>will this cgi nonsense be topped
Sure. The next time literally anyone makes another plane movie using real planes again like they did in the original top gun, unlike this moronic cgi nonsense
They used real planes, dumbshit. And the original Top Gun is a joke to anyone who knows the slightest bit about real aircraft. The damn enemy planes were fricking american jets.
No. They didn't. Even in the few scenes that were shot over the Nevada desert in real life with F-18E, they were CGI'D over in the movie.
How fricking dumb do you have to be to think the dark star sequence was real
The Su-57s were "real"
The F-14 was "real" (the US doesn't have a single fly able F-14 btw)
The Mi-24 hind sequence
You must have a sub 60 IQ, you dumb Black person. It was practically a marvel movie
>They used real planes, dumbshit
sure, except for every shot containing: darkstar, tomcat, su-57, or everytime you see more than 2 airplanes at once. so, 95% of flying scenes are CGI lol
Imagine thinking that the US got on loan Su-57s from Russia and then got a fricking working F-14 to film the final sequence of the movie.
How fricking dumb do you have to be to think Tom Cruise flew a top secret mach 10 spy plane for the movie. Not even the fricking training sequences over the desert were real.
For the love of God, have a nice day
Top Gun 2 is fricking trash
Tom Cruise tried really hard to convince people for years that he's filming TG2 with no CGI. And people believed him, which is OK if you didn't see the movie.
But morons saw the movie and they were like 'yes daddy Cruise totally no CGI I believe you' while it was painfully obvious. Then CGI artists confessed that almost every flying scene was CGI: there was never more than 1 airplane in shot, all others were CGI'd in, there were L-39s that were CGI'd into other types and so on. Obviously Darkstar doesn't exist at all - CGI. Obviously then only F-14s that fly are in Iran and were not used for filming - CGI. Obviously the only Su-57s are in Russia and were not used for filming - CGI. Obviously some F-18 manouvers were so silly nobody would approve flying like that - CGI.
Meanwhile Tom Cruise looks straight into the camera and lies to your face 'it's all real' he says in every interview, what a liar, and gullible morons believe him.
Trips and dubs aside, I don’t care. It was nice to see at least one movie that wasn’t full of transgenders, ‘cool’ ghetto blacks, sexism/racism lectures, BLM horseshit, et cetera.
TG:M celebrated a team of people from different backgrounds coming together to overcome adversity and differences and achieve a common goal. It was both inspirational and aspirational and presented an almost Star Trek level of optimism about humanity’s ability to form bonds that cut across differences.
What a refreshing change from movie after movie and show after show that ram disagreement, division, hatred and po-faced pseuomoralistic nonsence about how we we should actually, genuinely and unironically hate people for being born straight white and male.
>It was leagues better than capeshit
Fun fact
The opening darkstar sequence was actually lifted from a shelved potential Green Latern reboot scipt where Hal Jordan crashes a test aircraft and as he lays dying is saved by a Green Latern ring
Just another level to how shitty this movie actually is
*its also why the opening sequence has nothing to do with the rest of the movie or why Maverick was testing an Airforce plane
5 months ago
Anonymous
It was his job after the airforce dummy, he worked as a contracted pilot for secret warplanes. God you have bad taste. No I don't care if they took some scene idea from another movie and did it justice.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>It was his job after the airforce dummy,
Maverick is in the navy.....
5 months ago
Anonymous
mav was always in the navy and fricking still enlisted you stupid frick
He's in the Air Force you fricking idiots, they just need the Navy for the boats to get them close enough to get the planes into the country. You ever see him drive a boat? No.
5 months ago
Anonymous
1/10
5 months ago
Anonymous
kek I can't wait for these these morons to be like "yeah astronauts are in the navy" because they're called spaceships like it's fricking halo or something lmao
5 months ago
Anonymous
mav was always in the navy and fricking still enlisted you stupid frick
5 months ago
Anonymous
He's in the air force but sometimes rides a boat. He's in the navy officially when he's on the north, but goes back and convetts to air force in the plane
5 months ago
Anonymous
Tou don't know eejat you're talking about he concert to the air force when he leaves the boat. When he's on the boat he's navy
>They used real planes, dumbshit
sure, except for every shot containing: darkstar, tomcat, su-57, or everytime you see more than 2 airplanes at once. so, 95% of flying scenes are CGI lol
>Top Gun is a joke to anyone who knows the slightest bit about real aircraft
Every real life fighter pilot with a YouTube channel hates TG2 and loves the original though....
In fact, it seems to be only ace c*mbat playing trannies that like top gun maverick
Imagine thinking that the US got on loan Su-57s from Russia and then got a fricking working F-14 to film the final sequence of the movie.
How fricking dumb do you have to be to think Tom Cruise flew a top secret mach 10 spy plane for the movie. Not even the fricking training sequences over the desert were real.
For the love of God, have a nice day
Top Gun 2 is fricking trash
I still think there's room for a hard-sci fi. Something that can approach the fun star wars offers, but more grounded. Battlestar Galactica type stuff with non-energy based combat.
Would allow top-gun type sequences and be something that really isn't depicted that often, honestly
But I am bias and everything I do in life is with the motivation of seeing space pirate kino so there is that.
I think Avatar proves people are craving hard scifi, all the chads thinks the guns and vehicles look cool and don't give a shit about the blue cats. I think the problem is that hard scifi in the last 15 years has been gay class struggle shit like Elysium instead of cool and fun like Avatar. The numbers support it at least.
That's exactly why I said they need to make it fun, kinda like star wars, which is the closest thing
You can have le dark gritty sci fi but it must be balanced with fun action if you do
And the entire thing can't be totally depressing
Also I can't handle another "robots that look like humans" "ai taking care of a child" and all these repeated fricking stories
Basically just make game of thrones in space with good action
and don't make diversity slop like Rebel Moon (will obviously be trash, even though it's in the vein of what I'm looking for)
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Basically just make game of thrones in space with good action
D U N C
5 months ago
Anonymous
you missed >good action
I won't embarrass you by posting the webm I thought Dune was ok
5 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah I was being a bit cheeky with Dune, it was alright but only half of what I was hoping for. I'm interested to see what 2 is like.
5 months ago
Anonymous
we all fight and hate each other when we agree with each other
let's all suck each others dicks about it
>the whole darkstar sequence was literally just to show that the old guy from the first movie is still alive and in the navy and a reason to talk to mav in his office
>shall we have mav come into his office for any reason >no let's have mav be the pilot for an experimental airforce plane that an F-22 pilot would probably be doing then let him disobey orders and destroy the plane and almost die then get rewarded by running top gun
>F-22 pilot
kek nope, they let all the old dudes do experimental flights because they're going to die anyway. they need young pilots for actually flying combat missions, why waste them on death traps. look how old the X-57 pilots were
When I watched it I said on here that I found it underwhelming
Another guy said it was awesome and that I must be gay or something
I think he didn't realize that my standards must have been much higher than his, so actually he is very easily impressed and I am a man who needs quality
Anyway he didn't think that through did he
Though the rewatch was proabbly better and I appreciate the vroom vrooms and the military stuff etc more
By what
You about to get topped right now anon
>will this cgi nonsense be topped
Sure. The next time literally anyone makes another plane movie using real planes again like they did in the original top gun, unlike this moronic cgi nonsense
They used real planes, dumbshit. And the original Top Gun is a joke to anyone who knows the slightest bit about real aircraft. The damn enemy planes were fricking american jets.
>They used real planes, dumbshit.
No. They didn't. Even in the few scenes that were shot over the Nevada desert in real life with F-18E, they were CGI'D over in the movie.
How fricking dumb do you have to be to think the dark star sequence was real
The Su-57s were "real"
The F-14 was "real" (the US doesn't have a single fly able F-14 btw)
The Mi-24 hind sequence
You must have a sub 60 IQ, you dumb Black person. It was practically a marvel movie
Tom Cruise tried really hard to convince people for years that he's filming TG2 with no CGI. And people believed him, which is OK if you didn't see the movie.
But morons saw the movie and they were like 'yes daddy Cruise totally no CGI I believe you' while it was painfully obvious. Then CGI artists confessed that almost every flying scene was CGI: there was never more than 1 airplane in shot, all others were CGI'd in, there were L-39s that were CGI'd into other types and so on. Obviously Darkstar doesn't exist at all - CGI. Obviously then only F-14s that fly are in Iran and were not used for filming - CGI. Obviously the only Su-57s are in Russia and were not used for filming - CGI. Obviously some F-18 manouvers were so silly nobody would approve flying like that - CGI.
Meanwhile Tom Cruise looks straight into the camera and lies to your face 'it's all real' he says in every interview, what a liar, and gullible morons believe him.
Trips and dubs aside, I don’t care. It was nice to see at least one movie that wasn’t full of transgenders, ‘cool’ ghetto blacks, sexism/racism lectures, BLM horseshit, et cetera.
TG:M celebrated a team of people from different backgrounds coming together to overcome adversity and differences and achieve a common goal. It was both inspirational and aspirational and presented an almost Star Trek level of optimism about humanity’s ability to form bonds that cut across differences.
What a refreshing change from movie after movie and show after show that ram disagreement, division, hatred and po-faced pseuomoralistic nonsence about how we we should actually, genuinely and unironically hate people for being born straight white and male.
It was leagues better than capeshit
>It was leagues better than capeshit
Fun fact
The opening darkstar sequence was actually lifted from a shelved potential Green Latern reboot scipt where Hal Jordan crashes a test aircraft and as he lays dying is saved by a Green Latern ring
Just another level to how shitty this movie actually is
*its also why the opening sequence has nothing to do with the rest of the movie or why Maverick was testing an Airforce plane
It was his job after the airforce dummy, he worked as a contracted pilot for secret warplanes. God you have bad taste. No I don't care if they took some scene idea from another movie and did it justice.
>It was his job after the airforce dummy,
Maverick is in the navy.....
He's in the Air Force you fricking idiots, they just need the Navy for the boats to get them close enough to get the planes into the country. You ever see him drive a boat? No.
1/10
kek I can't wait for these these morons to be like "yeah astronauts are in the navy" because they're called spaceships like it's fricking halo or something lmao
mav was always in the navy and fricking still enlisted you stupid frick
He's in the air force but sometimes rides a boat. He's in the navy officially when he's on the north, but goes back and convetts to air force in the plane
Tou don't know eejat you're talking about he concert to the air force when he leaves the boat. When he's on the boat he's navy
>They used real planes, dumbshit
sure, except for every shot containing: darkstar, tomcat, su-57, or everytime you see more than 2 airplanes at once. so, 95% of flying scenes are CGI lol
>Top Gun is a joke to anyone who knows the slightest bit about real aircraft
Every real life fighter pilot with a YouTube channel hates TG2 and loves the original though....
In fact, it seems to be only ace c*mbat playing trannies that like top gun maverick
Not anytime soon. Not everyday you have the almost full support of the navy to make a propaganda movie.
of course.
tom cruise is a bottom
not in terms of guns
This movie has the exact same premise as A New Hope
Imagine thinking that the US got on loan Su-57s from Russia and then got a fricking working F-14 to film the final sequence of the movie.
How fricking dumb do you have to be to think Tom Cruise flew a top secret mach 10 spy plane for the movie. Not even the fricking training sequences over the desert were real.
For the love of God, have a nice day
Top Gun 2 is fricking trash
got the latina in that movie is fricking gorgeous
>2023
>f18
jet is as dated as cruise
bump
It'll take a lot
I still think there's room for a hard-sci fi. Something that can approach the fun star wars offers, but more grounded. Battlestar Galactica type stuff with non-energy based combat.
Would allow top-gun type sequences and be something that really isn't depicted that often, honestly
But I am bias and everything I do in life is with the motivation of seeing space pirate kino so there is that.
It's called Avatar.
...while there is air to air combat, I don't think that's what he was going for
The sad thing is, he's right in the sense it's the closest fricking thing
hard sci fi bros let it end
I think Avatar proves people are craving hard scifi, all the chads thinks the guns and vehicles look cool and don't give a shit about the blue cats. I think the problem is that hard scifi in the last 15 years has been gay class struggle shit like Elysium instead of cool and fun like Avatar. The numbers support it at least.
That's exactly why I said they need to make it fun, kinda like star wars, which is the closest thing
You can have le dark gritty sci fi but it must be balanced with fun action if you do
And the entire thing can't be totally depressing
Also I can't handle another "robots that look like humans" "ai taking care of a child" and all these repeated fricking stories
Basically just make game of thrones in space with good action
and don't make diversity slop like Rebel Moon (will obviously be trash, even though it's in the vein of what I'm looking for)
>Basically just make game of thrones in space with good action
D U N C
you missed
>good action
I won't embarrass you by posting the webm
I thought Dune was ok
Yeah I was being a bit cheeky with Dune, it was alright but only half of what I was hoping for. I'm interested to see what 2 is like.
we all fight and hate each other when we agree with each other
let's all suck each others dicks about it
>Avatar is hard sci-fi
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA you’re are literally the biggest moron in Cinemaphile history.
>the whole darkstar sequence was literally just to show that the old guy from the first movie is still alive and in the navy and a reason to talk to mav in his office
>anon figures out how movies work
>shall we have mav come into his office for any reason
>no let's have mav be the pilot for an experimental airforce plane that an F-22 pilot would probably be doing then let him disobey orders and destroy the plane and almost die then get rewarded by running top gun
>F-22 pilot
kek nope, they let all the old dudes do experimental flights because they're going to die anyway. they need young pilots for actually flying combat missions, why waste them on death traps. look how old the X-57 pilots were
>F22
>young pilots getting limited edition aircraft flight time
yep, fresh young elastic arteries capable of taking those gs in combat. no crusty old salt hardened arteries necessary
>2022
>Cinemaphile worshiped Tom Cruise as the savior of cinema.
Tom Cruise has never made a bad movie.
When I watched it I said on here that I found it underwhelming
Another guy said it was awesome and that I must be gay or something
I think he didn't realize that my standards must have been much higher than his, so actually he is very easily impressed and I am a man who needs quality
Anyway he didn't think that through did he
Though the rewatch was proabbly better and I appreciate the vroom vrooms and the military stuff etc more
since when does Cinemaphile hate this white man savior kino? is this a /leftypol/ psyop?
>we can't send 5th gen due to gps jammers!
lmao worst fricking excuse ever
It already has
lmao
>the marvel chars towards the end
Lmao and they say chinks can't make kino.