Why was stop motion discarded forever? It was an amazing technique that gave a weird uncanny feeling everytime.

Why was stop motion discarded forever? It was an amazing technique that gave a weird uncanny feeling everytime. No cgi can match it.

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because GOTTA GO FAST.

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why was stop motion discarded forever?
    It hasn't been. There are still plenty of stop motion films being made today that have garnered critical acclaim / financial success

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      This movie was so garbage. Lost the last little bit of respect I had for Guacamole Tortilla after this

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Guatemala del Taco is a hack

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >wait years
    >get a few minutes of choppy clay dolls barely interacting with anything.

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Laika and Aardman still make stop motion films, and even Netflix Animation has a stop motion house.

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Spooky.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Still not sure how a irl dude fights a stop motion skeleton.
      So much more impressive than cgi.
      This post was made with stop motion.
      I started this 2 months ago.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ray Harryhausen was a fricking artist. The studio would tell him what they wanted and hand him the film, he'd tell them to shut the frick up and leave him alone and then do all of this shit himself.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          That’s fricking amazing. Anyone here have an abiding appreciation for Dragonslayer? It, in my opinion, was the pinnacle of stop-motion, a perfect marriage of old tech and new. For those not in the know, check this out:

          ?si=ZmZiQvFHKB0N2Svo

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Fricking love Dragonslayer. Easily one of the better 80s fantasy kinos. The only fault I have with it is that I wish they had cast a better lead actor. Peter MacNicol is like a wet paper bag. At least the girl was good and cute.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              It cracks me up how few people realize how much GRRM lifted from this movie. That may be a bit too harsh, but he was definitely inspired by it.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >A Song of Ice and Fire author George R. R. Martin once ranked it the fifth-best fantasy film of all time, and called Vermithrax "the best dragon ever put on film with the coolest dragon name". Vermithrax is mentioned as an Easter egg in a list of dragons' names in the fourth episode of that book series adaptation, Game of Thrones.
                He probably wouldn't even be ashamed to admit it.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Were it not for the overt presence of Latin and Christianity, Dragonslayer could almost be a tale set in the past of Essos.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              >The only fault I have with it is that I wish they had cast a better lead actor.
              Yeah, guy looked like a 45 year old divorced dad with mortgage and prostate issues and is supposed to be a teenage apprentice or something.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        pretty much they act out the scene like a dance choreography, Bruce Campbell goes over the process of how he did it for Army of Darkness in his autobiography.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      no skelly-san don’t look at my pantsu

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I took me 20 minutes to type this reply because after ever letter I had to stop an take a picture.
    I wish I made a shorter reply.
    Oh well,to late now.

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mad God came out less than a year ago.

  8. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    The British company Aardman produces stop-motion and Tim Burton has some done stop-motion films. If you are asking about Harryhausen use of stop-motion then why would, beyond a gimmick, the quicker and easier CGI not be used in its place?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Burton
      Wes Anderson also

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >British company Aardman produces stop-motion

      You're sure?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. That's clearly stop motion, though they are using blue screen for some backgrounds

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          I imagine with current tech it would have been much quicker and easier to make a quality stop motion film as opposed to the gruelling task of making the first Wallace & Gromit.

  9. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kubo and the 2 Strings

  10. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Missing Link was terrific.

  11. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Kino. Literally everything a movie needs in 26 seconds.

  12. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I take it you mean stop-motion as a special effect in live-action, for stop-motion alone hasn't fully been discarded:
    >Wallace and Gromit
    >Shaun the Sheep
    >Chicken Run
    >Flushed Away
    >Caroline
    >various things with the Moomins
    >The Nightmare Before Christmas
    >Corpse Bride
    >Frankenweenie
    >Fantastic Mr. Fox
    >Isle of Dogs
    >The Boxtrolls
    >Kubo and the Two Strings
    >Early Man
    >Missing Link
    >del Toro's Pinocchio
    >The Miracle Maker
    As for stop-motion's use as a special effect in live-action, CGI is far more versatile and less time consuming.

  13. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    it requires hard work and talent

  14. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    It was discarded (not counting independent gimmick movies and vanity projects or cartoons) in October 1992 after Spaz Williams "leaked" cgi T.rex he'd been working on in secret in front of Kathleen Kennedy. IT was used because there was no alternative.
    Other than suitmation which outlived stop motion and was even partially used in Jurassic Park probably a big blow to Harryhausen's ego.

  15. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  16. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    MonkeyBone was Kino and I’m tired pretending it isn’t.

  17. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    takes forever and what if you want to change something later?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >what if you want to change something later?
      the mindset that literally killed cinema.

  18. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    They stopped mixing live action actors with stop motion creatures because of how extremely limiting it is compared to CGI. If you have a shot where you have both an actor and a stop motion creature, then you can't have any camera movement. Matching the camera movement perfectly on set and and in studio is pretty much impossible because you have to shoot the actors and the models at different focal lengths due to the size difference between them.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      but it pays off. it looks hella kino. like the ED209 scenes. or the terminator limping in the iron foundry. or beetlejuice. or the several "villain dissolves" scenes from the 80's. the very harryhausen. all iconic.

      protip: memories are coded in the brain pretty similar to how a "jarring" stop motion is experienced.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        It has it's charm, but I don't fault any filmmaker for wanting to be able to move the camera in action scenes, or wanting to have smoother animation which sits better with the live action footage

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I remember watching T as a kid and thinking th Terminator exosekelton looked bloody awful. And the frame rate on the mobile ED209 was terrible. I can understand why the Terminator skellly had to be done for budget reasons but there would have been better practical ways to fix ED209's march.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          soulless kid

  19. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Life sized animatronics and costumes > stop motion

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Some of the best monster effects I've seen are in Where The Wild Things Are. They had actual costumes for the monsters, but used CGI only to animate their faces. It blends perfectly.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Good shit.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      You know animation fansm especially stop motion animation, hate being reminded that suits can and do work and can look great.

  20. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    For me, it's The Adventures of Mark Twain https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ntf5_ue2Lzw

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Amazing scene, great film. Well worth watching.

  21. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Just a tiny amount

  22. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Primevals is coming out soon

  23. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because the end point is you get results that look just like good CG but took way more time, money, and effort and everybody at a glance assumes it was CG and don't care it was stop motion.

  24. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    this fricked up east european version of alice in wonderland has kino stop animation

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      All of Svankmajer's films have great stop motion animation. Faust and Little Otik are even better.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      All of Svankmajer's films have great stop motion animation. Faust and Little Otik are even better.

      don juan is mega kino

  25. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is kind of like asking why we stopped carving letters on stone tablets in favor writing on soulless paper.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Explain your comparison.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Explain your comparison.

      I'll explain it. Messages written in stone will stand the test of time while papercucks will have their media literally rot away once people are done with it. People will still marvel at Ray Harryhausen's artistry 100 years from now while CGIslop from 5 years ago is already being laughed at for looking like shit.

  26. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    There are still a few stop-motion movies that come out like The Wolf House and Mad God. Actually now that it's not just being used as default special effects in normal movies, there's more of a focus on the artistry of it from small passion projects. Because of its uniqueness, I don't think it will ever go away. Even some random Filipino movie from last decade that I watched - Alipato - randomly had a sick stop-motion sequence in the middle.

    But to answer your question on why it's not used outside of vanity projects, because it is legitimately one of the most time-consuming methods of film. It's not even that it's very expensive, films are made on a strict time schedule with a thousand moving parts. Unless the director is in love with stop motion, he's not going to have important special effects tied up for months.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mad God sucked

  27. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *