>Why did the southpark guys seethe about Paris Hilton so much?
>she was cool to hate back then
Basically. It wasn't considered "seething". You were just making fun of something ridiculous, which was totally normal and acceptable. It wasn't until the zoomer generation that everyone became gays about "bullying" and the only winning move became to never react to anything ever lest you be accused of "taking bait" and "seething".
even the ugliest man looking women pass better than 100% of troonys, only a troony would deny this
2 years ago
Anonymous
>just completely ignores any discussion about Paris the moment an in to talk about trannies comes up
You homosexuals really are obsessed.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>the moment an in to talk about trannies comes up
you mean the moment (you), I know I know it's not you at all youre just another random anon, starts talking about troonys out of no where?
ywnbaw
I always thought she was cool. Let's face it if you were a billionaire heiress you would also do dumb shit like make a reality TV show to pick your best friend. She didn't take anything too seriously and simply enjoyed her fortune. What else are you supposed to do if you're Paris Hilton?
I'm sure the crossdressing southpark guys were up in arms over the disintegration of public morals.
well, they were definitely not fans of prostitute-culture and openly mocked homosexuals and trannies
Many many episodes had the "moral" that children should not be exposed to sexual things at all.
again, South Park often had the message of not exposing children to non-age-appropriate content. >LOTR episode >South Park movie >Ike's Teacher fricking Ike episode >the sexual education episode >the Paris Hilton episode >the death camp of tolerance episode
all had that message and that are the ones I just thought of in 30 secs.
Ok but if you were in school within the past 10-15 years you'd know that isn't true at all, Family Guy isn't a kids show but to say it didn't shape the youth of our time like many other un-kidfriendly shows/movies/vidya/books etc did is plain dishonest.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>stuff exists >kids find out about it and watch it, even if it's not meant for them
that's the way it's always been. the only alternative is to make all media PG which is what we're seeing with the age of Marvel. good job homosexual, you're the reason tv is unwatchable now
Celebrity is just a status. She had it innately because her father was a hotel tycoon. They had it because they worked hard in a skilled field and got lucky. I would argue that story is as old as time.
moral degeneracy
Yeah, because we all know that South Park promotes wholesome family values and important life lessons.
I think you can still have morals while being comedic in nature. Lots of the early and middle seasons were specifically moral in nature, how many times has south park played with the concept of "scary individual is actually just misunderstood because society didn't educate enough about them". Not saying matt and trey are some paragonal geniuses but south park on the whole leans towards accepting and promoting loving your family and aiming to make sensible choices by showing outlandish opposites.
>Celebrity is just a status. She had it innately because her father was a hotel tycoon.
They didn't have celebrity status, they had old money and powerful connections
I can open any thread in the catalogue right now and half the replies will be about zoomers
2 years ago
Anonymous
They bring it upon themselves
2 years ago
Anonymous
Obsessed
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Obsessed >a disgusting plague should be ignored
Zoomies need constant and savage bullying. It’s the only thing that can save these weak and useless gender confused homosexuals
Now look at all the aristocratics families who've had to turn their ancestral estates into fricking themeparks or outright sell them to cowboy boots wearing billionaires because all they've been taught to do for generations is frick hoors and get into debt.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Name 5
2 years ago
Anonymous
I live in bongland, I can't give specific names as they will do my location, but in my area there are tons of estates that got sold off, started as estates for the super wealthy and all have been sold and now used as public buildings or tard houses, there are at least 3 within a 20 minute walk and a lot lot more the further into the country you go, in fact I worked at one such estate that got re done into a tourist attraction, these estates are all over the UK, all were owned by title holding families
2 years ago
Anonymous
If they're so local you can't even name them without giving away your exact location then they're pretty far from being on the same level as the families being discussed ITT.
2 years ago
Anonymous
that's what you think, bongland is small, areas that were once secluded estates have been consumed by the expanding cities and adjacent areas
one of the houses near by was owned by a guy that controlled the entire county, held office in parliament and had insane wealth, these are the same types of people anon
2 years ago
Anonymous
>one of the houses near by was owned by a guy that controlled the entire county, held office in parliament and had insane wealth, these are the same types of people anon
Doubtful that they've ever been anywhere near Hilton levels of wealth if nobody outside your county even knows their family name
2 years ago
Anonymous
are you genuinely moron? some of the wealthiest people alive are unknown by 99.99% of the population
this guy would have absolutely mogged the Hilton's in terms of wealth and power
2 years ago
Anonymous
>n-n-NO THEY WERE JUST AS WEALTHY I SWEAR, THEY JUST NEVER MADE ANY IMPACT BEYOND THE TOWN THEY LIVED IN BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WANT TO OK?!?!?!
Christ anon, whatever I'll grant you that your literal whos were relatively wealthy to the area they lived in. So now can you name literally any family that once had Hilton levels of wealth and notoriety that this post
Now look at all the aristocratics families who've had to turn their ancestral estates into fricking themeparks or outright sell them to cowboy boots wearing billionaires because all they've been taught to do for generations is frick hoors and get into debt.
applies to then? One would think they would at least need to have achieved Hilton level fame and generational wealth seeing as that is the family the discussion was originally referring to when saying "Old money quickly wanes".
2 years ago
Anonymous
>He thinks that just because they're unknown by most of the population they "never made any impact beyond the town they lived in"
lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
>still can't name 1 >source: dude just trust me
lel ok
2 years ago
Anonymous
Most normies don't know who the Rothschilds are. Or who Klaus Schwab is. They don't know what Blackrock is. They MIGHT be vaguely aware of George Soros, but only as "some guy the alt-right hates for some reason"
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is true yet you can find entire books and websites dedicated to their family history because, despite normies not knowing about them, they have had a huge impact in the world and are still quite famous. I.e. they aren't literal whos only known about in a single county. Fame =/= normie celebrity status.
The entire country was once owned by the descendants of Normans knights whose names you would never have heard of but they owned entire counties and all the buildings, animals and people in them. Some of their descendants still hold large swaths of lands and have tens to hundreds of millions of pounds worth of assets, but most lost their wealth and slowly chipped away at their holdings to keep themselves going (it was beneath them to work). Many had to integrate back into the working class. Some migrated to the US, mainly the south, and became ranchers.
>can you name literally any family that once had Hilton levels of wealth and notoriety
"Notoriety", lol.
Names like this: >Smythe >Fortescue >Darcy >Percy >Fitz-anything >Any other French sounding surname
Indicate descent from a Norman Lord. Literal aristocracy who owned people. Fricking "notoriety", el em ay oh. Americans don't know what wealth is.
You can read about all of these families extensively online and you mentioned in your own post that they still have incredibly wealthy descendants so I'm not sure how that solidifies your point or why you are trying to argue that they had no notoriety.
2 years ago
Anonymous
now it's clear you are a historylet moron trying to save face
embarrassing
2 years ago
Anonymous
>gets btfo by his own argument >well y-you don't know history
kek
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm none of the anons you replied to in that post anon, can't you see multiple people are disagreeing with you?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Fair, hard to imagine why you would become emotionally invested in defending such a moronic argument for no reason though. Unless you are just shitposting of course.
2 years ago
Anonymous
because I agree with their side, you are the one who appears to be making the moronic argument, in my opinion
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm fairly certain you have no clue what was even being argued
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You can read about all of these families extensively online
Not all, I just gave a few examples. There are hundreds if not thousands of distinct Norman names (I have one), and there are multiple families with the same names who descended from different knights. Smythe quite obviously means smith, for example, and I doubt William only brought one smith with him.
I was laughing at notoriety because you seemed to think being famous for being rich comes anywhere near enslaving an entire country.
>Americans don't know what wealth is.
the thinly veiled seething boils over
>the thinly veiled seething boils over
We literally invented the modern world and are the most important people of the last thousand years. >colonised France >colonised the British isles >colonised America, Asia and Africa >invented industry >overrepresented in the arts, sciences, exploration, etc.
C O L O N I S É
Normans are literally the most OP people in history.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>We
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm a Norman
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I was laughing at notoriety because you seemed to think being famous for being rich comes anywhere near enslaving an entire country.
I don't think that and I'm not sure how you got that impression, but I do think it's fairly moronic to imply that a family that enslaves an entire country was not also rich or that they had no fame or notoriety.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Of course they were rich. I was ridiculing the claim that the old money of England couldn't touch the wealth and notoriety of the Hiltons.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It can't
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sounds like a bit of a misunderstanding, I was asking for a named example on their level of wealth whose money waned to nothing. That was the post where I was still trying to get anon to name a single family and he said he couldn't because it would dox himself, implying that they aren't known outside of his immediate vicinity. >So now can you name literally any family that once had Hilton levels of wealth and notoriety that this post
Now look at all the aristocratics families who've had to turn their ancestral estates into fricking themeparks or outright sell them to cowboy boots wearing billionaires because all they've been taught to do for generations is frick hoors and get into debt.
applies to then? >One would think they would at least need to have achieved Hilton level fame and generational wealth seeing as that is the family the discussion was originally referring to when saying "Old money quickly wanes".
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sure if you want a list of old money families who've fallen on, relatively hard times just look at a list of privately owned country houses and estates who's on the national trust or the like. These people come from positively ancient money and live in fricking palaces but some of them haven't the cash to repair a leaking roof.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>sure, I'm right because at this point I obviously am >look some vague stuff I don't even have passing knowledge to mention in any specificity but assume definitely exists
this is my first post in this thread, homie shut the frick up
2 years ago
Anonymous
Ok homie,
2 years ago
Anonymous
Do you think we don't know things about our own country or what? Everybody in the UK knows about aristocracy descendents who have mansions and estates that they can't afford to heat or maintain our what have you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Thanks anon. I did find some good examples just searching national trust estates, although it seems hard to tell just how wealthy some of these estates were. I read about the Hampden family estate as one example though, apparently they went broke and had to sell everything after Richard Hampden invested in the South Sea bubble with government money and their estate got inherited by another family they married into after all the Hampden male heirs died out. John Hampden was particularly noteworthy for his war in the First English civil war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hampden
2 years ago
Anonymous
>his war
meant to say his role but you get the idea
2 years ago
Anonymous
>because it would dox himself, implying that they aren't known outside of his immediate vicinity.
that's me, that's not what that implies at all, the houses around here were owned by well known people, I would dox myself because if I gave you a list of 10 names and all of them had an estate near one area (they owned multiple estates btw) it would be pretty obvious where I was located within the country, and I know that's not enough to find me or my exact location but autists found a flag by listening to frogs and looking at stars so I prefer to be cautious
2 years ago
Anonymous
Fair points, anyways the other anon gave me enough to go off of with regards to national trust estates and that basically validates your claims so my apologies for dragging it out and derailing the thread.
2 years ago
Anonymous
very big of you to admit you were wrong
have a good day friend
2 years ago
Anonymous
you don't even know who I'm talking about because I'm don't want to dox myself, for all you know I could be taking about someone everyone here has heard of, (and I guarantee the non historylets have) and I already stated they did have impact, they ran the entire (quite large) county and held office in parliament at a high level
you can literally Google a list of wealthy families who had to sell estats moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
>can you name literally any family that once had Hilton levels of wealth and notoriety
"Notoriety", lol.
Names like this: >Smythe >Fortescue >Darcy >Percy >Fitz-anything >Any other French sounding surname
Indicate descent from a Norman Lord. Literal aristocracy who owned people. Fricking "notoriety", el em ay oh. Americans don't know what wealth is.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Americans don't know what wealth is.
the thinly veiled seething boils over
2 years ago
Anonymous
>prime Patty Smythe is your god of this earth
I could be ok with that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
listen europoor we owned people way after it fell out of style so frick off back to toblerone
2 years ago
Anonymous
We owned you
2 years ago
Anonymous
The entire country was once owned by the descendants of Normans knights whose names you would never have heard of but they owned entire counties and all the buildings, animals and people in them. Some of their descendants still hold large swaths of lands and have tens to hundreds of millions of pounds worth of assets, but most lost their wealth and slowly chipped away at their holdings to keep themselves going (it was beneath them to work). Many had to integrate back into the working class. Some migrated to the US, mainly the south, and became ranchers.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Hahahah >if I name these families everyone will know it’s me, out of the thousands of people that could state the same thing
Summer sucks on this board
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah well running a major central bank is a perpetual money machine. Not the same as a mid level hotel tycoon
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Yeah well running a major central bank is a perpetual money machine. Not the same as a mid level hotel tycoon
I don't know if I would consider the first international hotel chain and second largest hotel chain in the world to be mid level. Putting aside the fact that their families are literally intertwined.
Out of nowhere? She orchestrated a "home video" leak to kick it all off, like a dozen before her and a dozen after her. Half of them were set up by the same dude who funded OJ's book, they should make a movie about it. It'd be like some whacked out Forrest Gump.
no not really, it was just because she was fricking everywhere in all the fricking news all the time because moronic clickbait tier shit. and she was literally only famous because she was rich and a prostitute. Basically she was the kardashians before the kardashians were a thing
She is still good looking for her age. Most actresses her age started getting bogged 10 years ago. Maybe it's the family money she has that she can afford the plastic surgeons not even rich actresses can afford?
they seethed because Paris Hilton didn’t react angrily to her portrayal. their entire thing was wanting to piss off big names and riff on people. They seethed even harder when it didn’t work and Paris said it was flattering they thought of her so much
It’s hard to find the links that far back but it’s in the Wikipedia page about the episode > Paris Hilton reacted to the episode by saying, "I haven't seen it, but when people copy you, that's like the most flattering thing, so whatever people can say, I just laugh about it. It doesn't matter to me."[1] To this, South Park co-creator Matt Stone reacted, "That shows just how fricked up she is. That's terrible that she's flattered by it."
>I haven't seen it, but when people copy you, that's like the most flattering thing, so whatever people can say, I just laugh about it. It doesn't matter to me.
This isn't "laughing something off", it incredibly thinly veiled "ummm you don't phase me" tier seething on her part.
i've always hated Stone and the other homosexual. they're the human equivalent of the youtube comment section. >DUDE SJW, JUSTIN BIEBER AND PARIS HILTON ARE...LE BAD! BOTH SIDES ARE SHIT! WOW I'M SUCH AN ELIGHTENED INTELLECTUAL!
>Based Paris dabbing on the degenerate leftoids.
SP's creators were libertarian and leaned to the conservative side from what I can tell in their early interviews. They were pretty adamant about their dislike of liberal ideals. Didn't take much time being part of the machine to become good little line-toeing cucks
I mean for a celebrity yeah, still got 45 days in jail for driving without a license. If anything she was the brains behind most of her early branding and knew when to leave the limelight. I would expect a hilton to at least raise their kid with higher educational standards. Poor nicole never stood a chance.
because they don't actually care about comedy, they just want to bully people. it's the exact same concept of making the schoolyard bully disarmed and uncomfortable when you just laugh along and agree with whatever shit talk he's giving you.
SP making cartoons about how much they hate this or that used to be charming because they were just two guys making a crappy cartoon that strived to be offensive and ridiculous. Then the show gained visual fidelity, fame and wealth and suddenly they're the top dog. Now with the $900,000,000 deal they definitely aren't outsiders anymore so mocking another branch of the media empire seems less edgy and more petty especially when they leave more worthy targets alone. Remember when they spent two years seething over Trump and have given pedo Joe a free pass? Now watch as someone takes what I wrote and decides to derail the thread even though I just used them as an example.
Thats right they havent mentioned Biden even once. They made fun of every president since Bill Clinton and even a few mainline Presidential candidates. But silence on Biden
For a time she was everywhere. Its one thing to be the hhot blonde on a reality tv show, but after The Simple Life her exposure took off. She was in a movie, she released her own song, she was getting pictures taken everywhere and thrust into the middle of the entertainment scene immediately. She was hanging with Britney Spears at her worst. She even coined "That's Hot!" as he catchphrase and was selling that on t-shirts for $100 each. By the time Matt and Trey focused a whole episode on her, the exposure was starting to wind down and they bsaically just animated what everyone had said about her and and was just more less pissing into an ocean of piss at that point. She laughed the episode off, either having watched it in its entirety or just saw the clips of it people were buzzing about and when asked about, she just brushed it off and shurgged, which probably pissed Matt and Trey off to no end. As others pointed out, the focal point of the episode is the concerned tone of getting little girls to emulate Paris or those shitty BRATZ dolls that had come out around that time glamourizing that lifestyle.
In the end, Paris stepped away from the limelight and Matt and Trey fill South Park seasons up with shit jokes about a weed farm and are desperate to try other things. Neither side won but nothing matters about it now.
Thats right they havent mentioned Biden even once. They made fun of every president since Bill Clinton and even a few mainline Presidential candidates. But silence on Biden
Very suspect. Every US president since the show started had beeen lampooned or mocked. Either they know he isn't president, or are in the same club now and don't want to rustle feathers. Trey and Matt lost their piss and vinegar of what made them popular and famous in the first place.
Because during the early 00's when celeb culture was at its peak, Paris Hilton was famous for 'doing nothing.' In all seriousness, back during those days, it was rare for rich socialites to be considered A-listers or famous. Sure, you could be famous for just being hot, but normally those people worked their way up through modeling or acting (Pamela Anderson, Monroe, etc.
Paris Hilton was the original Kim Kardashian. People would reee about her because she did seemingly nothing to get famous, just like how people seethe about the Kardashians and Jenners today. But back then, Paris was the first of her kind... Stone and Parker were just pissy because she carried herself as a 'stupid, spoiled prostitute' but they didnt realize she was actually pretty smart in creating a brand an parlaying that image to generate fame.
South Park used to be about 'attacking the man who shits on you'
For some weird reason, they through Paris making money from Black folk watching her do shit was 'wrong'
She was one of the first celebrities to have their sex videos leaked and it was considered an incredibly shameful thing back then despite everyone loving it in private.
Looking back I can't believe I ever watched seeth park. My older brother still talks about seeth park. That and the daily show. I have pretty much lost all respect I have ever had for him.
>zoomer detected
In the 2000s there was a whole class of young women called "it girls" who were famous for being famous (closest you have today would be the Kardashians). They would do and say absurdly stupid/bitchy/entitled/ignorant stuff, providing endless material for comedy writers and tabloid journalists. The writers and journos would in turn make fun of them, providing free publicity and making them even more famous in an endless symbiotic cycle.
>gossipposters
The whole point of Paris Hilton is gossip. She made herself famous by generating gossip. You cannot understand her outside the framework of gossip.
She was the Kim K of the 2000s. She was a pop culture icon, but easy to hate on because she was famous for simply just being rich. Also the Simple Life reality show that people thought wasn't scripted.
Protoinfluencer, it was a time before publicly whoring yourself was the obvious way to become popular. The prediction of the episode essentially came true.
Paris being a train wreck bawd is why her grandfather gave 98 percent of his money to charity and basically cut out his kids and grand kids. Ironically Paris is worth 350 million dollars because she is a very calculating train wreck that jumped on opportunities and developed her brand. Her cousins were the only ones fricked over by her grandfather’s seething ironically.
she was cool to hate back then
>Why did the southpark guys seethe about Paris Hilton so much?
>she was cool to hate back then
Basically. It wasn't considered "seething". You were just making fun of something ridiculous, which was totally normal and acceptable. It wasn't until the zoomer generation that everyone became gays about "bullying" and the only winning move became to never react to anything ever lest you be accused of "taking bait" and "seething".
>pushed moral degeneracy
>pushes weird celebrity worship for people that didn't even achieve anything
Because it there’s one thing Matt Stone and Trey Parker hate, it’s moral degeneracy.
Imaging simping for Paris hilton in 2022.
kind of a stretch
I cannot imagine, nor am I doing it.
She’s super hot now and better looking than most zoomers
>She's super hot now
I've seen trannies that pass better than her
even the ugliest man looking women pass better than 100% of troonys, only a troony would deny this
>just completely ignores any discussion about Paris the moment an in to talk about trannies comes up
You homosexuals really are obsessed.
>the moment an in to talk about trannies comes up
you mean the moment (you), I know I know it's not you at all youre just another random anon, starts talking about troonys out of no where?
ywnbaw
Post one
>inb4 you won’t. Because you can’t
Taftaj mogs Paris Hilton
Hahahahahaha NO
That’s hilarious though. Thanks for the laff mate
Can we at least agree Taftaj mogs Hunter?
god damn every fricking thread
can you homosexuals not?
It's super gay
She’s hotter now than she was in her 20s very rare care
I liked her old nose but she had it changed before she even got famous
Let’s see it
I always thought she was cool. Let's face it if you were a billionaire heiress you would also do dumb shit like make a reality TV show to pick your best friend. She didn't take anything too seriously and simply enjoyed her fortune. What else are you supposed to do if you're Paris Hilton?
well, they were definitely not fans of prostitute-culture and openly mocked homosexuals and trannies
Many many episodes had the "moral" that children should not be exposed to sexual things at all.
I'm sure the crossdressing southpark guys were up in arms over the disintegration of public morals.
moral degeneracy
Yeah, because we all know that South Park promotes wholesome family values and important life lessons.
>"I've learned something today."
Yes, that is a quote from the show.
shut the FRICK up kyle you homosexual israelite
again, South Park often had the message of not exposing children to non-age-appropriate content.
>LOTR episode
>South Park movie
>Ike's Teacher fricking Ike episode
>the sexual education episode
>the Paris Hilton episode
>the death camp of tolerance episode
all had that message and that are the ones I just thought of in 30 secs.
>again, South Park often had the message of not exposing children to non-age-appropriate content
While doing exactly that themselves. SPgays are fricking braindead.
South Park isn't a kids show, was never intended as a kids show? But yes, the critique is valid in a way, children will see it anyways.
Ok but if you were in school within the past 10-15 years you'd know that isn't true at all, Family Guy isn't a kids show but to say it didn't shape the youth of our time like many other un-kidfriendly shows/movies/vidya/books etc did is plain dishonest.
>stuff exists
>kids find out about it and watch it, even if it's not meant for them
that's the way it's always been. the only alternative is to make all media PG which is what we're seeing with the age of Marvel. good job homosexual, you're the reason tv is unwatchable now
That really ironic because south park exposed me to a lot of sexual content as a kid
It's definitely her becoming a celebrity out of nowhere. They were jealous.
Celebrity is just a status. She had it innately because her father was a hotel tycoon. They had it because they worked hard in a skilled field and got lucky. I would argue that story is as old as time.
I think you can still have morals while being comedic in nature. Lots of the early and middle seasons were specifically moral in nature, how many times has south park played with the concept of "scary individual is actually just misunderstood because society didn't educate enough about them". Not saying matt and trey are some paragonal geniuses but south park on the whole leans towards accepting and promoting loving your family and aiming to make sensible choices by showing outlandish opposites.
>Celebrity is just a status. She had it innately because her father was a hotel tycoon.
They didn't have celebrity status, they had old money and powerful connections
Old money quickly wanes. Paris was smart enough to renew the generational coffers
Zoomer logic
I can open any thread in the catalogue right now and half the replies will be about zoomers
They bring it upon themselves
Obsessed
>Obsessed
>a disgusting plague should be ignored
Zoomies need constant and savage bullying. It’s the only thing that can save these weak and useless gender confused homosexuals
Old.
>Old money quickly wanes
Yeah totally
Now look at all the aristocratics families who've had to turn their ancestral estates into fricking themeparks or outright sell them to cowboy boots wearing billionaires because all they've been taught to do for generations is frick hoors and get into debt.
Name 5
I live in bongland, I can't give specific names as they will do my location, but in my area there are tons of estates that got sold off, started as estates for the super wealthy and all have been sold and now used as public buildings or tard houses, there are at least 3 within a 20 minute walk and a lot lot more the further into the country you go, in fact I worked at one such estate that got re done into a tourist attraction, these estates are all over the UK, all were owned by title holding families
If they're so local you can't even name them without giving away your exact location then they're pretty far from being on the same level as the families being discussed ITT.
that's what you think, bongland is small, areas that were once secluded estates have been consumed by the expanding cities and adjacent areas
one of the houses near by was owned by a guy that controlled the entire county, held office in parliament and had insane wealth, these are the same types of people anon
>one of the houses near by was owned by a guy that controlled the entire county, held office in parliament and had insane wealth, these are the same types of people anon
Doubtful that they've ever been anywhere near Hilton levels of wealth if nobody outside your county even knows their family name
are you genuinely moron? some of the wealthiest people alive are unknown by 99.99% of the population
this guy would have absolutely mogged the Hilton's in terms of wealth and power
>n-n-NO THEY WERE JUST AS WEALTHY I SWEAR, THEY JUST NEVER MADE ANY IMPACT BEYOND THE TOWN THEY LIVED IN BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WANT TO OK?!?!?!
Christ anon, whatever I'll grant you that your literal whos were relatively wealthy to the area they lived in. So now can you name literally any family that once had Hilton levels of wealth and notoriety that this post
applies to then? One would think they would at least need to have achieved Hilton level fame and generational wealth seeing as that is the family the discussion was originally referring to when saying "Old money quickly wanes".
>He thinks that just because they're unknown by most of the population they "never made any impact beyond the town they lived in"
lol
>still can't name 1
>source: dude just trust me
lel ok
Most normies don't know who the Rothschilds are. Or who Klaus Schwab is. They don't know what Blackrock is. They MIGHT be vaguely aware of George Soros, but only as "some guy the alt-right hates for some reason"
This is true yet you can find entire books and websites dedicated to their family history because, despite normies not knowing about them, they have had a huge impact in the world and are still quite famous. I.e. they aren't literal whos only known about in a single county. Fame =/= normie celebrity status.
You can read about all of these families extensively online and you mentioned in your own post that they still have incredibly wealthy descendants so I'm not sure how that solidifies your point or why you are trying to argue that they had no notoriety.
now it's clear you are a historylet moron trying to save face
embarrassing
>gets btfo by his own argument
>well y-you don't know history
kek
I'm none of the anons you replied to in that post anon, can't you see multiple people are disagreeing with you?
Fair, hard to imagine why you would become emotionally invested in defending such a moronic argument for no reason though. Unless you are just shitposting of course.
because I agree with their side, you are the one who appears to be making the moronic argument, in my opinion
I'm fairly certain you have no clue what was even being argued
>You can read about all of these families extensively online
Not all, I just gave a few examples. There are hundreds if not thousands of distinct Norman names (I have one), and there are multiple families with the same names who descended from different knights. Smythe quite obviously means smith, for example, and I doubt William only brought one smith with him.
I was laughing at notoriety because you seemed to think being famous for being rich comes anywhere near enslaving an entire country.
>the thinly veiled seething boils over
We literally invented the modern world and are the most important people of the last thousand years.
>colonised France
>colonised the British isles
>colonised America, Asia and Africa
>invented industry
>overrepresented in the arts, sciences, exploration, etc.
C O L O N I S É
Normans are literally the most OP people in history.
>We
I'm a Norman
>I was laughing at notoriety because you seemed to think being famous for being rich comes anywhere near enslaving an entire country.
I don't think that and I'm not sure how you got that impression, but I do think it's fairly moronic to imply that a family that enslaves an entire country was not also rich or that they had no fame or notoriety.
Of course they were rich. I was ridiculing the claim that the old money of England couldn't touch the wealth and notoriety of the Hiltons.
It can't
Sounds like a bit of a misunderstanding, I was asking for a named example on their level of wealth whose money waned to nothing. That was the post where I was still trying to get anon to name a single family and he said he couldn't because it would dox himself, implying that they aren't known outside of his immediate vicinity.
>So now can you name literally any family that once had Hilton levels of wealth and notoriety that this post
applies to then?
>One would think they would at least need to have achieved Hilton level fame and generational wealth seeing as that is the family the discussion was originally referring to when saying "Old money quickly wanes".
Sure if you want a list of old money families who've fallen on, relatively hard times just look at a list of privately owned country houses and estates who's on the national trust or the like. These people come from positively ancient money and live in fricking palaces but some of them haven't the cash to repair a leaking roof.
>sure, I'm right because at this point I obviously am
>look some vague stuff I don't even have passing knowledge to mention in any specificity but assume definitely exists
this is my first post in this thread, homie shut the frick up
Ok homie,
Do you think we don't know things about our own country or what? Everybody in the UK knows about aristocracy descendents who have mansions and estates that they can't afford to heat or maintain our what have you.
Thanks anon. I did find some good examples just searching national trust estates, although it seems hard to tell just how wealthy some of these estates were. I read about the Hampden family estate as one example though, apparently they went broke and had to sell everything after Richard Hampden invested in the South Sea bubble with government money and their estate got inherited by another family they married into after all the Hampden male heirs died out. John Hampden was particularly noteworthy for his war in the First English civil war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hampden
>his war
meant to say his role but you get the idea
>because it would dox himself, implying that they aren't known outside of his immediate vicinity.
that's me, that's not what that implies at all, the houses around here were owned by well known people, I would dox myself because if I gave you a list of 10 names and all of them had an estate near one area (they owned multiple estates btw) it would be pretty obvious where I was located within the country, and I know that's not enough to find me or my exact location but autists found a flag by listening to frogs and looking at stars so I prefer to be cautious
Fair points, anyways the other anon gave me enough to go off of with regards to national trust estates and that basically validates your claims so my apologies for dragging it out and derailing the thread.
very big of you to admit you were wrong
have a good day friend
you don't even know who I'm talking about because I'm don't want to dox myself, for all you know I could be taking about someone everyone here has heard of, (and I guarantee the non historylets have) and I already stated they did have impact, they ran the entire (quite large) county and held office in parliament at a high level
you can literally Google a list of wealthy families who had to sell estats moron
>can you name literally any family that once had Hilton levels of wealth and notoriety
"Notoriety", lol.
Names like this:
>Smythe
>Fortescue
>Darcy
>Percy
>Fitz-anything
>Any other French sounding surname
Indicate descent from a Norman Lord. Literal aristocracy who owned people. Fricking "notoriety", el em ay oh. Americans don't know what wealth is.
>Americans don't know what wealth is.
the thinly veiled seething boils over
>prime Patty Smythe is your god of this earth
I could be ok with that.
listen europoor we owned people way after it fell out of style so frick off back to toblerone
We owned you
The entire country was once owned by the descendants of Normans knights whose names you would never have heard of but they owned entire counties and all the buildings, animals and people in them. Some of their descendants still hold large swaths of lands and have tens to hundreds of millions of pounds worth of assets, but most lost their wealth and slowly chipped away at their holdings to keep themselves going (it was beneath them to work). Many had to integrate back into the working class. Some migrated to the US, mainly the south, and became ranchers.
Hahahah
>if I name these families everyone will know it’s me, out of the thousands of people that could state the same thing
Summer sucks on this board
Yeah well running a major central bank is a perpetual money machine. Not the same as a mid level hotel tycoon
>Yeah well running a major central bank is a perpetual money machine. Not the same as a mid level hotel tycoon
I don't know if I would consider the first international hotel chain and second largest hotel chain in the world to be mid level. Putting aside the fact that their families are literally intertwined.
>mid level hotel tycoon
moron
Hey look an absolute idiot
You looking in a mirror?
Out of nowhere? She orchestrated a "home video" leak to kick it all off, like a dozen before her and a dozen after her. Half of them were set up by the same dude who funded OJ's book, they should make a movie about it. It'd be like some whacked out Forrest Gump.
no not really, it was just because she was fricking everywhere in all the fricking news all the time because moronic clickbait tier shit. and she was literally only famous because she was rich and a prostitute. Basically she was the kardashians before the kardashians were a thing
Did you even watch the episode? Mr. Slave is the hero at the end you fricking idiot.
>has a huge speech that his life-style sucks and is nothing to imitate
She did but that blowjob video from One Night In Paris was f'ing hot for a rich trustfund b***h like her.
It was a different time
It's not seethe it's clout chasing. It works too.
South Park was all about bagging on celebrities who it was "OK" to hate. Hilton, Streisand, etc. Surprised they never had a Nickelback episode.
I guess I watched it without that context, I probably would have liked it less if I knew they were just part of the crowd
They had that ep makiblng fun of creed type bands at least
they were worried girls would emulate her in real life
Why do morons like OP on 4chins assume that criticism or parody = seething?
This isn't about the episode itself dipshit, Matt and Trey literally got mad at Paris after she laughed off the episode in question.
Why would anyone assume that's what the thread is about without it being mentioned at all? Thinking you're the moron here but thanks for the context
She is still good looking for her age. Most actresses her age started getting bogged 10 years ago. Maybe it's the family money she has that she can afford the plastic surgeons not even rich actresses can afford?
they seethed because Paris Hilton didn’t react angrily to her portrayal. their entire thing was wanting to piss off big names and riff on people. They seethed even harder when it didn’t work and Paris said it was flattering they thought of her so much
proofs?
>dude trust me
There's been threads about this before you fricking tourist, most people here saw the proof ages ago
It’s hard to find the links that far back but it’s in the Wikipedia page about the episode
> Paris Hilton reacted to the episode by saying, "I haven't seen it, but when people copy you, that's like the most flattering thing, so whatever people can say, I just laugh about it. It doesn't matter to me."[1] To this, South Park co-creator Matt Stone reacted, "That shows just how fricked up she is. That's terrible that she's flattered by it."
holy based Paris, Matt and Trey are seething betas
>people didn't think matt and try were seething
They're getting angry over a bimbo saying "lol idk."
That's a little disappointing. I thought they didn't take themselves that seriously.
actually substantially ruined my image of them. imagine getting felted this hard by a bimbo. actual low iq on display
wtf I love Paris now
>I haven't seen it, but when people copy you, that's like the most flattering thing, so whatever people can say, I just laugh about it. It doesn't matter to me.
This isn't "laughing something off", it incredibly thinly veiled "ummm you don't phase me" tier seething on her part.
And yet it still made them seethe
Seethe begets seethe I suppose. What was their actual response though?
i've always hated Stone and the other homosexual. they're the human equivalent of the youtube comment section.
>DUDE SJW, JUSTIN BIEBER AND PARIS HILTON ARE...LE BAD! BOTH SIDES ARE SHIT! WOW I'M SUCH AN ELIGHTENED INTELLECTUAL!
Based Paris dabbing on the degenerate leftoids.
>Based Paris dabbing on the degenerate leftoids.
SP's creators were libertarian and leaned to the conservative side from what I can tell in their early interviews. They were pretty adamant about their dislike of liberal ideals. Didn't take much time being part of the machine to become good little line-toeing cucks
>libertarians
They thought the child could consent and went to epsteins island. Now the system has them by the balls
She was extremely overexposed for a few years through her own doing. It was annoying
i am thoroughly convinced that paris hilton was A LOT smarter than she let on
I mean for a celebrity yeah, still got 45 days in jail for driving without a license. If anything she was the brains behind most of her early branding and knew when to leave the limelight. I would expect a hilton to at least raise their kid with higher educational standards. Poor nicole never stood a chance.
>and knew when to leave the limelight
That was important, she was seemingly everywhere and then disappeared. Smart move
She knows how celebrity bullshit works.
She's trying to be the female Jay Leno of cars
because they don't actually care about comedy, they just want to bully people. it's the exact same concept of making the schoolyard bully disarmed and uncomfortable when you just laugh along and agree with whatever shit talk he's giving you.
That's hot.
>push degeneracy among kids
>mock degeneracy being pushed among kids
she used to be the epitome of classless and trashy
little did we know she looks like an innocent baby compared to the degenerates we have now
>There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil. - Ayn Rand
Proof?
Was this before or after she died shitting herself in penury?
Yes she said it AFTER she died as a New York socialite and Bohemian
>the world is black and white
What a midwit b***h
What are you, moronic?
She’s talking about a middle ground thus she’s not talking about black and white. Being a midwit is better than being a moron.
simpler times
Single greatest moment in TV history.
>making fun of the seething southpark troons =/= defending Paris Hilton
OK simp
>OK simp
I wish I was chad enough to show up to some major event in a pink dress as a guy.
They were also high as hell.
They were on acid
Jesus Christ
Being inside a woman is heterosexual therefore having a woman inside you is the most anti heterosexual thing ever
>people are now praising Paris Hilton
Where did everything go so wrong?
I'm indifferent.
Who is praising her? At least she’s slightly better than the coalburning kween Kim Kardashian
name something bad she did
protip, you can't
she sold champagne in cans. That's pretty disgusting.
She's unironically a lot more likeable than the southpark betas.
people make fun of you
go I don't care but thanks for talking about me
they get mad
south park guys suck anon
Couple of betas seething about a stacey
Her role in House of Wax was disappointing
Black folk
is that language really necessary?
Yes.
thread theme https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--tFqSFgF-k
I love aged Paris Hilton. She's much more interesting now than she was during the aughts.
it was like an earlier version of everyone hating justin bieber and the media israelites spamming it anyway
SP making cartoons about how much they hate this or that used to be charming because they were just two guys making a crappy cartoon that strived to be offensive and ridiculous. Then the show gained visual fidelity, fame and wealth and suddenly they're the top dog. Now with the $900,000,000 deal they definitely aren't outsiders anymore so mocking another branch of the media empire seems less edgy and more petty especially when they leave more worthy targets alone. Remember when they spent two years seething over Trump and have given pedo Joe a free pass? Now watch as someone takes what I wrote and decides to derail the thread even though I just used them as an example.
Thats right they havent mentioned Biden even once. They made fun of every president since Bill Clinton and even a few mainline Presidential candidates. But silence on Biden
For a time she was everywhere. Its one thing to be the hhot blonde on a reality tv show, but after The Simple Life her exposure took off. She was in a movie, she released her own song, she was getting pictures taken everywhere and thrust into the middle of the entertainment scene immediately. She was hanging with Britney Spears at her worst. She even coined "That's Hot!" as he catchphrase and was selling that on t-shirts for $100 each. By the time Matt and Trey focused a whole episode on her, the exposure was starting to wind down and they bsaically just animated what everyone had said about her and and was just more less pissing into an ocean of piss at that point. She laughed the episode off, either having watched it in its entirety or just saw the clips of it people were buzzing about and when asked about, she just brushed it off and shurgged, which probably pissed Matt and Trey off to no end. As others pointed out, the focal point of the episode is the concerned tone of getting little girls to emulate Paris or those shitty BRATZ dolls that had come out around that time glamourizing that lifestyle.
In the end, Paris stepped away from the limelight and Matt and Trey fill South Park seasons up with shit jokes about a weed farm and are desperate to try other things. Neither side won but nothing matters about it now.
Very suspect. Every US president since the show started had beeen lampooned or mocked. Either they know he isn't president, or are in the same club now and don't want to rustle feathers. Trey and Matt lost their piss and vinegar of what made them popular and famous in the first place.
>Remember when they spent two years seething over Trump
this never happened
after trump became president they barely even used garrison
they had 2 entire seasons of 'lol look how fricking stupid tru..... Mr garrsion is!'
Because during the early 00's when celeb culture was at its peak, Paris Hilton was famous for 'doing nothing.' In all seriousness, back during those days, it was rare for rich socialites to be considered A-listers or famous. Sure, you could be famous for just being hot, but normally those people worked their way up through modeling or acting (Pamela Anderson, Monroe, etc.
Paris Hilton was the original Kim Kardashian. People would reee about her because she did seemingly nothing to get famous, just like how people seethe about the Kardashians and Jenners today. But back then, Paris was the first of her kind... Stone and Parker were just pissy because she carried herself as a 'stupid, spoiled prostitute' but they didnt realize she was actually pretty smart in creating a brand an parlaying that image to generate fame.
Look at the beak on that israeliteess on the left.
South Park used to be about 'attacking the man who shits on you'
For some weird reason, they through Paris making money from Black folk watching her do shit was 'wrong'
Typical incel shit tbqh.
She was one of the first, and the biggest celebrity who was famous for only being a celebrity. She set the stage for the Kardashians et al.
Same Energy.
>Old money quickly wanes
Then it wouldn't be old money
She was one of the first celebrities to have their sex videos leaked and it was considered an incredibly shameful thing back then despite everyone loving it in private.
it was called "One Night in Paris"
Looking back I can't believe I ever watched seeth park. My older brother still talks about seeth park. That and the daily show. I have pretty much lost all respect I have ever had for him.
>zoomer detected
In the 2000s there was a whole class of young women called "it girls" who were famous for being famous (closest you have today would be the Kardashians). They would do and say absurdly stupid/bitchy/entitled/ignorant stuff, providing endless material for comedy writers and tabloid journalists. The writers and journos would in turn make fun of them, providing free publicity and making them even more famous in an endless symbiotic cycle.
Name 8
Read them for yourself:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38918918
This is such drivel. Please get off my board gossipposters.
>gossipposters
The whole point of Paris Hilton is gossip. She made herself famous by generating gossip. You cannot understand her outside the framework of gossip.
She was the Kim K of the 2000s. She was a pop culture icon, but easy to hate on because she was famous for simply just being rich. Also the Simple Life reality show that people thought wasn't scripted.
Protoinfluencer, it was a time before publicly whoring yourself was the obvious way to become popular. The prediction of the episode essentially came true.
They said it better than anyone else. She was a spoiled, untalented, stupid, prostitute.
Paris being a train wreck bawd is why her grandfather gave 98 percent of his money to charity and basically cut out his kids and grand kids. Ironically Paris is worth 350 million dollars because she is a very calculating train wreck that jumped on opportunities and developed her brand. Her cousins were the only ones fricked over by her grandfather’s seething ironically.
how the frick was she ever a sex symbol
they predicted tiktok and instagram
>stupid spoiled prostitute video playset show the whole world what a bawd you are