There are many causes from a large variety of sources (some of which relate to larger criticisms of society) but the main reason is that your movie was a bomb.
>kino
this is a movie where women talk to each other and it's not about a man. this shit was designed to evoke the subjective experience of being a woman, the way things look to them. If you didn't turn it off in discomfort before that expedition or whatever even starts, you're a homosexual or troony as you might also not mind something hot slipping up inside you
based and blatantly sexist. Go back to your incel seething /misc/. >It's an all women cast so somehow females just suck at acting? what are you on OP?
>No big strong man to save the day
> Natalie Portman's boyfriend in the film was a key plot point throughout the whole movie and he was MALE. Why do you doubt the ability of a woman to act?
Great characters, great story arc and amazing sci-fi action/gore.
You're just a fricking moron with bad taste
Menstruationblood: the Movie
Please explain how is this Sci-fi
Yet again another unappealing sexist homosexual who claims that all women actors just ruin everything. Based based based
pic related is obviously an example of shit movies we get now insted af kino
>Great characters, great story arc and amazing sci-fi action/gore.
things that didn't happen, hole
Dumbing down arthouse classics for Netflix audiences sounds easy enough.
What planet are you anons living on by chance? I'm curious because aside from the female protagonist characters and all female cast members the film wasn't bad whatsoever. You claim it was based on a novel. Okay? You expect it to be based on the book page by page? Of course, sequences are going to be reworked and cut down to make the film an appropriate run time. This "Oh, the book was better than the movie" crap Is so redundantly thrown out there and arguments for them suck most of the time anyways. b***h to Cinemaphile about it if the film deviated from the original source material that bad or if the story didn't match up all the way with every aspect of the book. As long as the movie delivered as it was suppose to. Who cares?
Most of the hate seems to stem from the fact that the film has been distributed by Netflix. Which as a streaming platform gets shit on by /tv a lot. Frick the haters. Annihilation was kino. Plain and simple. Any other anon who says other wise is clearly full of shit.
Din't read beyond the fist line
The book was already shit and this movie is shit even compared to the book. >You expect it to be based on the book page by page?
you morons always g with this strawman, as if there is no middle ground between putting every written word into the movie and completely ignoring the book , it's themes, setting and character and literally doing what you want, just keep the title
Jurassic Par changed a lot from the book, and still isn't regarded as a shit adaptation, let alone a shit movie.
Annihilation is just a piece of shit with shit characters
>Jurassic Par changed a lot from the book, and still isn't regarded as a shit adaptation, let alone a shit movie.
Exactly anon, that's my point. I'm saying why do people b***h about the complete narrative of a book not coinciding with a 2 hour or less movie run time? Annihilation was successful as a film overall. The acting was believable, the special effects were great, the storyline and plot twists were all original.
It's a fun sci-fi horror film from 2018. It's not The Thing, Jaws, Jurassic Park or Alien.
But your book argument is wearing really thin and if you want to critique a movie at least leave the fricking literature out of it. These are movies not books.
11 months ago
Anonymous
So your argument is repeating the shit you previously said and that I just destroyed with facts?
OK > Annihilation was successful as a film overall. The acting was believable, the special effects were great, the storyline and plot twists were all original.
things that didn't happen
>kino
this is a movie where women talk to each other and it's not about a man. this shit was designed to evoke the subjective experience of being a woman, the way things look to them. If you didn't turn it off in discomfort before that expedition or whatever even starts, you're a homosexual or troony as you might also not mind something hot slipping up inside you
>this is a movie where women talk to each other and it's not about a man. this shit was designed to evoke the subjective experience of being a woman, the way things look to them. If you didn't turn it off in discomfort
>and it's not about a man
90% of the movie is about her losing her mind about her husband, and at the same time cucking him thousands of times with the black professor nerd guy
I watched this with someone and they got real upset because it was only women being women. I just liked the sci-fi shenanigans and that part where Herschlagg smoked a mutant crocodile.
No. Objective quality exist. If it didn't words like "quality" or "art" wouldn't even exist.
Just say you like something if you like it, don't use words liek "good" or "kino" if you can't tell
Movie would have been way better if it was about the first group that went in. Still pretty good though, except for the weird cuck scenes in the movie.
because anything of substance generally lacks big PR funding and unless it's pure 100% propaganda it'll be eaten up by the SJWs. Annihilation needed a recognizable face to sell it so they used Natalie Portman and this caused twitter and the like to cry about an asian woman being replaced by a white israelite.
There are many causes from a large variety of sources (some of which relate to larger criticisms of society) but the main reason is that your movie was a bomb.
based.
based and blatantly sexist. Go back to your incel seething /misc/. >It's an all women cast so somehow females just suck at acting? what are you on OP?
>No big strong man to save the day
> Natalie Portman's boyfriend in the film was a key plot point throughout the whole movie and he was MALE. Why do you doubt the ability of a woman to act?
Great characters, great story arc and amazing sci-fi action/gore.
You're just a fricking moron with bad taste
Yet again another unappealing sexist homosexual who claims that all women actors just ruin everything. Based based based
ahhh.... what?
What planet are you anons living on by chance? I'm curious because aside from the female protagonist characters and all female cast members the film wasn't bad whatsoever. You claim it was based on a novel. Okay? You expect it to be based on the book page by page? Of course, sequences are going to be reworked and cut down to make the film an appropriate run time. This "Oh, the book was better than the movie" crap Is so redundantly thrown out there and arguments for them suck most of the time anyways. b***h to Cinemaphile about it if the film deviated from the original source material that bad or if the story didn't match up all the way with every aspect of the book. As long as the movie delivered as it was suppose to. Who cares?
Most of the hate seems to stem from the fact that the film has been distributed by Netflix. Which as a streaming platform gets shit on by /tv a lot. Frick the haters. Annihilation was kino. Plain and simple. Any other anon who says other wise is clearly full of shit.
Din't read beyond the fist line
The book was already shit and this movie is shit even compared to the book.
>You expect it to be based on the book page by page?
you morons always g with this strawman, as if there is no middle ground between putting every written word into the movie and completely ignoring the book , it's themes, setting and character and literally doing what you want, just keep the title
Jurassic Par changed a lot from the book, and still isn't regarded as a shit adaptation, let alone a shit movie.
Annihilation is just a piece of shit with shit characters
>Jurassic Par changed a lot from the book, and still isn't regarded as a shit adaptation, let alone a shit movie.
Exactly anon, that's my point. I'm saying why do people b***h about the complete narrative of a book not coinciding with a 2 hour or less movie run time? Annihilation was successful as a film overall. The acting was believable, the special effects were great, the storyline and plot twists were all original.
It's a fun sci-fi horror film from 2018. It's not The Thing, Jaws, Jurassic Park or Alien.
But your book argument is wearing really thin and if you want to critique a movie at least leave the fricking literature out of it. These are movies not books.
So your argument is repeating the shit you previously said and that I just destroyed with facts?
OK
> Annihilation was successful as a film overall. The acting was believable, the special effects were great, the storyline and plot twists were all original.
things that didn't happen
>Great characters, great story arc and amazing sci-fi action/gore.
things that didn't happen, hole
>kino
this is a movie where women talk to each other and it's not about a man. this shit was designed to evoke the subjective experience of being a woman, the way things look to them. If you didn't turn it off in discomfort before that expedition or whatever even starts, you're a homosexual or troony as you might also not mind something hot slipping up inside you
>this is a movie where women talk to each other and it's not about a man. this shit was designed to evoke the subjective experience of being a woman, the way things look to them. If you didn't turn it off in discomfort
eat protein
>and it's not about a man
90% of the movie is about her losing her mind about her husband, and at the same time cucking him thousands of times with the black professor nerd guy
Menstruationblood: the Movie
Please explain how is this Sci-fi
I watched this with someone and they got real upset because it was only women being women. I just liked the sci-fi shenanigans and that part where Herschlagg smoked a mutant crocodile.
Lovecraftian, people are filtered by the cuck and feminism shit but I don't really blame them for that though.
this film fricking sucked. cgi garbage.
The cgi was pretty good though
because they don't let us have nice things
I refuse to believe this piece of trash was directed by the same man who made Ex Machina
i loved this movie, you just have to skip all the parts with women talking
>almost an all female cast
>still kino
How did they do it?
they knew i had this button the skip the parts with women talking
It's a "meh" movie. It's alright but not very interesting in any aspect. If you think this is "kino" you clearly don't know what constitutes "kino".
Define kino, anon.
Imho kino is a personal opinion. Therefore anyone can find anything kino.
No. Objective quality exist. If it didn't words like "quality" or "art" wouldn't even exist.
Just say you like something if you like it, don't use words liek "good" or "kino" if you can't tell
Movie would have been way better if it was about the first group that went in. Still pretty good though, except for the weird cuck scenes in the movie.
Feminist garbage and predictably worse than the book.
bad movie
bad books
bad author
bad libtard subculture
Men is better.
kino
Yes, it's a movie.
because anything of substance generally lacks big PR funding and unless it's pure 100% propaganda it'll be eaten up by the SJWs. Annihilation needed a recognizable face to sell it so they used Natalie Portman and this caused twitter and the like to cry about an asian woman being replaced by a white israelite.
pic related is obviously an example of shit movies we get now insted af kino
forced kino
Dumbing down arthouse classics for Netflix audiences sounds easy enough.
i liked the videogame better
>randomly inserts bbc into your flick
I liked it for eerie atmosphere and ayys being a completely mysterious with indiscernible motives