AI is the future

AI is the future

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like some shit that was airbrushed onto a T-shirt at the county fair

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's rough, but given some time, a little more refining of the models, and it'll get there.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Yeah, my computer only has 6gb vram.

      LA CREATURRAAAAHHHHHHHHHH
      It looks like a mentally insane baby. The facial features are too small for how big that head is. Can you believe actual living breathing people have these face proportions without it being photoshopped or went through plastic surgery Ughhhh might as well kill the poor kid at that point.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI getting better at drawing fingers it looks like

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Even femboy trapporn is possible
    Western porn has received a blessing from the machine gods.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The generator literally can draw it better than an actual person

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If you're visually impaired, yes.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yup.
    It's not quite there yet but the speed at which it's progressing is outstanding.
    Give it a few years and it will be perfect.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >progressing
      >dude just keep feeding it more art from actual artists
      kys schlomo or pajeet

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Awww is no one paying for you shitty porn commissions anymore?

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Now if only I had a model better for dynamic poses.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yeah, my computer only has 6gb vram.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's still pretty shit at the moment, tbh, but I have no doubt it will be pretty decent in the near future.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Huh.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wonder how long before AI e-boi posters start getting in trouble for posting what is essentially photobashed CP
      >b-but I didn't KNOW my heckin valid model was using actual CP to generate its images, pinky swear!

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They've been accusing anime characters of looking like "children" even if she has JJJ breasts. Pedo projection is going to start a witchhunt even before such images start spreading.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm surprised there hasn't been a purge from pixiv.
        There is so much of it. With the Visa/Mastercard fiasco I imagine there's gonna be be some changes with hyper realistic AI getting mass deletions.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I think some view these things as magical, and don't realize that if your image generator can spit out images that bear a reasonably passing resemblance to photos of real children in provocative poses, it was trained using photos of real children in provocative poses.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They already got into shit with Pixiv, they're gonna ban anyone making e-boi, guro, beastiality, rape, etc. on fanbox and request because of retards spamming real cp using img2img. my fucking sides.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think some view these things as magical, and don't realize that if your image generator can spit out images that bear a reasonably passing resemblance to photos of real children in provocative poses, it was trained using photos of real children in provocative poses.

        #doubt
        Yes, the AI needs to be trained on children to be able to produce children, but the whole point of ML is that it can interpolate various concepts. If the AI understands: photos of clothed children in ordinary poses, photos & drawings of naked adults in sexual poses, drawings of clothed children in sexual poses, then is it really so hard to imagine it can cobble together an approximation of photos of naked children in sexual poses from this data? It's like arguing it must have been trained on pictures of animals made of corn in order for it to produce animals made of corn. -t. not a pedo, just tired of retards like you

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This retard doesn't know whats in the laion dataset aifags are cooked clock is ticking

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          NTA, but this guy is omitting an important detail: many states still have obscenity laws on the books and have prosecuted otherwise legal works this way. You are not as free as you want to believe.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You’ve got to really piss someone off to get slapped with that shit though. They’re mostly on the books so that in the event some changes on the federal level happen, they don’t have to pass new laws to criminalize stuff. As it stands, they know this shit will get struck down, so they don’t pursue it, and no one is running around trying to get arrested for it so they can make a court battle out of it.

            There are some exceptions like the teacher in Idaho that got charged with Simpsons porn, but as I recall they pled out for some reason or other, and that’s more the exception than the rule.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              True. It still sickens me, though. Selective application of the law breeds a culture of terror. It is a totalitarian practice. Either ban something and enforce that ban, or don't. Anything else is injustice regardless how unsavoury the targets are today.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                this is idiotic

                You’ve got to really piss someone off to get slapped with that shit though. They’re mostly on the books so that in the event some changes on the federal level happen, they don’t have to pass new laws to criminalize stuff. As it stands, they know this shit will get struck down, so they don’t pursue it, and no one is running around trying to get arrested for it so they can make a court battle out of it.

                There are some exceptions like the teacher in Idaho that got charged with Simpsons porn, but as I recall they pled out for some reason or other, and that’s more the exception than the rule.

                the application in US law is contextual for the most part, they're not looking for it, they just find it alongside 500tb of kids getting nailed from OF

                at that stage it's just a way of adding years to the sentence, not obtaining custodial sentence

                outside the US you ain't covered for shit tho, and that SC judgement won't last forever once lawmakers start being predominantly people who a) grew up with the internet and b) aren't Gaetz or trying to protect him

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >this is idiotic
                no u

                Now please explain or admit you don't have an argument.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's guaranteed to have happened already.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Make one where she’s getting ryoaned

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm bothered. The uncanny valley does this outfit no favors.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like garbage once you notice the uncanny mistakes

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI "art" is not art. It's a soulless abomination which takes the visual representation of humanity's soul and creativity and reduces it to an algorithm. It's not just inhuman but anti-human.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes but consider the counterpoint: Backing AI art will theoretically hurt SJWs.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Imagine if people start tracing over AI art.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The AI does the tracing. That's basically what img2img is. I've been using it as a shortcut to coloring clothing folds.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I'LL CUT MY HEAD OFF IF IT OWNS THE LIBS!

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No it wouldn't. Lower barrier to entry = even more diversity and inclusion hires.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So it's Graphic Design?

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    what the FUCK dude? I just wanted some Mabel Pines lewds, not this sick deepfake shit

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry you can't read and gain context for the post and clicked a link even after a fucking warning on fucking Cinemaphile.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm talking about AI art in general

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ah, so you're retarded. Got it.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The future looks like shit

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Greg Land

    it sure is

    • 2 weeks ago
      Greg Land
      • 2 weeks ago
        Greg Land

        I don't have to do shit any more

        • 2 weeks ago
          Greg Land

          I've become a god and all I had to do was fucking nothing

          • 2 weeks ago
            Greg Land

            you people are fucking ants I own you

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I've become a god and all I had to do was fucking nothing

              I don't have to do shit any more

              it sure is

              Is this how people with advanced dementia see the world?

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ?t=87

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Considering how it can get so many complex shapes right, why do these AI SUFFER when it comes to fingers?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Their models were trained on images that were 512x512 pixels. At such a small size, fidelity gets lost at a certain scale, so fingers, toes, and other fine detail with full body images gets garbled. Now, if the models were trained with higher resolution images, we would be getting better results.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >AI Pajeets used AI art to sell Cheese Pizza
    >Pixiv is getting fucked over because of it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hopefully Pixiv just bans AI "art".

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They're banning fucking everything. e-boi and Shota is banned as well as Rape, Gore, and Incest to name a few.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Just with AI art right

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What's banned is the use of fanbox with any art that's guro, rape, or underaged. Some retards were making AI art of actual fucking children so now shit is getting fucked

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They've already embraced it, Japan is very tech-forward and actually already shitting on people that condemn or don't support it.

        They're banning fucking everything. e-boi and Shota is banned as well as Rape, Gore, and Incest to name a few.

        You don't know what you're talking about.
        >レイプ
        >rape
        >124,704 Works

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://www.pixiv.net/info.php?id=8788

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Retard, it's saying you can't use their own services for that, there's been other services that support those transactions for years.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Many transactions take place on BOOTH, pixivFANBOX, and the pixiv Requests feature. Some were found to violate the pixiv Terms of Use, Article 14 "Prohibited Conduct", Item 26 "Using the Services to display, sell, purchase, register, or engage in other transactions involving the products set forth below".
              >display
              >Under the Service Master Terms of Use, we ask that all users check for items that include the above content on BOOTH, pixivFANBOX, and the pixiv Requests feature, and if such content is found, delete the items or set them to private.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Retard, it's exactly as I said, retard. You seem to not understand what it means.

                Reread my post, retard.

                Retard, it's saying you can't use their own services for that, there's been other services that support those transactions for years.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, but we aren't talking about other services, we're talking about Pixiv?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Since you're hopelessly stupid I'll explain it to you

                You can keep selling all your rape, guro and e-boi on Pixiv all you like. You just can't do it using Pixiv's own sales functions.

                Do you comprehend, retard? People were using other sites linked on Pixiv for years before Pixiv's versions were available. And they still do.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think we're talking past each other.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're genuinely stupid

              • 2 weeks ago
                Birchyfunbags

                Hes Indian Anon, only insults hes knows is retard and idiot.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Many transactions take place on BOOTH, pixivFANBOX, and the pixiv Requests feature. Some were found to violate the pixiv Terms of Use, Article 14 "Prohibited Conduct", Item 26 "Using the Services to display, sell, purchase, register, or engage in other transactions involving the products set forth below".
                >display
                >Under the Service Master Terms of Use, we ask that all users check for items that include the above content on BOOTH, pixivFANBOX, and the pixiv Requests feature, and if such content is found, delete the items or set them to private.

                Like...how do you even function in life? You must be a wageslave, not really fit to do anything else.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I don't think you understand how many artists who make shota/e-boi porn use fanbox since Patreon doesn't allow it

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I didn't mean they're banning it from the platform, they're just banning people from paying for it via their services. It's still a pretty big blow for them since that'll just make them an inferior patreon.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >japan is very tech forward
          HAHAHAHAHAHA THIS PAJEET DOESNT EVEN KNOW

          Japs are notoriously bad at adapting to new technologies in the day to day life, they still use faxes for god sake and its one of the reasons their games are so infamously either poorly coded or with shitty textures. Its also why pc gaming has only VERY recently start gaining traction there, because the average jap is very tech illiterate.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            source: your behind

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No, he isn't wrong. Japan has always been absurdly conservative in it's practices. CGI anumation is only now starting to approach it's western peers because they insisted on using traditional 2D animation methods for an entirely new medium, despite it consistently looking like dogshit. And I dunno about faces, but flip phones survived there longer than they had any right to, despite their companies simultaneously producing smartphones for the western market. Something is really fucked in the way the Japanese approach change in their everyday lives.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kek, I'd never considered that's why pixiv suddenly dropped paid e-boi art. However AIshitters try to obscure it with the mask of "training sets," there's a very high probability that US law doesn't actually give a shit and will consider it illegal regardless
      >Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That law is patently unconstitutional, but nobody is going to contest it.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's definitely a "think of the children!!" type of law, but drawn stuff is so far removed from the appearance of the real thing that it's hard to argue that any child or image of a child was actually involved in the creation of the image. If you start trying to make photorealistic images, that's a different story. Imagine some AIjeet trying to argue about training data and denoising as he gets hauled away by the cops.
          >EMAD WILL EXPLAIN EVERYTHING SIR

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Every e-boi artist has abused children in order to get references. Anime should be illegal.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Birchyfunbags

    MA THE INDIAN ARSEHOLE IS RANTING ABOUTS AI AGAIN!!!!

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can AI generate you a new mom? Cause the current one ain’t going to last long

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It'll never be so good that it is able to create art that appeals to me. It'll be amazing for coomer types, though.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Shut up you moron.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That looks like shit.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >He said impotently into the raging storm that lays quiet his soul.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Birchyfunbags

            These all look like early development models for a lost Xbox 360 game.

            Fuck off.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >He lied unconvincingly, his opinion snuffed out entirely.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Birchyfunbags

                >Repeating the same response but wording it differently

                South India is better

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >With his humanity discarded he trolled blatantly.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Birchyfunbags

                >her hand is coming out her stomach

                Are the women in India that boring to yous?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are laid low.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Birchyfunbags

                Im more disturbed by the girl on the bottom left with the flowers growing out of her crotch.

                DISGUSTING

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                kinky

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                These are the good examples?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Was made as soon as it was public pretty much. There's been major improvements since then.

                Also you should know the issues with eyes, fingers etc are all because of the original data set being poor for those which results in that. Making the original data sets better could solve this but we have inpainting as well which fixes that afterwards which wasn't applied there.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            These look significantly less shit, but a little generic.

            >He lied unconvincingly, his opinion snuffed out entirely.

            These look like garbage. Did you deliberately choose shitty looking pictures for this one?

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Drawfags mad again

    LOL

    • 2 weeks ago
      Birchyfunbags

      Make a cartoony Bob Clampett style AI image Anon

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    two things ai art will never ever pull off, linework and comic pages, but sure, if you don't have the talent to draw you can have fun with it all you want

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Those are just a matter of training and set up, though ironically those concepts are why artists will never be replaced. Namely, AIs don’t get the fundamentals yet. They spit out generic looking images based on tags which WE recognize, and it tickles the recognition portion of our brains, but they still need someone who understands all the aspects of art to make sure the product ends up at an acceptable level. Worst case we eventually end up with a robust AI powered tool for generating images that still involves a bunch of work on the part of the artist.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I thought the deformed rabbits would be the worst, but supergirl's waist is super fucked.
    Like the blue backside goes above her stomach, so it looks like she is wearing a pair of fake legs to go over her thinner lower half.

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ask of Harley Quinn in Batman inspired outfit getting rawed by a horse. POV style.

    Bonus point if she wearing a wedding ring matching the horse’s cock ring.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If it was the horse's POV you wouldn't see a thing

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I get that this thread is purely here for demoralization, but what does AI art truly mean for the future of human made art in general? I get that it punches commission artists in the wallet which seems to be the main point spouted by the OP'S who make these threads, but in all seriousness this can and very may will replace artists in many fields in terms of concept art, storyboarding and even animation could theoretically be at stake here. It will never replace those who just want to make art for the hell of it, but it doesn't change the fact that people are this ready and willing to abandon human made art in favor of this autonomically produced work.
    >Human art is toilet with name and banana on wall AI has SOVL
    You know this argument is bullshit and yet you say it anyway to block the fact that this is attempting to overwrite an intrinsic aspect of the human conscious and spirit.
    This is fire that is being played with here, why is it being so readily accepted?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >what does AI art truly mean for the future of human made art in general?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        honestly, based. Kenny should get a real job

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          moron, we are in /toon/. A board to discuss these people's job

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well there's your first mistake. Thinking of them as people. They're the enemy, they're often leftist and woke. You're supposed to be dehumanizing them whenever possible.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              2edgy4me

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >A board to discuss these people's job
            The entirety of Western comic book artistry has culminated in Marvel Movies and Gay Superman. I don't give two bloody shits about these mainstream artists. People with talent or passion will continue to exist, but humdrum assholes with more degrees than common sense will be out of a job. Who cares? They didn't care when automation and outsourcing took out factory jobs, and now the robot's coming for them.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >real job gets replaced by AI
          Oh no!
          Now what, you self-righteous gay?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            My parents are wealthy so not my problem.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Then don't talk any shit about having a "REEEEAAAL JOOOB" then, Trust Fundie Jr. You have no right to talk about things you'll never understand.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If they no longer bring any value or entertainment then simply get rid of the useless people.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              If they no longer bring any value or entertainment then simply get rid of the useless people.

              >trust fund gay
              Opinion literally as valuable as 1 million Venezuelan bolívares

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're not needed anymore.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If I cut your head off and take your money that means your life was useless.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm sure meeting you in a dark alley would be very scary but the reality is that the vast majority of the population will never even get the chance to see one of the 1% much less interact with them. You're not a real person, you're a rounding error in a spreadsheet and if you can't make the line go up then what use are you in the grand scheme of things?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Farming would have been automated decades ago if not for fags like Caeser Chavez

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The Cult of the Singularity is honestly one of the most frightening things I've ever witnessed. These creatures (for they're not people) despise humanity and are not just willing but excited to slavishly devote themselves to some imagined AI God to be saved from the sins of the world and their hellish meatbag existence by a technological Rapture. They are misanthropic psychos and they're the ones running the world.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There's two groups who push it, the lobotomized slopslurpers on reddit who want nothing more than to live in the pod and spend every waking moment in VR, and those who simply hope to use the technology to rule over others.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, so either way it's misanthropic psychos.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That was literally one of the three endings for Deus Ex btw.
                90% of people literally do not give a shit and will accept whatever demands an overlord will give so long as their livelihood and comforts aren't threatened.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Sounds like all religions.

                *tips fedora*

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Do you see a lot around you worth saving?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not a misanthropic tech cultist so yes.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              What these other anons are missing here is most artists are also trustafarians. They can jack off and make "art" all day because their parentage affords them the luxury. Art creation is the domain of the privileged, if you're born poor good fucking luck.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What comic and Issue?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I think this was from Judge Dredd Complete Case Files #1 or #2?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I get that this thread is purely here for demoralization
      don't feel so attacked, you just have competition now. May the best man/bot win

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In the long term, it'll definitely be a tool used to auto-generate shit nobody wants to draw by hand. Stuff like background scenes, concept art, all that. It can't exactly replace humanity entirely at this stage, the artwork still needs a human's direct involvement in the process if they want to actually copyright and sell the art. But I don't doubt that it'll help artists who can use AI generation to shake and bake a general outline before drawing up their own variant to something.

      But in the short term, it's likely going the same way as the NFT since the exact same crowd shilling them are also shilling this. Its value is going to be overestimated extra hard and inflate like mad until it comes crashing down because the people that traditionally willing to shell out the big bucks for art don't WANT mass-produced shit they could make on their own, and the people who are happy with using ai generation to make their masterpieces will already have done so or just bought the ai engines themselves. All the jackasses and pricks talking about how it'll replace humans are being wishful thinkers. It MIGHT do it. Or it might just end up being yet another short-term gimmick in the vast sea of toys and tools that are in abundance in the art world. We don't know yet, and the dumbasses that are trying to tell you otherwise to cash in are just trying to goad you into accepting it so they can sell you their computer generated images at marked up prices while pretending it's art.

      Basically, if there IS going to be a revolution in the art fields at hands, I heavily doubt it'll be at the hands of the retards screaming about how they've already won while desperately hoping to cash in on a market that hasn't fully formed yet. It'll be years before we see how useful this shit actually is in practice before we can determine that.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >and the people who are happy with using ai generation to make their masterpieces will already have done so or just bought the ai engines themselves.
        That's the crazy part about it. It's already free. It's out in the wild. People can do this shit at home on a gaming PC. They can just plug in new models for new art styles and refined quality. There are already people charging out the nose to provide AI service, but as the technology improves, the requirements are coming down, and soon you'd be able to do it on a smartphone, locally.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >They can just plug in new models for new art styles and refined quality
          That's what always makes me chuckle, how the AIgays will gloat about the obsolescence of artists, despite shamelessly swiping art from real artists to "train" their models to pump out what are at best shitty looking knockoffs.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Precisely. Their haste to build up hype is basically killing their intended market, and eventually the people who want art the old fashioned way will continue to do so while the people who want ai generated artwork will be able to make it without paying the programmers a dime. They're basically wetting themselves with glee over the trillions they expect to make before they've even brought the cow to market.

          >They can just plug in new models for new art styles and refined quality
          That's what always makes me chuckle, how the AIgays will gloat about the obsolescence of artists, despite shamelessly swiping art from real artists to "train" their models to pump out what are at best shitty looking knockoffs.

          Remember, they're coders, not artists. They know as much about what makes good art as the average fartknocker, they've just convinced themselves that they don't HAVE to know because a robot can just replicate what's "proven" to work. If you asked them to explain what's good about the art their ai makes, they'd more than likely freeze up and not have a clue what to say.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Every furry I know with a CS degree has a DeviantArt page

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >they're coders
            That's being quite generous to the people who keep spamming this.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >This is fire that is being played with here, why is it being so readily accepted?
      It doesn’t from what I’ve seen. Most normalfags don’t see it as anything more than a novelty, and those of differing views tend to lean more towards the “this is a butchery of art!” angle rather than a positive one. Frankly, the only people that by-and-large support AI art are techfags, and even then I’ve seen some wariness in that community about its potential applications for less-than-savory stuff. A couple of pajeets from Cinemaphile trying to start shit with other communities shouldn’t give you the impression of AI art being “readily accepted.”

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >look at those hands from pajindihars shitty prompt and render who could ever call this art!
        >now this, this here is true art with sovl
        both images are actually drawn with AI
        You're seeing AI generated art and not knowing it's AI generated art, which is where the "controversy" comes from. It's a tool and the fun part is that it's only fucking over macfags and other art school types who don't have real computers. If you're an artist and do have an actual style, it'd be worth generating a model from lineart for your own use for posework and matting out drawings. Turn the first hour of the drawing process into a few minutes iterating renders.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Did you reply to the wrong post? I’m not seeing how this correlates to my post.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're claiming it's being rejected by normies when normies are consooming it already. People have already picked up that "forklift certified" types will buy wolf Tshirts screen printed off an AI prompt as readily as they will something actually stolen off google images.
            It's literally only artists without actual job jobs who rely on commissions and cottage industry contract work who are shitting themselves.

            The rights scenario of things like

            [...]
            I’m pretty sure they already have.

            are entirely against the "artists" and is a direct result of them not understanding how publishing licenses and copyright law works when they willingly uploaded their portfolio to pixiv/artstation/deviantart.
            generating the model is noncommercial, off noncommercial/open license art freely uploaded to the internet. Then the model after being trained is then released and generates works released under a different license. All kosher. All comporting to the existing publishing licenses and copyright/trademark law.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Ah okay. I can’t say my experience is the same, as when I’ve seen the topic brought up among normies who don’t give two shits about art their opinions tended to fall under what I said. I won’t deny your words though, as most don’t seem to have a great understanding of these systems or their applications either, so even with these views I wouldn’t be surprised if they unintentionally buy into products featuring it regardless. Doing things thoughtlessly is practically a hallmark among these people, and if you’d qualify that as acceptance then it is done out of ignorance rather than acknowledgement.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Consciousness is an illusion and the spirit does not exist. Man is a machine of flesh and is building his own replacement.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Consciousness is an illusion

        What does this even mean? I experience qualia.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Back into your shitty little samsara reincarnation light trap, Archon.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that just sounds like religion with extra steps

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        what's your point?

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So, do you know how to fix that hand?

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    One wonders why Americans think that culture should make money. - Bruce Sterling

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Bruce Sterling
      Based. He's a better writer than William Gibson, if you ask me.

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >that time Victoria Von Doom put on a mask because her super-science couldn't cure her dog nose

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >standing on a chimney
      >shoulders as wide as a fucking fireplace
      kek

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that's literally her build, even the AI knows

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder how long it will take for someone to code a reverse-image-search for AI images. I.e. something that tells you what images were used for an AI produced image. Because most of them clearly just take a picture someone drew and then change the color or add in longer hair, with maybe changing the arm position slightly.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Probably never. There's a reason so many AI fags are too chickenshit to show what their prompts were.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Probably never. There's a reason so many AI fags are too chickenshit to show what their prompts were.

      I’m pretty sure they already have.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's hard to argue AI art isn't art when it only one in a thousand of these pictures looks good. It clearly needs a skilled hand at the machine running the thing.

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If art is merely human expression, why are artists afraid of AI? Having a bunch of porn generated by some random dude won't make their artwork worthless.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is it cheaper than hiring a human artist?
      Then it will inevitably completely replace the human artist in everything that involves money.
      Production, commission, promotion.

      And once the artists lose income from art as a product there is no economic base for their art as culture, or anything else.
      They will finally, once and for all, have to get real jobs, learn actual professions with their time instead of the arts.
      All that will be left is the rich upper class hobbyist learning to scribble on the side. And a hobbyist will never be a Michaelangelo, someone who could reach the heights he did because he could dedicate his whole life to the professions of paintings and sculptures.

      With the roots gone the tree is dead, even if people loved its fruit.
      It's not that complex.
      It's the most basic and simple economic reality.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >economics argument
        >living in an age where art "supplies" and art training as entirely free
        >where 2D drawing work has been relegated to scabs in SEA yet people still make art everywhere for the sake of it and the le upvotes
        >where people routinely put hundreds of hours into their hobby because real people feel the need to create and aren't doing it for vanity.

        Funny how the utopian commies who think Logan's Run is a pretty swell idea are the first to show their materialist true colors when someone is going to redistribute their resources instead of give them someone elses.
        >I want the ability to make art for the people
        >good, everyone can
        >No not like that!

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Mere hobbyists are good enough, okay?
          >Please ignore all the death screams of culture dying ok
          >Embrace the hedonist trivial culture

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >this is the thing that killed #culture
            Friend look around, Craig of the Creek exists. What you think is culture is a puppeted skin suit that needs to finally go in the ground. Meritocracy and "real" art are at their furthest points from each other in all of human history. There are no michaelangelo's anymore. That's a kid in Bancock with an artstation account while "real art" is post post post modernist banana's taped to walls only ever bought to lie on tax forms and clean money. There is no Walt Disney or even a butch hartmann anymore, just bean heads and brown gay carchuds.

            When the AI animation programs hit the scene, it's going to kill the industry and the world will be that ever bit brighter when network animation out of Burbank can't compete with a rando with an RTX card and an idea.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >kill the industry and the world will be that ever bit brighter
              Sure. Agree.

              >a rando with an RTX card and an idea.
              ...The future is a pitch black dark void.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              And here we have three of the worst takes:
              >mUh CuLtUrE
              >I can't enjoy something so no one can
              >This is not art. True art is this pretentious shit I fished out of the toilet.

              No wonder people in the West cheer when artists lose their jobs.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >AI Seether defends ~~*modern art*~~
                Like pottery

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >le upvotes
          You really are projecting your rage over not getting attention on the internet, aren't you?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >projecting as your gums bleed over the thought of rapid drawing programs killing your pixiv dreams faster than mastercard.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >projecting as your gums bleed
              What's your native tongue, boy?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                remember to unclench your jaw buddy

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Kara
    How did I do/How did I make the AI do, anons?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unf! Sexy

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Be artist
    >Spend days drawing comic
    >Nobody buys it

    >Be AI artist
    >Spend hours generating comic
    >Nobody buys it

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >posting /toon/ girls in generic artstation goblin style
    have some fucking standards and download the proper models, christ.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >muh mooodels
      >results look like the same grade of "screencaps or other fanart traced and shooped by an alzheimers patient" slop that's plagued DA since the 00s
      AIcucks are truly pathetic

      You're not needed anymore.

      Oy vey.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >anon seething his own DA isn't going to get updoots
        lol, lmao

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Which model did you use?

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Paying money to calarts to learn how to draw
    Nah, I'd sooner pick up a How To Draw Manga book. Point is that all the talk about art quality is technically irrelevant, cause this shit was never about the art itself. Programs like stable diffusion aren't literal art making machines, they're bots that have the brainpower needed to process and mimic image generation better than they have in previous years. They don't MAKE anything better than a human can, they just know how to slap shit together a lot better than they used to. It's legitimately impressive shit on a technical level, I'm happy to give it that. But it's embarrassing to see all the people that are hailing this shit as the downfall of Calarts and fetish artists when they don't even understand what it is they're claiming to celebrate.

    >they're coders
    That's being quite generous to the people who keep spamming this.

    I gotta call them something besides shills.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I gotta call them something besides shills.
      He's saying that they're Pajeets who are notoriously awful coders.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >u don't even understand
      >still coping that it's just photobashing

      It's a neuralnet training model AI that is literally learning to draw the way a human does. It isn't tracing or kitbashing grass like the humans cluttering up artstation and deviantart. Your art isn't actually "in" the training set anymore than it's "in" the head of an artist who has studied the same work. That's why the models can be blended and weighted to create new models.

      >muh fetish muh unique art
      if it's not shit then someone will spend the hundred dollarydoos to get a model iterated. That's why models are out for disney, DC, pixar, overwatch, and furry porn m8.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >literally learning to draw the way a human does
        You are absolutely retarded.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >willful Ignorance of how neural net training works
          The models don't store any photos because it isn't drawing off of them, it's drawing off of training data from humans telling it it's replicating a style correctly.

          You can't copyright or trademark a style and everything idiots have uploaded to pixiv and DeviantArt is under some creative Commons license, the thing that lets them use trademarked characters. Frothing seethe at not knowing where the rights fall on "your" sonic OCs is a never ending source of entertainment as people learn AI can be told it's drawing like them.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Humans develop their artwork from observing and interacting with the real world, understanding artistic fundamentals, and applying it all to a variety subjects. That's nothing like how a machine learns to draw. It ONLY learns from analyzing the end result of digital 2D images. Again, you're a retard.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Muh sovl tier nonargument
              >Still doesn't know how AI term training works
              lol

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Post your deviantart to totally own Stablepoo-loosion bro. Show the world what true human inspiration can do!

  39. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like bunnies.

  40. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >/toon/
    >Not even posting western e-boi while cope vandalizing
    Pathetic on all fronts

  41. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You're not from around these parts if you don't have a few gigs of Gwen Tennyson on hand. This some kind of really tedious, ill thought out consensus crack effort?

    AI is going to do great things for democratizing animation production and shit canning all you chuds in Burbank.

  42. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Nononono that's my unique way of drawing team sonic scalie OCs you can't do this, no reposts and no copying this is the unique trademarked work of @edgeshadow6669 DeviantArt you can't do this I withdraw consent via comment because that's how this works right???1!
    The funniest part in all of this is it's the selfsame infighting of you hacks writ large. Your shit is copies of IP and copies of real artist styles and you did it for the updoots, not for the sake of it, because to you art is a cargo cult. You're doing an excellent job of showing the character of "artists" and why everyone is so glad they won't need to hire you.

  43. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >surely vandalizing /toon/ will show the world that the real problem is AI taking my upvotes

  44. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The cute and funny part is that the novelAI leaked model can draw e-boi every bit as generic as this. Bugman art is a terrible example to use when it was the first thing you could generate at the press of a button.

    I'm just glad the people are shelling out the cash to model western styles now. Eventually someone will get around to new retro and beanart just to make animation industry storyboarders and show designers kill themselves.

  45. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Pixiv purge has you on a short fuse doesn't it chang.
    First AI "steals" "your" art and now you can't monetize it anyway.

  46. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Art doesn't matter for porn. As long as people get their tags of choice presented in a manner that isn't disgusting for the 35seconds they're looking at it, it will do the job just as well as dicky you spent 8h on. Even if it is recycling parts, there's more images to pull from than anyone could know or recognize so they won't notice. Pornography is lowest common denominator garbage so of course it'll be the first form of 'art' replaced.

  47. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  48. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I'm not paid. All porn is abhorrent to me so an ai melted pile of limbs and pussy are no more or less valuable than what you do. And now you can see that the average coomer doesn't see a difference either. Did you really think these people cared about the quality of rustles floors? They're just beating their meat for a tiny bit of feel-good.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Great job but this is /toon/ not /aco/ nor /b/
      Go to an ophthalmologist

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What they're coping about is that fact artists are taking generated content, upscaling it, then finishing it in a tenth of the time it would take to draw the lions share of the image. Then going on to win contests and get accolades while not disclosing until they can dab on their fellow "artists" that the evocative and groundbreaking transcendentalist masterpiece the fart sniffers were praising took their gtx3090 20 seconds to render.

      It's all hypocrisy at the end of the day, the fucking cope about photobashing is projection from the fact these hacks steal images to make backgrounds and trace art all the fucking time because they usually can get away with it.

      In a professional setting I've been using it for generating reference images to hand to artists or map out the framing of content.
      >and logo and GUI element design
      graphic design is a dead career now. Globohomo clipart bullshit that is cheap and offensively inoffensive will hopefully die due to people wanting something more aesthetic. We're going to see a lot more anime girls in advertisements

  49. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Were janitors paid off to let this thread stay alive?

  50. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >sampleposting
    cringe

  51. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    All I learnt today is that you have a poop fetish

  52. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    still find it wild that yall would take the chance of having e-boi shit saved on your computer, especially if your in the USA

  53. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good morning sirs

  54. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Inevitably.
    Yes.

  55. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Probably not, this new fad one seems pretty weak even it's basically doing shit that old face generator has been doing for years already but worse. Artists can probably use it as a tool, but people really underestimate how little patience that people who hire artists actually have, so this will likely only be something to be used by better artists while just a novelty for hobbyists but not really replacing anyone except maybe those people who just make derivative logos on fiverr.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, didn't you read the post above? Some ideas guy is totally going to make the next amazing cartoon with his animation generator.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >too new to know newgrounds

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Maybe they will if they stick to it, but it'll likely be a pretty difficult endeavor that he needs patience for. Actual people who need art and animation likely won't care to learn to make the process 100% AI driven especially if it means they're the ones doing it and it'll just be used for shortcuts by people who dedicated more time to animation.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The majority of people shilling for these ai programs absolutely wouldn't have the patience for such a task. They don't even have the patience to see who's happy paying out the nose for this tech before declaring the art industry dead. What potential there is for this tech still isn't going to be apparent until years from now at best due to the level of internal connections the neural networks still need to build to get to the quality that animators would find useful. Most of the good results people are showcasing on media using their own libraries worth of pictures, so unless these animators are willing to spend hours upon hours feeding the AI neural net, they're still better off animating it by hand and using a frame interpolation tool to trim time down for the present.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Thousands of idea guy spiritual successors to Linkara will pump the internet full of their very own Lightbringers

        Oh goody... The power of commissioner being made the director and the artist...

  56. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like Poopjeet got some time off from monitoring the designated shitting street again.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >sweet and funny poster buckbroken by the janny
      >still seething about indians because Xers commissions dried up after the first thing corporations did was make this shit draw furries and porn

  57. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You need AI do something that children are able to do with ease. Do you realize how pathetic that is?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If children can do it with ease why are artists even paid to begin with??

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *