>AI can generate images faster than a human
Wrong, moron. AI relies on images generated by humans. AI doesn't actually create but amalgamates previous images. Its the reason why most AI images are ugly.
>UUH AKTUALLY
Shut up you fricking moron. The vast majority of art for comercial productions is not unique. And you're wrong. One of the FIRST things AI was able to do was take existing images and change them into a different style. Stylistic transformation is more than taking what already exists, it shows the ability to map ideas from one paradigm to another. >O-okay but THAT's all AI can do
You are going to look even more moronic when entirely new algorithms come out.
Pandora's box is open, people know AI has viable uses. It's being researched like nothing else.
What they’re really whining about is that nobody cares about the difference between something that’s 90% there and the extra 10% that costs 1000x as much.
Studios making some ad copy and promo images don’t give two shits if it’s got 6 fingers and repeats itself. And here’s the real painful thing - neither do audiences.
The sloppa generators will only get better. More and more artists are fighting over scraps. Prices plunge through the cellar. Big name artists now do shittier gigs so the entry level is unattainable for anyone not currently connected.
Over time the industry shrivels up. >How do you know
Because it’s happened. Many times. Take animation - entire stables full of hand drawing masters going a mile a minute. Studios cut back. Only the big names can get funding. 3d and 2.5d take over, over a few decades.
If you had infinite money you couldn’t get what existed in the hand drawing heyday. There’s not enough artists left. They died off, the handful still in business take the few jobs that exist. >Just one example
Again, there are tons. Study the death of the printing arts. Both books and the artistry behind copper plate, woodcut, lithography. From being a vital big part of the print biz, printers and computer art replaced them.
Japanese woodcutters went through this in the early 1900s. Grandmasters of the art were not making prints anymore, they were reduced to cheap advertising gigs. Magazine work. Matchstick designs.
And there’s no work for apprentices so the artform dies off with the old masters.
just because going against AI is now like a massive virtue signal (like when games say WE USE NO AI ART PLEASE PAY US), doesn't make your inability to see why people are so upset a good take.
you have no appreciation for aesthetics or respect for anyone who isn't breaking their back paving roads or some bullshit, probably.
get ready for the incoming, inevitable and incomprehensible onslaught of slop. you are gonna eat. it. up.
while I think AI images are an incredible tool that can lead to amazing results, it's gonna do what cameras in your phones did to photography. It's gonna lower the bar to a satisfactory standard that anyone can do and truly masterful work will go under appreciated.
What they’re really whining about is that nobody cares about the difference between something that’s 90% there and the extra 10% that costs 1000x as much.
Studios making some ad copy and promo images don’t give two shits if it’s got 6 fingers and repeats itself. And here’s the real painful thing - neither do audiences.
The sloppa generators will only get better. More and more artists are fighting over scraps. Prices plunge through the cellar. Big name artists now do shittier gigs so the entry level is unattainable for anyone not currently connected.
Over time the industry shrivels up. >How do you know
Because it’s happened. Many times. Take animation - entire stables full of hand drawing masters going a mile a minute. Studios cut back. Only the big names can get funding. 3d and 2.5d take over, over a few decades.
If you had infinite money you couldn’t get what existed in the hand drawing heyday. There’s not enough artists left. They died off, the handful still in business take the few jobs that exist. >Just one example
Again, there are tons. Study the death of the printing arts. Both books and the artistry behind copper plate, woodcut, lithography. From being a vital big part of the print biz, printers and computer art replaced them.
Japanese woodcutters went through this in the early 1900s. Grandmasters of the art were not making prints anymore, they were reduced to cheap advertising gigs. Magazine work. Matchstick designs.
And there’s no work for apprentices so the artform dies off with the old masters.
Get used to sloppa.
I didn't read it all the way, but from the first couple of lines he seems to get it.
>Why does AI make normies seethe?
Because it's going to completely nullify their careers in only a few years. People need to understand that they can't stop it. AI is going to change everything.
I Like fricking around with AI
It's fun
It's not a big deal.
The music generators are the best imo. I've made some actual bangers I listen to repeatedly
>real artists
lmfao, they're just butthurt coz AI has finally called their bluff. It did the job real people were unwilling to do, because it's obvious to all that modern day "artists" are nothing but charlatan scammers. Just go outside and look at the "architecture". Turn on the radio and listen to the "music". Pick up a children's book and be horrified at the "illustrations". This pure aesthetic sadism and unforgivable mutilation of the divinely ordained creative order of the human soul.
You see, an actual artist can easily outdo AI, because even with the little imperfections and little mistakes an honest artist makes, he still inspires something living and powerful into his art that no AI can even begin to approach. But the catch is, you need to actually have talent to produce such art. Something none of these aforementioned butthurt scammers have ever once even attempted to cultivate in their miserable existences. AI is actually an improvement on their criminal laziness. These people deserve to be phased out.
Being an actual artist is a form of priesthood. God has given you talents and entrusted you as a conduit of his will to translate his Logos into physical manifestations of beauty, truth, and order. You are the keeper of this Garden of Eden. These "artists" are in dereliction of duty. They are fakes, and deserve to be exposed and deposed from this office.
>"Real artists" think a toilet is art.
don't gets hard filtered by art. The entire point of some of the more ridiculous art movements has been that art, even what can seem like total trash, will make for an emotional response.
that the entire of some of the past art movements. Even the total experimental sort of ones like ok here is my empty gallery. Oh you showed up expecting to see art but my art is no art. How does that make you feel? Oh you felt something? See it's was art after all.
I get how strange that sounds.
The PR in practice, everyone. Probably should move on from >it's bad on purpose!
The internet ran that one into the ground already. The current racket is claiming a black disabled woman made it
When slop gets fully automatic with zero humans involved, every art form will go back to being exclusively a hobby, every project will be a passion project, quality will be the norm, the potential of storytelling again untapped, far from the restraints of big corporations, and finally art will be saved
AI is great. Everyone is just sick of AI gays shitting up social media and boards with their shitty low quality ai content. Don’t hate the tool. Hate the useless and incponent users that barely know how to use the tool and think they’re smart and brag about using it. Like kids that want praise for completing a video game level, thinking it’s an achievement and means something IRL
They can’t just acknowledge that AI can generate images faster than a human, and it’s more cost effective
Just whining over DEY TOOK R JORBS bullshit. Sorry but digital art as a career is on it’s way out or will be greatly minimized
>AI can generate images faster than a human
Wrong, moron. AI relies on images generated by humans. AI doesn't actually create but amalgamates previous images. Its the reason why most AI images are ugly.
>UUH AKTUALLY
Shut up you fricking moron. The vast majority of art for comercial productions is not unique. And you're wrong. One of the FIRST things AI was able to do was take existing images and change them into a different style. Stylistic transformation is more than taking what already exists, it shows the ability to map ideas from one paradigm to another.
>O-okay but THAT's all AI can do
You are going to look even more moronic when entirely new algorithms come out.
Pandora's box is open, people know AI has viable uses. It's being researched like nothing else.
What can a human draw that Ai can't?
Your mom not having sex
What they’re really whining about is that nobody cares about the difference between something that’s 90% there and the extra 10% that costs 1000x as much.
Studios making some ad copy and promo images don’t give two shits if it’s got 6 fingers and repeats itself. And here’s the real painful thing - neither do audiences.
The sloppa generators will only get better. More and more artists are fighting over scraps. Prices plunge through the cellar. Big name artists now do shittier gigs so the entry level is unattainable for anyone not currently connected.
Over time the industry shrivels up.
>How do you know
Because it’s happened. Many times. Take animation - entire stables full of hand drawing masters going a mile a minute. Studios cut back. Only the big names can get funding. 3d and 2.5d take over, over a few decades.
If you had infinite money you couldn’t get what existed in the hand drawing heyday. There’s not enough artists left. They died off, the handful still in business take the few jobs that exist.
>Just one example
Again, there are tons. Study the death of the printing arts. Both books and the artistry behind copper plate, woodcut, lithography. From being a vital big part of the print biz, printers and computer art replaced them.
Japanese woodcutters went through this in the early 1900s. Grandmasters of the art were not making prints anymore, they were reduced to cheap advertising gigs. Magazine work. Matchstick designs.
And there’s no work for apprentices so the artform dies off with the old masters.
Get used to sloppa.
Absolutely blackedpilled but you are probably right tbhdesufamalamadingdong.
just because going against AI is now like a massive virtue signal (like when games say WE USE NO AI ART PLEASE PAY US), doesn't make your inability to see why people are so upset a good take.
you have no appreciation for aesthetics or respect for anyone who isn't breaking their back paving roads or some bullshit, probably.
get ready for the incoming, inevitable and incomprehensible onslaught of slop. you are gonna eat. it. up.
>yaasss rich elites maximizing profits slaaayyy
AI art is super fricking unnecessary and only soulless uncreative gays like it
>AI art is super fricking unnecessary
>art is super fricking unnecessary
fify
>and it’s more cost effective
shalom!
it's lazier than photoshop
Yeah, they should just use photoshop… you tell ‘em.
Human fear of getting replaced by machines
while I think AI images are an incredible tool that can lead to amazing results, it's gonna do what cameras in your phones did to photography. It's gonna lower the bar to a satisfactory standard that anyone can do and truly masterful work will go under appreciated.
Why wouldn't that make masterful work stand out more?
see
I didn't read it all the way, but from the first couple of lines he seems to get it.
Same reason as always.
They're scared of the new.
Fragile machinacist, terrified of being replaced by more talented and intelligent beings (they are, and I'm here for it).
>Why does AI make normies seethe?
Because it's going to completely nullify their careers in only a few years. People need to understand that they can't stop it. AI is going to change everything.
>NOOO THE FICTION IS FAKE
I Like fricking around with AI
It's fun
It's not a big deal.
The music generators are the best imo. I've made some actual bangers I listen to repeatedly
big swan
I assumed it was like one of these
>real artists
lmfao, they're just butthurt coz AI has finally called their bluff. It did the job real people were unwilling to do, because it's obvious to all that modern day "artists" are nothing but charlatan scammers. Just go outside and look at the "architecture". Turn on the radio and listen to the "music". Pick up a children's book and be horrified at the "illustrations". This pure aesthetic sadism and unforgivable mutilation of the divinely ordained creative order of the human soul.
You see, an actual artist can easily outdo AI, because even with the little imperfections and little mistakes an honest artist makes, he still inspires something living and powerful into his art that no AI can even begin to approach. But the catch is, you need to actually have talent to produce such art. Something none of these aforementioned butthurt scammers have ever once even attempted to cultivate in their miserable existences. AI is actually an improvement on their criminal laziness. These people deserve to be phased out.
Being an actual artist is a form of priesthood. God has given you talents and entrusted you as a conduit of his will to translate his Logos into physical manifestations of beauty, truth, and order. You are the keeper of this Garden of Eden. These "artists" are in dereliction of duty. They are fakes, and deserve to be exposed and deposed from this office.
What does 'normie' even mean nowadays
people who regularly have sex
Artists are leftists so I hate them. Simple as
that's okay we hate you too
Art circles are notoriously for being dominated by cliques who bully any artists who don't tow the line. AI wounds the power such cliques wield.
Good AI will still never replace real artists. It will only replace hacks.
"Real artists" think a toilet is art. They're just as big hacks - simply better at PR
>"Real artists" think a toilet is art.
don't gets hard filtered by art. The entire point of some of the more ridiculous art movements has been that art, even what can seem like total trash, will make for an emotional response.
that the entire of some of the past art movements. Even the total experimental sort of ones like ok here is my empty gallery. Oh you showed up expecting to see art but my art is no art. How does that make you feel? Oh you felt something? See it's was art after all.
I get how strange that sounds.
The PR in practice, everyone. Probably should move on from
>it's bad on purpose!
The internet ran that one into the ground already. The current racket is claiming a black disabled woman made it
>AI art elicits an emotional response from artists
>'NO NOT LIKE THAT!'
When slop gets fully automatic with zero humans involved, every art form will go back to being exclusively a hobby, every project will be a passion project, quality will be the norm, the potential of storytelling again untapped, far from the restraints of big corporations, and finally art will be saved
Purveyors of slop mad they no longer have a monopoly on slop
It's like if Indians were software
Indians are the ones using it the most
AI is great. Everyone is just sick of AI gays shitting up social media and boards with their shitty low quality ai content. Don’t hate the tool. Hate the useless and incponent users that barely know how to use the tool and think they’re smart and brag about using it. Like kids that want praise for completing a video game level, thinking it’s an achievement and means something IRL
you still need effort, skill and entry barrier to use photoshop. AI shit you just type and soulless slop generates