A good plot? The fricking story is about how some neet inherited a bunch of money and then wanted to colonize a planet with artificial people. Everything else is just the same exact themes told differently, but just as poorly.
Hampton Fancher is a fricking moron.
Leto's character is embarrassing in general, but the retroactive super-speshul significance of Deckard and his robo-waifu feels like George Lucas-tier nonsense.
I was trying to articulate this, but you put it pretty well. It's one of those films that you just let wash over you as an audio/visual experience, rather than getting caught up in the intricacies of the plot as if you're reading a wiki. It's sort of the same mindset that one must get into while watching a David Lynch film, though BR isn't quite as surreal as a Lynch movie. But still, a similar mindset nonetheless.
your brain is destroyed by the internet
you need to stop posting you make the only manifestation of consciousness suffer through your moronicness
stop it
go away
frick off
unironically
I saw it in the theatre on release, kiddos, and I almost fell asleep; I am in fact that old. Why does this make you so assmad? It’s boring, deal with it
10 months ago
Anonymous
>deal with it
I am, a constant deluge of sub 100 iq opinions opining since steve jobs ruined the internet by allowing fools like you to infest it
how jesus forgave the morons, ill never understand, you need to be culled
10 months ago
Anonymous
I genuinely hope you really are this upset over someone’s opinion about a shitty movie. Your salt is like manna to me
i have watched it at least 5 times and am looking forward to the next time
To each their own I suppose
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Your salt is like manna to me
you can say that, even post a laughing emote, it doesnt change the fact you got filtered by the base tier of modern culture, you're the type to take a selfie in front of the mona lisa and then go get robbed by africans and say "paris sucks bro"
you need to be culled, and I pay homage to our overlords for culling you via "vaccination"
god bless pfizer
10 months ago
Anonymous
Rofl. Please be real
You guys are right that the movie sucks but for the wrong reason. The bigger problem is it’s all style and no substance. Take away the flashy visuals and all you’re left with a story so awful that people dick suck the sequel’s protagonist far more than they do the original. Almost as is if Deckard is such an awful character that if it wasn’t for the replicant debate, nobody would care.
Can’t disagree. Love just about everything Dick wrote which is part of the reason the film was and remains such a disappointment
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Love just about everything Dick
absolute reddit homosexual
the cancer that killed Cinemaphile: a thread
10 months ago
Anonymous
Have you ever even read a book, son? You should try it
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Have you ever even read a book, son? You should try it
Look at this fricking reddit post god damn it this isnt trolling this homosexual actually posted this unironically.
10 months ago
Anonymous
You’re literally making my day anon. Please never stop seething
10 months ago
Anonymous
>literally
as opposed to figuratively making your day you goddamn human detritus
10 months ago
Anonymous
Why not both? Your butthurt sustains me
10 months ago
Anonymous
i have watched it at least 5 times and am looking forward to the next time
10 months ago
Anonymous
Boomers and gen x truly are worthless
10 months ago
Anonymous
but gen x discovered it as a classic when they came of age in the late 80s and early 90s
t. xoomer
10 months ago
Anonymous
You guys are right that the movie sucks but for the wrong reason. The bigger problem is it’s all style and no substance. Take away the flashy visuals and all you’re left with a story so awful that people dick suck the sequel’s protagonist far more than they do the original. Almost as is if Deckard is such an awful character that if it wasn’t for the replicant debate, nobody would care.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>The bigger problem is it’s all style and no substance
This, but who cares because film is a visual medium
10 months ago
Anonymous
No, you're jaded by decades of debate over if AI or artificial lifeforms are sentient and comparable to humans. It wasn't a new idea in scifi when Blade Runner came out, but it was one of the earlier movies to tackle that.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>all style and no substance >all of this gone, like tears in the rain
debating film on reddiCinemaphile is like going to an art museum in detroit
10 months ago
Anonymous
>all of this gone, like tears in the rain
Wow, one monolog sure makes up for the rest of that boring movie
10 months ago
Anonymous
go watch star wars
10 months ago
Anonymous
>The bigger problem is it’s all style and no substance.
the world building is substance. it's a fricking sci-fi story. just admit that you dont care for that but instead came for muh hollywood epic and got filtered
10 months ago
Anonymous
Like Patton, Ben-Hur, Lawrence of Arabia, A Bridge Too Far, Apocalypse Now, Fear and Loathing
What is substance?
10 months ago
Anonymous
Well, if Deckard didn't exist, the movie would have played out essentially the same way.
go watch star wars
Star Wars is peak man child trash
10 months ago
Anonymous
what would have become of rachel and who else would the replicants have killed
10 months ago
Anonymous
>rachel
She would have continued to not know she was a robot >who else would the replicants have killed
No one, they would have killed Tyrell and Sebastian and then died do to reaching the end of their programmed life
10 months ago
Anonymous
>She would have continued to not know she was a robot
so he made a difference >She would have continued to not know she was a robot
you have no idea what leo, priss and zora would have done in their remaining days or weeks
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Almost as is if Deckard is such an awful character
see you came for the "compelling characters" and "the drama". move along kiddo
10 months ago
Anonymous
Me too. Old too loved it. You’re wrong, and you should feel bad.
No, I don't think it is boring. It's not exciting, but the appeal of Bladerunner isn't the story.
I can't think of a movie that looks or feels like Bladerunner. It has incredible visual appeal.
Bladerunner
Visually codifies the cyberpunk genre >boring
kek
>sure the story sucks, but the visuals are the breasts
lol
10 months ago
Anonymous
I never said the story sucks. It's not exactly groundbreaking, but the primary appeal of the movie is visual.
Film is a visual medium. Films should play to their greater strength.
10 months ago
Anonymous
nta but the story is fine. it's a sci-fi story not your typical hollywood drama
>Visually codifies
No it doesn't. Neuromancer did that.
Blade Runner is more noir than cyberpunk, in tone and visuals.
10 months ago
Anonymous
How can a book codify the visuals?
You see Blade Runner in Akira, GitS, The Matrix, Cyberpunk 2077, etc.
10 months ago
Anonymous
you see it in star trek picard season 3
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Akira
Was conceptualized, produced, and written before Blade Runner's release, though the first volume wasn't published until December of '82. >Ghost in the Shell
is closer to Neuromancer in concept, and Blade Runner was never quoted as an inspiration. >The Matrix
Never seen it. >Cyberpunk 2077
Arguably the closest representation because Pondsmith has quoted Blade Runner as a direct inspiration. However, people have assumed Neuromancer as a major inspiration due to their similarities, but Pondsmith has also noted that he didn't read the novel until well after Cyberpunk's release.
So if anything that actually proves that Blade Runner is an unoriginal piece of trash with wooden acting and a horrible story that stole all of its ideas from novels and actual artists.
No offense to Dick, Do Androids Dream(...) is a really good short, and the movie "adaptation" is fricking embarrassing compared to it.
10 months ago
Anonymous
God damn you really do like huffing your own farts dont you. Put more effort into sounding like smug smartass please, your attempt was tedious to say the least.
10 months ago
Anonymous
This guy gets it. I wonder if they casted Ford specifically because he’s such a shit actor and could easily pass as an automaton
10 months ago
Anonymous
>he’s such a shit actor
I have come to realize this is true
10 months ago
Anonymous
This guy gets it. I wonder if they casted Ford specifically because he’s such a shit actor and could easily pass as an automaton
>samegay
embarassing
>he’s such a shit actor
I have come to realize this is true
>I have come to realize this is true
>ah yes, after several decades of introspection i too have realized harrison ford is not an auteur
god damn Cinemaphile is dumb and gay anymore
10 months ago
Anonymous
Please keep seething, moron. You’re a comedy goldmine
10 months ago
Anonymous
>9BC2925C-A8CF-4D82-B034-3(...).jpg
and there it is
the iphone poster reveals itself
too stupid to use a computer, too stupid to deal with entry level cinema
disgusting
10 months ago
Anonymous
>t.
10 months ago
Anonymous
its actually fascinating to be subjected to your idiocy, you are completely incapable of a novel thought, every single thing you produce is just a copy/paste simulacrum of the thoughts of other actual humans which you mimic
you arent even real
10 months ago
Anonymous
Just like your favourite shitty movie, huh?
10 months ago
Anonymous
for the record it doesnt make me feel good dominating you intellectually, just like beating a woman at arm wrestling is no victory, you literally aren't smart enough for Cinemaphile so you deserve a thrashing for spewing dogthoughts all over the internet
i forgive you, its not your fault you are what you are
10 months ago
Anonymous
I’ve thoroughly enjoyed your autistic shrieking. Please never seek professional help
10 months ago
Anonymous
hey man thats cool, just curious how many mrna vaccines you took? dont look too hard into it, its just autistic shrieking after all haha, no worries. For instance me, an autistic shrieker, i took none, so you being superior to me must've had a different number of injections right? i mean uhhhh trying to post this in language you'll understand but its hard bear with me, uhhh duhhh i mean bro how many uh fauci ouchies you get bro man uhhh bro?
10 months ago
Anonymous
All of them of course, which is to say none of them, but after your little display I’m starting to think maybe I should
10 months ago
Anonymous
>fter several decades of introspection
Sorry I'm not a 40 year old loser who does nothing but watch movies and post on Cinemaphile
10 months ago
Anonymous
No, you’re just some random idiot with shit taste in movies
I unironically cried when I watched this movie because how much I loved the aesthetic of it. It's unparalleled and I've been seeking for something that scratches the same itch.
Wrong also. The best ever. That these morons don't know what it is about is excellent news. I won't feel anything when their boosters blow them up. >brutal >fricking >murder
>The rest of the movie is just "ok"
its a stunning visual representation of an important perhaps pivotal literary examination of the nature of artificial humanity, every prescient now in the era of extant AI
Cinemaphile is "filtered" because you're all morons, the great unwashed masses, phoneposting moronic unthinking opinions shat into the void
you are the great filter
I'm the anon that said the movie was just ok and you got so fricking filtered holy shit, roy being a machine is vital to the ending where he shows mercy at deckard and bares his soul to him because he doesn't want to die alone
>It’s a mediocre movie at best
but unlike your favorite marvel movie it ranks among the top 10 scifi movies of all time
funny how societal consensus doesnt agree with your middling opinion, and by funny i mean funny as in laughing at you, not with you, AT you
>It’s a mediocre movie at best
but unlike your favorite marvel movie it ranks among the top 10 scifi movies of all time
funny how societal consensus doesnt agree with your middling opinion, and by funny i mean funny as in laughing at you, not with you, AT you
You couldn't understand the context. An old frick like me remembers urban sprawl before and after this movie. It was outstanding because it was incredibly prophetic. Not to mention that it influenced all of manga.
this is a 2049 board
redditors can cry all they want but that's not changing
Is the sequel better?
Not for you
The frick does that mean?
It would be extremely painful for him to bear
No
>Cinemaphile hypes up a movie
>it's utter trash
Every fricking time
If you want a good plot? Yes.
A good plot? The fricking story is about how some neet inherited a bunch of money and then wanted to colonize a planet with artificial people. Everything else is just the same exact themes told differently, but just as poorly.
Hampton Fancher is a fricking moron.
Let me clarify, good compared to the original. That isn’t saying very much since the original already set the bar low pretty low.
2049 has a truly stupid story.
Explain
Leto's character is embarrassing in general, but the retroactive super-speshul significance of Deckard and his robo-waifu feels like George Lucas-tier nonsense.
villeneuve is a hack/fraud and he got carried by the cinematographer, evidenced by the claptrap known as dunc
leto's on the screen for 30 seconds
And he's terrible and in a bad story.
Yes. morons won’t get much out of either film though in my experience
A bit more divisive (see the replies you got) but generally yeah it's a worthy sequel. I wouldn't say it's better but I liked it a lot.
I had the same reaction.
Maybe it simply aged poorly but holy shit is it meh
You must have watched the theatrical version.
>Maybe it simply aged poorly
You have to watch the director's cut
I watched the final cut
What's the difference?
I think the ending is completely different
Theatrical had narration and a literal 'driving into the sunset' happy ending.
same, its a boring ass frickin movie, 2049 is great and i wish it was just a standalone thing that wasnt tied to this
it's absolute kino but you have to let yourself be absorbed in the atmosphere of it
if you're a plotgay you'll just get filtered
Literally nothing happens in it and if the main character didn't exist, everything would play out the same way. It's a complete waste of 2 hours
I was trying to articulate this, but you put it pretty well. It's one of those films that you just let wash over you as an audio/visual experience, rather than getting caught up in the intricacies of the plot as if you're reading a wiki. It's sort of the same mindset that one must get into while watching a David Lynch film, though BR isn't quite as surreal as a Lynch movie. But still, a similar mindset nonetheless.
You are a gay trans Black furry wienersleeve
Your moronation is duly noted
And anyone who dislikes Bladerunner has awful taste
It’s boring af and you know it anon
your brain is destroyed by the internet
you need to stop posting you make the only manifestation of consciousness suffer through your moronicness
stop it
go away
frick off
unironically
I saw it in the theatre on release, kiddos, and I almost fell asleep; I am in fact that old. Why does this make you so assmad? It’s boring, deal with it
>deal with it
I am, a constant deluge of sub 100 iq opinions opining since steve jobs ruined the internet by allowing fools like you to infest it
how jesus forgave the morons, ill never understand, you need to be culled
I genuinely hope you really are this upset over someone’s opinion about a shitty movie. Your salt is like manna to me
To each their own I suppose
>Your salt is like manna to me
you can say that, even post a laughing emote, it doesnt change the fact you got filtered by the base tier of modern culture, you're the type to take a selfie in front of the mona lisa and then go get robbed by africans and say "paris sucks bro"
you need to be culled, and I pay homage to our overlords for culling you via "vaccination"
god bless pfizer
Rofl. Please be real
Can’t disagree. Love just about everything Dick wrote which is part of the reason the film was and remains such a disappointment
>Love just about everything Dick
absolute reddit homosexual
the cancer that killed Cinemaphile: a thread
Have you ever even read a book, son? You should try it
>Have you ever even read a book, son? You should try it
Look at this fricking reddit post god damn it this isnt trolling this homosexual actually posted this unironically.
You’re literally making my day anon. Please never stop seething
>literally
as opposed to figuratively making your day you goddamn human detritus
Why not both? Your butthurt sustains me
i have watched it at least 5 times and am looking forward to the next time
Boomers and gen x truly are worthless
but gen x discovered it as a classic when they came of age in the late 80s and early 90s
t. xoomer
You guys are right that the movie sucks but for the wrong reason. The bigger problem is it’s all style and no substance. Take away the flashy visuals and all you’re left with a story so awful that people dick suck the sequel’s protagonist far more than they do the original. Almost as is if Deckard is such an awful character that if it wasn’t for the replicant debate, nobody would care.
>The bigger problem is it’s all style and no substance
This, but who cares because film is a visual medium
No, you're jaded by decades of debate over if AI or artificial lifeforms are sentient and comparable to humans. It wasn't a new idea in scifi when Blade Runner came out, but it was one of the earlier movies to tackle that.
>all style and no substance
>all of this gone, like tears in the rain
debating film on reddiCinemaphile is like going to an art museum in detroit
>all of this gone, like tears in the rain
Wow, one monolog sure makes up for the rest of that boring movie
go watch star wars
>The bigger problem is it’s all style and no substance.
the world building is substance. it's a fricking sci-fi story. just admit that you dont care for that but instead came for muh hollywood epic and got filtered
Like Patton, Ben-Hur, Lawrence of Arabia, A Bridge Too Far, Apocalypse Now, Fear and Loathing
What is substance?
Well, if Deckard didn't exist, the movie would have played out essentially the same way.
Star Wars is peak man child trash
what would have become of rachel and who else would the replicants have killed
>rachel
She would have continued to not know she was a robot
>who else would the replicants have killed
No one, they would have killed Tyrell and Sebastian and then died do to reaching the end of their programmed life
>She would have continued to not know she was a robot
so he made a difference
>She would have continued to not know she was a robot
you have no idea what leo, priss and zora would have done in their remaining days or weeks
>Almost as is if Deckard is such an awful character
see you came for the "compelling characters" and "the drama". move along kiddo
Me too. Old too loved it. You’re wrong, and you should feel bad.
No, I don't think it is boring. It's not exciting, but the appeal of Bladerunner isn't the story.
I can't think of a movie that looks or feels like Bladerunner. It has incredible visual appeal.
>sure the story sucks, but the visuals are the breasts
lol
I never said the story sucks. It's not exactly groundbreaking, but the primary appeal of the movie is visual.
Film is a visual medium. Films should play to their greater strength.
nta but the story is fine. it's a sci-fi story not your typical hollywood drama
Bladerunner
Visually codifies the cyberpunk genre
>boring
kek
>Visually codifies
No it doesn't. Neuromancer did that.
Blade Runner is more noir than cyberpunk, in tone and visuals.
How can a book codify the visuals?
You see Blade Runner in Akira, GitS, The Matrix, Cyberpunk 2077, etc.
you see it in star trek picard season 3
>Akira
Was conceptualized, produced, and written before Blade Runner's release, though the first volume wasn't published until December of '82.
>Ghost in the Shell
is closer to Neuromancer in concept, and Blade Runner was never quoted as an inspiration.
>The Matrix
Never seen it.
>Cyberpunk 2077
Arguably the closest representation because Pondsmith has quoted Blade Runner as a direct inspiration. However, people have assumed Neuromancer as a major inspiration due to their similarities, but Pondsmith has also noted that he didn't read the novel until well after Cyberpunk's release.
So if anything that actually proves that Blade Runner is an unoriginal piece of trash with wooden acting and a horrible story that stole all of its ideas from novels and actual artists.
No offense to Dick, Do Androids Dream(...) is a really good short, and the movie "adaptation" is fricking embarrassing compared to it.
God damn you really do like huffing your own farts dont you. Put more effort into sounding like smug smartass please, your attempt was tedious to say the least.
This guy gets it. I wonder if they casted Ford specifically because he’s such a shit actor and could easily pass as an automaton
>he’s such a shit actor
I have come to realize this is true
>samegay
embarassing
>I have come to realize this is true
>ah yes, after several decades of introspection i too have realized harrison ford is not an auteur
god damn Cinemaphile is dumb and gay anymore
Please keep seething, moron. You’re a comedy goldmine
>9BC2925C-A8CF-4D82-B034-3(...).jpg
and there it is
the iphone poster reveals itself
too stupid to use a computer, too stupid to deal with entry level cinema
disgusting
>t.
its actually fascinating to be subjected to your idiocy, you are completely incapable of a novel thought, every single thing you produce is just a copy/paste simulacrum of the thoughts of other actual humans which you mimic
you arent even real
Just like your favourite shitty movie, huh?
for the record it doesnt make me feel good dominating you intellectually, just like beating a woman at arm wrestling is no victory, you literally aren't smart enough for Cinemaphile so you deserve a thrashing for spewing dogthoughts all over the internet
i forgive you, its not your fault you are what you are
I’ve thoroughly enjoyed your autistic shrieking. Please never seek professional help
hey man thats cool, just curious how many mrna vaccines you took? dont look too hard into it, its just autistic shrieking after all haha, no worries. For instance me, an autistic shrieker, i took none, so you being superior to me must've had a different number of injections right? i mean uhhhh trying to post this in language you'll understand but its hard bear with me, uhhh duhhh i mean bro how many uh fauci ouchies you get bro man uhhh bro?
All of them of course, which is to say none of them, but after your little display I’m starting to think maybe I should
>fter several decades of introspection
Sorry I'm not a 40 year old loser who does nothing but watch movies and post on Cinemaphile
No, you’re just some random idiot with shit taste in movies
I don't like Blade Runner though
This.
Zoomer, guaranteed.
Don’t sugar coat it.
i miss vangelis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX30BN_2cZ4
Yeah, I love his work.
You're just stupid OP.
Naw, you just like shit movies
man reddiCinemaphile just sinks lower and lower
i need to delete the bookmark and just stop coming here
I prefer Moon.
I prefer Galaxy Quest
filtered so many people on here its not even funny.
Same director? Wow, never knew.
no?
I prefer Mom and Dad save the World
I unironically cried when I watched this movie because how much I loved the aesthetic of it. It's unparalleled and I've been seeking for something that scratches the same itch.
homie it's just cyberpunk, a well establish sub-genre at this point.
>t. audiences 1982
i liked it
watch black rain instead.
You'll like it
Calm down and take your ritalin zoomer.
This is the best scifi kino of the 80s.
its a fantastic movie but its no Kin-dza-dza
Wrong also. The best ever. That these morons don't know what it is about is excellent news. I won't feel anything when their boosters blow them up.
>brutal
>fricking
>murder
Both Blade Runner movies have to be near the top of the most plebs filtered lists.
This but 80s blade runner and dune. Scifi requires a >100 IQ, so its just going to be misunderstood by the masses by its very nature.
Cinemaphile should be locked with this thread as the only post left up as a warning for why it was shuttered
just like /qa/
the entire movie gets carried by the visuals and the ending, tears in the rain is certified kino. The rest of the movie is just "ok"
>The rest of the movie is just "ok"
its a stunning visual representation of an important perhaps pivotal literary examination of the nature of artificial humanity, every prescient now in the era of extant AI
Cinemaphile is "filtered" because you're all morons, the great unwashed masses, phoneposting moronic unthinking opinions shat into the void
you are the great filter
Please. This movie has nothing profound to say about AI. The fact the "villains" are robots is almost inconsequential
>Please
moron, learn elocution
>has nothing profound to say
watch the goddamn youtube i posted, if you dont think thats profound then thats your problem, YOU, you are the problem
why did you respond to the same post twice?
>watch my israelitetube link
No, I don't think I will
I'm the anon that said the movie was just ok and you got so fricking filtered holy shit, roy being a machine is vital to the ending where he shows mercy at deckard and bares his soul to him because he doesn't want to die alone
So the ending would be the same if he were a dying human. Gotcha.
It's an existentialist scientific epic. TV is replitarded forever.
Just being "ok" does not a "classic" make
Perhaps because it’s not a “classic”? It’s a mediocre movie at best
>It’s a mediocre movie at best
but unlike your favorite marvel movie it ranks among the top 10 scifi movies of all time
funny how societal consensus doesnt agree with your middling opinion, and by funny i mean funny as in laughing at you, not with you, AT you
People widely regard it as a classic
“People” like this moron
“People” also widely regard Star Wars as good
filtered. the original blade runner had unreal amounts of soul and defined the whole cyberpunk aesthetic
>muh soul
99% of the time, this just means you like something because of nostalgic reasons
wrong
winning an argument on the internet is like winning $2 on a lottery ticket
its a hollow victory
I accept your concession. Better luck next time
Blade runner is the definition of forced soul. muh mega corporations.
GET OFF MY BOARD
It had a good atmosphere thats about it.
Take away the special effects and the sci-fi setting and it's literally just a boring old 1940's hardboiled detective story.
In fact, it's not as good as those old noir films. Harrison Ford doesn't really pull it off.
>take away the sci-fi setting
then you dont have the conundrum of loving a machine zoomie
>zoomer
Can you homosexuals not conversate without using your meme buzzwords?
Buzzword is a buzzword moron
yep
It completely fails as an adaptation of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?.
The director's cut is one of my favourite movies. I think zoomers' brains are just fried. Too much 20sec content.
i agree, op
the sequel is better.
both movies are pure reddit. the sequel is even worse
It's a good film to watch if you are suffering from insomnia
let's just say that if you are a demented coprophagus son of a b***h this kino is not for you. If you know what I mean
You couldn't understand the context. An old frick like me remembers urban sprawl before and after this movie. It was outstanding because it was incredibly prophetic. Not to mention that it influenced all of manga.