Why Exactly Does King Hate It?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because Kubrick made an actually scary movie and not a Goosebumps shit with living bushes and fire hoses that King wrote.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Kubrick made an actually scary movie
      Do you have any evidence to prove this?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Spooky Shelley Duvall Face
          Try "sexy". Shes sexy as frick in this movie

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >king wrote the shining basically projecting his own problems with alcohol in jack torrance's character
    >kubrick made jack an alcoholic bastard with zero redeeming qualities

    there, it's not that dificult to understand.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Kubrick just used the story as a jumping off point to do his own this and King took it personally.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. He recognized jack as kings self insert and made him a prick. King remains forever ass hurt to this day.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bill was also King's self insert as well.
        He does like putting himself in his own stories, sometimes literally like in the Dark Tower series.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I wouldn't say zero redeeming qualities. Kubrick's Jack has a quicker temper and its not built up like in 1997 tv movie.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hit too close to home.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kubrick made King's self insert a violent butthole who blames anything but himself for all his problems.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    King made a metaphor for alcoholism/ quitting drinking, Kubrick took all the relevant parts for that to make sense out and turned it into a meaningless le spooky ghost story.

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    He hates the film because the character of Jack Torrance is based on Stephen King himself. While in the novel Torrance is a good man overwhelmed by evil, Kubrick’s Jack Nicholson is a bad man from the start. King didn’t like that change.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    He didn't leave the part of the boiler room that would have blown up the entire hotel if you don't constantly keep watching it before it overloads.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just read the book. There's next to no characterization in the movie and the payoff is non-existent. This movie is unironically for pseuds. Reddit's perfect horror movie.

    >Creepy British twins

    OMG

    >Spooky Nicholson Face

    OMG

    >Spooky Shelley Duvall Face

    OMG

    >That child said murder backwards really creep while bending his finger

    OMG

    >Elevator full of blood

    OMG

    >Gay fellatio with animal masks

    OMG

    >Indian Burial Ground

    OMG

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >t. double digit IQ

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's because Kubrick was an atheist, while King is a moral therapeutic deist. The latter was profoundly disturbed by the former's worldview.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >while King is a moral therapeutic deist
      aka an atheist

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Called him out for being a crappy dad. Called him out for being a casual racist.
    Kubrick basically stripped away the cope and made the story better.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Fine I'm ruining the book. Frick you morons. Instead of freezing to death in a maze, the dad lets the boiler of the hotel blow so that the Overlook is a crater. The hotel was trying to make him stop the boiler from exploding but his last piece of humanity let his son and wife escape. That's it, frick you. You deserve the dumb scene where Jack Nicholson is frozen in the maze and gets outsmarted by a 5 year old.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's the point, numb nuts. It was a laughable, self serving redemption. Kubrick stripped it out for the same reason you love it.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        So what happens to his spirit? He just hangs around in the boonies haunting a crater?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Man, can you imagine a hotel having such a dangerous boiler that can wipe out the entire establishment, and then leaving it in the hands of a some former drunk who nearly ran over some kid on his bike?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >hire visionary director who you probably admire to adapt your book
      >director makes a legendary film
      >the entire film is a big middle finger to you
      >have to pay director for this and give him royalties
      >seethe for the rest of your life
      Pottery.

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    How would you feel if someone reproduced your work and basically made it obsolete?

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kubrick took King's mediocre book (honestly not worth reading) and rewrote much of it to make a really brilliant film. It's envy, basically. The film eclispes the book it was based on in every conceivable way.

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The mini series looks so stupid.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      The old lady in 237 has much better makeup in the miniseries

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The old lady in 237 has much better makeup in the miniseries
        You hag grabbers are disgusting.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The miniseries' Wendy was far closer to the book. I still don't know why Duvall was cast here, she was supposed to be a hot bombshell, King's wish fulfillment.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          you mean like this?

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            King had a lot of control of the casting, so yeah, this is what he wants in a woman.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Ment for

              They skipped the baby gangbang scene. King did NOT like that.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          I have not read the book so perhaps I'm missing context, but to me if wendy is meant to be some strong beautiful woman why would she be staying with a guy that abused her son and was a drunk? I feel the casting of shelly makes a lot more sense considering she seems like the kind of person that would make excuses for jacks behaviour and ultimately adds more to the subjext of abuse within the family.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I feel the casting of shelly makes a lot more sense considering she seems like the kind of person that would make excuses for jacks behaviour and ultimately adds more to the subjext of abuse within the family.
            I have read the book and you're 100% correct. Kubrick saw the description of Shelly as the wank fantasy it was and replaced it with something much more realistic.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          If you don’t think this is a 10/10 piece of ass than you’re low T

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Are you fricking her gap tooth anon?

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              He's right, anon. Shelley Duvall was a roaring flame at her peak.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Well he chose a great photo...

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Well, she was gangly and quirky. No getting away from that. You'll learn to appreciate uniqueness more as you get older.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah those two front teeth scraping off my epidermis, yum

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                A woman like that will bear you sons with healthy, sturdy dentition

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Every time I see her all I can hear mentally is “Charlie don’t surf”. Same with BDH and Richie from happy days.

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    He was publicly slighted and put in his place by Kubrick whose talent and vision were much greater than King's

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    King hates subliminal messages and pretentious "deep" shit. King makes fun horror movies with creative themes.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Skating a bit too close to "I know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards" there.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well then he should have hired Micheal bay.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Tim Burton would have done it more justice imo.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Tim Burton
          He’s good as long as you keep him away from the wardrobe department, everyone dressing up in black or a 30’s chain gang outfit is annoying. We fricking get it, you’re gothic or whatever.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Skating a bit too close to "I know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards" there.

      >being moronic on purpose is actually le enlightening and intellectual
      we're reaching Planck levels of contrarianism

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    i read the book when i was like 13 and i remember noticing that the suite 237 scene was on page 237 and laughed my ass off. stephen king is honestly a decent storyteller and people kinda rip on him unfairly but damn was that corny

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    kubrick direction + jack nicholson acting means a far better story and infinitely more iconic and King is jealous cause its not exactly what he wrote, wonder how he feels about IT thats also much better than the book

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    They skipped the baby gangbang scene. King did NOT like that.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous
  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Drrrrrrugs and booooooze.

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yep Kubrick dissed King a few times in the movie, but that's Hollywood; 'I'm the director and you're the writer, you're lower than me and I'm going to point that out.'

      Kubrick had a lot of that too though, Kirk Douglas argued with him on Spartacus and fled away on horseback leaving Kubrick in his dust. 'You're the junior replacement director and I'm the big star, you're lower than me.'

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Douglas's mog only exists in anecdote though, and will be lost to time.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Its in a big bio so no, it won't be ever lost

          There's a new bio come out recently which apparently goes into the 14 years he was smoking weed and playing GTA

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            he was handsome as a young man but the genes really betrayed him

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              He got his actress wife then didn't need to try anymore

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Idgi

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    All work and no play makes me a dull boy.

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Tommyknockers is the worst book I've ever read. I think King doesn't even remember writing it.

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    AS mentioned Jack is a self-insert for King (like all of his alcoholic writer characters).
    This is like filming a drunk during one of his sloppy binges and showing him the next day. King is mad because he didn't like having a mirror held up to him.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Writer writes himself as the main character
      Yeah it's a self-insert you moron, he's mad because Kubrick completely disregarded what he wrote and turned him into a psychopathic lunatic.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        He's mad because he thought he was a wacky, cool drunk artist and was mortified to find that people who aren't addled see him as a psychopathic lunatic.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Thank god he did or the movie would have sucked balls.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *