Having low-libido or being molested doesn't make you special. Jughead actually meets the standard of someone who replaces libido with food, usually that's self-important fat chicks.
A low level of arousal in the brain is actually what causes Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, because those receptors are also responsible for waking you up when you stop breathing
''''''Asexuals aren't a thing. Any cool or attractive people has sex. If you don't you're an incel. "Asexual" is just a cute way to label incels.'''''''
moronic. everyone is used to Incel being super sexual and perverted people, that's what everyone really thinks|
Incel are people who complain about everything that is not their problem, an irrational moronic hate. Asexuals don't seem to give a damn. For Oncels they sound like super sexual perverts!
Asexual does not mean they don't feel sexual pleasure it just means they don't have any interest in it engaging in it.
A good analogy might be like trying hard Drugs and ultimately deciding "oh that feels good but it's not for me"
>"oh that feels good but it's not for me"
You just exposed yourself as being so clean that you'd get high from just touching weed. You don't know how addiction works, you don't know how opioids work
That sounds weird to me. I have no interest in pursuing girls solely for sex, but I would never call myself asexual. Jaiden's explanation makes more sense to me, because her situation is something I've never experienced.
Generally aspirational characters aren't meant to be defective individuals, particularly not in a way that only extinguishes storytelling opportunities without creating much if any.
Generally aspirational characters aren't meant to be defective individuals, particularly not in a way that only extinguishes storytelling opportunities without creating much if any.
Lastly the isolation of COVID lockdowns has made people desire more genuine intimate relationships and connections, because the time spent alone makes us dwell upon how much time in our life we've actually wasted on work
They exist. Though not independent ones. More like unions controlled by government that every citizen is forced to join in. They also hate independent unions and keep destroying it.
You know I meant independent and private unions, don't' play coy
>Also It's a wholly leftist ideal to be toxically devoted to your work. Only the left carries this denial of abusive working conditions
This is literally the protestant work ethic, you just rewrote it and slapped leftist in their because you either have an axe to grind or have been taught wrong as a joke. Where do you people even come from
Yeah like banning religion will instantly make sweatshops get shut down and instantly shut down Uighur Labor Camps
>Also It's a wholly leftist ideal to be toxically devoted to your work. Only the left carries this denial of abusive working conditions
This is literally the protestant work ethic, you just rewrote it and slapped leftist in their because you either have an axe to grind or have been taught wrong as a joke. Where do you people even come from
>Also It's a wholly leftist ideal to be toxically devoted to your work
the left isn't advocating that you should stay in your place or that your boss won't choose his son over you
>nuh-uh!
Yuh-huh. Reproduction is the single objective of every living being, so genuine asexuality is a bigger defect than blindness or a malformed limb. With an "asexual" character all romance storylines are eliminated- the only one you can do is "X wants to date Y, but Y isn't interested" which you can do with regular non-defectives as well. The best use of asexuality is in making a character seem inhuman and unrelateable. I await your further "nuh-uh!"
It's also kind of been scrapped ever since some bots or lurkers on /trash/ saw me posting about rapists getting away with their acts by claiming they do not view what they have done as sexual in nature
And if it doesn't make the character seem unrelatable and inhuman, it ends up making them seem emotionally cold and disingenuous because none of the feelings they have for their partner are ever genuine
Also there's the general idea that it acts as a gateway for antisexuality, as evidenced by Twitter's views on sex
Asexual doesn't necessarily mean a disinterest in romantic relationships, just not an interest in a sexual one. Most long term marriages are usually asexual.
It sounds like an excuse to watch your partner's self-esteem slowly decay over time, as they start to harm themselves and take on toxic people as lovers. Like you get a sexual thrill not from the act of sex, but rather from the act of driving a partner to drugs, eating disorders, and STDs through a lack of sex. Married couples also have an established relationship with diminished romantic feelings toward eachother (yes, romance is more than sweet gibberish nothings whispered in the ear, get over it)
Asexual doesn't necessarily mean a disinterest in romantic relationships, just not an interest in a sexual one. Most long term marriages are usually asexual.
>Reproduction is the single objective of every living being
Oh wow, so we’re going down reproductive essentialism, are we? On fictional character no less. Do you not understand you can reproduce without sex? Also, asexuals can be in relationships, they just aren’t into fricking. Aromantics are not into having romantic relationships, that’s entirely different. Educate yourself out of ignorance, bro.
>Do you not understand you can reproduce without sex?
Do you not understand that even if that were true it wouldn't make you less defective from an evolutionary standpoint? >Educate yourself on tumblr fanfiction
Literally why?
It would make you worse off because human contact is required within the first 4 days of birth or the baby will die from being locked in its own paralyzed body
>Reproduction is the single objective of every living being
You're a tiny bit wrong, reproduction is the single objective of every living *species
That's an important distinction, because a lot of species die out because they reproduce too much and those use up the natural resources too fast before they can grow back, essentially dooming themselves. And yes, that "also" applies to humans.
Plus there is stuff like worker-ants, whose goal is not to frick but to work, so that the people who do frick can do it in peace.
Thus some humans being gay or asexual(if it really exists) is a good thing in the long run for the human species, because 8 billion humans are simply way too fricking many. Clearly we can't control our population with our intelligence(as can be seen in china), thus having a natural way to make it happen by more people becoming gay or asexual would be the only way to stop our eventual doom from overpopulation.
But we can't be stuck on earth forever. BY now I think the only thing stopping us from interstellar expansion are closeted-flat-earthers virtue signaling the environment
Even if we can get people to Mars or the moon in time, we won't be fast enough until we can send them to another star system or a self sustaining space station. Earth and the people living on it will be ruined by then. It will be a dystopia like in so many fictional stories. Yes the species "humans" will very likely survive until the heatdeath of the universe, but we will do so under terrible conditions
2 years ago
Anonymous
You'll be too late if you wait for a Carrington event to set all of our computers and buildings on fire. Why are you always obsessed with waiting for some grand apocalyptic "signal" before you consider expanding humanity out into space? It screams of a cargo cult
2 years ago
Anonymous
because sending humanity into space is not needed, it's a waste of time and money to try to do this, when we could simply fix the problems here on earth. Sending humanity into space is just delaying the inevitable if we don't fix ourselves before that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>when we could simply fix the problems here on earth. >"You're not allowed to have a nice day until you leave your work shoes at the door"
This is essentially what you're saying. Earth needs to be tidied up before we all die, solely to a have a pretty-looking hill to die on. Earth's aesthetic is not the same as its function. The "ideal earth environment" presented by the media is one that is devoid of any birds, bees, animals, flowers, seasons, or weather of any kind
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're essentially denying that apocalyptic events can happen to earth by doing that. It's a denial of events like solar flares, meteor strikes, polar shifts, and volcanic eruptions
2 years ago
Anonymous
Like I halfway expect you to claim all volcanic eruptions throughout history are a result for fracking, or that our ozone hole and 5G waves are somehow attracting CME's to our planet
2 years ago
Anonymous
*result of
2 years ago
Anonymous
>wanting our species to get "great filtered"
Awful take.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Such people are merely closet-suicidal, they want to kill themselves, but vocally express the need to take down everyone else with them in some way to avoid dying alone
Worker ants only work cause the new eggs being reproduced are essentially the same as them and thus spread their genes further. But saying asexual are about as human as literal insects without thoughts or feelings is preety accurate on your part.
>nor does it limit storytelling opportunities
Considering that it restricts or eliminates sex and romance as storytelling opportunities, it objectively does.
Asexual and aromantic are different things.
You can be sexual (wanna smash) but aromantic (dates are dumb)
You can be asexual (sex is gross) but romantic (let's have a candlelit dinner)
You can be sexual and romantic.
You can be asexual and aromantic.
Also there's the general idea that it acts as a gateway for antisexuality, as evidenced by Twitter's views on sex
[...]
It sounds like an excuse to watch your partner's self-esteem slowly decay over time, as they start to harm themselves and take on toxic people as lovers. Like you get a sexual thrill not from the act of sex, but rather from the act of driving a partner to drugs, eating disorders, and STDs through a lack of sex. Married couples also have an established relationship with diminished romantic feelings toward eachother (yes, romance is more than sweet gibberish nothings whispered in the ear, get over it)
>Reproduction is the single objective of every living being
Oh wow, so we’re going down reproductive essentialism, are we? On fictional character no less. Do you not understand you can reproduce without sex? Also, asexuals can be in relationships, they just aren’t into fricking. Aromantics are not into having romantic relationships, that’s entirely different. Educate yourself out of ignorance, bro.
Test tube babies grow up with health issues and weakened immune systems
What you said makes no sense in the context of my post. I'm neither happy nor sad about what you said, because I have frame of reference to base an emotion on.
2 years ago
Anonymous
have no frame*
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I have frame of reference to base an emotion on.
You base your emotions off a lack of emotion and thus present the same blindly accepting personality to every post you see
>Asexual and aromantic are different things.
lol
Next you'll explain why asexuals can totally jerk off and have sex, and the tumblr genderspecial cycle will be complete
If such a thing as asexuality were to exist "not worrying about it, because it is trivial" would NOT be it. That's why people don't take asexuality serious, because you homosexuals just think just because you're currently busy with other stuff that means you're asexual. No you're not, you're just busy.
You touching your own body is different from other people touching it. Or do you mind if I lean on over and start fondling your sweaty balls? You don’t mind, right? It’s just touching, you touch your balls all the time, what’s the difference.
My ex spent months coming onto me and e fricking me, decided to come onto me twice IRL, then decided all of a sudden she was ace and called me a coomer for saying I "didn't know" if I could stay in her life after that type of whiplash. Fricking hate this concept. If you don't want sex you're literally broken, seek therapy.
Romance drives stories and helps out with character interaction.
The most influential part of cartoon fandoms is shipping.
By willingly limiting a characters ability to be shipped and form connections in the story, you are snubbing their potential
Not to mention most asexuals are giving morons. >I’m asexual but I like having sex, I just don’t like having sex with random strangers and need an emotional connection!
Yeah, you’re not ace, you’re just a decent human being
It's kind of like Sigma Male - Not interested in women, but gets them anyway because he is so succesful...
But he doesn't get laid anyway because he is so focused on his career that he gets NTRed by ugly bastard Alpha Male.
You're idealising them too much. A Sigma is not chivalrous or polite, they show indifference to human life to the point that one Old Sigma geezer was in the news for shooting a pregnant women to death because she was on his lawn
Strait people are 1930s, wienernicks that can't get over the fact that there are other genders and identities than two genders, they think asexuality is fake and homosexuality is wrong. When in reality there just people who actually are asexual and homosexual, and you sir haven't done research or went to medical school.
ITT you blatantly disregard any actual points because you made your mind up hours before ever making this thread. The points are that it's used as a crutch for workaholism, sociopathy, and justifying inappropriate touching
I know this might sound off to some anons here, but as an asexual person who had MANY opportunities for sex and jerk offs, there's an alarm in my head that would go off and constantly tell me "DO NOT COMMIT" every time. I feel like the subconscious can tell when you're fit or not to actually commit towards any relationship, and having casual sex fricks up your ability to form a healthy bond.
Non asexual people don't "worry" about sex or think about it most of the time anon, unless there's something wrong with them at least.
It's just a thing to do among the many other unimportant ones when you are free.
So there is no real reason to have or not have asexual or any-sexual characters as heroes.
Are you sure the thing you want is not just representation?
Asexuals lack the capacity to feel true emotions, they have no dopamine receptors and thus can only create simulations of feelings like live, hate, or sadness. They are too mentally weak to form an emotion of anger
As someone that frequents reddit and Twitter and hobby boards on this site.
The discussion about sexuality and all other dumb bullshit is always higher on this site. Seriously lol even the trannies on twitter don't talk about trannies as much hobby boards do.
I can go on twitter and reddit and see actual discussion on shit going on but anytime I come on here there's always a guaranteed thread about trannies and gays and shit. You guys are obsessed
Why come to Cinemaphile if those other sites are better in your opinion anyways? It seems like a waste of time to post with us anons than it is to go hang out with those normies on reddit and Twitter.
Incel are people with no success with women, but they are super perverted. I don't think the asexuals are there since they don't even care, in fact they seem friendly!
Having low-libido or being molested doesn't make you special. Jughead actually meets the standard of someone who replaces libido with food, usually that's self-important fat chicks.
A low level of arousal in the brain is actually what causes Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, because those receptors are also responsible for waking you up when you stop breathing
Asexuals aren't a thing. Any cool or attractive people has sex. If you don't you're an incel. "Asexual" is just a cute way to label incels.
''''''Asexuals aren't a thing. Any cool or attractive people has sex. If you don't you're an incel. "Asexual" is just a cute way to label incels.'''''''
moronic. everyone is used to Incel being super sexual and perverted people, that's what everyone really thinks|
As an asexual, and not to the reply, the commenter, (Did you know that this is not 1956?)
Incel are people who complain about everything that is not their problem, an irrational moronic hate. Asexuals don't seem to give a damn. For Oncels they sound like super sexual perverts!
Nadia needs a cute boyfriend.
Asexual isn’t a thing. Even people on asexual forums admit to jerking off.
Asexual does not mean they don't feel sexual pleasure it just means they don't have any interest in it engaging in it.
A good analogy might be like trying hard Drugs and ultimately deciding "oh that feels good but it's not for me"
>"oh that feels good but it's not for me"
You just exposed yourself as being so clean that you'd get high from just touching weed. You don't know how addiction works, you don't know how opioids work
That sounds weird to me. I have no interest in pursuing girls solely for sex, but I would never call myself asexual. Jaiden's explanation makes more sense to me, because her situation is something I've never experienced.
Though is jerking off sex, self masturbation is not sex, here let me teach you somthing
<SEX - 2
<MASTURBATION -1
.. simple..
Is Shiva asexual?
That’s not Shiva. That’s Tremor.
Best one right here.
Generally aspirational characters aren't meant to be defective individuals, particularly not in a way that only extinguishes storytelling opportunities without creating much if any.
Also It's a wholly leftist ideal to be toxically devoted to your work. Only the left carries this denial of abusive working conditions
Lastly the isolation of COVID lockdowns has made people desire more genuine intimate relationships and connections, because the time spent alone makes us dwell upon how much time in our life we've actually wasted on work
what the frick are you talking about, are you implying that labor organization is right wing?
You think Unions existed in the USSR and China?
They exist. Though not independent ones. More like unions controlled by government that every citizen is forced to join in. They also hate independent unions and keep destroying it.
You know I meant independent and private unions, don't' play coy
Yeah like banning religion will instantly make sweatshops get shut down and instantly shut down Uighur Labor Camps
The Soviet UNION. The entire point is that the government was supposed to be the workers party. Didn't turn out well But still .
Westerners have a union that functiins to this day.
>Also It's a wholly leftist ideal to be toxically devoted to your work. Only the left carries this denial of abusive working conditions
This is literally the protestant work ethic, you just rewrote it and slapped leftist in their because you either have an axe to grind or have been taught wrong as a joke. Where do you people even come from
>Also It's a wholly leftist ideal to be toxically devoted to your work
the left isn't advocating that you should stay in your place or that your boss won't choose his son over you
These issues extend far beyond western left and right but unless you were told Bezos voted for Trump, the left is still pro-forced-labor
>Only the left carries this denial of abusive working conditions
Ah yes, the famously right wing labor movement that simped for the bosses until they got rewarded with weekends.
Being asexual doesn’t make you defective nor does it limit storytelling opportunities.
>nuh-uh!
Yuh-huh. Reproduction is the single objective of every living being, so genuine asexuality is a bigger defect than blindness or a malformed limb. With an "asexual" character all romance storylines are eliminated- the only one you can do is "X wants to date Y, but Y isn't interested" which you can do with regular non-defectives as well. The best use of asexuality is in making a character seem inhuman and unrelateable. I await your further "nuh-uh!"
It's also kind of been scrapped ever since some bots or lurkers on /trash/ saw me posting about rapists getting away with their acts by claiming they do not view what they have done as sexual in nature
And if it doesn't make the character seem unrelatable and inhuman, it ends up making them seem emotionally cold and disingenuous because none of the feelings they have for their partner are ever genuine
Also there's the general idea that it acts as a gateway for antisexuality, as evidenced by Twitter's views on sex
It sounds like an excuse to watch your partner's self-esteem slowly decay over time, as they start to harm themselves and take on toxic people as lovers. Like you get a sexual thrill not from the act of sex, but rather from the act of driving a partner to drugs, eating disorders, and STDs through a lack of sex. Married couples also have an established relationship with diminished romantic feelings toward eachother (yes, romance is more than sweet gibberish nothings whispered in the ear, get over it)
r/what?
Asexual doesn't necessarily mean a disinterest in romantic relationships, just not an interest in a sexual one. Most long term marriages are usually asexual.
>Reproduction is the single objective of every living being
Oh wow, so we’re going down reproductive essentialism, are we? On fictional character no less. Do you not understand you can reproduce without sex? Also, asexuals can be in relationships, they just aren’t into fricking. Aromantics are not into having romantic relationships, that’s entirely different. Educate yourself out of ignorance, bro.
>Do you not understand you can reproduce without sex?
Do you not understand that even if that were true it wouldn't make you less defective from an evolutionary standpoint?
>Educate yourself on tumblr fanfiction
Literally why?
It would make you worse off because human contact is required within the first 4 days of birth or the baby will die from being locked in its own paralyzed body
>Reproduction is the single objective of every living being
You're a tiny bit wrong, reproduction is the single objective of every living *species
That's an important distinction, because a lot of species die out because they reproduce too much and those use up the natural resources too fast before they can grow back, essentially dooming themselves. And yes, that "also" applies to humans.
Plus there is stuff like worker-ants, whose goal is not to frick but to work, so that the people who do frick can do it in peace.
Thus some humans being gay or asexual(if it really exists) is a good thing in the long run for the human species, because 8 billion humans are simply way too fricking many. Clearly we can't control our population with our intelligence(as can be seen in china), thus having a natural way to make it happen by more people becoming gay or asexual would be the only way to stop our eventual doom from overpopulation.
But we can't be stuck on earth forever. BY now I think the only thing stopping us from interstellar expansion are closeted-flat-earthers virtue signaling the environment
Even if we can get people to Mars or the moon in time, we won't be fast enough until we can send them to another star system or a self sustaining space station. Earth and the people living on it will be ruined by then. It will be a dystopia like in so many fictional stories. Yes the species "humans" will very likely survive until the heatdeath of the universe, but we will do so under terrible conditions
You'll be too late if you wait for a Carrington event to set all of our computers and buildings on fire. Why are you always obsessed with waiting for some grand apocalyptic "signal" before you consider expanding humanity out into space? It screams of a cargo cult
because sending humanity into space is not needed, it's a waste of time and money to try to do this, when we could simply fix the problems here on earth. Sending humanity into space is just delaying the inevitable if we don't fix ourselves before that.
>when we could simply fix the problems here on earth.
>"You're not allowed to have a nice day until you leave your work shoes at the door"
This is essentially what you're saying. Earth needs to be tidied up before we all die, solely to a have a pretty-looking hill to die on. Earth's aesthetic is not the same as its function. The "ideal earth environment" presented by the media is one that is devoid of any birds, bees, animals, flowers, seasons, or weather of any kind
You're essentially denying that apocalyptic events can happen to earth by doing that. It's a denial of events like solar flares, meteor strikes, polar shifts, and volcanic eruptions
Like I halfway expect you to claim all volcanic eruptions throughout history are a result for fracking, or that our ozone hole and 5G waves are somehow attracting CME's to our planet
*result of
>wanting our species to get "great filtered"
Awful take.
Such people are merely closet-suicidal, they want to kill themselves, but vocally express the need to take down everyone else with them in some way to avoid dying alone
>WAAAAH FLAT EARTHERS ARE GUILTY OF ME NOT BEING ABLE TO LIVE MY BALLSHIT FANTASY WAAAH
Worker ants only work cause the new eggs being reproduced are essentially the same as them and thus spread their genes further. But saying asexual are about as human as literal insects without thoughts or feelings is preety accurate on your part.
Cause you’re part of the troon goons, right? Dilate moron
Why do you think getting your dick wet should be the only thing dictating what stories are told?
Because you're too scared of stories being distracting from your mindbreaking manual labor
>nor does it limit storytelling opportunities
Considering that it restricts or eliminates sex and romance as storytelling opportunities, it objectively does.
It literally doesn’t. Women came onto Connor all the time.
Asexuals are a meme. They just need a good dicking.
ew.
this is not how asexuals act though
Lets makeout, Magik.
Hickman's ooc shit doesn't count
Isn’t it kind of fricked up they made the character who was SA’d and tortured in Hell hypersexual?
Asexual = No love drama
Asexual and aromantic are different things.
You can be sexual (wanna smash) but aromantic (dates are dumb)
You can be asexual (sex is gross) but romantic (let's have a candlelit dinner)
You can be sexual and romantic.
You can be asexual and aromantic.
See
Test tube babies grow up with health issues and weakened immune systems
If you had a romantic partner, they would be an anorexic serial-cheater with a Fentanyl habit
There I used small words, happy now?
What you said makes no sense in the context of my post. I'm neither happy nor sad about what you said, because I have frame of reference to base an emotion on.
have no frame*
>I have frame of reference to base an emotion on.
You base your emotions off a lack of emotion and thus present the same blindly accepting personality to every post you see
u wot m8
>Asexual and aromantic are different things.
lol
Next you'll explain why asexuals can totally jerk off and have sex, and the tumblr genderspecial cycle will be complete
Then ask them to explain why it's non-sexual and educational to show a child your genitals and then touch theirs
If such a thing as asexuality were to exist "not worrying about it, because it is trivial" would NOT be it. That's why people don't take asexuality serious, because you homosexuals just think just because you're currently busy with other stuff that means you're asexual. No you're not, you're just busy.
Nah, I'm just grossed out by the idea of coming into physical contact with other people.
Your skin is always touching your body's organs, bones, and flesh. Are you going to deglove yoruself in order to feel "clean"?
You touching your own body is different from other people touching it. Or do you mind if I lean on over and start fondling your sweaty balls? You don’t mind, right? It’s just touching, you touch your balls all the time, what’s the difference.
You're socially moronic because you believe groping is something that will randomly appear in every conversation a person has ever made
As soon as they become available, I'm going full augment
Imagine if your organs could ITCH...
Mine actually do sometimes. I get itches under the skin on my feet and legs
I can see asexuals aging into body-mod people who have a kink for cutting off the senses
Furthermore who raised you to believe groping is non-sexual in nature and practiced in everyday conversations?
These dudes say ghosts aren't real but then say we can't expand into space until we're already ghosts
I was kinda hoping for more Nadia in this thread.
She’s the demisexual form of asexual.
She’ll frick but she doesn’t u detest and romance.
Oh boy! I want to tell Nadia I love her and she responds with "thank you"!
That's my fetish now.
Wanting to frick is a central part of the human condition. Characters that don't want to frick are boring and stilted. No one wants to read that shit.
My ex spent months coming onto me and e fricking me, decided to come onto me twice IRL, then decided all of a sudden she was ace and called me a coomer for saying I "didn't know" if I could stay in her life after that type of whiplash. Fricking hate this concept. If you don't want sex you're literally broken, seek therapy.
Real chads would commit attacks on hospital NICUs and claim they're "making room for people's lives"
Romance drives stories and helps out with character interaction.
The most influential part of cartoon fandoms is shipping.
By willingly limiting a characters ability to be shipped and form connections in the story, you are snubbing their potential
Not to mention most asexuals are giving morons.
>I’m asexual but I like having sex, I just don’t like having sex with random strangers and need an emotional connection!
Yeah, you’re not ace, you’re just a decent human being
Out of all those, Jughead is the only one I like, and that's probably because he's NOT asexual. He's Burgersexual.
Asexuals are just incels, inventing excuses to make themselves special.
They're soicels, incels that lack the mental drive or aggression to harm others
It's kind of like Sigma Male - Not interested in women, but gets them anyway because he is so succesful...
But he doesn't get laid anyway because he is so focused on his career that he gets NTRed by ugly bastard Alpha Male.
You're idealising them too much. A Sigma is not chivalrous or polite, they show indifference to human life to the point that one Old Sigma geezer was in the news for shooting a pregnant women to death because she was on his lawn
Strait people are 1930s, wienernicks that can't get over the fact that there are other genders and identities than two genders, they think asexuality is fake and homosexuality is wrong. When in reality there just people who actually are asexual and homosexual, and you sir haven't done research or went to medical school.
I thought Jughead was just a misogynistic. He carries hit hatred of women over his base needs.
he's literally me
As expected, so many incels ITT are seething at the idea that some people just don’t want to have sex even if they had the opportunity.
ITT you blatantly disregard any actual points because you made your mind up hours before ever making this thread. The points are that it's used as a crutch for workaholism, sociopathy, and justifying inappropriate touching
>even if they had the opportunity.
But they never had, so they invented asexualism as excuse.
And you're seething because we're basically calling you incels with a cute name.
See
Asexuals view molestation as non-sexual in nature, they view rape as punitive instead of sexual
I know this might sound off to some anons here, but as an asexual person who had MANY opportunities for sex and jerk offs, there's an alarm in my head that would go off and constantly tell me "DO NOT COMMIT" every time. I feel like the subconscious can tell when you're fit or not to actually commit towards any relationship, and having casual sex fricks up your ability to form a healthy bond.
You have a weak willed mind that's predisposed to addiction, you blame other people to deny it
Do what makes you happy, not what your impulses tell you to do.
Non asexual people don't "worry" about sex or think about it most of the time anon, unless there's something wrong with them at least.
It's just a thing to do among the many other unimportant ones when you are free.
So there is no real reason to have or not have asexual or any-sexual characters as heroes.
Are you sure the thing you want is not just representation?
I want to do the Buckely's cough syrup of representations where I describe other reps as "cloyingly sweet idealizations"
No
>Incels angry that there's a group of people willingly not having sex and having productive lives without it without being miserable fricks
>blaming everyone else for you having repressed obsessive thoughts about sex
Incels are the ones that blame everyone and everything for not having sex Asexuals don't give a frick
Asexuals lack the capacity to feel true emotions, they have no dopamine receptors and thus can only create simulations of feelings like live, hate, or sadness. They are too mentally weak to form an emotion of anger
You make it sound like being mentally ill is a virtue.
because its fundamentally an uninteresting concept.
>tfw this board couldn't care less about asexuals until Jaiden Animations came out as asexuals and couldn't daydream about her enjoying being fricked
>What is "Stuff no one was talking about" for 400, Alex
If you’re gonna lie, you should at least put some effort in your denial.
Because writing a character as anything besides desperately heterosexual means they are gay, even if their default is "is not horny".
Either you are actively trying to do the sex, or you're in the closet. So has fandom decided.
As someone that frequents reddit and Twitter and hobby boards on this site.
The discussion about sexuality and all other dumb bullshit is always higher on this site. Seriously lol even the trannies on twitter don't talk about trannies as much hobby boards do.
I can go on twitter and reddit and see actual discussion on shit going on but anytime I come on here there's always a guaranteed thread about trannies and gays and shit. You guys are obsessed
Why come to Cinemaphile if those other sites are better in your opinion anyways? It seems like a waste of time to post with us anons than it is to go hang out with those normies on reddit and Twitter.
t.gay agenda shill pushing the bot and shill filled narrative manipulation and brainwashing skinner box websites
Twitter isn't even real.
Just a bunch of ai controlled by homosexuals political types and depop agenda monsters.
If it's trivial then there's no need to worry and you ca just have sex. Its the asexuals who worry to the point of quitting
Asexual aren't a thing
Incel are people with no success with women, but they are super perverted. I don't think the asexuals are there since they don't even care, in fact they seem friendly!
Asexual is just incel cope
Because thesr losers and queers and many systems of wealth gathering depend on base sexual lust.
Without it most things people see as needed or even acceptable are judged as bad and meaningless
It's why they try so hard to get the next Gen with hypersexuality early on.
Easy emotional triggers to pull.
Think it's a coincidence porn shills started naming their porn sites after innocuous things like the Whitehouse.
To cause psychosexual trauma and addiction early.