The name is moronic-sounding, but the Huffs defended the walls of Hogwarts during the Death Eater assault and were instrumental in the rebuilding afterwards so they're based enough in deed.
In the books, the sorting hat directly calls Hufflepuff the reject house—“hufflepuff said she’ll take the lot” (as in students that all the other houses rejected) and other such quotes.
Gryffindor is for brave people.
Ravenclaw is for smart people.
Slytherin is for edgelords and cunning people.
Hufflepuff is for... Loyal people.
It's basically a consolation prize.
Right, but you can be brave and loyal, like Harry's gang. You can be smart and loyal, like Luna. You can be cunning and loyal, like Malfoy's gang. You only get Hufflepuff if you're loyal and nothing else.
Right, but you can be brave and loyal, like Harry's gang. You can be smart and loyal, like Luna. You can be cunning and loyal, like Malfoy's gang. You only get Hufflepuff if you're loyal and nothing else.
>tfw took it twice and got the same result
Welp I really am a midwit, I always thought of myself as high IQ. I can tell which answers would get me into Slytherin or Ravenclaw, but if I were being honest then I get put in Hufflepuff
>Ravenclaw chads rise up
Here. I like to read, to learn, to solve puzzles and shit. And I'm into Asian girls. So it's the ideal house for me. >im moronic
You're probably just a creative thinker whose ideas go way over other people's heads, anon.
I don't think anyone hates Hufflepuff. It's more that no one really cares about them, and the house has the reputation of just taking anyone that doesn't fit anywhere else.
It'd also help if their one big feature, loyalty, wasn't also a secondary feature for another house, Gryffindoor.
That being said, while they don't have any truly unique strength, they also don't have any unique weaknesses either. Contrast that to the other houses, where Gryffindoors are couragious but also incredibly reckless (if not outright too stupid to live), Ravenclaws are clever and creative but also aloof (and at times eccentric/arrogant) and Slytherins are ambitious but also self-absorbed (sometimes irredeemably evil) shitheads.
Slytherin are mostly White and male.
Gryffindor is multiracial and equal gender split.
Ravenclaw is multiracial and mostly female.
Hufflepuff are all White with equal gender split.
>Gryffindor is multiracial and equal gender split.
Gryffindor would be mostly black if there were more blacks at Hogwarts. It's the jocks house. >Ravenclaw is multiracial and mostly female.
Ravenclaw is mostly Asian, not mostly female.
>The vast majority of named Ravenclaws are female.
If you only count actual characters, sure, both of them are female. Once you include former Ravenclaws (read: teachers) that doesn't hold anymore at all.
But if you only include actual characters, that also makes all Hufflepuff students male (all of them being one: Edward Cullen).
Named students from the books still has mostly girls. >Female students
Penelope Clearwater
Cho Chang (Chinese)
Marietta Edgecombe
Luna Lovegood
Padma Patil (Pakistani)
Lisa Turpin
Morag MacDougal
Mandy Brocklehurst
S. Fawcett
Dani Carroll >Male Students
Roger Davies
Terry Boot
Michael Corner
Anthony Goldstein (jew)
Hufflepuff has a fairly even split of named students >Male students
Cedric Diggory
Justin Finch-Fletchley
Ernie Macmillan
Zacharias Smith >Female students
Hannah Abbott
Leanne
Susan Bones
>Named students from the books
Most of those are not characters in any sense of the word. And, again, the two major teachers associated with the house (Warwick Davis and Hercule Poirot) are both male.
>sly like a Slytherin but without the power >cowardly like a Hufflepuff but without the kindness >nerdy like a ravenclaw but without the intelligence >arrogance of Gryffindor but without the bravery
Honestly don't know what house I belong in
IT'S NOT A JOKE HOUSE. It's the hard workers house. Genuinely, being a hard worker is superior to being cunning/ambitious/smart, at least a little. It's WAY superior to being "brave." I'd take hard-working over any other quality, because those who say "work smarter, not harder" are generally gifted underachievers.
theyre literally a fricking filler house. they dont do shit and no one cares what hufflepuff lore is, including the author. slytherin got cool lore. griffindor got cool lore. im sure ravenclaw had something in there that I didnt read or care about. what the frick was hufflepuff even about? being a gay homosexual?
>im sure ravenclaw had something in there
the only lore for ravenclaw is that the daughter of the ravenclaw was a thief and got murdered by a slytherin
The name is moronic-sounding, but the Huffs defended the walls of Hogwarts during the Death Eater assault and were instrumental in the rebuilding afterwards so they're based enough in deed.
Isn’t it just magic fat camp?
In the books, the sorting hat directly calls Hufflepuff the reject house—“hufflepuff said she’ll take the lot” (as in students that all the other houses rejected) and other such quotes.
They win for tactical acuity: the other Houses are houses, Hufflepuff had an army.
If a muggle born with absolutely perfect Slytherin traits gets sorted, they'd be put in Hufflepuff.
Slytherin already had half-bloods in it, Tom and Snape. After the war there would've been some muggleborns accepted into the nazi house
Wow, that actually makes them cool though. Hufflepuff being the house where all the outsiders and non-conformists go could make it interesting.
>non-conformists
they're literally the biggest conformists though
I was already in the leftover loser house in real life school and it wasn't cool.
Gryffindor is for brave people.
Ravenclaw is for smart people.
Slytherin is for edgelords and cunning people.
Hufflepuff is for... Loyal people.
It's basically a consolation prize.
If you don't value kindness then that's your choice. But it isn't objectively lower than any of those other virtues.
Right, but you can be brave and loyal, like Harry's gang. You can be smart and loyal, like Luna. You can be cunning and loyal, like Malfoy's gang. You only get Hufflepuff if you're loyal and nothing else.
>take the quiz
>tfw
>Tonks
>dead
>Diggory
>dead
>guy that has "Fat" in his name
>never made a cardinal
>BUT HEY!
>fewest dark wizards!
>tfw took it twice and got the same result
Welp I really am a midwit, I always thought of myself as high IQ. I can tell which answers would get me into Slytherin or Ravenclaw, but if I were being honest then I get put in Hufflepuff
moronic premise
>good house
>bad house
>smart house
>uhhh uhhhhhh the loyalty house
Rowling is a moron who got lucky 7 times in a row
Ravenclaw chads rise up
(i did the online test and ended up there, im moronic)
Best House for sure.
>Ravenclaw chads rise up
Here. I like to read, to learn, to solve puzzles and shit. And I'm into Asian girls. So it's the ideal house for me.
>im moronic
You're probably just a creative thinker whose ideas go way over other people's heads, anon.
I always get sorted to ravenclaw but pick hufflepuff
you're not moronic anon, just really gay. and maybe a little moronic. chin up, you're gaytarded
The houses aren’t based on what you are, but what you value. That’s why Neville was sorted into Gryffindor and Hermione isn’t in Ravenclaw.
Makes sense a drooling moron like you would value that which was ever out of reach of your spastically spasming hands.
>The houses aren’t based on what you are, but what you value.
This.
So Hufflepuff values loyalty? The dumbest people are also the most capable of blind loyalty
Because huffling a puff goes against nature.
I don't think anyone hates Hufflepuff. It's more that no one really cares about them, and the house has the reputation of just taking anyone that doesn't fit anywhere else.
It'd also help if their one big feature, loyalty, wasn't also a secondary feature for another house, Gryffindoor.
That being said, while they don't have any truly unique strength, they also don't have any unique weaknesses either. Contrast that to the other houses, where Gryffindoors are couragious but also incredibly reckless (if not outright too stupid to live), Ravenclaws are clever and creative but also aloof (and at times eccentric/arrogant) and Slytherins are ambitious but also self-absorbed (sometimes irredeemably evil) shitheads.
Slytherin are mostly White and male.
Gryffindor is multiracial and equal gender split.
Ravenclaw is multiracial and mostly female.
Hufflepuff are all White with equal gender split.
Hufflepuff is the patrician choice.
>Gryffindor is multiracial and equal gender split.
Gryffindor would be mostly black if there were more blacks at Hogwarts. It's the jocks house.
>Ravenclaw is multiracial and mostly female.
Ravenclaw is mostly Asian, not mostly female.
There are at least three non-White Ravenclaws, but there are White ones like Luna.
The vast majority of named Ravenclaws are female.
>The vast majority of named Ravenclaws are female.
If you only count actual characters, sure, both of them are female. Once you include former Ravenclaws (read: teachers) that doesn't hold anymore at all.
But if you only include actual characters, that also makes all Hufflepuff students male (all of them being one: Edward Cullen).
Named students from the books still has mostly girls.
>Female students
Penelope Clearwater
Cho Chang (Chinese)
Marietta Edgecombe
Luna Lovegood
Padma Patil (Pakistani)
Lisa Turpin
Morag MacDougal
Mandy Brocklehurst
S. Fawcett
Dani Carroll
>Male Students
Roger Davies
Terry Boot
Michael Corner
Anthony Goldstein (jew)
Hufflepuff has a fairly even split of named students
>Male students
Cedric Diggory
Justin Finch-Fletchley
Ernie Macmillan
Zacharias Smith
>Female students
Hannah Abbott
Leanne
Susan Bones
>Named students from the books
Most of those are not characters in any sense of the word. And, again, the two major teachers associated with the house (Warwick Davis and Hercule Poirot) are both male.
You can huffle on my puff, homie
They only had one character of note from the house, and they never established a gimmick.
And every attempt at one has been completely stupid.
>sly like a Slytherin but without the power
>cowardly like a Hufflepuff but without the kindness
>nerdy like a ravenclaw but without the intelligence
>arrogance of Gryffindor but without the bravery
Honestly don't know what house I belong in
i get that the movie was written by a woman, but why is a badger the joke house? badgers don't frick around, give a frick, or back down
IT'S NOT A JOKE HOUSE. It's the hard workers house. Genuinely, being a hard worker is superior to being cunning/ambitious/smart, at least a little. It's WAY superior to being "brave." I'd take hard-working over any other quality, because those who say "work smarter, not harder" are generally gifted underachievers.
stop trying to excuse women writing
theyre literally a fricking filler house. they dont do shit and no one cares what hufflepuff lore is, including the author. slytherin got cool lore. griffindor got cool lore. im sure ravenclaw had something in there that I didnt read or care about. what the frick was hufflepuff even about? being a gay homosexual?
>im sure ravenclaw had something in there
the only lore for ravenclaw is that the daughter of the ravenclaw was a thief and got murdered by a slytherin
Hufflepuff is the house for queers.
jealousy
buncha normie wizards who like to work hard, play hard i.e. suck and frick
Literally only because of the stupid sounding name
Houses in hari pota:
1. Grifindor
2. Sliterin
3. Everything else
CMV
They are literal Nazis
What the hell is a Hufflepuff?