>shot the entire movie on a 480p digital camera to get 5 minutes of abandoned london footage
The beginning is kino but it's such a strange decision, would it have been that bad of a visual cut if they'd switched to something more HQ afterwards?
All I had to do was google the title and I found a free stream on Sling, although you have to watch a shit-ton of ads. It is technically streaming, though.
It's a brief respite before Big Brother ramps up the "anti piracy" effort or your social credit score is hurt. The lax days aren't for long, from the way things deteriorate.
Always has been, I don't even know why they fight piracy. >it actually helps to spread an IP so is like free publicity >people that makes a backup of everything for free >spending a shit ton of money to take down a pirate site and get some dude into jail only result in 10 more sites being made so they are literally throwing money to the trash
This is interesting with TV, usually documentaries. >find it on YouTube or Vimeo >the uploader is actually the director/producer
Like, why wouldn't you? It's been on TV already. This is something you made out of passion, as an artist of some kind. What WOULD stop you is if Blahblah Media holds the rights.
The whole basis behind copyright is obsolete. I'd get it if people were editing movies to scrub out "Quentin Tarantino" and say "i made this", but that's not happening, is it?
>I don't even know why they fight piracy.
See, there are lawyers, beautiful people beyond reproach. Definitely not kinda overrepresented when it comes to phenotype.
Anyway, when they tell you you should pay them 60.000.- because you downloaded a 360*240 80Megabytes video back in 2008...you should pay that sum because you owe it to decent society.
No profit incentive + rights squabbles. There is a ton of art that can't be legally distributed because of these issues. Old video games run into this problem as well. Leaving illegal p2p sharing as the only option if you want to view the media. Any attempt to legally distribute it could get you sued by the homosexual rights holder who doesn't distribute it because it's not profitable enough. World's full or c**tbags.
Tales from the Crypt and Drew Carrey never got proper HD remasters or streaming releases because of license frickery. And don’t even get me started on Beavis and Butthead’s troubled home video releases. I love all those shows and would actually pay money to watch them again in high quality.
> Piracy becoming so morally justified due to the Enshittification of streaming services that were supposed to save us from cable television that now I'm seeing complete normies on TikTok informing their viewers how to use torrent clients
DO WHAT YOU WANT BECAUSE A PIRATE IS FREE, YOU ARE A PIRATE
Tormenting will never be user friendly enough to become a problem. Normies will read >downloading the torrent file doesn't mean you downloaded the movie
and just give up.
> The subject of this very thread is no longer available on streaming services or physical media being made. There's no seller for this film except second-hand copies
Who's bottom line are we affecting exactly by tormenting 28 Days Later, moron, Ebay stores, your local bargain bin?
> The subject of this very thread is no longer available on streaming services or physical media being made. There's no seller for this film except second-hand copies
Who's bottom line are we affecting exactly by tormenting 28 Days Later, moron, Ebay stores, your local bargain bin?
This was meant to address this moron
>so morally justified
I wish morons like you would stop using this stupid argument. Pirate as much as you want, but it's not moral. It's stealing
Yes it is still stealing. You own something that you didn't pay for. That is the very definition of stealing
3 months ago
Anonymous
The definition of stealing implies there is an injured party. If there is no one streaming or selling the item, if no revenue is being made from the production, how is there any damages inflicted against the party?
This argument is the same as claiming breathing the air within a Starbucks is somehow stealing from Starbucks.
3 months ago
Anonymous
FRICK YOU Black person BOY
3 months ago
Anonymous
So by your definition of stealing then owning an item gifted to you is theft since you didn't pay for it. My point being your definition is lacking.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I paid for a cinema ticket do therefore by your logic I now own the movie.
Now frick off.
>Tormenting will never be user friendly
You literally download a program (like your steam gaymes and dickscord), and then use a plugin to search whatever you want.
>remove a product in demand from the market >people want it >only way is to pirate >AAAAAAAH WHY ARE YOU PIRATING INSTEAD OF BUYING IT OR STREAMING IT FROM OUR AMAZING 0 AVAILABLE SOURCES
Yeah, it's not theft it's just tactical acquisition
It's so simple to use but normies can't figure it out. My entire life I've been the "computer guy" my family asks to torrent things. I used to burn anime CDs for my friends back in school and they thought I was a genius.
>so morally justified
I wish morons like you would stop using this stupid argument. Pirate as much as you want, but it's not moral. It's stealing
have a nice day. There's nothing wrong with sharing files you Black person ape. Zero property was lost or destroyed. Also, stop calling it "piracy". It's p2p file sharing. Comparing that to scurvy-ridden flea-infested Black folk sailing up to a ship and shooting people and stealing their shit is something only a disgusting israelite could come up with.
> Comparing that to scurvy-ridden flea-infested Black folk sailing up to a ship and shooting people and stealing their shit is something only a disgusting israelite could come up with.
Studios started calling the act “piracy” because they wanted to scare people away from doing it. But it backfired horribly because most people think pirates are awesome.
It would be like if celebrities started calling AI generating their likeness “Devil Summoning”.
Based, I've been buying up copies of every popular series on as many formats as I can for turbo cheap for years. I knew this day would come when physical copies stop being produced and eventually digital copies will cease, then I can scalp the shit out of all these things to make tons of profit.
The end game is to alienate the average Joe by making it think piracy is the reason for all bad things, the average Joe is the one who votes and when a law bans piracy for real is proposed they will vote for it and it all will be really over
Why isn't there a website licensed by every company where you can order a dvd, VHS, betamax, blurry and whatever straight from the website, you pick a movie, they burn it onto the medium and mail it to you. It's such a simple concept.
Why do they just make bulk sales and out then on store shelves, and if they don't sell they lose money and they stop making it forever. It's such a moronic system. It's fricking DATA, you can just burn it on any disk no problem. It's such a simple concept. Have an archive of every movie on streaming.
because the israelites that own one media would get mad at the israelites that own the other media because they're not getting their cut of the shekels
intellectual "property" is not property
Why isn't there a website licensed by every company where you can order a dvd, VHS, betamax, blurry and whatever straight from the website, you pick a movie, they burn it onto the medium and mail it to you. It's such a simple concept.
Why do they just make bulk sales and out then on store shelves, and if they don't sell they lose money and they stop making it forever. It's such a moronic system. It's fricking DATA, you can just burn it on any disk no problem. It's such a simple concept. Have an archive of every movie on streaming.
just said it. I don't know how you managed to get confused.
You'd have to own a vast, vast library of content, high quality originals of the data to copy onto new data without significant quality loss, production to order instead of mass shipment means increased overhead, demand would be niche at best.
Doesn't make sense to cater to Criterion Collection tier movie fanatics when production is so costly. Better to invest in live-action adaptations of Disney nostalgia.
They could waitlist orders and do smaller production runs based on demand.
Wait for a minimum number of demand to accumulate before producing them.
But ultimately, I think there are quite a few people that are willing to pay the higher cost for an out-of-print copy.
The price may reflect what people are paying for vinyl records. There’s certainly demand there so I don’t see zero demand for out-of-print movies waitlisting orders and sending when they get a minimum amount of demand.
Because that would make too much sense. Movie companies are dinosaurs and only allow a certain amount to be printed, i mean even Blockbusters were idiots because they had the chance to buy Netflix for like 20 million bucks in the early 2000's which would be like the equivalent of 10 bucks for them in net worth back then but they were just like nah, we don't want people to stream we want them to come into the store.
Digital media is ephemeral by nature. Don't rely on anything digital.
Think about it: we can uncover a 2000 year old Greek papyrus from a desert and read it today because it's low-tech and durable: all it requires is someone who can read Greek. Meanwhile there's digital storage from just 40 years ago that we can't read because the tech has been superseded.
Films should be ephemeral. Visit a (good) cinema, the kind where people don't clap and shit, they're there to watch the film.
If you don't catch a screening you don't get to watch it. You certainly don't get to have an opinion on it. There are e-famous film reviewers who literally talk about going to the bathroom in the middle of a film... anyway here's what they thought of it.
The entire movie was shot on a fricking handheld camcorder, every physical copy should be burned and the filmmakers should be forced to reshoot every scene with an actual camera.
I legitimately find streaming to be more confusing than torrenting. Maybe it's because I've learned what to do, but if I know film + year I can find a torrent within minutes. From the filename I know the quality etc.
If I just know a film + year and I don't give a shit about resolution, which cut it is, I "just want to watch it" on a legal streaming service, where the frick do I even begin? Do you check the services one-by-one? Don't you need a Netflix account, and to be logged in, just to even SEE if something is on there?
>just do a fricking IRC interview bro to pirate films
Can't believe this was ever a thing people accepted.
>PublicHD, then RARBG, etc., HD films that aren't aXXo/YIFY shite
Great.
But it's like there was a monopoly and those torrents aren't seeded any more. Now the 'big' public trackers are god awful. There really was a golden age and we've passed it.
Have that search engine plug-in set up in Qbittorrent and it's terrible.
I have the search engine plugin too and it works fine, what are you looking for that you can't find on there? I like TV shows that were made for literal boomers and haven't aired in decades and I even manage to find them on the public trackers.
It's very good, the pacing is incredible: there's no filler, if Sgt Friday says: "let's run the plates by the DMV" it will smash cut to three weeks later with him saying "the plates came back, it was a '66 Plymouth"... and so forth. The angry monologues Friday delivers when he gets pissed off are kino, it's doesn't come off as preachy or idealistic, it just feels real. Look the scene of him confronting child molester on Youtube that's typical of the show's writing. Obviously, this was made in the '60's, so there are episodes which centre around proto-social justice stuff, so if you're bothered by that kind of stuff, you may not like some episodes. But I think something of this quality is enjoyable even if you disagree with the message.
>I like TV shows that were made for literal boomers and haven't aired in decades and I even manage to find them on the public trackers.
This but as a British guy.
Our Friends in the North is/was on Amazon Prime with the original music. Tracked it down on DDL sites, feels like the sort of thing that would have been on Demonoid back in the day.
Really it's just finding 1080p films, h264 or whatever, that aren't those 2GB re-encodes. RARBG curated those in a way that TPB, 1337x, this new TorrentGalaxy site and so on don't. And I've typed "film name + year + 1080p" into the default search stuff (plus a few other plugins) and gotten no results, when those torrents DO EXIST on those trackers. Not doing any weird formatting shit.
I'm actually British too and I watch our boomer shows as well. I agree, if you're particular about the quality you want, you might need to do some looking, but if you just want to find a film or TV show, it's easy, even if it's an obscure one.
>you might need to do some looking, but if you just want to find a film or TV show, it's easy, even if it's an obscure one.
I know there have been a couple of private trackers but I can't really be arsed anon.
Daft, one-off dramas like The Second Coming? Queer as Folk? Fist of Fun (had a DVD release)? Robin of Sherwood ended up RARBG shortly before it died, which was nice (been out on Blu-ray for ages).
Are these things you can just find on public trackers? Again I've looked, and had better luck with obscure DDL forums, where you're then fighting with MEGA or something.
>I like TV shows that were made for literal boomers and haven't aired in decades and I even manage to find them on the public trackers.
This but as a British guy.
Our Friends in the North is/was on Amazon Prime with the original music. Tracked it down on DDL sites, feels like the sort of thing that would have been on Demonoid back in the day.
Really it's just finding 1080p films, h264 or whatever, that aren't those 2GB re-encodes. RARBG curated those in a way that TPB, 1337x, this new TorrentGalaxy site and so on don't. And I've typed "film name + year + 1080p" into the default search stuff (plus a few other plugins) and gotten no results, when those torrents DO EXIST on those trackers. Not doing any weird formatting shit.
28 Days Later fricking sucks. The first half wherein it's focused on the zombie apocalypse is okay (if far from great) but right after the father dies and they join up with the army guys it goes full moron.
Just buy the DVD.
Honestly unless they sourced the DVD from like a VHS rip or something DVD looks perfectly fine.
Maybe if you watch on like a 50 inch screen or something it looks bad? But like seriously DVDs can look pretty nice.
be careful i had one of those Game Boy "50 games in 1" carts but it turns out "Super Mario Land", "Mario Brother's Land" and "Mario Adventure" were all the same game.
it's possible there isn't even such a film as "28 Weeks" or "Transporter 2".
>homosexual scalpers already raising prices to joke tier levels
This movie wasn't worth the money I paid to see it in theaters, it sure as frick isn't worth $50 to own a shitty transfer on HD media kek.
why would you want to own this piece of shit on blu-ray?
does that fricking look 4k to you?
this doesn't even look like dvd.
this is vhs tier.
Looks very cool. It's a nice aesthetic, I like the thought of having a flower farm.
does that look good to you?
Yeah, it does. Not from a technical perspective of course. But it adds to the overall feeling of dread and disarray the movie tries to evoke.
Kino
>a bunch of pots and tiny cups strewn around
>no umbrellas or tarps or any attempt to cover a significant area
creatively bankrupt
it's set in London and it's on a roof.
two inches of snow and they cry like babies. presumably the inverse is true and sky-water is like a blessing from the gods.
>shot the entire movie on a 480p digital camera to get 5 minutes of abandoned london footage
The beginning is kino but it's such a strange decision, would it have been that bad of a visual cut if they'd switched to something more HQ afterwards?
HD didn't exist in 2002. Blu ray was still a couple of years away
They could've still shot the rest on film, no?
Film isn't HD
yes it is, 35mm is more than 4k
But blu ray didn't exist until 2006?
yes it is you dumb fricking moron
Then why did VHS look so shitty?
They couldn't afford the equipment. It was a success. While technically not a found footage film, it did kickstart the genre
The last shot in the film was shot on film.
That's not an impressionist painting? That's an actual shot from the movie?
Yes. This movie was shot on a terrible 480p digital camera from the era. There is no HD version of it. It just looks like shit.
>vhs tier
VHS doesn't have upscaled AI shit.
This is 100% digital era bullshit.
All I had to do was google the title and I found a free stream on Sling, although you have to watch a shit-ton of ads. It is technically streaming, though.
>watching any ads ever
You are not pirating properly.
what is your point
Doesn't this prove that piracy is now the only way forward?
It's a brief respite before Big Brother ramps up the "anti piracy" effort or your social credit score is hurt. The lax days aren't for long, from the way things deteriorate.
Always has been, I don't even know why they fight piracy.
>it actually helps to spread an IP so is like free publicity
>people that makes a backup of everything for free
>spending a shit ton of money to take down a pirate site and get some dude into jail only result in 10 more sites being made so they are literally throwing money to the trash
This is interesting with TV, usually documentaries.
>find it on YouTube or Vimeo
>the uploader is actually the director/producer
Like, why wouldn't you? It's been on TV already. This is something you made out of passion, as an artist of some kind. What WOULD stop you is if Blahblah Media holds the rights.
The whole basis behind copyright is obsolete. I'd get it if people were editing movies to scrub out "Quentin Tarantino" and say "i made this", but that's not happening, is it?
>I don't even know why they fight piracy.
See, there are lawyers, beautiful people beyond reproach. Definitely not kinda overrepresented when it comes to phenotype.
Anyway, when they tell you you should pay them 60.000.- because you downloaded a 360*240 80Megabytes video back in 2008...you should pay that sum because you owe it to decent society.
>*torrents*
Whoops looks like I own it now. Sorry Mr. Schwab.
https://myflixerz.to/watch-movie/28-days-later-18681.5299231
This is the case for a lot of movies
Why?
Because no one cares about them anymore. If they did then the DVD wouldn't be out of print
No profit incentive + rights squabbles. There is a ton of art that can't be legally distributed because of these issues. Old video games run into this problem as well. Leaving illegal p2p sharing as the only option if you want to view the media. Any attempt to legally distribute it could get you sued by the homosexual rights holder who doesn't distribute it because it's not profitable enough. World's full or c**tbags.
Tales from the Crypt and Drew Carrey never got proper HD remasters or streaming releases because of license frickery. And don’t even get me started on Beavis and Butthead’s troubled home video releases. I love all those shows and would actually pay money to watch them again in high quality.
They can't just put it on YouTube movies and get money from it?
which ones?
Probably not enough demand to do another print run. Literally nothing to see here.
Just forget about the past goyim
>see >196364914
>Not enough demand
It’s one of the best horror movies ever made
aren't them doing a new one next year? sounds like there's enough demand
wow that sucks
anyways
Jokes on you I bought the DVD like twenty years ago
I think I have it on a hard drive around the house. So uh, checkmate lol
> Piracy becoming so morally justified due to the Enshittification of streaming services that were supposed to save us from cable television that now I'm seeing complete normies on TikTok informing their viewers how to use torrent clients
DO WHAT YOU WANT BECAUSE A PIRATE IS FREE, YOU ARE A PIRATE
Tormenting will never be user friendly enough to become a problem. Normies will read
>downloading the torrent file doesn't mean you downloaded the movie
and just give up.
> The subject of this very thread is no longer available on streaming services or physical media being made. There's no seller for this film except second-hand copies
Who's bottom line are we affecting exactly by tormenting 28 Days Later, moron, Ebay stores, your local bargain bin?
Apologies,
This was meant to address this moron
>can't even reply properly
>calls me the moron
Fancy addressing the actual point, moron?
Yes it is still stealing. You own something that you didn't pay for. That is the very definition of stealing
The definition of stealing implies there is an injured party. If there is no one streaming or selling the item, if no revenue is being made from the production, how is there any damages inflicted against the party?
This argument is the same as claiming breathing the air within a Starbucks is somehow stealing from Starbucks.
FRICK YOU Black person BOY
So by your definition of stealing then owning an item gifted to you is theft since you didn't pay for it. My point being your definition is lacking.
I paid for a cinema ticket do therefore by your logic I now own the movie.
Now frick off.
>Tormenting will never be user friendly
You literally download a program (like your steam gaymes and dickscord), and then use a plugin to search whatever you want.
>so morally justified
I wish morons like you would stop using this stupid argument. Pirate as much as you want, but it's not moral. It's stealing
>inviting your friend over to watch a VHS is immoral because they don't own it too
jew
Not the same thing at all and you know it
buy movie,make copy, send to frend
where is the theft?
>remove a product in demand from the market
>people want it
>only way is to pirate
>AAAAAAAH WHY ARE YOU PIRATING INSTEAD OF BUYING IT OR STREAMING IT FROM OUR AMAZING 0 AVAILABLE SOURCES
Yeah, it's not theft it's just tactical acquisition
It's so simple to use but normies can't figure it out. My entire life I've been the "computer guy" my family asks to torrent things. I used to burn anime CDs for my friends back in school and they thought I was a genius.
have a nice day. There's nothing wrong with sharing files you Black person ape. Zero property was lost or destroyed. Also, stop calling it "piracy". It's p2p file sharing. Comparing that to scurvy-ridden flea-infested Black folk sailing up to a ship and shooting people and stealing their shit is something only a disgusting israelite could come up with.
> Comparing that to scurvy-ridden flea-infested Black folk sailing up to a ship and shooting people and stealing their shit is something only a disgusting israelite could come up with.
Studios started calling the act “piracy” because they wanted to scare people away from doing it. But it backfired horribly because most people think pirates are awesome.
It would be like if celebrities started calling AI generating their likeness “Devil Summoning”.
>Jim, my men have been unable to stream the movie for an entire month. there is no other way
Based, I've been buying up copies of every popular series on as many formats as I can for turbo cheap for years. I knew this day would come when physical copies stop being produced and eventually digital copies will cease, then I can scalp the shit out of all these things to make tons of profit.
what happens when those physical copies are no longer usable due to bit rot? i hope you are backing them up
Spin them in reverse to counter rotational velocidensity.
The end game is to alienate the average Joe by making it think piracy is the reason for all bad things, the average Joe is the one who votes and when a law bans piracy for real is proposed they will vote for it and it all will be really over
Why isn't there a website licensed by every company where you can order a dvd, VHS, betamax, blurry and whatever straight from the website, you pick a movie, they burn it onto the medium and mail it to you. It's such a simple concept.
Why do they just make bulk sales and out then on store shelves, and if they don't sell they lose money and they stop making it forever. It's such a moronic system. It's fricking DATA, you can just burn it on any disk no problem. It's such a simple concept. Have an archive of every movie on streaming.
because the israelites that own one media would get mad at the israelites that own the other media because they're not getting their cut of the shekels
intellectual "property" is not property
Anon, one "media" is a "medium"
just said it. I don't know how you managed to get confused.
You'd have to own a vast, vast library of content, high quality originals of the data to copy onto new data without significant quality loss, production to order instead of mass shipment means increased overhead, demand would be niche at best.
Doesn't make sense to cater to Criterion Collection tier movie fanatics when production is so costly. Better to invest in live-action adaptations of Disney nostalgia.
They could waitlist orders and do smaller production runs based on demand.
Wait for a minimum number of demand to accumulate before producing them.
But ultimately, I think there are quite a few people that are willing to pay the higher cost for an out-of-print copy.
The price may reflect what people are paying for vinyl records. There’s certainly demand there so I don’t see zero demand for out-of-print movies waitlisting orders and sending when they get a minimum amount of demand.
Intellectual property laws make what you're describing impossible.
Media companies could just sell individual licenses for movies directly to another company instead of batch.
Because that would make too much sense. Movie companies are dinosaurs and only allow a certain amount to be printed, i mean even Blockbusters were idiots because they had the chance to buy Netflix for like 20 million bucks in the early 2000's which would be like the equivalent of 10 bucks for them in net worth back then but they were just like nah, we don't want people to stream we want them to come into the store.
hell yeah brother
Digital media is ephemeral by nature. Don't rely on anything digital.
Think about it: we can uncover a 2000 year old Greek papyrus from a desert and read it today because it's low-tech and durable: all it requires is someone who can read Greek. Meanwhile there's digital storage from just 40 years ago that we can't read because the tech has been superseded.
I have a copy on my hard drive
guess I will just pirate it then
Piratebay has it. And I have it saved to a hard drive which is backed up thrice.
lol
lmao
This thread was made by a clever anon who needed a torrent
I approve
not available on stream platform =/= not available to stream
streaming, not downloaded content
if you 'buy' streaming content, you are moronic
Films should be ephemeral. Visit a (good) cinema, the kind where people don't clap and shit, they're there to watch the film.
If you don't catch a screening you don't get to watch it. You certainly don't get to have an opinion on it. There are e-famous film reviewers who literally talk about going to the bathroom in the middle of a film... anyway here's what they thought of it.
Your farts must smell really good since you inhale them all day.
I only inhale high-quality snuff and cocaine. I wouldn't dirty my nose with something for 'olfactory' purposes.
>sheboon lead
Into the trash it goes.
The entire movie was shot on a fricking handheld camcorder, every physical copy should be burned and the filmmakers should be forced to reshoot every scene with an actual camera.
Hell yeah, time to make a fortune on physical to desperate nerds
What
How is that possible
I legitimately find streaming to be more confusing than torrenting. Maybe it's because I've learned what to do, but if I know film + year I can find a torrent within minutes. From the filename I know the quality etc.
If I just know a film + year and I don't give a shit about resolution, which cut it is, I "just want to watch it" on a legal streaming service, where the frick do I even begin? Do you check the services one-by-one? Don't you need a Netflix account, and to be logged in, just to even SEE if something is on there?
Same. But to answer you question, some people use JustWatch for that purpose.
https://www.justwatch.com/us/movies
I remember some newonnetflix website on a Matt guy's personal website.
But by the time you've typed a movie into a search bar ... you could have done that to find a torrent ¯_(ツ)_/¯
wow you’re moronic. just search it up on whatever engine and it will tell you. you want your ass wiped, too?
I am not ok with the anti-semitism I am seeing around here!
AND BE HAPPY
>mfw I get complimentary roach crisps at the Davos Summit
whats the problem?
>whats the problem?
>.AMZN.WEB-DL.
>The car's on fire and there's no driver at the wheel
>And the sewers are all muddied with a thousand lonely suicides
>And a dark wind blows
Watched this film for the first time recently, it's pretty shit like
>Not available on any streaming platform
Works on my machine
Do zoomers not know how to torrent?
Millennial here and I have no clue any more.
>just do a fricking IRC interview bro to pirate films
Can't believe this was ever a thing people accepted.
>PublicHD, then RARBG, etc., HD films that aren't aXXo/YIFY shite
Great.
But it's like there was a monopoly and those torrents aren't seeded any more. Now the 'big' public trackers are god awful. There really was a golden age and we've passed it.
Have that search engine plug-in set up in Qbittorrent and it's terrible.
I have the search engine plugin too and it works fine, what are you looking for that you can't find on there? I like TV shows that were made for literal boomers and haven't aired in decades and I even manage to find them on the public trackers.
NTA but I've been thinking about watching Dragnet, is it any good?
It's very good, the pacing is incredible: there's no filler, if Sgt Friday says: "let's run the plates by the DMV" it will smash cut to three weeks later with him saying "the plates came back, it was a '66 Plymouth"... and so forth. The angry monologues Friday delivers when he gets pissed off are kino, it's doesn't come off as preachy or idealistic, it just feels real. Look the scene of him confronting child molester on Youtube that's typical of the show's writing. Obviously, this was made in the '60's, so there are episodes which centre around proto-social justice stuff, so if you're bothered by that kind of stuff, you may not like some episodes. But I think something of this quality is enjoyable even if you disagree with the message.
I'm actually British too and I watch our boomer shows as well. I agree, if you're particular about the quality you want, you might need to do some looking, but if you just want to find a film or TV show, it's easy, even if it's an obscure one.
>you might need to do some looking, but if you just want to find a film or TV show, it's easy, even if it's an obscure one.
I know there have been a couple of private trackers but I can't really be arsed anon.
Daft, one-off dramas like The Second Coming? Queer as Folk? Fist of Fun (had a DVD release)? Robin of Sherwood ended up RARBG shortly before it died, which was nice (been out on Blu-ray for ages).
Are these things you can just find on public trackers? Again I've looked, and had better luck with obscure DDL forums, where you're then fighting with MEGA or something.
>I like TV shows that were made for literal boomers and haven't aired in decades and I even manage to find them on the public trackers.
This but as a British guy.
Our Friends in the North is/was on Amazon Prime with the original music. Tracked it down on DDL sites, feels like the sort of thing that would have been on Demonoid back in the day.
Really it's just finding 1080p films, h264 or whatever, that aren't those 2GB re-encodes. RARBG curated those in a way that TPB, 1337x, this new TorrentGalaxy site and so on don't. And I've typed "film name + year + 1080p" into the default search stuff (plus a few other plugins) and gotten no results, when those torrents DO EXIST on those trackers. Not doing any weird formatting shit.
28 Days Later fricking sucks. The first half wherein it's focused on the zombie apocalypse is okay (if far from great) but right after the father dies and they join up with the army guys it goes full moron.
i have a dvd of this though
but do you have a dvd player?
only a vhs player
the superior medium
star trek deep space nine and voyager will also never get HD because of many reasons
I have it on my hard drive and can burn it to a disc, anyone want a copy?
imagine the braps
That lady needs some parachute pants
>You will own nothing
i have those two movies
they are nothing special
Just buy the DVD.
Honestly unless they sourced the DVD from like a VHS rip or something DVD looks perfectly fine.
Maybe if you watch on like a 50 inch screen or something it looks bad? But like seriously DVDs can look pretty nice.
hell I just went on ebay and some guy is selling 28 days, 28 weeks, and Transporter 1 and 2 for 8 bucks.
be careful i had one of those Game Boy "50 games in 1" carts but it turns out "Super Mario Land", "Mario Brother's Land" and "Mario Adventure" were all the same game.
it's possible there isn't even such a film as "28 Weeks" or "Transporter 2".
I will download everything and I WILL be happy
>no 4k version of 2001 Keira Knightley movie The Hole
>No 4k version of 2000 Keeley Hawes movie Complicity
>no 4k quality video of me ripping Keira Knightley's holes
It's not fair bros
Physical Media chads stay winning.
(Yes I backed up the film on my SSD)
>Blu-ray
what's the point. the film was shot in 240i or some shit. only time it looked OK was when I downloaded a camrip off napster.
>homosexual scalpers already raising prices to joke tier levels
This movie wasn't worth the money I paid to see it in theaters, it sure as frick isn't worth $50 to own a shitty transfer on HD media kek.