-Metrosexual buff black man who's slightly feminine with weird facial features.
-Androgynous, flat chested white women with masculine haircut portrayed as strong and a boss.
The ugly Black person
If it was a cute blonde e-girl or even a Britt Robertson in Tomorrowland type woman going "gee wilikers, Mr Wonka, are we going on an adventure?" it would be a super smash hit
>just like a big black oompady wiener >Wonka porn parody opens with a Latina woman, donning a light blue tracksuit and a short blonde bob wig, standing in front of a large machine >She's surrounded by a team of muscular black men dressed up in the 2005 CATCF Inventing room Oompa Loompa outfits >The woman chews the gum and grotesquely transforms into a giant 12 ft blueberry teetering in the middle of the set, her clothes are stretched to their limit, barely covering her huge midsection and chest >She is then surrounded by the men, who immediately start rolling her around and singing a song mocking her size >The film cuts out when they all reach for the waistband of her overtaxed pants >You need to pay for a premium membership to watch the rest
It’s a musical and people hate musicals..and Willy Wonka isn’t really that interesting of a character the movie in the 60s was only popular because of gene wilders weird ass performance, the confusing tone and the dry British humor. These sequels have neither an actor with charisma to match nor does it have the weird dry British humor or anything else that made the original great. It just comes off as a cgi filled musical. I also feel like this actor isn’t very charismatic tbh and it’s baffling to me that he’s getting so many roles.
>No one asked for it >Gene Wilder already did Wonka better than anyone else could 50 years ago >No one above the age of 17 likes or cares about Timothee Chalamet
Does it matter how well ~~*they*~~ claim a film does, though? No matter which of these is the case... >film does well >film does poorly and they lie about it >film does poorly and they don't lie
...they'll keep pumping out more of this uninspired woke shit, printing/moving money from elsewhere as and when necessary. From a chud's point of view, it doesn't matter.
t. chud
>this woke movie will flop >this woke movie is flopping (you are here) >this woke movie will break even but it won't make a profit >this woke movie will make a profit but not much >this woke movie made hundreds of millions of dollars but it was an exception >that movie is based and redpilled and made a bunch of money and no one ever said it was woke you fricking liar
this is standard on Cinemaphile. More common on /misc/ tho. You will often have 300 posts threads with anon fiercely debating something that literally didn't happen
effeminate "man" with african "person" - modern hollywood
The characters aren't likeable. He gets his factory in the last 60 seconds of the film. The TNT in the ship is never addressed.
"What does Tadzio have that Timmy doesn't?" -- his agent + fans
The more common combination is:
-Metrosexual buff black man who's slightly feminine with weird facial features.
-Androgynous, flat chested white women with masculine haircut portrayed as strong and a boss.
I am a 6'3" french twink and black girls love me
The film lacks blueberry gyatt
>no growing woman
>no see movie
The ugly Black person
If it was a cute blonde e-girl or even a Britt Robertson in Tomorrowland type woman going "gee wilikers, Mr Wonka, are we going on an adventure?" it would be a super smash hit
The film is literally only works with her being black because black men don't raise their children so she's an orphan.
Orphans have dead parents, not deadbeat parents, you imbicile.
She's literally called an orphan despite having a living parent, dumb fricker. Did you even watch the fricking film?
Nobody wanted one and the world is sick of israelites and their bullshit.
>failing at the box office
eh..... anon... it isn't
>failing
It's already crossing $200M and it's not Friday before Christmas yet
Overseas generate 1/4 as profit. It'll profit given little competition anyway.
>Overseas generate 1/4 as profit
Fake news
It hasn't even crossed 170.
International dailies are not updated daily at Mojo
facts don't matter to chuds
Black person
It's a moronic franchise.
Oompa loompa doompety doo
I've got another puzzle for you
hiring blacks will make your show flop
just like a big black oompady wiener
Why does your film fail to draw a crowd?
When you only appeal to those obnoxious and loud?
What do you get when they're dark in the face?
It's a disgrace to the human race!
>just like a big black oompady wiener
>Wonka porn parody opens with a Latina woman, donning a light blue tracksuit and a short blonde bob wig, standing in front of a large machine
>She's surrounded by a team of muscular black men dressed up in the 2005 CATCF Inventing room Oompa Loompa outfits
>The woman chews the gum and grotesquely transforms into a giant 12 ft blueberry teetering in the middle of the set, her clothes are stretched to their limit, barely covering her huge midsection and chest
>She is then surrounded by the men, who immediately start rolling her around and singing a song mocking her size
>The film cuts out when they all reach for the waistband of her overtaxed pants
>You need to pay for a premium membership to watch the rest
Think I might need a bell equivalent for israelites as well.
ring that bell at the 2 posts above you. the "oompa loompa doopity doo" song wasnt in the books
the johnny depp wonka is the best version
>the johnny depp wonka is the best version
No it isn't. Its total shit. With CGI oompas and a moronic backstory that made no sense.
Because musicals are fricking gay
It’s a musical and people hate musicals..and Willy Wonka isn’t really that interesting of a character the movie in the 60s was only popular because of gene wilders weird ass performance, the confusing tone and the dry British humor. These sequels have neither an actor with charisma to match nor does it have the weird dry British humor or anything else that made the original great. It just comes off as a cgi filled musical. I also feel like this actor isn’t very charismatic tbh and it’s baffling to me that he’s getting so many roles.
>see black side character in the trailer
>refuse to watch it
Because its something no one wanted.
>No one asked for it
>Gene Wilder already did Wonka better than anyone else could 50 years ago
>No one above the age of 17 likes or cares about Timothee Chalamet
This movie being successful really mindbroke chuds huh
Does it matter how well ~~*they*~~ claim a film does, though? No matter which of these is the case...
>film does well
>film does poorly and they lie about it
>film does poorly and they don't lie
...they'll keep pumping out more of this uninspired woke shit, printing/moving money from elsewhere as and when necessary. From a chud's point of view, it doesn't matter.
t. chud
Not only chuds. The horseshoe theory is correct again
And what were the numbers for The Marvels? He seems to have left that out.
And their budgets and Cinemascores and legs since opening?
Wow who knew that one number alone isn't enough to tell the entire story?
marvels made 200m on 270m budget. Wonka is on its way to make way above 500m on a 125m budget
I don't think 500M is locked yet. It's doing Jumanji Next Level legs now but we'll get better picture next week if it can fend off Migration
>if it can fend off Migration
It isn't?
zero distinction between this creature and George Floyd
No idea, but a Wonka origin story has never been something I would care about seeing
>this woke movie will flop
>this woke movie is flopping (you are here)
>this woke movie will break even but it won't make a profit
>this woke movie will make a profit but not much
>this woke movie made hundreds of millions of dollars but it was an exception
>that movie is based and redpilled and made a bunch of money and no one ever said it was woke you fricking liar
did you make this anon? why is there a wall of text plastered over some shitty image?
Scenes when people were trying to claim the Barbie movie wasn't woke.
Or Mario, where they suddenly discarded their legion of "Girlboss!!!!!" videos.
this is standard on Cinemaphile. More common on /misc/ tho. You will often have 300 posts threads with anon fiercely debating something that literally didn't happen