No it didn’t. Jesus Christ to need to go back to plebbut. These types of “I’m apart of the group” posts don’t belong on an anonymous image board. Avatar sucked and rode on a gimmick.
Stfu no it didn’t. It took the titular character the series was based on and reduced him to a nearly mute side character while the main story focuses on a dykey Charlize Theron. The story amounts to one big circle in a not very satisfying way. It shouldn’t have been called Mad Max: Fury Road it should have been called “Fury Road: from the Mad Max universe”
>Stfu no it didn’t. It took the titular character the series was based on and reduced him to a nearly mute side character
Why are you suddenly talking about Mad Max 2?
The story in 2 wasn't about Max at all. He really had nothing to do with the conflict of blonde stronk womyn camp and evil mask dude.
And that was the movie that followed Mad Max 1. Which was entirely about Max. And all the fricked up shit and him going full Saw movie is pretty much brushed over in the first 5 minutes of MM2.
it's a shame the new one has done away with it all. it's not like i was even a very expensive movie to make but now it all has to be shitty cgi (at least from the trailer).
It's full of ugly digital matte composited backgrounds and CGI ragdolls. The citadel scenes look like shit and the sandstorm was full CGI. Color grading is also gross in general, especially in the day for night scenes. This movie has a lot of good stunts but they're almost always surrounded by ugliness.
>Mad max, a movie series about max in a fricking post apocalypse world killing and running around >but instead we got a b***h and her 4 dwarfs doing almost anything while Max is just being around
haha, look good and some good performances but that's it
Why would they imagine it would be any different in the outside world? They’re women. It’s post apoc. Thems the breaks.
It’s actually another example of women being written like men because historically women have always fell into practically for situations like this. That’s why their romantic literature skews toward escapism and reckless abandon. Because in truth they’re very practical and adept at compartmentalization
Only modern women who never experienced hardship. Which I guess is a testament to how well they were treated and kept lol.
Idk post apoc settings with current era values really irks me. I never played TLOU2 but I always thought it was annoying that Ellie insisted on genetic deadendedness in spite of a diminishing population and low genetic diversity. It’s a missed opportunity in terms of interesting writing too. Sexual self sacrifice is a very underexplored concept in the modern landscape
there was the whole bit about the woman land which is why they left and where they were headed, which turned out to be even worse so they went back.
either way when presented with the choice of being repeatedly used as a breeding/milk machine vs chancing it i don't blame them for chancing it.
Nah they weren’t the breeding/milk machines those were lesser women, they were royalty. Expected to conceive princes and princesses in exchange for the absolute peak of luxury and freedom. I’m surprised they weren’t all there voluntarily. Maybe they were and just got pozzed by Fury’s second wave feminism.
a prison is a prison. rape is rape. huge numbers of people on this website wish, despite living in the most prosperous time in history, for some form of collapse that would see them materially worse off but in their minds in a better, freer place. how is what the film depicted any different?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Because it’s presented as a good thing and not a moronic thing.
4 months ago
Anonymous
but it is a good thing from the perspective of the people involved. you can make a broader utilitarian argument that justifies keeping them as slaves but then you may as well be a communist.
That gesture to spray the theet have some deep meaning? Someone know if authors take some inspiration from something or simply created this move from nothing?
Their afterlife is based on Valhalla and vikings did funky shit to their teeth as well. They would make these grooves and fill them with some colored substance.
It was a very good movie, but you can't deny it was one of the first movies to do the bait and switch of getting the audience in with a beloved character, but actually being about a strong womyn. Even if in this case it was well executed and they were smart enough not to actively shit on Max. I only say this in retrospect, it blew me away at the time.
Also lmao at people believing the "it's all practical" bullshit when there are multiple instances like the sandstorm where cgi is clearly used.
The action scenes were pretty fun, the writing was dumb. I can't help but like it less and less the more time goes on and the more I think about it but it was worth a watch.
It came out in 2015, during the post-gamergate/pre-Trump era when everyone was complaining about feminists and SJWs (for context this was before the word "woke" was used in a negative connotation - that happened in late 2016) and because the film features "strong female characters" it ended up having a whole "culture war" shitfight about it on some sites including this one. The funny thing is it was almost entirely prompted by one guy on some obscure website which then got turned into a whole movement of misogynists/MRA types boycotting the movie. In reality the "boycott" was literally one guy who didn't even remember the plot to Thunderdome correctly, and the script had been written in the late 90s/early 2000s and had nothing to do with shitty, mid-2010s, blogger "girl boss" feminism whatsoever
Also the site in question, Return of Kings, was this insane pick-up artist/men's rights site that was so absurd that unironic MRA types considered it a massive joke and not to be taken seriously. Case in point
Women are only good at making babies which is what they should focus on. Women who don’t want to make babies can choose between living in a convent or being a prostitute
4 months ago
Anonymous
That's not really a full time job.
So should they just sit around and watch tv all day?
People go crazy when they just sit around all day with nothing to do.
It's why housewives were all on valium.
4 months ago
Anonymous
They don’t do any work at their jobs lmao, they’re only there to frick their chad coworker.
4 months ago
Anonymous
so it's better to be at home and frick their chad delivery guy instead?
4 months ago
Anonymous
At least then they aren’t shitting up the workplace. Women are bawds who can shit out babies. That’s it. Having them work not only fricks up businesses it also depresses wages for men who actually do work.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>least delusional incel
That's not really a full time job.
So should they just sit around and watch tv all day?
People go crazy when they just sit around all day with nothing to do.
It's why housewives were all on valium.
Back in my grandmas day, the women in the neighbourhood had their own club where they would gather, drink tea, gossip, exchange recipes, knit and sew clothes and do other women things. There were some women who worked, but most women had a very active social life because of all the spare time they had.
The site's down now and I'm having to use wayback machine to look at it but I'll try to find the really infamous stuff. The all-tim classic was the article that tried to argue that rape should be legal indoors. Like, if you get raped outside then yeah, that should be legally punishable but inside? That's fair game.
Christ I'm almost feeling nostalgic for RoK now. Also the guy's bio is hilarious: >Donovan is a sexist son of a b***h who objectifies women by keeping them on their toes, their backs, and their knees where they belong. His column runs every Tuesday. Follow him on Twitter, or hit him up on Facebook.
Christ I'm almost feeling nostalgic for RoK now. Also the guy's bio is hilarious: >Donovan is a sexist son of a b***h who objectifies women by keeping them on their toes, their backs, and their knees where they belong. His column runs every Tuesday. Follow him on Twitter, or hit him up on Facebook.
Ah, vintage 2014-2016 culture war nonsense, I hate that I'm beginning to get nostalgic for it
>The all-time classic was the article that tried to argue that rape should be legal indoors.
I can't find it on WayBack but I have found one picture of it. Yes, he is unironically arguing that rape should be legal if done on private property
>make rape legal if done on private property
Tell me you've never actually read Jonathan Swift without telling me you've never actually read Jonathan Swift
Also the site in question, Return of Kings, was this insane pick-up artist/men's rights site that was so absurd that unironic MRA types considered it a massive joke and not to be taken seriously. Case in point
>the "culture wars" have been going on for a decade
jfc people will get bored eventually right?
They shouldn't. It's legitimately great. Thing of it is, sure, there is touch of stronk wimmin/crush da patriarky in there, but even then it felt like it was merely on the fringes to me. It didn't detract from the experience at all. Especially when you compare it to bullshit today that's exponentially worse, or the upcoming Furiosa movie.. which basically looks like what happens when you order Fury Road from Wish.
Women are the main focus of most Hollywood movies and TV shows now. Barbie, Little Mermaid, Prey, Star Wars, Marvel, Wednesday, Mad Max, almost every horror movie is a female lead.
because it's boring as frick
le bane guy does his bane voice for the whole movie while le edgy strong boss girl just b***hes
Every Mad Max movie is about Max either simping over a woman or taking it up the ass for girl boss energy
Contrarianism
So why does Mulholland drive always get dick sucked 24/7 here?
Mediocre.
i thought it was great.
>b-but a woman?
her character was fine.
what would a handjob with her robotic hand feel like?
contrarianism. this board loved it when it came out, constant 'witness me' threads. then reddit started liking it
Same thing happened with avatar. Old Cinemaphile shit all over it but then r*ddit ended up disliking it years later so now everyone here loves it.
No it didn’t. Jesus Christ to need to go back to plebbut. These types of “I’m apart of the group” posts don’t belong on an anonymous image board. Avatar sucked and rode on a gimmick.
Stfu no it didn’t. It took the titular character the series was based on and reduced him to a nearly mute side character while the main story focuses on a dykey Charlize Theron. The story amounts to one big circle in a not very satisfying way. It shouldn’t have been called Mad Max: Fury Road it should have been called “Fury Road: from the Mad Max universe”
But Max is in it. Why not just call it "Fury Road?"
>Stfu no it didn’t. It took the titular character the series was based on and reduced him to a nearly mute side character
Why are you suddenly talking about Mad Max 2?
That The best one and he’s got the most screen time and dialogue of any character by far. Road warrior is why anyone cares about any of them
The story in 2 wasn't about Max at all. He really had nothing to do with the conflict of blonde stronk womyn camp and evil mask dude.
And that was the movie that followed Mad Max 1. Which was entirely about Max. And all the fricked up shit and him going full Saw movie is pretty much brushed over in the first 5 minutes of MM2.
they had the same screen time tho?
Now do dialogue
you get mad over 17 lines?
>it's plebbit
also minimal cgi and vehicles that were actually built/driven/crashed/had stunts done off them and it looks fricking amazing for it.
Production value was off the kino charts.
it's a shame the new one has done away with it all. it's not like i was even a very expensive movie to make but now it all has to be shitty cgi (at least from the trailer).
It's full of ugly digital matte composited backgrounds and CGI ragdolls. The citadel scenes look like shit and the sandstorm was full CGI. Color grading is also gross in general, especially in the day for night scenes. This movie has a lot of good stunts but they're almost always surrounded by ugliness.
it doesn't, it's kino
>Mad max, a movie series about max in a fricking post apocalypse world killing and running around
>but instead we got a b***h and her 4 dwarfs doing almost anything while Max is just being around
haha, look good and some good performances but that's it
Does it? I thought Cinemaphile liked it but just hates the fact that a lot of cucks liked it too
I don’t really understand what the women were escaping from. They literally had books.
rape, nonconsensual conception and birth.
Why would they imagine it would be any different in the outside world? They’re women. It’s post apoc. Thems the breaks.
It’s actually another example of women being written like men because historically women have always fell into practically for situations like this. That’s why their romantic literature skews toward escapism and reckless abandon. Because in truth they’re very practical and adept at compartmentalization
>Why would they imagine it would be any different in the outside world?
cause the grass is always greener and women are dumb and impulsive?
Only modern women who never experienced hardship. Which I guess is a testament to how well they were treated and kept lol.
Idk post apoc settings with current era values really irks me. I never played TLOU2 but I always thought it was annoying that Ellie insisted on genetic deadendedness in spite of a diminishing population and low genetic diversity. It’s a missed opportunity in terms of interesting writing too. Sexual self sacrifice is a very underexplored concept in the modern landscape
there was the whole bit about the woman land which is why they left and where they were headed, which turned out to be even worse so they went back.
either way when presented with the choice of being repeatedly used as a breeding/milk machine vs chancing it i don't blame them for chancing it.
Nah they weren’t the breeding/milk machines those were lesser women, they were royalty. Expected to conceive princes and princesses in exchange for the absolute peak of luxury and freedom. I’m surprised they weren’t all there voluntarily. Maybe they were and just got pozzed by Fury’s second wave feminism.
a prison is a prison. rape is rape. huge numbers of people on this website wish, despite living in the most prosperous time in history, for some form of collapse that would see them materially worse off but in their minds in a better, freer place. how is what the film depicted any different?
Because it’s presented as a good thing and not a moronic thing.
but it is a good thing from the perspective of the people involved. you can make a broader utilitarian argument that justifies keeping them as slaves but then you may as well be a communist.
That gesture to spray the theet have some deep meaning? Someone know if authors take some inspiration from something or simply created this move from nothing?
Their afterlife is based on Valhalla and vikings did funky shit to their teeth as well. They would make these grooves and fill them with some colored substance.
It literally was the best car-based action movie of the 2010's.
I was shouting witness me passing semi-trucks on the highway for like a few months.
Just started this, pure fricking kino. Next up is Metropolis, Blade Runner & Raiders of the Lost Ark tommorow
It was a very good movie, but you can't deny it was one of the first movies to do the bait and switch of getting the audience in with a beloved character, but actually being about a strong womyn. Even if in this case it was well executed and they were smart enough not to actively shit on Max. I only say this in retrospect, it blew me away at the time.
Also lmao at people believing the "it's all practical" bullshit when there are multiple instances like the sandstorm where cgi is clearly used.
>Why does Cinemaphile hate this movie?
Charlize Theron is a deranged psycho who buys African kids and troons them out into lady boy frick toys for the elites.
The action scenes were pretty fun, the writing was dumb. I can't help but like it less and less the more time goes on and the more I think about it but it was worth a watch.
It came out in 2015, during the post-gamergate/pre-Trump era when everyone was complaining about feminists and SJWs (for context this was before the word "woke" was used in a negative connotation - that happened in late 2016) and because the film features "strong female characters" it ended up having a whole "culture war" shitfight about it on some sites including this one. The funny thing is it was almost entirely prompted by one guy on some obscure website which then got turned into a whole movement of misogynists/MRA types boycotting the movie. In reality the "boycott" was literally one guy who didn't even remember the plot to Thunderdome correctly, and the script had been written in the late 90s/early 2000s and had nothing to do with shitty, mid-2010s, blogger "girl boss" feminism whatsoever
Also the site in question, Return of Kings, was this insane pick-up artist/men's rights site that was so absurd that unironic MRA types considered it a massive joke and not to be taken seriously. Case in point
Everyone knows women shouldn’t be allowed to vote. How is that absurd?
Then they should be tax-exempt too.
They shouldn’t even work. Every woman should be a housewife, a nun, or a prostitute.
Why do you want to make women even more useless?
Women are only good at making babies which is what they should focus on. Women who don’t want to make babies can choose between living in a convent or being a prostitute
That's not really a full time job.
So should they just sit around and watch tv all day?
People go crazy when they just sit around all day with nothing to do.
It's why housewives were all on valium.
They don’t do any work at their jobs lmao, they’re only there to frick their chad coworker.
so it's better to be at home and frick their chad delivery guy instead?
At least then they aren’t shitting up the workplace. Women are bawds who can shit out babies. That’s it. Having them work not only fricks up businesses it also depresses wages for men who actually do work.
>least delusional incel
Back in my grandmas day, the women in the neighbourhood had their own club where they would gather, drink tea, gossip, exchange recipes, knit and sew clothes and do other women things. There were some women who worked, but most women had a very active social life because of all the spare time they had.
That's obvious and true
That's also true but only because they shouldn't even work to begin with, making money and paying some of it to taxes is exclusively the husband's job
The site's down now and I'm having to use wayback machine to look at it but I'll try to find the really infamous stuff. The all-tim classic was the article that tried to argue that rape should be legal indoors. Like, if you get raped outside then yeah, that should be legally punishable but inside? That's fair game.
Christ I'm almost feeling nostalgic for RoK now. Also the guy's bio is hilarious:
>Donovan is a sexist son of a b***h who objectifies women by keeping them on their toes, their backs, and their knees where they belong. His column runs every Tuesday. Follow him on Twitter, or hit him up on Facebook.
Ah, vintage 2014-2016 culture war nonsense, I hate that I'm beginning to get nostalgic for it
it's still better than current day culture war bullshit because it had less facebook boomers, the_donald redditors, and tryhard zoomers.
>The all-time classic was the article that tried to argue that rape should be legal indoors.
I can't find it on WayBack but I have found one picture of it. Yes, he is unironically arguing that rape should be legal if done on private property
>Make rape legal
>Therefor rape will stop happening
I don't think that's how it works Roosh
>make rape legal if done on private property
Tell me you've never actually read Jonathan Swift without telling me you've never actually read Jonathan Swift
>the "culture wars" have been going on for a decade
jfc people will get bored eventually right?
It's actually been going on since the dawn of cibilization.
It's mediocre on it's own and shit compared to the old ones
i like it a lot, even got the bluray.
Cinemaphile loved this film I dunno what you're talking about.
Man this sounded so good on a nice home theatre setup. I think I like 1 the most.
Barely any Australian accents; it felt like it could have taken place in the American southwest.
They shouldn't. It's legitimately great. Thing of it is, sure, there is touch of stronk wimmin/crush da patriarky in there, but even then it felt like it was merely on the fringes to me. It didn't detract from the experience at all. Especially when you compare it to bullshit today that's exponentially worse, or the upcoming Furiosa movie.. which basically looks like what happens when you order Fury Road from Wish.
It isn't really a touch by the end of the film, the entire plot arc was to get the woman in power who will presumably be fair and just.
I, /television & film/, think it's a pretty good action movie.
The day for night shot looks bad, but it looks good in black and white.
feminism
I prefer happy endings
not bad ones where feminism causes human extinction
I prefer escapism over realism in movies
Women are the main focus of most Hollywood movies and TV shows now. Barbie, Little Mermaid, Prey, Star Wars, Marvel, Wednesday, Mad Max, almost every horror movie is a female lead.
Le feminist narrative, controlling masculinity