Is this some satanic ritual where they want everyone to worship ugliness instead of beauty?
I've heard others say it's because women can't see themselves as the female lead and it's an unfair version of beauty for them to aspire too?
I've heard the notion that white men don't pay for movies anymore so they only cater to other demographics? Hence not having females that white men would find attractive in movies.
Is it some depopulation scheme by socially engineering girls into wanting to look unattractive to the opposite sex? Thus people have less babies.
Jews
Women get bothered by attractive women in movies and TV shows, so they took it away. Also
Jews were running Hollywood from the beginning
yeah...it's always such a boneheaded argument. israelites are a demographic that tend to go to school and study rather than drink beer and try to bang cheerleaders. so they get out and start working and make stuff that the beer drinking contingent consume.
and then the dumb jocks run out of cheerleaders to bang because they (the cheerleaders) have gravitated to the goofy dudes with money and the beer jocks start sucking up mein kamf and all that shit.
same as it ever was.
>teen love is bad
>jocks can't be smart
the smart jocks don't have to find some way to digest not being the center of attention any more. so they keep up or even excel. good on em', i says. they actually are at an advantage because jocks have done physically dangerous things and know that they can think and do stuff even when their hands are shaking.
>know that they can think and do stuff even when their hands are shaking.
huh?
my point was more their are smart and dumb people in all walks of life
also being smart doesn't always equate to success just like being athletically gifted doesn't always equate to success.
This looks like something a bitter nerd would write. Honestly sounds like something I'd write in high school 15 years ago. This is a stupid delusion.
100% not true
Hollywood used to have a written code of ethics when it was run by Christians
Lol
Lmao even
fippy bippy
the woman in OP's pic is israeli
she also isn't attractive
Post what you consider attractive.
Because they put women in charge of making them
Also an acceptable answer
The fricking israelites run hollywood since forever. This cant be the fricking reason
It was the israelites who put attractive women in movies in the first place
100% correct!!!FACT!!!
because it bothers you so much and doesnt bother some people at all
divide and conquer
stop playing into it
Only good answer in the thread
>assrape bothers you and doesn't bother other people
>divide cheeks and conquer
>stop playing into it
You fricking moron
because frick you that's why
Onlyfans
>Why'd they stop putting attractive women in movies?
because BIG HARV, who was the only one who had good taste in beautiful women, went to jail.
Yeah it's as if Harv put a stigma on having attractive women in films. I think it could be people don't want to others in the industry to think you harvested the actress so she could be in your film.
Nah, the producers are all old lesbian yentas now who get jealous if an actress is more attractive than them.
yeah its crazy how all the casting directors are female
they me-too'ed all the straight men casting directors, even the good ones who werent pervs, just greedhead fricks. it was a plan by fat ugly israeli dykes to oust the fat ugly male israelites.
those are plastic zipperheads not beautiful women
Nuke Los Angeles ASAP
why do they do it?
I think it's got to be some kind of body dysphoria/dysmorphia like is seen in people with eating disorders like anorexia and bulimia.
homosexualS AND FEMINISTS, WITH THEIR CUNNILUNGUS AND PSYCHATRY HAVE DONE THIS TO US.
Holy frick, why???
Women control the industry now. MeToo was a coup wherein foids took power. The remaining men with power have been cowed into submission.
These anons have the right of it.
shame women generally aren't very good leaders imho
this appears to be the case. i just don't watch any of their movies. there are enough pre-girlboss movies that i can watch them sequentially til i die of old age and i will never run out. it's downright comfy.
well pretty much everything coming out now shit. I just watch movies from like pre-2010 because that's when things started going downhill.
Yes. And? Works for me, though not really any need to go even as late as 2010 if you're an actual chronological grown up and have liked movies since you were a kid. After about the turn of the millenia the visual quality improvements reached the point of diminishing returns and now you just buy to see the "newest and latest" so you can post that you did so and reap the rewards of ... what?
The next improvements that will be worth changing your consumption medium will be something like Elon's chip in your head or an actual, stick-the-prong-in-the-back-of-your-head Matrix.
AI will likely kill us all prior to that, however.
70's and early 80's was the best period for movies imho
I wouldn't argue at all, but you can easily go a decade forward or back and see stuff that looks pretty good and yet not be subject to egregious agenda based bullshit.
yep exactly
the problem i have with 60's movies is a lot of the music of the time isn't that good and can be quite jarring not saying their aren't good movies from that era
90's was based though
I bet she wears just this coat on cold nights and schlicks herself in bed thinking of Harvey.
>i'm just taking a break from making movies guys because feminism
sure you are sweaty
It's all of that shit combined
You don't worship beauty you insincere bastard, you just want to jerk off. You don't want people to "aspire" to beauty, and a bimbo with bolt ons is not beauty, it's a sex object. And the only reason why it's there is because sex sells, especially since the world is filled with pathetic losers such as yourself. Yet, instead of being honest and say "i Wish there were more prostitutes on tv i could rub one out with", you pull out this absurd, hypocritical mental gymnastic about how in reality you're in pursue of higher and more refined pleasures but the evil joos are simply preventing it. Nevermind that the same israelites put those prostitutes there in the first place.
Admit that you just want to complain, that your life is empty and you're making slide threads cause you're bored, you lying piece of shit. You fricking disgust me.
I ain't readin that shit homie
>the ancients' sculptures were for people to jerk off to
wew lad a lot of projection there, if you look at the
there's no mention of israelites, it is you who associates anti-beauty and with israelites not me
sure some bolt on bimbo could be good jerk off material but in reality you'd never want her to actually meet her or have sex with her or her be your girlfriend and introduce her to your family and eventually marry her and have your children
also theirs nothing wrong with being attracted to women bro, beauty and attraction aren't negative things
like you need to be physically attracted to a woman to be in a relationship with her, you know that right? you wouldn't just go out with an ugly girl because she's beautiful on the inside it doesn't work like that.
You're completely wrong. They're even removing women who are simply just pretty, without any "coomer" aspect every being there. It really is about ugliness and beauty.
They want to cater to the average now instead of the exceptional. People are too weak minded now to admit that someone may be more attractive than they are. They don't want to be reminded that they may be average or even ugly. The focus is on coddling people now instead of helping them grow spines. So your stars can't be too stunning or striking anymore, lest you make the emotionally frail boycott the entire thing
We're in the celebration of ugliness mode now. However the pendulum always swings back
They still have attractive men in movies though....
Of course they do. Ask yourself who wants to see attractive men but not very attractive women
see
women
Progressives see ugliness and beauty as political, and I bet you can guess which side of the coin they're on.
how is it political in what way?
beauty is power, power is political and needs to be equitable to all women
Thank you, very succinct way of putting it I understand now.
wtf is wrong with you? Just watch porn if you're like this. You've obviously made a conscious decision at some point in your life to be a weird creep but for some reason you expect mainstream movies made for normies to pander to your incelish sensibilities?
Either dumb or baiting
Why are you projecting so hard bro? Must be a bait post.
I don't think you understand porn is very different from a normal movie. Men appreciate a beautiful women who isn't a prostitute.
I'm not watching a movie simply in the hopes of some sex scene because i'm a horny coombrain.
and what is wrong with having an attractive female lead? how does that hurt anyone?
it hurts women who arent as beautiful because it establishes unrealistic beauty standards. Women in film need to be average and overweight for it not to become an unfair competitive environment for the female population
Yes but then you have the female population tricked into thinking they are 10's because the male romantic lead is still a conventional 10/10 in women's eyes.
So women in real life don't select for their appropriate level of beauty in their partners they think they should be with a male 10.
Again this is probably going to cause the number of babies to go down.
>Men appreciate a beautiful women who isn't a prostitute.
>Let me tell you how all men in the world collectively feel
lmao the delusions of your post is palpable
ok so you just appreciate prostitutes and not beautiful women?
Anon, I just like women
I don't give a shit if you deem them to be prostitutes or not
you're just a homosexual, plain and simple
go to a wheatfield maybe a "trad"wife will show up
i like women too but their is a difference between a prostitute and a normal woman you appreciate them in different ways
>there is a difference between a prostitute and a normal woman
No, there isn't
a woman is a woman
whether you choose to arbitrarily describe them as prostitutes is irrelevant
and just asking, how is a woman a prostitute?
I think to truly appreciate women one must see the virtues of both the Madonna and the Harlot. You, sir, have taste.
she has yet to even glimpse the wall even at her old age.
WOG
Sit quietly and listen to them when they feel like bragging and the tribe will rant ant whites being amalek.
Sarah Gadon is still in movies.
Blacks are still in Sarah Gadon
More like Sarah GAY'D-on
Sarah Gadon is a Goddess
Why is film and television so woke now? What happened? It's all made by SJWs. Its almost like the west has fallen.
>attractive
>women
I disagree
start watching korean media if you want to see beautiful women as the norm
asian beauty standards make them all look generic. If they had atleast a couple of big breasts and ass girls it would be good.
ugly artificial bawds
compare them to true beauty like jeniffer connelly and it almost disgusts you how fake and flat-faced like they're wearing masks these prostitutes are
>if you want to see plastic women as the norm
ftfy
Compared to 10 or 15 years ago... There are A LOT more female casting directors, female directors, and older female producers in positions of power in Hollywood now.
Many Women (especially older women) are Insecure and don't like seeing women they consider prettier than them on screen. It bothers the "cave woman" part of their brains. It feels like a threat to their territory. That this younger and prettier woman will steal away her husband or man she's worked so hard to attract. That she will lose valuable resources to another female competitor.
Men are the opposite. When men see a muscular and fit dude on screen, it inspires men to want to be like them. To work harder, hit the gym, get in better shape, etc. Men don't seethe with anger like women do. Men are more of a brotherhood and want to inspire other men and stick together in a pack. Because back cave man days....men used to be hunter gatherers and needed to work together to hunt large animals. We all had to be in shape and support eachother during the hunt.
>Why'd they stop putting attractive women in movies?
They didn't
Post an image of a conventionally attractive woman in a film from 2023 or 2024?
I'm not falling for your bait anon
it's time to stop being an incel and go outside
the reason you didn't post an image of a conventionally attractive woman in a film from 2023 or 2024 was because you can't.
Yes, let's restrict the years to the last two so you can push your disingenuous narrative
Good job anon, you did a propaganda
see
he manned up and posted a picture of 3 ugly chicks and one attractive one, sorta gives me hope i guess
i'll widen the goal posts for post an attractive chick in a movie post 2016
>i'll widen the goal posts for post
i'll widen the goal posts for you* post
>he manned up
lmao
>i'll widen the goal posts for post an attractive chick in a movie post 2016
You know attraction is 100% subjective right?
are you saying beauty is in the eye of the beholder?
>are you saying beauty is in the eye of the beholder?
if you want to rephrase it for your tiny brain sure
you still haven't come up with an image, i'll widen the goal posts ever further you can post an image of a women(female)(+18) that you find subjectively attractive that has been in a movie from post 2016.
I'm too lazy to pull an image but Zazie Beetz from the Joker is pretty hot
finishes with a bait post typical
How is it bait?
Also she was in Deadpool 2 where she was also pretty hot
hahahah had to
> pretty hot
see you don't even find her conventionally attractive and why are you watching all these shitty films?
>conventionally attractive
ah, sorry I didn't use the chud approved term for saying someone is attractive
if anyone is baiting is you
ok here is a conventionally attractive female
Ok and?
the term literally is meaningless because attraction is subjective
is she hot? yep
is that chick from the joker equally hot? they are to me
>Zazie Beetz
isn't hot though she was kinda cute in the joker from memory but looking at her images in a search engine she isn't attractive at all her face is pretty ugly tbh if i'm being real
>she isn't attractive at all her face is pretty ugly
That's nice
Now stop making these bait threads next time
23
yeah the latina chick is attractive the rest aren't though i'll give you that although i don't even know what this movie is?
The brown chick is the ugliest and wears too much make up.
How did she go from that to this?
she's just a typical prawn
rip of the head and eat the body
This Sarah Gadon film released in 2023
i hope she doesn't wall also her husband/boyfriend looks like a bit of a c**t of a bloke
I love Sarah Gadon
Gadon the toilet clogger
>Post an image of a conventionally attractive woman in a film from 2023 or 2024?
Gal Gadot in Shazam 2.
gadot isnt even a female
> imagine being Han Lue
she's like 38 years old and was hot like 15 years ago in the fast furious movie she was in when they use to still hire hot women and she's wasn't even that hot she's kinda skinny and was miscast as wonder woman for obvious reasons
>Post an image of a conventionally attractive woman in a film from 2023 or 2024?
Amber Heard in Aquaman 2.
>posting an empty webm
anon are you dumb?
amber and biel are contemporary
walled
she peaked in that seth rogan, james franco dude where's my weed movie
amber is like 37 bro she walled after the johnny depp case and that was 5 years ago
>Post an image of a conventionally attractive woman in a film from 2023 or 2024?
Hayley Atwell in Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning
another one who is just breasts
ugly
>Post an image of a conventionally attractive woman in a film from 2023 or 2024?
Rebecca Ferguson in Reminiscence (2021) she is also in Mission Impossible from last year.
ugly
she's ok i guess
also why are you watching shit like scream and shazam lol
> Rebecca Ferguson
> Ugly
Are you fricking brain damaged?
>also why are you watching shit like scream and shazam lol
Because there is nothing wrong with slasher or superhero films?
you have to 18 years or older to view this site
What does age have to do with anything I said.
Slashers are rated R. They aren't for kids.
>Post an image of a conventionally attractive woman in a film from 2023 or 2024?
Grace CCF in Shazam 2
>Post an image of a conventionally attractive woman in a film from 2023 or 2024?
Melissa Barrera in the last 2 scream movies.
again I don't know what movie this is from?
also i'm getting a teen vibe from this girl...
yeah i said women not teenagers
breasts or gtfo.
this is just modern rosie perez who has not high value 25 years ago
ewww just googled who that was
You googled who Rosie Perez was? Are you old enough to be on this website?
Obama Propaganda Act 2013
Way too many ugly israeli women are casting directors now. The israelites that run the studios aren't controlling them like they should, telling them they need to cast attractive women to put butts in the seats. Also many of the israeli men that run hollywood are gay and don't realize the power of female beauty. It's a shitshow.
They still cast attractive women in films but they do not make stuff aimed at men like they used to. Everything now has to appeal to women and/or non-binary people so it ends up appealing to no one which is why no one is going to the theaters anymore.
yes i'm sure their is a large bi-sexual demographic that movies are now catered too...
Um exsqueeze me? Non-binary =/= bisexual, chud.
Loxism. Cancel culture is a dress rehearsal for mass murder.
Do you believe that zionist's see white men as the amalek?
fat old hags that will never amount to anything have made it their life's mission to ruin everything they can possibly touch
This is what I really think they want to weaken the west through this kind of pre-war propaganda to:
>reduce the number of fighting age men
>demoralise men so their morale will be low when the fight begins as they don't have a woman to fight for
>also castrate the youth so they can't produce fighting age men
>castrate the youth so when they grow up they develop into weaker men because they didn't get the appropriate hormones
dude, just go outside
holy frick you're so delusional
What's with all the projection? Why do you continue to argue in bad faith?
The only one arguing in bath faith is you, all that shit you just posted, is just demonstrably not true
>is just demonstrably not true
demonstrate to me how someone who has castrated themselves reproduces?
>demonstrate to me how someone who has castrated themselves reproduces?
that is not what you stated, don't be moronic
see
>>also castrate the youth so they can't produce fighting age men
You ascribe it to being intentional by an external force, which is not true
Also just gotta ask, who is "they"?
who know who "they" are bro
globalists, aka guys like
>klaus schwab
>soros
>rothschild
>rockerfeller's
>bezos
and they are using china their favoured nation as a weapon against the west
Ok so you're just going full schizo moron chud
Glad to know you'll never breed
your incel ideas will die with you
>you'll never breed
kek exactly my point this is a dehumanist thing you should look into the fate of the Red Guards you will too meet an unlikely end probably before you've had the chance to reproduce as well
also they are
>the tavistock institute
>the fabian society
>the esalen institute
these are all leftist institutes that have been cooking up this shit for hundreds of years
>by an external force
Yes the tavistock institute pioneered this kind of research into saying gender is a social thing not a biological thing
>Bell, a distinguished psychiatrist and practising psychoanalyst, is the doctor who in 2018 wrote a controversial report about the activities of the gender identity development service (GIDS), a clinic at the Tavistock and Portman NHS foundation trust in north London, where he worked in adult services from 1995 until his retirement earlier this year. GIDS, the only clinic of its kind in England, specialises in treating children with gender identity issues and in recent months has been in the news even more than usual. Last December, a judgment by the high court ruled that those under the age of 16 were unlikely to be mature enough to give informed consent to the prescription of puberty blockers (such drugs delay the development of secondary sex characteristics in patients, in theory enabling children more easily to transition into their desired gender identity as an adult). This ruling, the result of a judicial review brought by 23-year-old Keira Bell – born female, she was prescribed blockers by GIDS at 16 and now regrets her transition – has effectively curtailed medical intervention for children with gender dysphoria. (The Tavistock is to appeal; the case will be heard in June. David Bell will be what is technically called an intervenor in the appeal, which means he can give evidence.)
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/may/02/tavistock-trust-whistleblower-david-bell-transgender-children-gids
>tldr the tavistock institute clinic is getting sued for giving puberty blockers to a 16 year old girl
guys, stop with the buzzwords
are you going to call me a cultural marxist next? despite the fact that that is literally not a real thing
>cultural marxist
i don't know what that means but it sounds like your a "rules for thee and not for me" type of guy
>my made up words have meaning but yours don't
>gender is a social thing not a biological thing
yeah? it's the truth you fricking moron
gender is a thing we made up, biological sex is entirely separate from gender
that's like saying words have no meaning and we should go back to animalistic grunts
it's like saying a table isn't a table because i decided tables can be whatever they want to be like a chair if they want even though it's a table
>that's like saying words have no meaning
nope, that's literally the opposite
adapt to change or perish
nah you're just trying to destroy reason
women will always be women and men will always be men their is no getting around to it
and the change you are trying to enforce is going to backfire on people like you no matter what
you may without realising it be ushering a fascist right take over not that theirs much difference between that and a hard left communist take over anyways you are fricked either way
English is a descriptivist language, not prescriptivist. we don't have a set standard in England (other languages/countries do).
yes but where did language come from, saying language is a social construct now are we?
or is that just gender?
but i could just as easily dismiss your argument that social constructs are a social construct.
anon what traps have you ensnared?
>language is a social construct
absolutely.
>is that just gender?
no.
>your argument that social constructs are a social construct.
yeah this is true in and of itself etc.
no traps just logic and reasoning something these people who work in humanities teaching people gender studies who like to make up words don't understand
>gender is a thing we made up
hmm... I wonder who made it up.
They think that standards of beauty are entirely the result of societal expectations and are seeking to transform that by attempting to change what is considered beautiful
israeli art is ugly. israeli architecture is ugly. israeli music is ugly. Now israeli movies are ugly.
We have gone through this a million times. It's because progressivism hates beauty even more than it hates every other form of excellence, and because women hate competition: even fictional competition; and Hollywood, as every single organization of the West, is more progressive and more feminine every year than the year before since the 60s at least.
Because a black man tied to use a fake bill to buy a banana and then overdosed.
Shut goy and watch what you're given
Nonwhites are hideous, so movies are reflecting that
this is a love interest in 2024
stop watching slop.
frick the anon who recommended this movie a few days ago.
pointy elbow
She’s cute AF tho
Cristin Milioti is a CUTE
women became powerful, so everything caters to them these days, movies, shows, advertising, like car ads used to say how big the engine was ,if you could fit a 44 gallon drum in the trunk etc now car ads don't even show the car and its all slow mo shots of a happy woman with some dumb line at the end like "life begins here"
but to answer your question more directly women don't like women who are more attractive than them it offends them and puts them off
are you calling her ugly?
repulsive
she looks like she has an onlyfans
she needs to grow her hair and get rid of the bull ring and lose a few pounds to get back to her best
Fat disgusting PIG
She used to be cute.
the nose ring is the most effective demotivational campain idea chang and igor ever had
>shes not even the ugliest girl in dube
All the casting directors now are women and they, for some reason, think that men's standards need to be lowered.
And guess what the casting director looks like.
I thought she was pretty hot but in the games all the women were super hot.
The actress isn't ugly, but she doesn't look like Yennefer.
yeah no shit problem is it's what the left does everything is just a vessel to spread their ideologies and if they sink the ship in the process (henry leaving) they don't care as long as everyone got the point, then they move onto the next ip to destroy (Tolkien, wheel of time etc etc..)
Hello Biel
Sydney begs to differ.
She is just breasts but in this age of misery it is enough to be considered super hot
Wrong, Sydney is heart.
Isn't because woman and darks are now the only hires on writing staff?
best tummy, best neck, best back, best ass, best thighs, best legs
bc unattractive women (and their neversex orbiters) got iphones
heterosexuality is evil now. But don't worry people with an IQ above 75 saw this coming a long time ago
Somewhere around 2010 they found out they could make more money if the girls looked more "relatable" a prime example is Emma Stone in Easy A
ana de armas - attractive
margot robbie - attractive
alexandra daddario - attractive
>ana de armas - attractive
peaked in blade runner which was 2017 (she's 35 and walled)
>margot robbie - attractive
peaked in wolf of wall street in 2013 and is a bit of a fridge body when she isn't working (she's 33)
>alexandra daddario - attractive
peaked in true detective (2014) doesn't get many roles anymore and has crazy eyes and is more just breasts (she's 37)
so that's 3 mid to late 30 year olds where were hot last decade....
yeah unlike ASR who is walled and doesnt get any roles
good post
yeah i'm just saying they're phasing them out bro it's getting less and less
i've jerked off to that asr photo set so many times bros
it's like god put all of his energy into her ass
how did they ok this wardrobe? its so distracting and takes away from the entire scene
she's just wearing a skirt i don't see the issue?
TWU
>peaked in wolf of wall street in 2013 and is a bit of a fridge body when she isn't working (she's 33)
>33
Bloody hell, I thought she was my age. (38)
yeah she looks way older these days
Filters, same girl auditions, can't even make it past the screening.
>women can't see themselves as the female lead and it's an unfair version of beauty for them to aspire too
If I wanted to see ugly people I would be in front of the mirror
i'm not ugly but yeah i perfectly understand this sentiment like if some actress is jarringly ugly and is the main character it puts me off wanting to watch the movie
was hoping this would be a biel thread, instead it's morons arguing over some dumb shit like in every thread
Old biel-posting is not posible these days
Didnt madam web just bomb and it had 3 sexy women in it/
Middle aged roasties got hired as casting directors and think they're making the world a better place by hiring uggos.
The risk of getting metoo'd means that the remaining male casting directors are too scared to try anything, or they're only making uggos frick them for the part so that they get some plausible deniability
>Middle aged roasties got hired as casting directors and think they're making the world a better place by hiring uggos.
>The risk of getting metoo'd means that the remaining male casting directors are too scared to try anything, or they're only making uggos frick them for the part so that they get some plausible deniability
Also 100% correct!!!FACT!!!
Cinemaphile only likes women who look like rats and 35 yo, fat, leftist women like "taytay" now. Sorry.
Zoomer females are hideous which is why
Dear