
closet foreskin expert
Kind of hate the Critical Drinker. and how utterly flaccid and repetitive his content is.
>dude, I just want to go back to the 80's when feminism and black people were cool!
I respect him for trying though.
He's doing the "I'm just a cool dude from the 90's" impression and people are lapping it up. What is up for debate is if he really believes it or not. Everybody wants it it be 1999 again because that's when we took a vacation from history but by this logic if we reset the clock to 30 years ago we would be back in the same shithole in 2049. You cannot undo the damage of globalism, liberalism, etc. You can't vote your way out of it and you can't "vote with your wallet" or whatever homosexualry the 2-more-week crowd is spouting.
To the powers that be, money is irrelevant, stock numbers are irrlelevant. Some redditors fricked with a hedge fund and the competing hendge funds took the hit for them despite being direct competitors. Hollywood will be remaking every single movie ever with every permutation of race, lose money off it and still be in business because money is a rounding error to the zaibatsus.
If you ask me why the drinker succeded? Because there is a market for people who want to believe that "go woke go broke" is a thing and want to close their eyes and pretend really, really hard that it's still the 90's and we can party on forever if only it was not for those gosh, darn, SJW's. He's no better than the guy on the corner selling cheap fentanyl.
It's interesting; because from your perspective it seems like the alternatives are:
-submission/collaboration, get into a position within the regime and benefit from it
-escape, move to Russia or El Salvador or somewhere with a different ruling ethos.
-suicide (which is actually just submission/escape given the priorities of the regime)
-terrorism
Wheras if you genuinely believe that reform is possible, and on a long enough time scale, inevitable (70's and 80's sci-fi is replete with the Soviets competing with the Americans in space. It seemed like it was going to last forever or blow up in a decade or two), your advice is the fentanyl. Numbing yourself with despair to avoid taking any positive action.
I don't know which is right, and I'm not going to be a Panglossian "you can change the world through luxury consumer spending"; but I don't know. The romantic in me prefers the struggle against the inevitable.
I see that all your options involve glowing like a nuclear landfill and your second point:
>Wheras if you genuinely believe that reform is possible, and on a long enough time scale, inevitable (70's and 80's sci-fi is replete with the Soviets competing with the Americans in space. It seemed like it was going to last forever or blow up in a decade or two), your advice is the fentanyl. Numbing yourself with despair to avoid taking any positive action.
The world that we live in is the direct consequence of the 60's, 70's, 80's and yes, 90's. We can't turn back the clock because we would be making the same kind of mistakes we made before. I just don't like to pretend that we have a choice. It's hard enough to have to pretend like I give a shit during election season as to not upset my wife's NPC friends.
But getting back to the Drinker, he's a pressure valve. I hate the self described culture wars and culture warriors. It's a giant waste of time and energy for everyone involved, except those making bank from it.
So, even if RLM lost the public appeal at least they are not pretending to be some grandiose figure fighting for truth and liberty. I'll still tune in to them because they are Gen X Siskel and Ebert, no more and no less.
you're missing the alternative of just going out and living in the country where 99% of the world's bullshit won't actually affect you if you just pay taxes and don't bother anybody and live your life however you want.
the world got stuck in a hole and no one seems interested in climbing out, just being king of the pit.
basically all youtube views are from third worlders and literal children. no one is "lapping it up" who weren't already guzzling liquid shit by the gallon daily.
the reason all attempts by actual networks/studios to put ecelebs on the big/small screen fail is because it doesn't translate to viewership from people who can actually afford to buy food in a first world country.
Rlm suffering from agoraphobia and not reviewing shit people actually see instead of ghost adventures or random low budget vod shit outside of BoTW. How tf is there not a plinkett review of avatar 2? It released almost a year ago. They’re just phoning it in. I do think the drinker was overly buttblasted by Barbie when most people don’t seem to care
I get not reviewing bog standard mcu/dceu slop but no review for Avatar 2 or The batman (where a director's voice is present in these movies) was odd.
Avatar 2 made billions and had 0 cultural impact. No one even talks about it. Still having conversations about Joker though.
>How tf is there not a plinkett review of avatar 2?
It would be a golden goose egg but maybe he refuses to bring Plinkett back. Bad move
I kind of understand the point of them not reviewing movies everyone has seen and has a million billion other reviews already. reviewing movies that arent getting a ton of attention makes more sense. and also only reviewing movies that they care about is respectable. I definitely don't need them to review movies I've already seen, why would I need that?
Which one succeeded?
RLM
Drinker liked The Last Of Us, then I stopped watching him.
I've never watched RLM and I never will.
this. and half of those homosexuals in that sphere defending the God of My Wifes Son game was the final straw for me as well
why are people so obsessed with saying atreus is not the son of kratos? he has spartan rage
I think people wanted it to be a cuck story so bad just to bash it. Game has some criticisms but that isn't one of them for me.
>Drinker liked The Last Of Us, then I stopped watching him.
I think he praised episode 3 whilst criticizing a lot of the rest of it. And you know what? He's fricking right. Episode 3 is a fricking masterpiece and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.
And after they ate those strawberries they fricked each others hairy shit filled buttholes.
Heckin' wholesome.
look i know you're a huge community fan but joel mchale is never going to be mainstream. rlm is notable enough to be on the ballots for a nomination at the oscars. that's more than joel could ever hope to acheive.
I'm tired of channels that only focus on how terrible things are and have nothing good to say about anything. Channels like the Drinker, Nerdroric, Geeks and Gamers and that RK Outpost c**t make me wonder how being miserable 24/7 can get you millions of views.
Good thing the Drinker also makes «the drinker recommends» videos then
The drinker is a legit writer and knows how to structure a script to keep his audience entertained until the end of the video. I've read his novels and are tom clancy tier. I'm supporting him on his action movie project
Drinker bros our response?
I hate bemoaning about these people. I watch RLM because they're half-drunk old boomers that make fart jokes, not everything has to be this over god damned serious culture war shit. Just watch shit you like and don't watch shit you don't like.
I enjoy listening to them talk about things that aren't mainstream. Whenever they discuss any arthousy, indie or small budget movies that's when I tune in. But they have a patreon and the patrons demand they cover capeshit and all the blockbusters. There are enough movies made at the moment that we could watch a new one every day, forever and die without seeing half of the list so anytime they go out of their way to search for interesting, less known content I tune in.
I like some of their Re:Views and Star Trek discussions. Basically things that they still have passion for are pretty good. Almost everything else from RLM these days either begins with or should begin with a grunt, a sigh, and one of them muttering "right, let's get this bullshit over with".
Dance monkey, dance. Another reason why I listen to them is that I can learn something new. Drinker's palate is limited. It's always going to be some brand name or easy to recognize name.
I can't stand listening to him. He's way too negative about absolutely everything.
>5.6 lakh views
thank you sir
who is who
good morning sirs i like redit letter media yes goodsirs very interesting
Critical Drinker has the most annoying voice ever. It's like he's fricking got this down-inflection growl at all times, and it sounds reaaaaally fake and gay, and bad, and grating, and moronic. I thought his reviews were too bad like "WELL THIS FEMINISM PART IS BAD BECAUSE FEMINISM BAD" like yeah dude. I don't really need a guy to point out the woke shit. I need people to talk about movies. I'm not watching woke movies because I know they suck already. I don't want to think about woke shit I'm not going to watch.
Mike is a little pandering to SJW/woke homosexual shit, but he still makes fun of things and ignores things. It's more Jay who is like "um that's not progressive, okay mthanks" more reddit side of the whole thing. Jay's the pussy, not Mike. I don't listen to any of those other people on that show btw so don't come at me with one of those guys. I don't watch videos with that fat loud fricker or the two that look like they take estrogen
Not only did RLM give a good review for TFA, they have Jay who actually likes Marvel, even enough there are hints that Mike correctly sees the whole thing as a pile of shit. They are just like dorks
RLM is fricking shit. Guys are massive simps to wokeness. Absolutely pathetic.
please give real examples, not the ones you made up so you have something to be mad about
Ross is the only based youtuber. The rest are fricking cringe redditors.
who is he?
Ross Scott
His youtube channel is called Accursed Farms
This guy is also pretty good
Why is it that the good ones only put out content when there's a major alignment of the planets?
Blessed pipeman
The only professor on YT worth of respect.
Doesn't look like that anymore
I love Voxis Productions. he's a hilarious little guy. youtube monkeys have treated him unfairly, censored his content, gave him strikes, as I recall
Speaking of Critical Drinker he did do an after hours with our little muppet.
Best bit was Voxis asking how he writes sex scenes in his Tom Clancy knock-off books.
I read Dune after watching his review of the movie. His passion is contagious.
How can one man be so off-topic yet still so correct?
Yeah but his stuff is Cinemaphile related. If we're going for youtubers that talk about Cinemaphile related stuff I'd go with E;R and pointless hub.
Georg Rockall-Schmidt is the Ashens of actually good movies.
Critical drinker is basic b***h knee-jerk reactionary
>Bottle isn't even open
Always makes me laugh
One panders to conservative crying.
The other to Lib crying.
They’re both shit takes. One just pays more.
One is a fake drunk, the other a real one.
Left looks like a fake alcoholic while right looks like a real one.
So where’s the examples?
Or is everyone being fickle little homosexuals because they disliked your favorite movie?
drinker gave in to the anti-woke mob because he realized it's easy clicks and views. rlm keeps doing whatever they want when they want
cuz cumdrinker is boring
Not television
Not film
All ecelebs fail by the default of being ecelebs.
Because Mike isn’t a racist, sexist Nazi chud
Hey, Drinker didn't fail, he's still limping about. He just wasn't ever in the level of RLM.
Drinker has chill charisma that Jerem Jahns has + some substance.
I RLM, but Mike and Jay are charisma voids, whose autistics rants only appeal to fellow autistics and nor normies.
Drinker's success is pretty insane:
>Interview with Russel Crowe
>Co-writing a Rambo book with Stallon
>Regular EFAP guest
>Interview with Russel Crowe
>Co-writing a Rambo book with Stallon
>Regular EFAP guest
How did he get any of that stuff? He's a nobody youtuber with poor editing skills and has a garbage mic
There are tiktokers and e-thots who do absolutely nothing and make millions for simply existing.
Critical Drinker finding some success isn't really mind blowing.
he writes books and hes half decent
Old celebs are desperate to stay relevant so they align themself with big YouTubers.
It's also free advertisement, Russel Crowe did it for his low-budget movie.
All things considered, RLM managing to still find success despite retiring the character that put them on the map is quite impressive. Other similar Youtubers have tried that and failed.
If you watch these, know that I despise you and think your calling is laboring in a coal mine till you drop dead.
RLM stands for Reddit-Literate Midwits.
>Drinker asked to name female led movies that are good
>Alien, Terminator, uh, the list goes on...
>doesn't name anything else and changes subject
>Drinker asked if he has seen all of David Lynch's movies
>he hasn't
>Drinker asked to name is favorite films
>Uh, Terminator 2, The Menu, Fellowship of The Ring
this guy is a absolute pleb with no real film knowledge but people eat his grift up like semen slurpers
>his taste in movies should matter
No, not really.
You'd be surprised to see the types of movies that end up on the list of all time favorites from some respected directors like Kubrick.
It absolutely does matter since this guy has framed himself as a big authority on cinema and it is pretty obvious that his own taste is extremely limited and he hasn't been exposed to many films outside of Hollywood mainstream movies. But that's also majority of his subscriber base so it works wonders for him.
>since this guy has framed himself as a big authority on cinema
No he hasn't.
Practically he has. Or has he ever told people he's a pleb and they should take his opinion for just that, a plebeian one?
>Practically he has.
No he hasn't.
>Or has he ever told people he's a pleb and they should take his opinion for just that, a plebeian one?
No one gives a shit about this "pleb" shit. If he makes a point and people agree with what he has to say than that's all that matters
Yeah, but people are moronic and their opinions to be discarded. Sorry, not sorry.
That goes for you to smart ass.
So you agree there is a necessity for authority? Do you also agree by creating his channel and pushing his stuff to millions(?) of viewers, he took a position of (at least perceived) authority?
>So you agree there is a necessity for authority?
Not at all.
>Do you also agree by creating his channel and pushing his stuff to millions(?) of viewers, he took a position of (at least perceived) authority?
No, he's just voicing his opinion. Whether people believe what he's saying is right or not is up to them regardless of stupid their take is.
Holding such opinions in 2023 makes you the problem.
>Holding such opinions in 2023 makes you the problem.
And here he finally reveals his true motives.
So your problem isn't that 'he is authoritative' but rather your problem is that you hate his political adjacency or views.
Yeah, obviously. Authority good, but needs to come from a proper place. Not that tough to grasp, is it?
>but needs to come from a proper place.
Thankfully, people like you don't get to decide that lol
Do you also believe the psychology experts when they say that there are 50000 genders?
What are you going on about?
His channel is growing because people like to hear what he has to say and will go watch his videos out of their own volition.
When you say he assumed a position of authority, it implies that he is coercing people to watch his content or trying to control other people's opinions and dialogue.
You're just being absurd and hysterical.
He put himself out there, assuming a degree of responsibility, which he's not fulfilling when not properly acknowledging the limitations of his knowledge or moral character even.
Well, he's not forcing anyone to watch his videos, so everything you're saying is stupid and can be easily handwaved away.
Anything else you got for me?
Same argument pornographers and drug dealers use. Be better.
>which he's not fulfilling when not properly acknowledging the limitations of his knowledge or moral character even.
Pseudo intellectual gibberish
For a midwit maybe.
What is it with you midwits always jumping to the lowest hanging fruit conclusion there is? I'm far right.
The only midwit here is you
Become useful or get lost. Stop voicing your dime a dozen garbage opinions, no one cares.
>He says while spouting nothing but the most generic opinions possible
Take your own advice.
>JUST SHUT UP STOP VOICING YOUR OPINIONS
You're so mad LOL
>I'm far right.
No you're not lol
Too late to use this defense now. You've already overplayed your hand and showed exactly the type of rat you are.
>assuming a degree of responsibility
No, all the responsibility falls on the viewer.
Nope. He got a platform, illegitimately in a sense, but he still has it, which increases responsibility on his end.
You're not even intelligent enough to make sense of them.
>He got a platform
Completely irrelevant.
>which increases responsibility on his end.
Not at all.
Power something something responsibility.
>P-Peter remember to tell your...YouTube viewers to like and subscribe....
Favorite movie and best movie are two different things.
Bro needs to take off his sunglasses.
As a closeted gay I can confirm my gaydar is 100% saying "This man is a gay"
Still based for hating women though
>based for hating women
correct
women are mostly utter gutter trash
This guy's voice is infuriating to listen too.
Drinker is for the lowest common denominator, the unwashed plebs of youtube to whom even a basic distaste of the system is seen as rebellious. RLM is for more intellectual people who will spend an hour digesting a film from a creators perspective, whether its be lighting, camera work, costuming, etc.
Simply, RLM is for smarter older people while Drinker is for young dumb people, and there is no shortage of those. I mean, Drinkers style is literally recounting the plot while throwing in memes over the vid, very little substance and more about the trends of hollywood.
The dumber thing will generally be more popular than the smart thingm
>this popular thing is woke shit
>smells like shite
>shite, definitely shite
>go away now
His videos suck
Real engagement with the fans. Livestreams often or appears on other livestreams. RLM is a no-show in that department. Can't be bothered.
>the fans
>MUH DISNEY IS LOSING MONEY
They'd still be if you stopped obsessing about it, you deranged freak.
Drinker mostly stays in his lane and talks narrative composition.
People may try to cry about him being 'le culture war grifter' but his videos are short and focused on actual criticism. The character is performative so the meat of what he's saying doesn't have to be.
RLM chose the woke side
they chose poorly
Well Drinker has his books, I make no declarations about their quality but the reality is at least he can fall back on his books, RLM they can't risk their channel, they've got nothing else.
I see the YMS fur homosexual fans have arrived, his take on Drinker was sub 50 IQ brainlet shit
>it's anotherCinemaphile seethes over drunk boomers watching movies thread
who hurt you
can an RLMgay explain the appeal? What do they offer that other youtubers don't?
Lemme ask you this, what do other YouTubers offer that RLM doesn't?
Watching YMS try and explain his dogshit take on Drinker the other day was fricking hilarious. Every take he had was so dishonest, literally sounded like all he does is spend his days watching Destinys content and the just parrots it
he was right though in the sense that drinker doesnt really like film and would rather just comment on the state of woke mainstream massive budget films
what about this is inaccurate
>we shouldn't take him seriously because he doesn't like film
So we shouldn't take YMS seriously either? Isn't this the same person who said that he doesn't watch movies older than 50 years because it's all outdated we've seen it already before?
How can you or YMS know what films drinker spends his time personally watching? Just because he doesnt make a video on it doesnt mean he hasnt watched it, what a stupid fricking brainlet take. What i find even funnier is if you go to YMS channel all he reviews is normie shit. I mean literally look at this shit and tell me how its any different from exactly what he's claiming of Drinker?
>Barbenheimner
>Little Mermaid
>Spiderman
>Last of Us
>Mario movie
>Shazam
>John Wick 4
>Cocaine Bear
YMS torpedoed most of his credibility and good will after his mealy mouthed positive review of TLJ.
He's still seething about the fact that the smarter, more socially aware youtubers like Mauler and Critical Drinker caught onto the cultural paradigm shift and found incredible success by going against the mainstream narratives.
YMS is forever locked into the pro-TLJ wing of youtube which means he will eventually end up in the dustbin of irrelevancy.
>this +1 million sub youtuber must be le responsible and le socially conscious he must listen to meeeeeeee!!!!!
Cringe thread with cringe redditor.
Culture war shit is so gay.
I'm so sick of culture war grifters. Fight or don't fight but don't be a grifter standing in the way.
The Critical Drinker reviewed The Batman (2022) and Mike didn't. I'll never forgive RLM for actively ignoring a great film with such a strong directorial voice.
>Chad Letter Media doesn't feel like watching big capeshit of the month
>doesn't
>Drinker desperately sucks on current thing to stay relevant and does it only for views
Based RLM
I honestly don't understand how talking about things being "woke" and constant "disney is going to die bros, any second now trust me!" Doesn't get absolutely boring
It does but it's also a constant problem with modern media.
This. If you're going to be honest when reviewing anything new, you have to at least touch on the wokeness. And it does get tiresome precisely because it's so pervasive. Also tiresome: leftists accusing you of "inserting your politics into it" if you bring it up, and pretending it's your only criticism even if it's only one among many.
I don't watch Drinker, but didn't he once shill for TLJ? Or am I getting him mixed up with another person?
No that was yourmoviesucks who is gay a furry.
>The analytical alcoholic
I genuinely don't understand why someone would enjoy this type of content
a while ago i decided to check him out and he's just tortanic posting but for movies.
I could tell his political leanings from his reviews but what's the appeal of a biased and nitpicky review that adds nothing constructive? Do people enjoy the affirmation of hate toward entertainment they hate?
If i saw a movie and hated it I'd just move on and find something i enjoy
Watching lore stuff and analysis of media you like is more enjoyable especially for your mental wellbeing.
Other adjacent channels that flooded my recommendation after watching this homosexual is pure ass cancer
STARWARS THE Black folk AWAKENS IS OVER! KATHLEEN KENNEDY WILL BE THROWN INTO TRASH COMPACTOR!
with the channel owner thumbnail soïfacing and their subject of criticism is deformed .
It's just feels like a waste of time watching these gays and mentally it's not good either.
You could argue this shithole is the same but still there's a comfy thread always around or atleast discussion.
But there its an echo chamber of tortanic morons.
>nitpicky
>nothing constructive
Almost all of his videos point out character problems and how older hollywood slop didn't have the same characterization issues last generation.
>Do people enjoy the affirmation of hate toward entertainment they hate?
Drinker's popular with people who don't like the current thing but are too dumb to understand why they don't. Drinker articulates why and then they can go 'oh I get it now'.
The idea Drinker is like doomcuck or the like is ludicrous.
The thing is the "issue" he present as a flaw is just different writing style
I watch old movies a lot and enjoy them but i also enjoyed new stuff
Otherwise what's the point of watching new stuff if it's just the same as the old just remade with new faces.
I think the issue is the lack of skills of current writers who are unable to implement them
For example a strong female lead aren't inherently bad, but the moment it's announced even before the plot is known these channels go full tortanic mode to get views from homosexuals who are too scared to get laid and want to just hate on women.
If alien was released today they would make thousands of videos about how much the movie will suck and how woke it is.
And it's not even an honest review, they know their audience and it's an easy grift
Just frame new thing as a flaw because new = bad, couple overused reaction snippets from media for comic relief them label anything deviating from old as bad and their audience will eat that slop and lick their fingers till the next ragebait drops.
I saw a screencap a while ago, they even change the title or reupload with positive review if the movie is well received.
Can't hate on that tbh from a business point of view but as a viewer it just seems cancerous.
jesus.
did you really have to write each sentence.
on an entirely new line.
like you just got here from reddit
Im ESL pyramidhomie
My brother in christ, we had a single teacher for english and french from year 1 throughout highschool and he couldn't even pronounce triangle correctly
So, give me a break kek
oh well thats fair
>Watching lore stuff and analysis of media you like is more enjoyable especially for your mental wellbeing.
Frick no, those videos are gay as shit.
You do you anon, i respect your opinion
Whatever makes you happy
i dont even know who the one on the left is, so their irrelevant as frick imo
both are losers