Why was Paws of Fury so fricking bad?

Why was Paws of Fury so fricking bad?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Truly one of the animated movies ever made.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Still better than Lightyear

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Poor Kakamucho

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >How do you adapt a classic Mel Brooks movie
    This is a Blazing Saddles adaptation? WTF?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yup. It was initially called Blazing Samurai in early development. It was an inversion of an early 2010s trend of westernizing Asian films, in this case making a western film Asian.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        But Blazing Saddles was his best movie. It was so good, why mess with perfection?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It was pretty obvious considering all the fart jokes

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes sadly.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It wasn’t worth the weight

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Its "jokes" are just nonstop fourth wall breaks and toilet humor. Visually uninspired, fails to capture the humor or spirit of Mel Brooks, just incredibly, almost offensively bland. Literally the only thing remotely interesting about it was it being saved from seven years of development hell, it's a Duke Nukem Forever scenario.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Literally who?

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >looks like shit
    >worst title I’ve ever fricking seen
    >bland character designs
    >trailer had multiple fart jokes
    >the rest of the jokes looked like some variant of WELL THAT JUST HAPPENED
    I’m sure there’s plenty of other reasons too

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is what Kung Pow: Enter the Fist must feel like for people who hate Kung Pow

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >The Critical Drinker
    Is he going to whine how woke the movie was or something

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >WOKE SJW RETELLING OF "PROBLEMATIC" CLASSIC FILM GETS R@PED IN THE BOX OFFICE

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        While TCD is a reactionary, he thankfully dosn’t make that kind of clickbait

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, it's the opposite. This movie is so bad that it can't even do offensive comedy right.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >An insulting adaptation of a classic
    Didn't Mel Brooks work on this?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Didn't Mel Brooks work on this?
      He produced it…and stars in it as a voice of one of the characters.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's a kung fu Panda ripoff that came out fricking 14 years after Kung Fu Panda

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Okay I had to searched up this fricker channel, only to find that this video doesn’t exist

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Blazing Samurai actually released? I thought that movie was buried in dusty archives forever

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Movie was actually pretty good imo

    …Same cannot be said for the godawful abomination that was the “Big Nate” short before it. Felt like the second coming of the Angela Anaconda short before the Digimon movie.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So. About that movie, guys/

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The story of how it came to be and was shelved is more interesting than the actual movie, like most lost then found media

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    did he remove the video?

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The only think that's going to be worthwhile to SOMEBODY is going to be a compilation of all the fart scenes.
    Not me!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      please link when they do, king

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Blazing Saddles sucked and Critical Drinker’s videos are unwatchable.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Directed by the guy who did Lion King.

    Are these veterans losing their touch?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *