why is this the case?

>men murder hundreds of millions to create a society that is no better than nature

women force concessions to stragglers. the heirarchy gets watered down with communism. at the same time the success of patriarchy creates abundance which attracts decadence. undermining the heirarchical structure of struggle

>real patriarchy has never been tried

Post it

Same reason why a female cop is more likely to go lethal in an encounter than a male cop. Aggression comes from two main sources:
1) sensing weakness(easy "win")
2) fear(I'm scared. I need first mover advantage to prevent the thing I'm scared of)

women force concessions to stragglers. the heirarchy gets watered down with communism. at the same time the success of patriarchy creates abundance which attracts decadence. undermining the heirarchical structure of struggle

>men useless
Who does the jobs that actually maintain modern infrastructure, and who work HR jobs. Fricking moron.

what is necessary? what needs to be done? beyond trades keeping bridges from collapsing

>Very few women on OF make any real money.
That's maybe even more concerning. The amount of women willing to destroy their name is gigantic, while the profit is not guaranteed, as if destroying society was fun for them. Onlyfans made prostitution look like a hobby.

False but whatever floats your turd. Just leave for a matriarcal society and STFU

Women take anti depressants and men take the rope
Women find solutions, men find escapism
99% of male “””depth””” is just undiagnosed depression

Killing yourself isn’t a solution

Queen Victoria oversaw multiple genocides in africa and india.

Hell modern feminist icon Madeleine Albright oversaw the killing of 1 million Iraqis.

Temporary leaders in patriarichal societies, plus men kill that many worldwide every month

They find love and support, leading to a path to recovery. Men just die.
>b-but men don’t get love or support!
Because majority of men are horrible people, if men decided to love and support each other they wouldn’t be killing each other constantly. That’s a bit hard for their primitive minds however

based post, very concise. women truly are just children waiting for the next shiny toy to distract them from their own existence

>vietnam vet
Probably cheated on his wife a dozen times before being captured by the local freedom fighters

And yet men are the vast majority of suicides. It seems women are perfectly capable of being happy on their own while men need to larp as their grandfathers

>Im so much smarter than wo-ACK
Men, when faced with the collapse of the evil societies they slaughtered innocents to create, either kill themselves or chop their dicks off and pretend to be women

Women plan ahead, men just do whatever feels best in the moment

>Women plan ahead,
no they fricking don't.
>Americans now hold $1.7 trillion in student loan debt. Nearly two-thirds of that money – at least $929 billion – is owed by women.
>Eichberger’s debt snowballed at every turn in her academic journey, as did her expenses. She had a daughter, and became a single mother, while getting her master’s.
>“I took out loans for everything because I'm not making $1 million a year,” said Eichberger, 51. “It just piled on, just kept piling on.”
single moms in debt. what's the plan?

what do they plan for? do you mean their constant neurosis and complaining outloud that forces men to act?
just compare Greta Thornberry with Boyan Slat (Ocean Cleanup).
she doesnt

A WOMIN??? IN MY 4CHIN???? I bet you're ugly or starving for some of the attention your father didn't gave you when growing up

What's your point? You are shitting on people. On Cinemaphile of all places

There's always a bigger fish sweaty. Do you have an actual point to make?

>women are perfectly capable of being happy on their own
LMAO now youve just admitted the only woman youve ever interacted in your life was your mother

touch grass
get a job Black personneet
then you will see
holy lol

>Just because we managed to successfully reproduce for thousands of years doing it one way doesn't mean the way we do it now where the species is dying off doesn't work.

lol. lmao even.

>t. israelite

>less able to connect with women

one day i wish to achieve this level of antisemitism

for a second I thought his shirt was the Megaman 2 select screen.

Women have a much higher pain tolerance, it’s why most women commit suicide, they’re pussies

shock

Cringe and desperate cope post

Bad angles from her side and good angles from his, in a nutshell. Proper form is important. But arm wrestling in general is a risky activity without much reward.

arm wrestling is stupid. it's all technique in how you twist your arm. like breaking a wishbone it's just how you are placed compared to your opponent. it's moronic, not a test of strength, and prone to catastrophic injury

a jacked dude with poor technique would lose to a dork with torque

of course if you know the little trick with cheating by holding the table and pulling your elbow closest to you then size also plays a role.
but it's about jockeying for that tweaked torque. it's a wishbone game

>but forearm and tendon strength has A LOT to do with it as a "serious" sport. There's a reason all those dudes have enormous forearms.
elbow torquing has A LOT to do with it too.
I bet forearm LENGTH is more important than raw strength

everytime lol

>penis gives manlet homosexual twigs some hidden percent bonus
It does, even on all the hormones/steroids possible, female muscle is weaker, pound for pound, than male. There are more differences between males and females than just wedding tackle. The sexes are not equal, in any way, shape, or form.

Height has little correlation with strength

Anyone got the webm of that elementary school kid(male) whose adult teacher(female) challenged him to a fight and he choked her out?

stop goal post pushing

incels here literally claimed

>least powerful male still stronger than most powerful woman

I am sorry your eggos are so fragile
your value is so low
that you only find any hint of being worth something in being male
and so you latch on to that
but no, theres some bullshit your peddling around

why are you replying to me and not to the homosexual who made incorrect claim in the first place or any other incorrect claims
maybe in your best interest would be self reflection on what you are comfortable to overlook without calling it out

all you do in this entire thread is keep moving the goalpost and seething and coping lol

I never did.
I never needed to.
Incels making generic claims about all women are easy target to call out without such thing.
But when you get called you apparently can only do no-you

>least powerful male still stronger than most powerful woman
Jesus Christ, that's from the men and women tested for the study, you absolute fricking dunce.
Regardless on average males have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females. If you think that doesn't matter you're moronic. The average man is capable of fricking up 99.5% of women, and that includes the 5'9 negress you posted.

like check this morons
he thinks that 99.5% of men can beat that freak of Black person nature serena
he is aware of asian males sizes and is conviced by all of you that magical muscles make them win
will you call him out, or not?

her husband would win a playfight. and she famously lost handidly to a mid-ranked tennis guy after bragging that she couldn't.

And? Is reading comprehension a difficult task for your mighty male brain? Or are we going to need crayons to explain to you how her tenis matches results are not important factor here?

>and she famously lost handidly to a mid-ranked tennis guy after bragging that she couldn't.

Supplements are words, phrases, and relative clauses that add extra information to a sentence, often for the purpose of description or elaboration.

1. nope, claim continues:
and that includes the 5'9 negress you posted.

>most average men would frick her up and that includes plenty of asians.
Suddenly you are at 50.000001% homosexual?

err, your dick is small lol

come come mr slow day...
99.5% was the number for women which included the Black person tenis player

you came up with most average men, which dunno what really means, where you make cut from not being average, but the most means over half... so yeah, 51% right?

you are pathetic btw
cant argue a point for shit in clean logical manner

>Says who? I never did.
the comment that you are discussing and from which you pulled the number 99.5%

>least powerful male still stronger than most powerful woman
Jesus Christ, that's from the men and women tested for the study, you absolute fricking dunce.
Regardless on average males have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females. If you think that doesn't matter you're moronic. The average man is capable of fricking up 99.5% of women, and that includes the 5'9 negress you posted.

>Yeah, 51% of men could beat Serena Williams ina a fight.
which is rather downgrade from what incels scream around here
kinda playing it safe now ;D

>If you only had enough self awareness to see how fricking braindead your arguments have been in this thread.
come come, insults have no weight when you cant even point out what frick up I did
like I can do now
fricking moron who has to pretend previous comments do not exists or he ends up being logically inconsistent

yeah, you are getting in to repeat mode.. pathetic
lets corner you

a world has population of males = 100
someone says average male has XYZ
lets not put anything there, cuz putting there two arms, a penis, teeth, could affect the number
what number of males out of 100 do you imagine?

>I literally have. I just did again.
sure you did, we just cant see it

>The irony. Also the fact that you're arguing a point about women being as physically strong as men with Serena Williams as your proof is evidence enough that you're braindead.
losing it boyo and it shows hard
so now you claim my position is that women are as physicaly strong as men
Why?
because I called out some homosexual, probably you,
when he tried to claim 99.5% of men on this earth can win over that ape serena...

>least powerful male still stronger than most powerful woman
Jesus Christ, that's from the men and women tested for the study, you absolute fricking dunce.
Regardless on average males have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females. If you think that doesn't matter you're moronic. The average man is capable of fricking up 99.5% of women, and that includes the 5'9 negress you posted.

they are HATEFACTS, frick you incel

>with boxing experience

Oh do you know the guy?

Being pedantic is not an argument. If I had swapped out "guy" for "individual" would you have given a response little buddy?
>pulled a random percentage out of your ass.
Yeah, I'm not going to download a bunch of videos to prove my point.

>I don't know what gym you go to, but mine has gigastacies deadlifting/squatting in the mid 300s, and even the blue belts regularly ragdoll some of the male white belts who have been going for a while.
kek you're so full of shit

I shouldve known when you said double leg, also known as the "please punch my dumb fricking face" takedown jiu jitsu is a marketing ploy and sucks

Ive won the US Open and am a national champion. Can timestamp my medals when i get home if you dont believe me 🙂

I love kimura, obviously and am not him, but i still am fricking good at judo lmao.

Its cause i fought a lot of them and they all suck at takedowns that would severely injure them in most scenarios. I know your shitty sport too. You gays never have any cardio either. Its a hobbyist sport.

It is hard to find a good judo gym though, I empathize with you 🙂

>I don't know what gym you go to, but mine has gigastacies deadlifting/squatting in the mid 300s, and even the blue belts regularly ragdoll some of the male white belts who have been going for a while.
Post forearm.

their leg strength is like 70% but arm strength, pound for pound, is 40%.
they can train for a decent squat.

that troony powerlifter made a tiktok complaining that legit powerlifters were only putting up 50lbs on bench

even without your error, your assertion has been soundly defeated on every level.

>My baseless claim is right because your claim was also baseless

Thats what BJJ people say to themselves lmao. Its not true. You could never ever land a double or single leg on me lmao

Lmao, you think i dont know how to defend a choke? You know much less about judo than I do about BJJ. I probably know more about BJJ than you too.

I've been the guy talking to you about fundamental differences between male and female muscle fibers.

ESL moment.

no, you've confused yourself

Then you just haven't been paying as much attention as I have. Which is, again, your fault.

because they're tangentially related and you read fast enough to keep up with multiple conversations.

Oh wait, that's me.

You have some pretty bad reading comprehension. Cinemaphile might be too much for you.

No, I didn't. you got confused by

even without your error, your assertion has been soundly defeated on every level.

You never actually refuted anything I said, you said a woman would get her head bounced off the concrete in a street fight without giving any evidence. By your logic, you've made the same type of baseless assertion you're pedantically trying to accuse me of.

I've been the guy talking to you about fundamental differences between male and female muscle fibers.

I say again, Cinemaphile is too much for you. stick to reddit, where you can easily keep track of who is who and exclude people from conversations if you want.

>biology isn't a part of the conversation about equality (or lack thereof) between sexes

I say again, or rather, for the first time, you're upset that someone brought up basic biology as a refutation of equality between sexes and are trying some inane tactic to regain control over the conversation. Basically, a woman brained moment of "NO ONE ASKED U!"

And now you've gone full delusion.

you're being a girl. there's no id. it's a collective conversation. get over it

>you still mistook me for a different poster.
I too am a different poster. SURPRISE

how individual do you feel here?

or i just don't try to ascribe identity to posts, only the ideas contained therein.

>t. trying to be recognized on Cinemaphile

WHO THE FRICK ARE YOI TALKJNG TO

You've been upset for about an hour now that someone didn't recognize you on Cinemaphile.

What's logical about being upset people don't recognize you on Cinemaphile?

You're the one who's mad in this equation. and getting madder. why? because of something you could've just ignored, but instead your ego got involved.

>You
you're talking to multiple people. at least 2, probably 3, possibly someone unique every single time.

exceptions dont make the rules homosexual