If this came out maybe 10-15 years ago these would’ve been hyper realistic abominations. I think the Sonic movie backlash single handedly whipped CGI designers into shape, kind of a miracle this movie actually looks pleasant to watch
no its exactly the same. in those terms, its like the early days where they have to go find imaginary friends whereas in the show its an established business. but also its written in 2023 so its obnoxiously shitty like that fricking worthless monster wanting to say "ifs".
and they flipped it around so instead of a little boy and a woman its a little girl and a man which means the porn is gonna be way better
>I haven't seen Foster's since I was a kid but wow the concept is completely identical to what I remember, minus the Home itself >Imaginary Friend needs to pass from it's grown up kid to a new young kid while all imaginary friends know each other and hang out.
Seriously. I know people want to make it more Cinemaphile than it actually is, but it's not like Foster's is the only media that ever dealt with the concept of imaginary friends.
PERFECT HEIGHT.
I would test the shit out of her toonforce powers via throatfricking like you wouldn't believe. She even comes with handlebars. If she had breasts she would be perfect.
>I'm surprised we didn't get a thread on it the second the trailer dropped
It's in a grey area since it seems like it would overall fit Cinemaphile better than Cinemaphile
I'll have you know when I was like 12/13 all my female oc's had it., so it kinda counts. I developed that fetish very early on, not healthy for a kid, I know
I dunno. who voices her? It sounded a bit weird in that first scene
I promise I’ll jerk off to her porn.
Who?
They're basically making a live action Fosters Home for Imaginary Friends.
I'm surprised we didn't get a thread on it the second the trailer dropped but I guess No Frankie No Buy?
Ryan Reynolds is the Frankie
And the little girl is Mac?
Ryan Reynolds us Mac, and the little girl is either Goo or an aged-down Frankie
If this came out maybe 10-15 years ago these would’ve been hyper realistic abominations. I think the Sonic movie backlash single handedly whipped CGI designers into shape, kind of a miracle this movie actually looks pleasant to watch
I don't see any difference between this and say Bill Murray Garfield
I haven't seen Foster's since I was a kid but wow the concept is completely identical to what I remember, minus the Home itself
no its exactly the same. in those terms, its like the early days where they have to go find imaginary friends whereas in the show its an established business. but also its written in 2023 so its obnoxiously shitty like that fricking worthless monster wanting to say "ifs".
and they flipped it around so instead of a little boy and a woman its a little girl and a man which means the porn is gonna be way better
>I haven't seen Foster's since I was a kid but wow the concept is completely identical to what I remember, minus the Home itself
>Imaginary Friend needs to pass from it's grown up kid to a new young kid while all imaginary friends know each other and hang out.
Yeah this is Drop Dead Fred.
Seriously. I know people want to make it more Cinemaphile than it actually is, but it's not like Foster's is the only media that ever dealt with the concept of imaginary friends.
I immediately went to Monsters INC myself.
Here's the behind the scenes feature that show all the main IFs
Why is Awkwafina in everything?
her voice is unique
Unique =/= good or appealing
Yes
This guy seem interesting
Why is the Github logo an imaginary friend?
That's not Github, it's Gamespy.
That's the Neighborhood Watch Guy
Mr. Enter finally made it big.
>John K
You c**t, I had to look to see if it really was him. Thankfully it wasn't.
So happy?
I’m incredibly happy.
PERFECT HEIGHT.
I would test the shit out of her toonforce powers via throatfricking like you wouldn't believe. She even comes with handlebars. If she had breasts she would be perfect.
Imagine…
>Awkwafina again.
Her head game must be fricking surreal.
the purple dude just looks so uninteresting, it's like looking at a Minion
So is it just the same concept, or is this an origin movie with the little girl Madam Foster?
movie looks terrible
It looks cute.
>I'm surprised we didn't get a thread on it the second the trailer dropped
It's in a grey area since it seems like it would overall fit Cinemaphile better than Cinemaphile
Do they have a thread on it?
they did but it didn't last long
>CGI with realistic rendering on cartoony designs
eughhh, humor seems annoying too. The artist mannequin was a funny design though
Sold
maybe, but only because of steve carrell monster
If disney live action CG looked like this I wouldn't hate it so much.
what if at the end of the movie the girl makes her own imaginary friend and its a rabbit she names mr herriman?
is that blackfacing?
No, it's clearly inspired by Fleischer
>Fleischer
confirmed racist caricature
Pearl's voice would have been great but this is fine too.
looks like she's doing blackface
I love her.
literally who?
The cutest ‘20s rubberhose sex icon I’ve ever seen.
I’m gonna say it:
I like her design better than Spinel
Is that a character with eyelashes?! I'm so horny rn!
no.
>bug
I watched the trailer on my phone and I thought she was an otter or something.
Here's a better shot of her
imagine the gloved handjobs
>imagine the gloved handjobs
Imagine the ballet shoejobs
Would human sperm fertilize her?
I think imaginary friends operate on Ork logic. If you and those around you believe it hard enough you can make it come true.
anyone else unsettled by this?
something about this design makes me squirm, and I don't know why
It's because is a HD CGI of a Rubber Hose toon character?
Is she supposed to be a bug?
She’s a cute bug.
She’s cute but I probably won’t.
I liked the butterfly thing.
Why does she look like some Black person caricature?
Never watched a cartoon made before 2010?
Okay this is just a blatant ripoff of Fosters. How did they get away with it?
By being different enough to get past the lawyers.
>Banana Joe from Gumball
>Asimo robot
>straight-up Grimace
Copyright isn't as strict as you think it is.
Nothing new under the sun, but something else about this movie seems derivative
If she was my imaginary friend, I would have never given her up. She’d be my imaginary wife.
Maybe people in this universe DO have imaginary friend wives
Imaginary frankie.
As in, it depends on the rules, maybe you have to be young to make a friend, young enough that your parents can get rid of her without your consent.
Now that would be an interesting take. Kind of like "Her" meets Foster's
Her name is Blossom btw
Smeet
"Alright! Let’s measure that inseam!"
what is this sonic styled atrocity?..
have a nice day zoomer.
>Anon doesn't know Sonic is directly based on retro toons like Felix the cat and Mickey Mouse
Craig McCracken should sue.
She's a cartoon bug but with no booba?
Such a shame.
Flat is justice.
>early 1920/30's cartoon girl
>imagine the bush she'd have back in those days...
>implying she doesn’t shave
Don’t bushes stop growing after a while?
yeah, bit it'd still be big like they were back then
What kind of sick frick imagines their imaginary friend shaving?
what sick frick thinks about bush when imagining a friend? What’s the age restriction?
I'll have you know when I was like 12/13 all my female oc's had it., so it kinda counts. I developed that fetish very early on, not healthy for a kid, I know
you think your fetish is unhealthy? I’m a fatgay and my fetish developed a lot earlier.
I love her. I would do anything for her.
What is this?
A movie called If.
>rubberhose character looks like a wooden puppet or animatronic
Would've been so much better if she was 2D, or at least cartoony CGI
I think her name is Blossom? I'm taking a wild guess though of wikipedia.
It is Blossom. It was confirmed from the behind-the-scenes video.
nice, we got a name. Now we just need the porn
She has already: https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/6089577#search=Blossom
>That lineart
Nice
Amazing work!