WTF was his problem?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
WTF was his problem?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
he was white and had to blame the natives for everything
>White
Just look at him anon does he look anglo? Or does he look like one of ~~*Them*~~
>No nose.
>No beard.
Anglo.
>dig up shore
>wtf where is gold
>they must have hid it
he was just plain stupid
Raging homo
>Ratcliffe and 25 fellow colonists were invited to a gathering with a large group of Powhatan Indians. The Englishmen were promised they would be given corn in return for copper, but it was a trap. The colonists were given food baskets that were nearly empty, the Powhatan Indians ambushed them, and Ratcliffe was taken to the village. Only two colonists escaped. Ratcliffe suffered a particularly gruesome fate: he was tied to a stake in front of a fire. Women removed the skin from his entire body with mussel shells and tossed the pieces into the flame as he watched. They skinned his face last and finally burned him at the stake.
Sounds like bullshit to me.
>t. "only white people can be bad" racist
I meant more along the lines of they didn't even have a means of communication so how was this supposed deal in the first place, how we're they overpowered when they were most certainly better armed, and just the whites general attempts at genociding pretty much every indigenous race they've ever met with extraordinary efficiency makes this...
Sound like bullshit. But yeah, Indians, as well as most of the world can suck too. But I don't think there is a single shred of historical proof for what you posted.
>and just the whites general attempts at genociding pretty much every indigenous race they've ever met with extraordinary efficiency makes this...
They wanted to convert them to christianity to save their souls, you liar. If whites intended to genocide natives in the americas especially with "extraordinary efficiency" there would be none of them left.
>They wanted to convert them to christianity to save their souls
They wanted their lands. If there were any native Americans left it was because that land wasn't worth shit.
>During the Age of Discovery, the Catholic Church established a number of missions in the Americas and in other Western colonies through the Augustinians, Franciscans, and Dominicans to spread Christianity in the New World and to convert the Native Americans and other indigenous people.
The frick are you just talking out your ass? The Pilgrims regularly traded with the natives from the beginning. Pelts, food, navigation... They even worked with natives by picking sides during conflicts, which may have been part of why things went sour, but that was necessary just to learn the local agriculture practices and hunting techniques.
How's that more fantastical than scalping?
>do general colonist things
>nothing actually too bad
>get tortured and mutilated by natives until you die an horrific death
…and he’s the bad guy? Fricking Disney don’t wanna talk about how ‘natives’ were actually what he said they were: savages. Just rewriting history into ‘white man bad’. Fricking israelites.
Yeah cause that totally wasnt one of many Bullshit propaganda stories told to justify genocide.
>anything and everything bad about muh natives is propaganda
>it can’t possibly be true
Frick off moron
Literally zero historical proof besides the word of homosexual fricking puritans.
>he believes the anglo
lmao you probably believe in the holocaust too.
No, I don't. Same shit: inferior race of c**ts blaming the white man for their own issues.
I mean, even if it wasn't the Puritans were literally not a hair better.
Look at what cartels do today.
Same blood.
>the holocoaster is obviously fake atrocity propaganda
>omg the injuns ripped all his skin off and he somehow survived that and then they burned him to death
>you can't survive a bit of flaying to your back
You really are a dumb c**t.
There are many corroborating sources and evidence of that behavior amongst various indigenous groups, it was quite plainly a part of their culture as described in their own words
https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1174&context=dissertations_mu
And woke people complain how Pachontas is problematic because it "both sides" things instead of showing all colonizers as evil. In real life the indians were far worse
While we're discussing this queer, can we pause, and talk for a moment about the travesty that is Pocahontas 2?
It at least gave us Pocahontas in her pantaloons.
>WTF was his problem?
Not finding gold. The Spaniards had found metric tons of gold and so he supposed that all lands in the Americas had equally distributed quantities of gold.
>WTF was his problem?
gtreat thread, moron. how many of these do you want to make?
i'm a leftist but the english were unironically in the right, natives were savages
why do all of the indians in this movie look Phillipino while this guy looks how actual indians look lol
I remember that, when the movie was released, all the indians in the US yelped that Pocahontas was too hot and looked like Naomi Campbell instead of a regular native woman.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1174&context=dissertations_mu
>everyone else commits atrocities
hmmm sounds about right
>actual tribal savages commit atrocity
nooooo! not our injuns! couldn't be precious crazy horse! the ones who hunted and scalped each-other for fun! no way!
The "genocide" of natives was an epidemic of cold and smallpox that killed millions because they didn't have the immune system up to speed unlike us, and there were no anti-biotics back then.
By the way, Spanish mixed with the natives, check what "missions" were.
English and French traded with them, it's when Americans got their country together that they started reproducing like rabbits and then taking the natives' lands.
But by the time of Pocahontas there was no systemic replacement in act.
Not enough indian pootang.
Friendly reminder: Pocahontas was actually ~12 and as such, she still was part of the "naked indian" group of her tribe.
So, in reality she was closer to a naked version of Tiger Lilly than to the character the film portrays..
Their whole disgusting race is like a curse. Their skin's a hellish red, they're only good when dead, they're vermin and as he said they're worse;
They're savages, savages, barely even human
>WTF was his problem?
Bri'ish genes
Did they fug?
He was a disgusting NORFMAN
>Sicklemore was born in Lancashire. In early life, he changed his name to Ratcliffe as an alias.[1]
>Ratcliffe left office (either by resignation or deposition) in July 1608, two months before the end of his term. The colonists were also enraged that as they were sick and dying, Ratcliffe ordered they build a capitol in the woods. The colonists dubbed the project "Ratcliffe's Palace." Ratcliffe accompanied Christopher Newport when he sailed from Virginia in 1608.
>During The Starving Time in December 1609 or early 1610, Ratcliffe and 25 fellow colonists were invited to a gathering with a large group of Powhatan Indians.[4] The Englishmen were promised they would be given corn in return for copper, but it was a trap. The colonists were given food baskets that were nearly empty, the Powhatan Indians ambushed them, and Ratcliffe was taken to the village. Only two colonists escaped.[5] Ratcliffe suffered a particularly gruesome fate: he was tied to a stake in front of a fire. Women removed the skin from his entire body with mussel shells and tossed the pieces into the flame as he watched. They skinned his face last and finally burned him at the stake.