he gets resurrected by his ex with magic, which makes him immortal unless he is killed by Spiderman. Then he gets killed by his clone while he's dressed as Spiderman. So the Kraven that Spiderman tortured in the sewer was someone who really didn't bury him alive.
First of all Cinemaphile doesn't have enough taste to read any good Spider-Man. All anyone here talks about is Spider-verse, the insomniac games, or post omd garbage. This post honestly doesn't make sense because Cinemaphile doesn't discuss good Spidey comics at all.
1. Contrarian backlash over the popularity of the late 80s/early 90s Spider-Man and the Spider-Marriage
2. The atomic bomb frick you clusterfrick that was the end of the Hobgoblin storyline and how Peter David's Spectacular Spider-Man was basically two stories sandwiched in with a ton of filler inventory stories that got burnt off because PAD couldn't make his deadlines and one or two issues of PAD writing stuff sprinkled into the filler crap.
3. 80s Spider-Man is still hard to find/read and especially the PAD run on Spectacular and a decent chunk of Amazing (#272-288 has never been reprinted). Meanwhile the 80s Ditko run has been repeated so often it's now practically an evergreen run at Marvel so more people have read it.
Kraven's last hunt is one of the most overrated and pretentious piece of trash I've ever read. It's only revered because the premise is "dark and mature". Otherwise, it's laughably bad.
Doesn't Kraven appear again after Kraven's Last Hunt?
he gets resurrected by his ex with magic, which makes him immortal unless he is killed by Spiderman. Then he gets killed by his clone while he's dressed as Spiderman. So the Kraven that Spiderman tortured in the sewer was someone who really didn't bury him alive.
>Why does Cinemaphile
Your bait is unbelievable
Well, that's what I keep seeing.
Post examples or btfo. If anything this board's discussion is primarily about 80-90s spider-man
How dare you?
You clearly browse a different co than me then.
>Ditko era
Wasn't that just the first 3 years?
First of all Cinemaphile doesn't have enough taste to read any good Spider-Man. All anyone here talks about is Spider-verse, the insomniac games, or post omd garbage. This post honestly doesn't make sense because Cinemaphile doesn't discuss good Spidey comics at all.
Black person we dick suck JMD all the time and he's the best writer of them all
You guys clearly don't actually read the Cinemaphile Spidey threads
The true redpill is that Spider-man is a shitty character with no truly great stories.
THIS.
The true redpill is that you're cringe enough to make a dumb statement and change your phone IP to respond to yourself
Spider-Man has some of the best and worst stories from Marvel. I've never seen so many amazing and shit comics from one character.
tbh he had like a milion series, minis and three or four ongoings at a time, that's basically the infinite monkeys with a typewriter kind of deal
Comics used to be easier to follow before the 2000s.
A couple of reasons:
1. Contrarian backlash over the popularity of the late 80s/early 90s Spider-Man and the Spider-Marriage
2. The atomic bomb frick you clusterfrick that was the end of the Hobgoblin storyline and how Peter David's Spectacular Spider-Man was basically two stories sandwiched in with a ton of filler inventory stories that got burnt off because PAD couldn't make his deadlines and one or two issues of PAD writing stuff sprinkled into the filler crap.
3. 80s Spider-Man is still hard to find/read and especially the PAD run on Spectacular and a decent chunk of Amazing (#272-288 has never been reprinted). Meanwhile the 80s Ditko run has been repeated so often it's now practically an evergreen run at Marvel so more people have read it.
if you really check any of comic spider-man threads no one ever talks about ditko.
OP is just baiting for no reason
Kraven's last hunt is one of the most overrated and pretentious piece of trash I've ever read. It's only revered because the premise is "dark and mature". Otherwise, it's laughably bad.