Arnold or Sly, who is the greatest kinoture of all time?
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Arnold or Sly, who is the greatest kinoture of all time?
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Sly is the better actor. First Blood, Rocky, etc.
Arnold has great physical comedic timing.
Sly writes, directs and has the more versatile filmography.
Arnold was just something to behold.
Sly is more versatile, in the end as an actor alone
>Demolition Man
>Copland
>Get Carter (yes, I rate it)
>Tango & Cash
Shwarzenegger
T2
Commando
Predator
Yes. But Arnold is the better movie star.
this. just look at mickey's death scene in rocky 3
>Sly is the better actor.
This.
Arnold is just a big, goofy, foreign dude that's fun to cheer for because he seems like a legit bro.
>"frick your freedom!"
he is, but Arnold was the better action star.
both are homosexuals who sucked their way to the hollywood
kinoture?
*ahem*
Predator arnold was peak
is this supposed to convince me that he's the better actor?
Yes
>you've failed your highness
his most convincing role of those was in t1. several of those, including batman, conan and, yes, t2 feature poor acting. arnie doesnt come across like a machine in t2 more like a wooden actor
Almost certainly Arnie.
none of his movies are as good as rocky 1 and first blood.
Predator alone mogs both
it's not called "rocky 1" you moron, it's called "one-in-a-million".
at least be consistent you fricking cancerous c**t
Total recall will forever be the best action flick of all time
sly has been in a lot more mediocre to bad movies than arnold.
And that's not even counting Sly's late career run of dogshit. He was putting out bad movies when they were both big and current.
Sly has been in 82 movies, Shwarzenegger has been in 40 movies, so unfair comparison.
>implying John Cazale isn't a better actor than Sly
Sly's a much better actor but Arnie has the best filmography of anyone.
They were both 80's action star gods and struggled to reinvent themselves in the nineties.
T2 marked the beginning of the nineties so Arnold got lucky with that. Rest of his nineties run was pretty much a dud with the main audience.
Sly had 'Demolition Man', which is great, but I don't recall it being an instant hit. He was pretty much relegated to a guy you'd watch on tv.
They were both struggling in the nineties. I think Sly is shitty for trying to make a movie about pretty much every sports discipline under the sun.
>Boxing
>Soccer
>Armwrestling
>Climber
>Formula 1
And he plays the underdog who prevails every single fricking time.
>Stallone is a writer
Yeah, frick that guy
That's why Tango & Cash is cool. He plays the chad.
As a massive Arnie fan, Rocky is probably better than any Arnie movie ever made. But I will say Arnold over all.
Sandra you minx
sly has a better career and accomplishments. he is a talented actor, writer and director
but I like Schwarzenegger more
Its Arnold, but Sly gave him a run for his money. Sly shouldve done more sci fi.
What does he do in 'Copland'? He plays the sad sack of shit who goes on to win the day. Again.
I watched the new one because Cinemaphile recommended it and it was awesome. So thanks, Cinemaphile
The 2012 Dredd is kino.
Stallone has the better personal story. Lots of Arnold's success boils down to "I bullied people to get what I wanted" while Stallone worked hard to make opportunities for himself.
I don’t care. I’ll lament the passing of both as cornerstones of action cinema.
Well Arnold was always a brainless moron who was (is) gay4pay and completely devoid of any morality; so Stallone.
They’re both meatheads.
>arnie fricks his goblin maid
>stallone rage spergs when Richard gere eats chicken
arnold has way more kinos under his belt, sly has way more C tier action slop for pajeets under his belt
Steven Seagal.