With the flops of Disney icons like Strange World and Lightyear, big budget animated films were thought to be dead. Mario proved that wrong. What does this film have that Disney doesn’t?
With the flops of Disney icons like Strange World and Lightyear, big budget animated films were thought to be dead.
>Disney icons like Strange World and Lightyear
Strange World and Lightyear are disney icons how?
Every day
Every night
>Twitter meme
>Twitter filename
go back.
how new are you?
It supports far right ideologies instead of wokism, therefore saving it from brokism.
>It supports far right ideologies
HOW?
The RT score mindbroke Nintendies so bad they've been spouting absolute nonsense for months.
Nintendo did support BLM in 2020, though.
That dated like hell man, and they know Gen Y would suck it up.
Only after their store in NYC was targeted
Pretty simple: it made money and my Youtube father figures didn't tell me it was woke so that means it's redpilled.
They did say it was woke though. They just reversed course and made up a new narrative when they found out people liked the movie despite their whining.
yeah right, keep trying to tell that narrative, cherry picking 2 cringe dudes that nobody watches doesn't mean that you are right.
everyone was excited, I was exited, there were worries about peach being a girl boss but that was like the worse and it was unconfirmed rumors at the time.
>your friendly chud.
By being neutral and fun.
Things that are seen as hitler far right by twitterhomosexuals.
>humorless outragetard accuses others of not having fun
lol ok
He's not talking about them though. The old lefty version of that word did have a pretty clear meaning, but nobody uses it that way because leftists simply don't use it at all and the right uses it to cry about anything they don't like.
Pretty sure leftyhomosexuals used woke for a bit before going to some other dumb buzzword.
If I remember right it meant "Being in the know" or "knowing the truth" type of bull. Said truth being some dumb political crap or something.
>If I remember right it meant "Being in the know" or "knowing the truth"
lol you still got it wrong
Explain it then.
why would i explain to a bigot like you?
pearls to swine
Blew your load a bit early mate.
For a bit, yes. It never entered wide usage.
I think the meaning was more like "be aware that public systems are not necessarily fair." That's obviously not something the right wants to complain against, so they gave it the meaning of "things I don't like."
>For a bit, yes. It never entered wide usage.
Are you sure? I could of sworn I use to hear it all the time from Thumblr gays and other SJW types.
>"be aware that public systems are not necessarily fair." That's obviously not something the right wants to complain against.
Pretty sure right wing also complains about that. Unless your talking about the dumb boomer gov sucking rightwing people .
Probably confirmation bias. It wasn't somethin gthat came up a lot. For one thing the old meaning doesn't lend itself to common usage because it's an awkward thing to work into a conversation or essay.
And yes, they also complain about that, because it's self-evident to anyone with minimal awareness that systems can be unfair in all kinds of ways. It's not helpful for their agenda to complain about people holding that reasonable belief.
It did get around a bit though. I saw it mentioned in other places too. But of course no one was offended because Bugs has been a gay icon with a free pass to do drag for many years. If it were some random character doing it for mockery, it might be a different story.
anything that isn't Disney is woke now
white males take the back seat to wokeboss females. Bossgirl Peach carried that film and saved mario and his brother
>"""""boss"""""girl
>sells out her kingdom to get bowser dick
>only gets out of it because of toad
>therefore saving it from brokism
Ohhhh, I see the problem.
No this isn't a "saving it from brokism" movie, but I totally understand how you may have misheard it that was. It's a "saving Brooklyn" movie.
GET WOKE
MAKE BILLIONS
now make a collage of M-She-U marvel or anything disney and not even 4 ultrawide monitors will fit all the woke stuff that there is in ONE average woke film.
Also that image is a joke, at best only two are kinda true, the others a just slapstick humor.
>I grew up stomping...Black folk
I know everyone wants Chris Pratt in their stuff but holy shit he got away with that?!
>Big budget
Illumination's films are famously cheap
>100 million is cheap
this is literally the industrygay equivalent of a 500lb fatass calling a McDonalds Super Extra Size Orange Man order a "light snack" if you removed A-list celebrities the budget for these fricking movies would "magically" shrink to 30-40 million dollars(or in Illumination's case not even reach 20 million)
>terminally online morons have no principles and flip-flop every five minutes
blow my mind some more, Sidis.
anyways homosexuals have fun fighting over which SilverGoldStein company is actually "based" or "woke" or some shit like that.
Illumination's movies are known for havign much lower budgets than Disney animated movies. Mario is Illumination's most expensive movie, but its budget is half of Lightyear's. Tangled had a budget comparable to an Avengers movie, $260 million.
>Illumination's movies are known for havign much lower budgets than Disney animated movies. Mario is Illumination's most expensive movie, but its budget is half of Lightyear's. Tangled had a budget comparable to an Avengers movie, $260 million.
"lower" by big budget SilverBergGoldSteinWitz studio movie standards. if we're really making the difference between 60-80 million dollars and 150-180 million then it's all become meaningless.
>*movie makes a gorillion dollars*
>w-well...it was cheaply made anyway!!
illumination is so owned
How are you guys going to react when this wins best animated feature?
happy that it cucked the Nogger-Verse movie
It would be two-for-two with the animated movies I watched in the last two years (Pinocchio and Mario) so that would be funny
It would be funny if it means that Miyamoto can accept the awards.
Spiderverse will win.
Oscar voters are not going to give a gong to Nintendo.
It won’t even get nominated
It won´t, Spiderverse will win.
Not because of Spiderverse is god or anything, but because its a disney property (even if the movie itself is not made by disney) and because of its very vocal fanbase that wanks it to no end.
They keep posting Spiderverse too
I've spent enough time in the Nintendo fandom to know that Drones will literally consoom anything.
I despise the movie and its hype (its fine for the kids I guess) but on the other hand, I like to see Mario destroy the shit-tier competition.
They are like a fricking third world country, they got so used to their situation that, not knowing whats going on outside of their bubble, they celebrate all shit thats spoonfed to them.
Breath of the Wild 1 & 2 are basically a best-of of features from 10 years of games on other consoles or PC and they think they have absolute genius on their hands. And Mario is always the same.
Nintendo fans always say its gameplay over presentation, and other characters suck compared to Nintendo characters. But the thing is, I've given up on Nintendo during the Wii-era (expecting WAY more than I got) and the gameplay is good, sure, but I'm so sick of seeing the same universe and characters over and over and over again.
>The Lion King Live-Action Remake
>Minions
Ah yes, truly, monetary gain. The one and only indicator of artistic quality and integrity.
>wolfwalkers
pedo movie
It's mutt goyslop like all mutt "animation". You will never be white. Frick off and die
Whites are the #1 consomers of Nintendo shit though.
>It's mutt goyslop like all mutt "animation". You will never be white.
I'm pretty sure it was made in a Westin country the people in Western countries don't have to be white in order to work on a film and why are you assuming this person wants to be white?
>blatant unprovoked racism and hostility out of nowhere
It wasn't woke
Simple as
>It wasn't woke
>Simple as
The definition of woke is so hard to Define because of it's been applied to anything some right-wing person doesn't like get many people will arguing if it was super woke or anti-woke.You can't really say what is or is not that because there is no real definition of What It Is by any real standard.
>”Le what does woke mean, chud?”
Same shit that SJW and Virtue Signaling means. It’s not a new concept, troon
You mean use a terminology so deliberately vague and what it actually means get two people who use it constantly while considered themselves to be on the same political Spectrum may have vastly different views of it?The concept is not you but the use of that what is still deliberately not defied for the benefits of those who use it as a term against anything they dislike for their own benefit. You could see these definitions being used by communist countries for defining people as enemies of the people by making it deliberately vague so the NEW government can Target whoever they want with this definition.
Gender swapping can be something as simple as Bugs Bunny when he's dressed up as a woman. Also the proper use of the term is white Watson because it was significantly more likely to be white people swap at historically you look at the numbers faceless swap for black to white well don't justification a lot more than white to black.And by gay do you believe a student in a classroom with another student who happens to have to save the pallets woke in your eyes by reality not being forced to adore them?3 I see people called civil war documentaries by solid slaves being treated badly as attacked in Western values and culture. 4
.Can you name one movie that has pus communism on anyone from Disney or anything else you consider work?
>Gender swapping can be something as simple as Bugs Bunny when he's dressed up as a woman
No, it isn't. Stop being a disingenuous homosexual.
> Also the proper use of the term is white Watson
Not even reading the rest of your trash bait.
>Gender swapping can be something as simple as Bugs Bunny when he's dressed up as a woman
Which wouldn't happen these days since it's insulting. It wouldn't be added as a joke. It would be blown up into a huge existential crisis. And honestly regarding that, modern fiction isn't nearly as terrible as it could be.
I'm sure Mario doesn't have an endless scene about Birdo's gender identity. We're not there yet. Yet.
Oh regarding that, frick Disney for turning Ariel black but not casting an actual drag queen as Ursula. I mean come the frick on, if you want to be diverse and piss people off, don't add one thing and remove another from the original. They are pretentious pussies, the ultimate marketing stunt wokes.
But you should be more offended they got an actual human to play her instead of trying to find an actual mermaid to play Ariel regardless of skin tone because her species is mermaid not ethnicity white human or black human?
>to find an actual mermai
Cute anon, you believe in mermaids?
More believable than cutting off your dick and calling yourself a woman
I love that even mentioning pissing neckbeards off pissed neckbeards off.
You're the one who seems upset though
No obviously. My point is she wasn't human to begin with why are you completed she was played by a black woman with your only argument was she was drawn as a white person when she wasn't a person to begin with and say that something to be upset about? Do you know Darth Vader was actually being voice entirely by a black guy but the moment they lifted that last they needed a white person? That sounds like something legitimately to be more upset about with actors and races then that not humans being played by a black person instead of a white person.
I never said I'M offended with black Ariel.
>wouldn't happen these days
It literally just happened these days and nobody was offended except the usual fragile rightoid homosexuals.
Guy who brought up Bugs Bunny. Do you have one within a year of time this has happened in a kid cartoon?
It was in the recent Tiny Toons or something. There were threads about it at the time. No one was outraged about it except people outraged by the existence of drag.
To be fair, no one outside Cinemaphile discussed it because it was official confidential material leaked and if they posted screenshots about leaked material their ass would get sued
We'll see when that episode debuts if the " college drag show in a kids show" is an issue to people
>nobody was offended except the usual fragile rightoid homosexuals.
Not even here? I doubt anyone wasn't offended about anything here, especially not the fragile rightoid homosexuals.
Wokism is a corporate mind virus created to weaponize the empathy of the working class against itself. It’s supposed to make organizing an endless purity test designed to split us among as many lines as possible in order to make any sort of collective awakening impossible
Mario isn’t woke because the ONLY vector you can push for it being woke is peaches personality, which after watching the movie it’s annoying but nothing that can be seen as an attack on a group or a blatant support of another group. Spiderverse not only SABOTAGED EVERY PETER showing them to be in a death cult, but it blatantly shows support for two dangerous real world “activist movements” that have both been designed to hurt the working class and split us
>no black washing/gender swapping
>no gay shit
>doesn't attack Western culture and values
>doesn't push communism or other leftist bullshit
It's pretty simple actually.
Mario was called woke for having girl boss peach. That only stopped due to the record breaking returns.
That was just leftoids trying to claim a win for ANYTHING lately. Mario to be woke would've required at least one major character having a race/sex change, and Bowser's gay shit with Kamek taken seriously at face value instead of a gag meant to be repulsive.
The main girl bossin' it up isn't anything woke or new, it's been an unfortunate staple of children's media since the 90s thanks to all that "GIRLS CAN BE JUST AS GOOD AS MICHAEL JORDAN" autism. That said, Peach wasn't at all a woke or even irritating character.
Stop trying to revise history, you gaslighting troon.
This is literal fragile masculinity. For frick sake, Mario does everything in the movie including beating the bad guy. Why are you so angry that the woman called him small? Is that such a deal breaker to you that you have to ignore every single thing Mario accomplished?
>The definition of woke is so hard to Define because of it's been applied to anything some right-wing person doesn't like
Dude no. I'd usually agree but this time it's clearly defined. Okay I admit there are SOME morons who already think that a black guy or a woman in media is already woke. Women clearly are like Bigfoot to those unfricked anons if they are special now.
I agree with others that the word has been changed a lot but I feel like the actual definition should be
>forced diversity that is marketed and made a big deal about that doesn’t add anything to the movie.
Like the little mermaid. It’s being marketed and being a made big deal about the fact that she’s black, it’s not going to add anything and both sides are seething. Her being black wasn’t made to change the story or to add any plot, it’s just made so republicans can seethe about it and make free advertisement.
diversity that is marketed and made a big deal about that doesn’t add anything to the movie.
If it's even in the movie. Remember when Gaston's bottom boy was said to be gay literally everywhere and all he did was dance with a man in the background during the final scene which could be seen as a joke? Disney keeps doing that shit. I'm so tired of it. I bet there is zero subtext in Luca and it all happened because Disney was worried noone would fricking watch it.
Well no, there's shitloads of subtext in the gay fish movie, but who can say whether they did all that deliberately and fibbed to the press or did it all by accident because some kinds of subtext just has easy broad application.
>But marketing!!
Ever notice how people are just getting offended by a marketing campaign these days? You don’t even have to watch anything, all you need is some clickbait online article and you have countless manchildren lose their shit and start b***hing about it for months.
Because the Trump-style "trolling a group into free marketing" is cancerous.
>Durr durr drumlf only wom becuz outrage!
Brain so smooth you could go ice skating on it.
Yeah. Because that worked for the Little Mermaid...
The idea of "outrage marketing" is a cope by homosexuals who get their corpo shit trashed online. It's pretending that people online can carry enough of a presence to substitute for millions of dollars in promotion, but simultaneously lack enough power in word of mouth to prevent people from consuming it.
Ironic coming from the ones who shout Nazi and far right at everything.
It was woke. Literally just read any interview about Peach, and how blatantly they changed her due to Peach getting constant criticism from progressives
Just because it wasn't as woke as the rest of hollywood doesn't mean it's not woke. It just shows that the conditioning is working.
No, it just seems like you are a snow flake
Everything about Peach's portrayal in the movie, and comments about said portrayal, is Feminism 101. Things have gotten so bad in the culture that milquetoast feminist agendas are the least of the issues nowdays.
Obvious feminist shit barely registers with you anymore. You've been successfully conditioned, and just blatantly admitted it right now.
No, you're just a snowflake
Conditioned. Got to hand it to leftists, no wonder they can push their agenda so easily.
True, the left will always win because their opposition is comprised of seething manbabbies
Well this is not Iraq, I believe women can do just about anything they wish, men should too.
It's just when Feminism starts with the "men are a waste of sperm" and "every man is born misogynistic" that's when feminism goes to shit.
The grifters you watch on Youtube twist eveything into being "woke". Anything to get morons to give them clicks.
they completely demolished peach's gentle feminine character to promote a sassy, spunky, generic dreamworks grrrrrrrl protagonist with an attitude.
>Strange World
>Disney Icons
Cinemaphile 2020:
>LOL BING BING WAHOO NINTENDIES ARE LITERALLY MANCHILDREN, MOMMY FRICKS TYRONE WHILE I PLAY ON MY SWITCH THAT I BOUGHT WITH GOOD BOY POINTS
Cinemaphile 2023:
>BASED SUPER CHADRIO BROS BTFO DISNEY DARKIES, LOL MOUSE DRONES NO BILLY NO BILLY NO BILLY
>Cinemaphile 2020
Those were just Snoys, anon.
yeah, totally the same people, you moronic frogposter
SUPER CHADRIO BROS BTFO DISNEY DARKIES, LOL MOUSE DRONES NO BILLY NO BILLY NO BILLY
The only one who actually say this are literally nintendrones.
>big budget animated films were thought to be dead
By whom? Who would ever think this? Only a fricking moron would think something like this after seeing two (2) movies, which leads me to suspect that this is just OP's opinion
>Cinemaphile gassing up literal illumination goyslop
Is Cinemaphile the only board outside of Cinemaphile where Nintendrones can get any type of attention?
They tried on Cinemaphile but it was essentially nintenyearolds talking to themselves until the thread fell off the board
Already existing Iconic characters like Mario and Miles Morales.
This shit finally made me feel over the culture wars bullshit either way. First it was "woke" because muh girlboss Peach then it wasn't woke when it did well.
It did well because it was fricking Super Mario Brothers a well-known brand and unlike some shit it didn't twist anything to be unrecognizable to consumers because "muh subversive shit." "Woke" plays a role there in the "we hate this IP so we have to make it better by totally changing it into something you can't recognize, now pat us on the back" but that can come in many forms besides being supposedly "progressive." Like if the Super Mario Brothers movie had totally eliminated Mario and Luigi and only had Peach, it'd be exactly what I'm talking about.
But if that movie flopped, it would not be because of "wokeness," just because they took a popular brand and totally changed it into something else. Lightyear was "what if Toy Story but we totally eliminated the toys?" It was from what I saw a bland generic space movie that didn't even have the same tone or comedy or ANYTHING at all IT DIDN'T EVEN HAVE BUZZ LIGHTYEAR IN IT. Strange Worlds or whatever it was called looked boring as shit.
Nobody even knew those two movies were "woke." Were they? They just looked FRICKING BORING AS SHIT.
It has frick all to do with "woke" itself for 99.99999% of consumers and 100% of somewhat normal sane people and anyone not terminally online.
Instead, studios make dogshit and then throw in their idea of "woke" crap as if that makes it good, it's even half asked at best or insulting most of the time. They think that makes it good or above criticism or some shit.
But even people who appreciate diversity won't watch and like dogshit just because it's "diverse" most of the time. Others will only see and care that it's crap. If it's different from something popular and beloved, it had better be good and not shit. Usually things are popular for a reason. If you change them just for the hell of it you risk losing the reason something was popular and successful in the first place.
The only "Woke" thing about might be Peach but even then its very minor and a nonconcern.
People were mostly worried They were going to make her a full girlboss and cuck out Mario.
>First it was "woke" because muh girlboss Peach then it wasn't woke when it did well.
That's not what happened. Trailers made people complain that Girlboss Peach was going to be the real main hero and Mario would be nothing but a bumbling sidekick. When the actual movie came out, this didn't turn out to be the case. People just got a different perception of the movie once they actually saw it instead of relying on trailers and shitposts based off the trailer.
>that's not what happened
>please ignore the temper tantrums we threw all over the board AFTER the movie had been released, involving discussion of specific plot points and the complete events of the movie, until it made a bunch of money and we reversed our narrative
If you're going to gaslight, do it about something that wasn't super obvious.
>temper tantrums we threw all over the board.
You mean Cinemaphilemblr made weak shit posts? You don't say.
>mblr
I'm not sure what point you think you're making here.
>temper tantrums we threw all over the board.
>You mean Cinemaphilemblr made weak shit posts? You don't say.
More like trolls reheated stale shitposts because they knew they wouldn't get any more mileage out of them after enough people saw the movie and/or webms disproving their "Peach stole the movie from Mario" narrative.
>More like election tourists reheated their stale shitposts even though enough people saw the movie and/or webms disproving their "Peach stole the movie from Mario" narrative.
ftfy
>until it made a bunch of money and we reversed our narrative
I don't know why people here still use this argument. How do you know people reversed their narrative when one doesn't even know if the guys who keep posting HURR WOKE DISNEY DEAD LOOK NON WOKE MARIO MADE MONEY months after the movie has been released seriously think that or are trying to get a rise of people who didn't like it.
What’s this image from?
I know it’s a Pizza Tower reference, but where did the SM64 come in?
https://desuarchive.org/co/search/text/disney%20mario/type/op/
Get a life, OP.
Holy based!
Currently the 3rd highest-grossing animated film and 14th highest-grossing of all time.
Mario Movie was shit. A total turd, just lazy paint-by-numbers use of a license, less entertaining than a cutscene, with maybe three decent laughs in its entire runtime.
It made money because Disney's recent output was far far far far FAR FAR worse than this shitty movie. Strange World and Lightyear should have gotten people slapped, not just fired.
>Mario succeeds
>Puss succeeds
>Miles succeeds
All this just tells me audiences are probably yearning for more action adventure animated movies.
I remember sassy black ladies tweeting "stay woke" like half a decade or more ago and then it cropped back up again. Super Mario swing your arms from side to side
Good writers, that prioritize the story over "the message".
Mario didn't have a story, which is why it got bad reviews.
The fact that Nintendo has a bigger fan base than Disney and that those fans (like die-hard Disney ones) will consume ANY Nintendo content regardless of quality.
>The fact that Nintendo has a bigger fan base than Disney and that those fans
Maybe only mario. Ain't nobody gonna bust their asses out to see a DK,Metroid or Kirby movie
...I'd bust my ass for a Metroid movie if not for the fact that I don't trust these fricktards with it. They made a bad waste-of-a-license Mario movie, their take on Metroid could end up making Other M look good.
The fact that it took Nintendo 11 years to make a new Metroid game (Dread) due to almost killing the franchise with Other M says a lot. But Nintendo wouldn’t do anything Metroid-related because it primarily appeals to the West first and Japan second (as opposed to Mario, Zelda and Pokémon which has to appeal to Japan first and everyone else second).
Prior to BotW, Zelda was more popular in the West than in Japan.
>Nintendo has a bigger fan base than Disney
If Disney had stuck to 2d animation and didn't get political this would be different.
>Weak Men Create Hard Times.
Where were you when Children Movies moved from imaginative and lighthearted tales to glorified advertisment made to turn your kid into Huxleyan brand slaves with an inability to critically think?
Today will cement a turning point. One in cinema's history where video game movies de-evolve into soulless 90 minute commericals for videogames. Characters, plots, themes and symbolism all come second to nostalgia, obnoxious references and distractingly bright colors.
They made their endgame clear: Infantilizing to masses until they have a pavilionian response of wanting to buy video games each time a reference gets shoved in your face through the theater screen.
Any shouting over the "wokeness" or "non-wokeness" of this movie was merely a distraction of the real game plan. Cinemaphile brought. Imdb bought it. Letterboxd bought it. Your children bought it. Your Nostalgia-addicted Millennial friends bought it. We failed together.
Welcome to the dark timeline. Enjoy your stay.
It's like this thread is a popurri of everything that's been said about the movie:
>MARIO NON WOKE
>BOX OFFICE
>MARIO ACTUALLY WOKE
>GRIFTERS
>DISNEY
>DOWNFALL OF SOCIETY
>MUH FAMILY VALUES
>PEACH
All for a fricking shit kid's movie that barely has a plot.
>a fricking shit kid's movie that barely has a plot.
I just want to commend you on your perfect description of the Mario Movie.
Tooroot toot tooroot tooroot toot tooroot toot toot
Why bother going to see anything by Warner or Disney if you have their streaming service? They are guaranteed to be on the service in 2 months.
Mario
>thought to be dead.
Nobody thought that
>Defy expectations
Do boomers just not understand how popular Super Mario is?
Fun? I don't know I didn't see it but I saw lightyear and that was mind-numbingly boring, it literally felt like a chore to watch.
Mario movie is shit, you can't even rewatch it a second time. Get a better studio than illumishit next time.
Speak for yourself. I saw it 6 times in theaters and enjoyed myself each time.
>Defy Expectations
The biggest games franchise of all time having an animated movie doing well is defying expectations????
B-b-b-b-but Detective Pikachu ONLY made $433.9 million at the box office! That's not even half a billion! Please ignore the fact that it was taking several creative risks and was going up against Avengers: Endgame at the time!
This is how you know it's bullshit, people didn't want a live action Detective Pikachu movie. Take one look at the and that is NOT fricking Pokemon.
Look at Super Mario Brothers. It IS Super Mario Brothers. Even the shitty Lion King movie that I hated WAS just The Lion King.
Honestly BOTH films were not good. TLK live action was outright bad and a huge waste of time and money like ALL of Disney's idiotic and totally creatively bankrupt live action remakes. Meanwhile Super Mario Beothers was fine and okay honestly, just meh and expected.
But both just took something PROVEN TO SELL AND BE POPULAR, didn't fricking change it or update it or "subvert" it or any of that stupid shit in any real way, and resold it. It just gave the fans what they already wanted and liked and both did well.
There was some luck: sometimes this strategy works and sometimes the timing or whatever else is just randomly bad and it just doesn't for no real reason. Still that's part of it.
Disney has this inability to appeal to a male audience. Nintendo adults are like the male equivalent of Disney adults.
>Disney has this inability to appeal to a male audience
This is a stupid statement
It's true, Redditbob poster. Answer this seriously, before Disney bought Pixar and the other stuff, did their movies please boys? No. Their movies cold be enjoyed by young boys, but those boys when they grow slightly older not even teenagers start to lose interest in Disney media. And if a grown man buys into Disney media it's because he's a hopeless creep Kidult or he has a family of his own with very young children. But the man himself has no interest in Disney infantile trite. And I can't blame men. Disney's media has always been lame shit.
I distinctly remember many teenage dudes hating on Disney tween sitcoms in particular because the teenagers and adults don't act like teenagers and adults. Something like Married with Children or Malcolm in the Middle on the other hand fared much better with young male viewers. Disney has never wanted male audiences because they know that doing so means they lose the sugary saccharine inoffensive family friendly image that they've used to milk girls out of their parent's money.
Hope Disney loses that and that they lose the girl audience as well so that they finally die.
>semantics
>among reddit
That;s what Star Wars and the MCU are for.
The “inability to appeal to boys” claim is wild, like is that saying that no boys liked movies like Rescuers, Mulan, Hercules, Lion King , goody movie, emperor’s new groove, toy story , cars and Alladdin. Even treasure planet and arlantis were cult hits
I figured anon was talking about Disney Princess stuff specifically. Obviously no little boy is interested in watching Frozen or Moana.
If they do, it's probably because they think Elsa is pretty. I used to watch girly cartoons as a kid because I thought the girls were cute. Hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi, Totally Spies, Winx Club, and Sailor Moon.
I was going to say they might watch Moana for The Rock and for comedy. It's not going to be one they make a beeline for, but they'd tolerate it.
It's more that their boys merchandise sells poorly compared to their girls merchandise. Disney dominates girls merchandise, but their boys merchandise is far behind their competitors. Even though movies like Lion King and Aladdin do well at the box office with boys, they don't sell anywhere near as much merchandise as Disney's girl brands.
>Star Wars
>>The force is female
Only thing I liked in the movie that made it stand out is how they didn't completely effinate Mario and make Peach an unlikeable and perfect "GIRLBOSS" for the sake of female empowerment or breaking a damsel in distress trope. They made Peach a competent platforming character (canon to the games) who seems mentally fit enough to run a nation, like a leader should be, but also humble. She was also patient enough to accept that Mario needed some training to become a hero (which they made him pretty competent by the end of his training montage) and kind. Mario was slightly hard headed, but also a humble and somewhat intelligent protagonist. Neither fit into the modern Disney characterizations of "Strong Woman" and "Dumb but lovable Man" that has been ruining the industry for so long. I loved that from Universal.
Luigi needed more screen time, though.
Currently just say it was a great movie without criticizing Disney or going on about sjws or anti-SJW?
Basically copy-pasted the most popular video game IP OAT
>What does this film have that Disney doesn’t?
Respect to the fans, the MCU began to die when Kevin Feige banned the leotard of Carol Danvers and any other heroine or villain in the MCU, if you banned the leotard, you will change the ethnicity, the origin, gender, the costumes and we will only have the names of the characters and that is what happened this would not happen if Disney said no! Let's respect the fans and the comics books, if Disney had that spirit we wouldn't have the live action fiascos, the one guilty of everything is the person at the top of Disney who allows all this from happening.
There are more than one way to burn a book.
>What does this film have that Disney doesn’t?
Wholesome non-liberal propaganda fueled family entertainment.
>Huge time gaps in replies
Your thread failed OP, so stop same gayging your thread
Because it's a colorful and silly adventure that primarily focused on being fun and entertaining that both kids from all ages and adults can enjoy. That's all it takes to make these movies successful. The fact that it was based on a property that literally everyone in the world has interacted with helped a lot. And to be honest the main sin of lightyear and strange worlds is that they are both boring as shit and looked dull since the first trailer. Seriously no kid is going to see a trailer for generic space man adventure in brown planet or generic fat kid in brown planet and get excited and most people are only willing to put up with these movies if their kids want to see it.
Soider-verse 2 will get more. Yet another victory for Sony. Nintendies can't get one.
Thats cool.
Just watched a video of a kid singing peaches in the school assembly with all the other kids singing. Love how well this movie connected with the little shits.
stop posting Cinemaphiletard
>What does this film have that Disney doesn’t?
mario
Mario is one of the strongest franchises out there, and it's being run by Illumination as a family friendly movie
They had something people wanted And they delivered...no controversy, no subvert expectations, without cynicism...just Fun with super Mario and friends...
The vast majority of people watch entertainment to entertain themselves, They're so in their asses these days that they refuse to do something simple and straightforward without meta-bullshit
nice samegay op
Considering Spiderverse is also doing big numbers, the real key to success is having a strong franchise.
Second place is first loser.
First loser is more profitable than tenth loser.
In box office terms, GOTG 3 is the 2nd highest grossing movie this year.
A new fanbase that wasn't going to the cinema, gamer have been waiting for good adaptations for ages but they always get resident evil style movies or ''game character goes to the real world'' stories
Mario movie is a bad video game adaption
It has fricking Mario
>What does this film have that Disney doesn’t?
You just answered your own question, it's not Disney.
all that fat and no breasts??
SAD!
I have so many questions.
>make straightforward colorful movie about an iconic character from people's childhood
>easy billie
Unironically why dont they try this more, they always put in some gimmick that ends up limiting the appeal
stop samegayging your shitty thread
If Disney had produced Mario alongside Nintendo, you and everyone else would be calling it a soulless exploitation of childhood vidya gaem nostalgia and b***hing in 100 threads about how Peach and Mario were ruined.
>Bean the lizard girl tried to be tough and fierce against the villain and he nearly kills her by breaking her neck strangling her and it left her entirely afraid of the villain of the movie.
No shit. Jake is a giant snake for christ sake who left the town so fast with a quake.
>What does this film have that Disney doesn’t?
Mario
Inserting a story into the movie already makes it SJW shit. Video games are not about stories, and never will be. Any game that tries having a story will automatically be worse off because of it, and any game that bases itself around having a story is objectively bad. whether it's TLOU, Metal Gear solid or any JRPG, get out of the medium and go back to making marvel movies. Video games will always be about gameplay, and ONLY gameplay. The Mario movie is proof of that, being objectively worse than just picking up a controller and playing Super Mario for the NES.
>He is still samegayging his thread.
We get it homosexual, The Super Mario Bros Movie is the best fricking thing since The Money Pit. Disney went broke cuz it got woke. Strange World and Lightyear suck. Nam nam nam, plumber wiener is delicious, whatever, we get it.
Aw what does it matter, you'll make the same fricking thread tomorrow.