Why didnt they just drone strike the fricking uranium bunker? Why didnt they just shell the fricking anti air missiles? Why is a woman an ace pilot?
Also
>Iranian bad
Holy frick who writes this shit?
Why didnt they just drone strike the fricking uranium bunker? Why didnt they just shell the fricking anti air missiles?
They spoonfeed you the answers to these questions yet zoomies still can't follow a movie. Also the woman is not an ace pilot.
>Also the woman is not an ace pilot.
Yes she is
She didn't shoot any planes down so, no she is not. You need to shoot down 5 enemies to be an ace, homosexual.
What are gps jammers?
>What are gps jammers?
Wow didnt know those have unlimited range. Fricking idiot
>omg this movie isn't completely accurate and I don't like the explanations it's giving!
You know most people die if their airplane disintegrates at Mach 10. I'm surprised you didn't storm out of the theater and demand your money back at the 20 minute mark.
I think gps jammers with unlimited range is more unrealistic
They could have Tomahawk'ed the entire site using nothing but INS and TERCOM. Then the AirForce could have come in and done the entire mission without ever flying into the canyon. There's a ton of reasons why the movie is stupid.
Planes that fly that high have special all enclosed wienerpits which eject along with the pilot.
So you want the movie to go into extreme tech detail about the range and functional ability of GPS jammers? Why isn’t “they have GPS” jammers enough of a reason?
They could just drop a tungsten rod on the site.
That wouldn’t be fun and I’m sure there’s an in universe reason they can’t because there needs to be a reason for Tom Cruise to fly a jet
Why don't you look up what it means to be an ace, ace. Fricking zoomers man
She's a Top gun pilot, but she's not an ace.
Shes an ace. We have to assume that the ace meaning in the top gun world is different. Just assume bro
>Shes an ace
Yeah, a piece of ace.
What the frick are you going on about? The movie never says she is an ace, she says Maverick an ace now after he comes back from the mission with two kills
Why not? We can assume that shes regarded as an ace. Just assume that the people in the top gun world regard her as an ace, easy
No
They said at the end of the movie Maverick is an ace now because he shot down 5 enemies
Damn this guy is really salty he got btfo so bad by
>Let me samegay my incompetent post one more time
"ace" =/= "really good pilot", she needs to shoot down 5 enemy planes. the film explicitly says maverick was the last active pilot to actually be in a dog fight, ergo no one else has shot down any planes since 1986, likely before the chick was born
No she isn't.
>They spoonfeed you the answers
No they didnt. Cope
>waaaaaaaaaahhhh they didn't give me the reason
>yes they did, here is reason.
>WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH I DON'T LIKE THAT REASON
op status: btfo
>Holy frick who writes this shit?
spooks
good movie though
Movie was beyond keyed. Is IMAX worth the extra shekels?
>keyed
Shut the frick up
Iranians are less white than Askhenazi israelites
Holy hell why are you so obsessed with whiteness? kys
>Iranian bad
Correct
israelite
Seething muzzie
I hope you're not white
Imagine being such contrarian homosexual that you unironically support iran or russia lmao
>supporting the Anglo death machine
>supporting the Anglo death machine
Yes?
Because it wouldn't be cool op
The first movie was cool and made sense.
In the original the entire final dogfight is entirely centered around not letting the MiG-28s (F-5s with painjobs lol) get close enough to launch Exocets (why are USSR-operated aircraft carrying French AShMs?), and once they get into the dogfight you can clearly see that none of them are actually carrying said Exocets
>why are USSR-operated aircraft carrying French AShMs
>Iraqi Mirage F1
>USSR-operated
uhhh lol?
He's talking about the original movie you moron.
At no point do they ever say they are USSR-operated. They are referred to only as “the enemy”. The bad guys in these movies are always a deliberately opaque amalgamation of America’s real-life enemies. It might as well be Belka or Erusea.
Except Belka obviously did nothing wrong.
Because it's a modern take on a new hope/dambusters
I went to see this piece of shit because of you fricking shills. Frick you
Good
it's good
t. shill
the hybrid iranian norf korean "bad guys" weren't really even bad guys, just the enemy
the politics aren't important to the movie, the mission and the pilots are
>Having nukes other than usa
Instant bad guys
Israel has nukes, I hope you aren't calling them bad, goy
This is antisemitic propaganda, Israel does not and has never had nuclear weapons. Israel is a peaceful nation.
Ackshually, with the Samson Option, Israel functions as the Doomsday Machine from Dr. Strangleove: a single nuke fired at (or detonated in) Israel would result in the nuking of the world.
Haha wouldn't that suck?
Officially unofficially, but known by usa and all of Nato and NPT signers. No sanctions. Greatest ally.
>you went to afghanistan as a 9/11 truther?!?!?!
this was a question asked to me a couple weeks ago.
>Domestic(50.9%) — $564,020,367
>International(49.1%) — $544,500,000
>Worldwide — $1,108,520,367
impressive
are these real numbers or "every black child in america had a ticket to black panther purchased on his or her behalf" numbers?
I’m assuming they’re real. I’m not in America and saw it. The first theater I went to was sold out and the second theater I went to only had like 10 seats available
it's the first film I've gone to the theatre for in years
many people I know were just like me
turns out if you make something great people go see it
no fake book-cooking needed like 99% of the rest of hollywoods propped up nonsense
I can't say anything about the overseas numbers, but in the US it's pulling in the "haven't been to the movie theater in over a decade" audience, so it has absolutely ridiculous legs.
The script didn't have enough coloureds or women patronising white men to get Soros to write a cheque for this one.
I can confirm it's very popular internationally. I haven't seen theaters this packed in a long time. Zoomers and Boomers alike, and everyone is talking about it at work/gym/school etc. It's the real deal
i’m a bong and me and my friends saw it three times. the idea that only americans and boomers like it is just cope. everyone likes it
I hope that guy is frickin' wasted or just selling it.
its a cool movie not a math problem homosexual
>Just turn your brain off bro
You disney rats are insufferable. Your capeshit bullshit will never ever make sense
I'm literally too handsome to care bud
Ok incel
It can be inferred that any other strategy used to destroy the target would have somehow been nullified by the enemy in some way shape or form, as they don’t mention those strategies as more viable. They say the only way to destroy it is with the jets so you can assume all other strategies have been ruled out. Anyone with half a brain can assume this you don’t need the film to get autisticly detailed about every single possibility
t. Didnt watch the movie
I watched it. How am I wrong?
you're not
you're just on the worst board on the internet with one dude who posts mean spirited contraian nonsense almost 24/7
>you're just on the worst board on the internet with one dude who posts mean spirited contraian nonsense almost 24/7
That's the nicest thing anyone has said about this place.
>Inferred
>assume
>assume
So this passes as good writing nowadays? The first film didnt have this problem
>The movie didn’t show the main character drinking water and taking a shit! Humans can’t live without drinking water and shitting this movie is unrealistic!
This is how you sound
I want to nullify you as my enemy because I infer you are a homosexual.
Iran is bad
>ace pilot
be a disney moron somewhere else
At the start of the movie only two pilots in the entire Navy even have an air-to-air kill at all, Maverick with three from the first movie and Hangman with just one. Maverick gets two during the climax making him an ace. Phoenix does not have a single kill what made you think she was an ace?
>iran bad
ah yeah dude it's definitely iran, because we can definitely put fricking aircraft carriers in the caspian sea, which is the only place where iran could conceivably have "snowy mountains by the water". you fricking moron.
Iran is the only place in the world you can find working F-14s
According to that 1 poster, you should ASSUME that other countries can. Just ASSUME bro, any plot hole or convenience can be explained if you just ASSUME
How is it a plot hole? It was obviously Iran
you saw an Iranian flag in the movie
This might sound wild but Top Gun isn’t a historical film. Other countries in the Top Gun universe have access to modern fighters.
Duh, the Ayatollah has a fake-snow mountain so he can ski. He's trying to emulate those Dubai ballers.
There isn't a single drone on the planet that could carry the bunker busters that were required to pull off the attack, before even getting to the fact that drones would not be feasible in that situation. Drones are honestly really shitty, their success rate when it came to dropping bombs on easy targets in the middle east was not all that great.
I missed the first one, who was Mave Rick?
The enemy had jamming equipment that made the F-35 and UAVs unsuitable for the mission. I guess that's plausible. The real question is why didn't they have any SAMs in the valley
They showed the SAM installations that were scattered around everywhere, they just avoided detection on the way in by flying low enough. The better question is why wasn't there a single manned bunker of some kind overlooking the canyon that could have seen the F-18s with their eyeballs and radioed in what was happening.
The F15s were covered in the mission impossible mirrortech
Would be irrelevant. They knew what was happening as soon as the airfield got bombed
a few radar guided AAA emplacements would have done some real good too, but then the movie wouldnt work so good
also the hind attempting to murder maverick was pretty silly, no reason they would kill a downed pilot rather than capturing and interrogating them. whatever the minor issues, it was still a great movie in which are tom btfo green screen directors and showed that real filmmaking >>> entirely fake crap, even at the top level of filmography
Is there any sadder than military "experts" poking holes in films that other well adjusted people have already accepted as part of suspension of disbelief?
No one is impressed.
>Is there any sadder [than] than military "experts" poking holes in films
Perhaps homosexuals who report "off-topic" threads and the jannies who delete them.
>can't stop
>won't stop
frick gen-z frick gen-y
You wouldnt get it.
When you feel the need for speed you just hop in your jet and let the eagles guide you on your path until it's time to blow up the enemies of freedom.
Both movies are shit written by hacks and I'm pretending to act like they aren't
Why don’t you pretend to be alive and kys
why cant people just enjoy a fricking movie
oh thats right, because its got white people in it
Because drones are gaylame.
Same reason they used guns guns guns instead bvr fox three.
>NOOOOO!!!!!! YOU CAN’T HAVE HANDWAVED PLOT EXCUSES FOR COOL ACTION SCENES!!!!!! THAT MAKES THIS OBVIOUSLY SILLY TOM CRUISE ACTION MOVIE ABOUT SHIRTLESS MEN FLYING PLANES UNREALISTIC TO ME!!!!!! JUST HAVE NO THIRD ACT!!!! JUST HAVE THEM SEND A MISSILE FROM 200 MILES AWAY!!!!! THAT WOULD MAKE THE MOVIE BETTER!!!
Top Gun 2 is a very intelligently made dumb summer movie. The dialogue is very to the point. “This is the mission. We need to do X. That is all”
This is so grandma can enjoy it too. Now take JW dominion or any other big ip. Most of them are really stupidly made smart movies. They are trying to be profound and it’s just bad and you poke holes in it
>The dialogue is very to the point. “This is the mission. We need to do X. That is all”
This is exactly why people love it, along with all the practical, in camera stuff. It's a simple movie, with real, tangible things happening on screen. After all the unnecessarily complicated, absurd CGI fests that are popular these days, TG:M is such a breath of fresh air.
plus you just cant bruise the cruise
I was never a fan of the original and never bought into its gun-ho machismo but I have to say that the sequel is very good and would recommend everyone see it. To be honest I think it's getting overpraised but in this era of meta deconstructionist post-modern subversive identity politics SJW woke trash it felt like a revelation and why audiences are gravitating toward it, a simple story well told, while Cruise used the sequel to basically make his version of Star Wars which is what the entire third act is and I loved that!!!FACT!!!
Its Tom Cruises Birthday , 60 years old today
Two more weeks.
>Hey Maverick pick your team for the final mission
>umm...let me get the latina and her white nerdy bf, give me the token black guy and mexican, and...the son of my dead friend
>how about the #1 pilot in the class
>he's white and a douchebag, frick him
>how about the #1 pilot in the class
>he's white and a douchebag, frick him
Hangman constantly shown to have a hige ego and was very anti-teamwork "they just couldnt keep up ;)" and literally left his wingman in the training exercises, would would Maverick choose him?
Hangman was a young Maverick. He was the best skilled pilot but dangerous, and like Maverick he was stuck on backup duty but came through at the end of the movie.
daily reminder they filmed these in two seaters and that's why Tom is so close to the wings
totally breaks your immersion
if you could look passed that then you do not like planes and are a homosexual, simple as