She's allowed to destroy her life and body if she wants. I never intervene when this happens. There's too many people on this planet anyway, so whenever someone fricks themselves over and shortens their lifespan all it does is make things slightly better for the rest of us. I think we need to convince more people to do it.
Because there is an overpopulation problem and we need useless people to die faster. Anyone who would do this to themselves is a useless sack of shit who wasn't important to society.
>There is an overpopulation problem
Keep this in mind. >Some like to assert that everybody on Earth could be fit into the State of Texas, using logic as follows. The area of Texas is about 262,000 mi2. Dividing this figure by the current human population of 7 billion leaves each person with less than 100 square meters, a small plot the size of a big room about 10 m x 10 m.
Most overpopulation messaging is just corpo astroturfing to get climate activists focused on something other than the massive environmental pollution corporations engage in daily.
No. Frick you. The increased number of people in my local area has had devastating effects on the prices of housing. And I'm strongly suspicious its a large factor in the increase in the price of goods in general. We need less people, not more. If we have more people they need to actually be useful. We can't keep pumping out a bunch of dead weight, eating food and contributing nothing. Their suicides can't come fast enough.
>According to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), approximately 31% of the available food supply is wasted, with 21% occurring in households and 10% in consumer-facing businesses.
https://www.edapp.com/statistics/food-waste-statistics/
Homelessness, food scarcity, poverty, etc. are all the results of artificial scarcity. We have enough homes in America to end homelessness. We have enough food in America to end hunger. Corporate greed will never let it happen though.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I look forward to you giving me your house anon. Awfully generous and forward thinking.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
If I was sitting on 200 empty houses like some people, sure, you can have 198.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
But why do those greedy corporations waste food instead of selling it for profit? why do they let houses sit empty instead of selling them or renting them? why can't leftists make simple logical inferences?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>why do they let houses sit empty instead of selling them or renting them?
Because without artificial scarcity they can't sell them for 20 times the price in 10 years after collecting enough rent from the ones they're renting to buy and hoard even more?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>But why do those greedy corporations waste food instead of selling it for profit?
Because supply exceeds demand and giving away the food to the homeless results in zero profit, you moron. >why do they let houses sit empty instead of selling them or renting them?
To let them appreciate in value first. Do you know nothing about real estate?
I'm not even that anon but pretty stupid arguments
>There is an overpopulation problem
Keep this in mind. >Some like to assert that everybody on Earth could be fit into the State of Texas, using logic as follows. The area of Texas is about 262,000 mi2. Dividing this figure by the current human population of 7 billion leaves each person with less than 100 square meters, a small plot the size of a big room about 10 m x 10 m.
Most overpopulation messaging is just corpo astroturfing to get climate activists focused on something other than the massive environmental pollution corporations engage in daily.
No. Frick you. The increased number of people in my local area has had devastating effects on the prices of housing. And I'm strongly suspicious its a large factor in the increase in the price of goods in general. We need less people, not more. If we have more people they need to actually be useful. We can't keep pumping out a bunch of dead weight, eating food and contributing nothing. Their suicides can't come fast enough.
The problem is that overpopulation doesn't paint a sufficient picture. The problem is not just Too Many Humans, it's too many of the wrong kinds of humans.
>According to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), approximately 31% of the available food supply is wasted, with 21% occurring in households and 10% in consumer-facing businesses.
https://www.edapp.com/statistics/food-waste-statistics/
Homelessness, food scarcity, poverty, etc. are all the results of artificial scarcity. We have enough homes in America to end homelessness. We have enough food in America to end hunger. Corporate greed will never let it happen though.
>Homelessness, food scarcity, poverty, etc. are all the results of artificial scarcity. We have enough homes in America to end homelessness. We have enough food in America to end hunger.
This is all moronic logic ignoring many externalities and other important concerns, like violence and quality of life. Pseuds love the term "artificial" I've noticed and commies are all moronic.
Homelessness and poverty aren't merely a result of scarcity.
The girl had a really bad personality and burned many bridges even when she was a teen being shilled as the nice quirky girl.
Very few of her old co-stars interact with her and rarely ever work with her again. If you ever want to see if actors are really good or bad people, check out how many times they work with the same people and if old co-stars still talk to them or interact with them on social media. Bill Murray might be a prick, but he still works with the same people constantly and he has his friends who go to bat for him. Nobody ever has Juno's back and that speaks volumes.
There are LOTS of actors, directors and producers who have had beef with Bill Murray at one time or another. But he brings enough to the table that they can settle their differences and work together if it means creating something great. I think Chevy Chase is the only actor who burns bridges and widens the river so they can never be re-built. Actresses are a lot more catty and vindictive so it's more common with them - and lesbians are even moreso by a factor of 100.
She saved himself.
Thank you for finally giving me a reason to post this.
Cinemaphile is a /BEAR/ board. No twinks allowed.
She's allowed to destroy her life and body if she wants. I never intervene when this happens. There's too many people on this planet anyway, so whenever someone fricks themselves over and shortens their lifespan all it does is make things slightly better for the rest of us. I think we need to convince more people to do it.
How is the world a better place with more gender confused future suicide cases walking around?
Because there is an overpopulation problem and we need useless people to die faster. Anyone who would do this to themselves is a useless sack of shit who wasn't important to society.
>There is an overpopulation problem
Keep this in mind.
>Some like to assert that everybody on Earth could be fit into the State of Texas, using logic as follows. The area of Texas is about 262,000 mi2. Dividing this figure by the current human population of 7 billion leaves each person with less than 100 square meters, a small plot the size of a big room about 10 m x 10 m.
Most overpopulation messaging is just corpo astroturfing to get climate activists focused on something other than the massive environmental pollution corporations engage in daily.
No. Frick you. The increased number of people in my local area has had devastating effects on the prices of housing. And I'm strongly suspicious its a large factor in the increase in the price of goods in general. We need less people, not more. If we have more people they need to actually be useful. We can't keep pumping out a bunch of dead weight, eating food and contributing nothing. Their suicides can't come fast enough.
>my one tiny area is experiencing thing therefore the entire planet is experiencing thing
what a fricking brainlet
>food comes from the supermarket
>According to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), approximately 31% of the available food supply is wasted, with 21% occurring in households and 10% in consumer-facing businesses.
https://www.edapp.com/statistics/food-waste-statistics/
Homelessness, food scarcity, poverty, etc. are all the results of artificial scarcity. We have enough homes in America to end homelessness. We have enough food in America to end hunger. Corporate greed will never let it happen though.
I look forward to you giving me your house anon. Awfully generous and forward thinking.
If I was sitting on 200 empty houses like some people, sure, you can have 198.
But why do those greedy corporations waste food instead of selling it for profit? why do they let houses sit empty instead of selling them or renting them? why can't leftists make simple logical inferences?
>why do they let houses sit empty instead of selling them or renting them?
Because without artificial scarcity they can't sell them for 20 times the price in 10 years after collecting enough rent from the ones they're renting to buy and hoard even more?
>But why do those greedy corporations waste food instead of selling it for profit?
Because supply exceeds demand and giving away the food to the homeless results in zero profit, you moron.
>why do they let houses sit empty instead of selling them or renting them?
To let them appreciate in value first. Do you know nothing about real estate?
I'm not even that anon but pretty stupid arguments
The problem is that overpopulation doesn't paint a sufficient picture. The problem is not just Too Many Humans, it's too many of the wrong kinds of humans.
>Homelessness, food scarcity, poverty, etc. are all the results of artificial scarcity. We have enough homes in America to end homelessness. We have enough food in America to end hunger.
This is all moronic logic ignoring many externalities and other important concerns, like violence and quality of life. Pseuds love the term "artificial" I've noticed and commies are all moronic.
Homelessness and poverty aren't merely a result of scarcity.
She didn't want to be saved. Despite being a fun and likeable character in X-Men
She was horribly miscast in x-men. Never has an actress showed less pride in her kitty.
🙂
She was born broken.
The girl had a really bad personality and burned many bridges even when she was a teen being shilled as the nice quirky girl.
Very few of her old co-stars interact with her and rarely ever work with her again. If you ever want to see if actors are really good or bad people, check out how many times they work with the same people and if old co-stars still talk to them or interact with them on social media. Bill Murray might be a prick, but he still works with the same people constantly and he has his friends who go to bat for him. Nobody ever has Juno's back and that speaks volumes.
kek, him and Egon feuded and didn't speak again for over twenty years
There are LOTS of actors, directors and producers who have had beef with Bill Murray at one time or another. But he brings enough to the table that they can settle their differences and work together if it means creating something great. I think Chevy Chase is the only actor who burns bridges and widens the river so they can never be re-built. Actresses are a lot more catty and vindictive so it's more common with them - and lesbians are even moreso by a factor of 100.
I did. I saved her breasts in a jar.
t.her retired plastic surgeon
When did she first get molested again? That stuff messes women up. It’s sad she hated herself so much she completely destroyed who she was.
who did it better?
I would rather a person commit suicide from gender dysphoric depression than see them go troony
>they are poisoning the water and making tomboys into ugly boys!
Who could have known
ACT
We lost a battle, but not the war!
>Punch your own head
>Start hearing a voice
>It tells you to self-mutilate
>Do so
>Tell the world about it
>Brave and valid
Is it that easy?