why do boomers insist the first one was objectively superior to 2049?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
why do boomers insist the first one was objectively superior to 2049?
why do boomers insist the first one was objectively superior to 2049?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Because this movie was terrible
the JOi part of this movie was good but the rest was a dry slog
>this movie was terrible
Because... finish your sentence, capeshitter.
old movie was less sandy
Because they can’t get their penises up without pills so this is the hill they die on to feel strong
is this really the character you would pick?
yes. effortlessly beautiful
They're both shit. Old one is vapid popcorn shlock this one stars that homosexual.
She's a hideous pig, get some fricking taste
so edgy
>small guy
u arent one of those morons who thinks that means 5'8 right?
I dunno, I'm literally a 30 year old boomer and like both about the same
these are the digits of a man whose opinion is correct
original has rutger hauer as roy batty so it's better
Yeah, and he was shit at it. Or the version of the character he was given was shit
I don't see the difference.
Its dishonest.
Film stock really is better huh. That's going to suck for future filmmakers.
you seem dishonest
Sex with Luv
Literally me.
Compare the scene with Tyrrell in BR to the scene with Jared Leto in BR2049.
The difference between the scenes and performances encapsulates why BR is by far the superior film.
The one where Baty cries "I want to live!!!"? So shit
>realization of that world and it's themes
What themes? That movie doesn't have theme
Honestly ledo contributed nothing of value to the movie and having his scenes cut makes 2049 objectively better.
i'm a zoomer and the first one was better. you just have shit taste
i thought the first one was a greater realization of that world and it's themes
but the second one has a character story that the first one was missing
old good new bad… just because!
Don’t ask me to jusitify my belief okay??
cause original doesn't have cringe leto, ugly piss filter, zimmer's shitty music etc
Not gonna pick which is better, but the first one's city/street scenes are infinitely better at feeling real and alive than 2049's random street shots and the horribly obvious soundstage (the one where the replicant girl says K doesn't even smile).
One Word.
Rutger.
Roy Batty is easily the best thing in the Blade Runner franchise.
Deckard raping a robot is more relatable to boomers than a loner's iPhone hiring a prostitute for him.
>seductress android fricks bounty hunters to get them out of the game
>she has done this so many times she's not sure how many guys she's done it to
>they reversed this into him forcing himself on her for no reason
This is what I mean by "nobody involved with this movie got the point"
remove harrison ford and 2049 is better. him being in it was so stupid plus he can't act
because when you're young, you love life. you're full of joy. as you get older, you experienced most of life, nothing interests you anymore, the little things that brought you joy aren't effective anymore.
on your topic. i was born in the early 80's and i love both films. the second slightly more than the first. stop caring about other people's opinions
Both Blade Runner movies are extremely good and if you think either one of them is bad you're a certified mental midget. Fact.
Mental midget would be someone who praises shitty empty emotionless movies like you
>Blade Runner 2049
>emotionless
Are you emotionally stunted?
my dad is a 63 year old boomer and he prefers 2049, though he does love the original
Gosling alone makes the 2049 superior.
Because it was.
BR is for adults, BR2049 is a fantasy for manchildren and incels.
I mean sure if your fantasy is being a soulless robot, getting cucked and having your dreams dashed, and then dying for someone else's benefit. If anything the original is more of a fantasy with the protagonist getting the girl and riding off into the sunset.
If these flicks are emotionless to you you might need to talk to a professional. Or just binge video essays on youtube until you can pretend to understand the films you talk about here.
I think the lighting is much better in the first one.
First one actually had a pace and tension whereas 2049 was overlong and dull.