>Pay money for service >Fricks up said service >Be surprised if patron is possibly peeved at the shit job you did
I mean I wouldn't be outright mad but some people would generally be annoyed if that happens to them.
Black and white hair are really different. If one group would be a very small portion of your potential clientele, you might consider it not worth the effort.
Wasn't Gambit never meant to be a major long term member of the team, and it was his presence in the cartoon that forced him to stick around out of just popularity alone?
The writer who planned for him to be a short term character left the book a year before the cartoon started, the people who took over either didn't know or didn't care what his plan was, and did their own thing with Gambit. By the time the cartoon started he was already getting popular enough that he wasn't going anywhere.
But even if the book hadn't changed writers, they would have had a very narrow window in which to write him out before the cartoon committed to using him, toys started getting made, etc.
Cartoon definitely would have been in production a year or two before that anyway. Normally those things take about 3 years so it's still perfectly plausible for them to add Gambit and never know.
Yes, but by this point he already has 30 years of stories and plots to use and develope.
Heh, he's like Axel who was supposed to die on Chain of Memories.
Gambit was already way too popular to follow through with the original plan of making him some fake projection of a psychic kid.
Even more interesting, that Marvel inventing a character designed to be what kids think is cool, turned out to be what kids thought was too cool to write off. It worked too well.
There’s a section of the population that doesn’t get why stories are made. They think people spend years working on their craft in order to just make meaningless slop. Nearly every piece of media created is done so with the purpose of conveying isome kind of message. When confronted with that fact, some people tend to melt down. They don’t get that creatives don’t want to make meaningless slop. They want to make things that mean something.
Why do homosexual always want to sell everyone about the time their parents didn't like their coming out speech all the fricking time? Why do they always turn whatever media they are a part of into a self insert about the time their parents didn't accept them every fricking time?
It's like they are just plain drawn to media production so they can eventually land a writer's or directors gig and then FINALLY turn the whole thing into that time they came out and their dad was mean to them, like that itself is the culmination of their entire fricking life.
when writing a high concept series about people who fly, shoot lasers,and routinely fight robots, personal experience events from one's own childhood do not really enter into things, and should not in the first place.
Nearly every piece of media is about something. In childrens cartoons, the message would often be simple and blatant. “Don’t steal, Ben once to people, etc”. As the age of the target audience raises, you expect the message being put into the piece of media to be a bit more advanced and obfuscated. Instead of telling you the lesson directly, it instead attempts to give you the information in a way so that you come to the same conclusion as the creator of the media. Like how the “racism is bad” angle of X-men is done through having you experience the racism through their eyes. The whole point is for you to think “Nah, I wouldn’t be mean to the X-men”, and internalizing that so that later on you might apply that lesson in your real life. Thought goes in to almost all media. It’s rare you’ll find a story that’s just valid gobbledyasiatic.
Cringe and Gay
Magneto is a hypocritical israeli murderer man who deserves all the bad things that happen to him.
Yes, that's why he's an antagonist
No shit anon. That’s the point of the character since day 1. Do you think you’re clever for pointing out the obvious?
i ain't reading all that but i'm happy for you or sorry that happened
>study to be a barber
>can't cut hair, literally the only thing it needs to know how to do
I don't think you've ever seen how badly black people ape out if you frick up even a single hair.
Can't be worse than white women.
>Pay money for service
>Fricks up said service
>Be surprised if patron is possibly peeved at the shit job you did
I mean I wouldn't be outright mad but some people would generally be annoyed if that happens to them.
Black and white hair are really different. If one group would be a very small portion of your potential clientele, you might consider it not worth the effort.
Yeah, but I still want Gambit back.
Wasn't Gambit never meant to be a major long term member of the team, and it was his presence in the cartoon that forced him to stick around out of just popularity alone?
The writer who planned for him to be a short term character left the book a year before the cartoon started, the people who took over either didn't know or didn't care what his plan was, and did their own thing with Gambit. By the time the cartoon started he was already getting popular enough that he wasn't going anywhere.
But even if the book hadn't changed writers, they would have had a very narrow window in which to write him out before the cartoon committed to using him, toys started getting made, etc.
Cartoon definitely would have been in production a year or two before that anyway. Normally those things take about 3 years so it's still perfectly plausible for them to add Gambit and never know.
Yes, but by this point he already has 30 years of stories and plots to use and develope.
Heh, he's like Axel who was supposed to die on Chain of Memories.
Gambit was already way too popular to follow through with the original plan of making him some fake projection of a psychic kid.
Even more interesting, that Marvel inventing a character designed to be what kids think is cool, turned out to be what kids thought was too cool to write off. It worked too well.
Really gotta wonder why he was fired cause he makes a lot of sense, and the show is pretty cool so far too
I suspect Marvel higher ups probably wanted to bring back some of the characters he killed or reverse some of the changes.
That kind of thing always guarantee a REEEEEE from the creative folks and them then getting fired for it.
It’s probably just because he had an onlyfans
You are seriously asking why people are talking of the most popular show on Cinemaphile right now?
It's the most aggressively shilled show on Cinemaphile right now.
Alright, what should we be talking about instead?
>Racism and homophobia is literally 9/11's fault
Two towers weren't enough, HUH Osama??
>stop watching or talking about this show
It's the only good cartoon made in this decade. Go drink bleach.
>stop talking about the cartoon that originated as a comic
homosexual
I'd almost forgotten how moronic and bitter Cinemaphile really is.
You gonna cry? Please don’t burn down any more buildings and homes in the name of peaceful protest.
Euthanize yourself
There’s a section of the population that doesn’t get why stories are made. They think people spend years working on their craft in order to just make meaningless slop. Nearly every piece of media created is done so with the purpose of conveying isome kind of message. When confronted with that fact, some people tend to melt down. They don’t get that creatives don’t want to make meaningless slop. They want to make things that mean something.
Cinemaphile is a crab bucket of consumers.
>shows can’t be about things
You’re an idiot
>Black Gay Man is the hero of Cinemaphile
What a time
I wish homosexuals like this chose suicide rather than shitting up media.
What do you want your media to be? Mindless nonsense without a purpose? If so, there’s plenty of baby sensory videos on YouTube you can enjoy.
Why do homosexual always want to sell everyone about the time their parents didn't like their coming out speech all the fricking time? Why do they always turn whatever media they are a part of into a self insert about the time their parents didn't accept them every fricking time?
It's like they are just plain drawn to media production so they can eventually land a writer's or directors gig and then FINALLY turn the whole thing into that time they came out and their dad was mean to them, like that itself is the culmination of their entire fricking life.
>why does author use a personal lives experience in their writing
Gee, I wonder.
they are writing about fricking superheroes not some gay that still cries about daddy
For frick's sake, anon.
At least pretend you know capeshit.
when writing a high concept series about people who fly, shoot lasers,and routinely fight robots, personal experience events from one's own childhood do not really enter into things, and should not in the first place.
Nearly every piece of media is about something. In childrens cartoons, the message would often be simple and blatant. “Don’t steal, Ben once to people, etc”. As the age of the target audience raises, you expect the message being put into the piece of media to be a bit more advanced and obfuscated. Instead of telling you the lesson directly, it instead attempts to give you the information in a way so that you come to the same conclusion as the creator of the media. Like how the “racism is bad” angle of X-men is done through having you experience the racism through their eyes. The whole point is for you to think “Nah, I wouldn’t be mean to the X-men”, and internalizing that so that later on you might apply that lesson in your real life. Thought goes in to almost all media. It’s rare you’ll find a story that’s just valid gobbledyasiatic.
When he comes back and decides it's time to launch an all-out attack on humans, which X-Men will probably side with him?