WTF was his problem?

WTF was his problem?

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    he was white and had to blame the natives for everything

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >White
      Just look at him anon does he look anglo? Or does he look like one of ~~*Them*~~

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >No nose.
        >No beard.
        Anglo.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >dig up shore
    >wtf where is gold
    >they must have hid it
    he was just plain stupid

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Raging homo

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Ratcliffe and 25 fellow colonists were invited to a gathering with a large group of Powhatan Indians. The Englishmen were promised they would be given corn in return for copper, but it was a trap. The colonists were given food baskets that were nearly empty, the Powhatan Indians ambushed them, and Ratcliffe was taken to the village. Only two colonists escaped. Ratcliffe suffered a particularly gruesome fate: he was tied to a stake in front of a fire. Women removed the skin from his entire body with mussel shells and tossed the pieces into the flame as he watched. They skinned his face last and finally burned him at the stake.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds like bullshit to me.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >t. "only white people can be bad" racist

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I meant more along the lines of they didn't even have a means of communication so how was this supposed deal in the first place, how we're they overpowered when they were most certainly better armed, and just the whites general attempts at genociding pretty much every indigenous race they've ever met with extraordinary efficiency makes this...

          >Ratcliffe and 25 fellow colonists were invited to a gathering with a large group of Powhatan Indians. The Englishmen were promised they would be given corn in return for copper, but it was a trap. The colonists were given food baskets that were nearly empty, the Powhatan Indians ambushed them, and Ratcliffe was taken to the village. Only two colonists escaped. Ratcliffe suffered a particularly gruesome fate: he was tied to a stake in front of a fire. Women removed the skin from his entire body with mussel shells and tossed the pieces into the flame as he watched. They skinned his face last and finally burned him at the stake.

          Sound like bullshit. But yeah, Indians, as well as most of the world can suck too. But I don't think there is a single shred of historical proof for what you posted.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >and just the whites general attempts at genociding pretty much every indigenous race they've ever met with extraordinary efficiency makes this...
            They wanted to convert them to christianity to save their souls, you liar. If whites intended to genocide natives in the americas especially with "extraordinary efficiency" there would be none of them left.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >They wanted to convert them to christianity to save their souls
              They wanted their lands. If there were any native Americans left it was because that land wasn't worth shit.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >During the Age of Discovery, the Catholic Church established a number of missions in the Americas and in other Western colonies through the Augustinians, Franciscans, and Dominicans to spread Christianity in the New World and to convert the Native Americans and other indigenous people.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The frick are you just talking out your ass? The Pilgrims regularly traded with the natives from the beginning. Pelts, food, navigation... They even worked with natives by picking sides during conflicts, which may have been part of why things went sour, but that was necessary just to learn the local agriculture practices and hunting techniques.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            How's that more fantastical than scalping?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >do general colonist things
      >nothing actually too bad
      >get tortured and mutilated by natives until you die an horrific death
      …and he’s the bad guy? Fricking Disney don’t wanna talk about how ‘natives’ were actually what he said they were: savages. Just rewriting history into ‘white man bad’. Fricking israelites.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Ratcliffe and 25 fellow colonists were invited to a gathering with a large group of Powhatan Indians. The Englishmen were promised they would be given corn in return for copper, but it was a trap. The colonists were given food baskets that were nearly empty, the Powhatan Indians ambushed them, and Ratcliffe was taken to the village. Only two colonists escaped. Ratcliffe suffered a particularly gruesome fate: he was tied to a stake in front of a fire. Women removed the skin from his entire body with mussel shells and tossed the pieces into the flame as he watched. They skinned his face last and finally burned him at the stake.

        Yeah cause that totally wasnt one of many Bullshit propaganda stories told to justify genocide.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >anything and everything bad about muh natives is propaganda
          >it can’t possibly be true
          Frick off moron

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Literally zero historical proof besides the word of homosexual fricking puritans.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >he believes the anglo
            lmao you probably believe in the holocaust too.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              No, I don't. Same shit: inferior race of c**ts blaming the white man for their own issues.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I mean, even if it wasn't the Puritans were literally not a hair better.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Look at what cartels do today.
          Same blood.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the holocoaster is obviously fake atrocity propaganda
        >omg the injuns ripped all his skin off and he somehow survived that and then they burned him to death

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >you can't survive a bit of flaying to your back
          You really are a dumb c**t.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          There are many corroborating sources and evidence of that behavior amongst various indigenous groups, it was quite plainly a part of their culture as described in their own words
          https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1174&context=dissertations_mu

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And woke people complain how Pachontas is problematic because it "both sides" things instead of showing all colonizers as evil. In real life the indians were far worse

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    While we're discussing this queer, can we pause, and talk for a moment about the travesty that is Pocahontas 2?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It at least gave us Pocahontas in her pantaloons.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >WTF was his problem?
    Not finding gold. The Spaniards had found metric tons of gold and so he supposed that all lands in the Americas had equally distributed quantities of gold.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >WTF was his problem?
    gtreat thread, moron. how many of these do you want to make?

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i'm a leftist but the english were unironically in the right, natives were savages

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    why do all of the indians in this movie look Phillipino while this guy looks how actual indians look lol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I remember that, when the movie was released, all the indians in the US yelped that Pocahontas was too hot and looked like Naomi Campbell instead of a regular native woman.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1174&context=dissertations_mu

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >everyone else commits atrocities
    hmmm sounds about right
    >actual tribal savages commit atrocity
    nooooo! not our injuns! couldn't be precious crazy horse! the ones who hunted and scalped each-other for fun! no way!

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The "genocide" of natives was an epidemic of cold and smallpox that killed millions because they didn't have the immune system up to speed unlike us, and there were no anti-biotics back then.

    By the way, Spanish mixed with the natives, check what "missions" were.
    English and French traded with them, it's when Americans got their country together that they started reproducing like rabbits and then taking the natives' lands.

    But by the time of Pocahontas there was no systemic replacement in act.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not enough indian pootang.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Friendly reminder: Pocahontas was actually ~12 and as such, she still was part of the "naked indian" group of her tribe.

      So, in reality she was closer to a naked version of Tiger Lilly than to the character the film portrays..

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Their whole disgusting race is like a curse. Their skin's a hellish red, they're only good when dead, they're vermin and as he said they're worse;
    They're savages, savages, barely even human

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >WTF was his problem?
    Bri'ish genes

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Did they fug?

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He was a disgusting NORFMAN

    >Sicklemore was born in Lancashire. In early life, he changed his name to Ratcliffe as an alias.[1]

    >Ratcliffe left office (either by resignation or deposition) in July 1608, two months before the end of his term. The colonists were also enraged that as they were sick and dying, Ratcliffe ordered they build a capitol in the woods. The colonists dubbed the project "Ratcliffe's Palace." Ratcliffe accompanied Christopher Newport when he sailed from Virginia in 1608.

    >During The Starving Time in December 1609 or early 1610, Ratcliffe and 25 fellow colonists were invited to a gathering with a large group of Powhatan Indians.[4] The Englishmen were promised they would be given corn in return for copper, but it was a trap. The colonists were given food baskets that were nearly empty, the Powhatan Indians ambushed them, and Ratcliffe was taken to the village. Only two colonists escaped.[5] Ratcliffe suffered a particularly gruesome fate: he was tied to a stake in front of a fire. Women removed the skin from his entire body with mussel shells and tossed the pieces into the flame as he watched. They skinned his face last and finally burned him at the stake.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *