Have you not seen box office numbers lately? Hollywood is desperate for revenue. 4 movies means 4 ticket sales for the same bullshit.
this reminds me of the old variant covers of comic books designed to get needs to buy 4 of the same issue. It was a desperate ploy then, and it still is.
The Beatles are completely irrelevant to anyone but western boomers, so unless hollywood wants to modernize them (make them gay black women) all 4 of these films are going to fail.
What a moronic idea. Just make a singular Beatles movie or a TV series or something.
FPWP. I can see how it could lead to bloat (and the concern about, er "wokeshit", for lack of a better word, is valid. However, there are a few considerations that you have failed to grasp, because you're dumb zoomies and aren't fans:
1) In A Hard Day's Night, one of the subtle things that makes it a good movie that's actually interesting to watch, is that although they spend time together as a band and do fun band stuff, the film also spends significant time with each member SOLO, ALONE. One of them goes for a walk by himself and talks to townspeople, another goes to the store, that sort of thing. They're "playing" themselves, but it gives a sense of each member's individual personality, in the film at least.
2) Each member went on to have a successful solo career, which creates a little fodder for the back half/third of each man's biopic. Lennon's assassination is sexy subject matter, and also George was attacked in his house like a year or two before he died (I tend to think that the trauma of that contributed to his death).
So is the John Lennon movie half as long as the others?
Not reading all of that. I still stand by the idea that The Beatles don't deserve four separate movies especially since everyone and their mom already knows their stories. A miniseries makes more sense.
Ever heard of Pauls self named 'Black & White MInstrel Show'?
Paul had two hookers in one room, one of which was black and the other white in the same hotel his girlfriend was sleeping in. The show was trying to hide them from her.
>be john Lennon >steal your music from others and make the world's biggest band >beat your wacky, squawking wife >start a peace and love brand of communism to spread to the youth for decades to come >get shot and die
Ringo had the best arc. He's been married to the Bond girl from Spy Who Loved Me for 45 years and will likely have the final word on The Beatles before leaving this world.
>The John Lennon one will be 50% about how he beat his wife
I've never seen any evidence of this actually happening. Other than John himself saying so once. And I literally think he was lying for attention there.
>And I literally think he was lying for attention there.
His ex wife wrote an auto-biograpy confirming some of it but saying it only happened when they were very young. She did confirm that he was very controlling despite sleeping with other women behind her back. He apparently had one of his friends proposition her to help in the divorce proceedings when he was leaving her for Yoko.
>His ex wife wrote an auto-biograpy confirming some of it
The opposite. His highly estranged ex-wife wrote a tell all book that distinctly LACKED any wife beating. And I don't know why she would hold back something so juicy. The one reported incident that comes close is when he got super jealous she was dancing with other men, or something like that, and started getting physical with her as the argument escalated. But this isn't even slapping let alone battered wife punching/kicking. Shook her etc. And rather than being a victim she got so mad at the experience she broke up with him and they didn't get back together till months later when he came back begging and apologising.
Years later I think he drew from that one experience to sell some hippie "I once was lost but now I'm found" male feminist BS guru message. He was lying. He was never a wife beater. Hella emotionally abusive though.
>And I don't know why she would hold back something so juicy.
Because she doesn't want to be known as the pitiful beaten ex wife of the man she loved? It's a humiliating position to be in, she may have wanted people to know she was treated badly but she would also want people to think that he at least loved her a bit.
There are other sources for for him hitting Cynthia, like in Hunter Davies book. >"Molly, the cleaning woman, once caught John hitting me, really clowning me. She said I was a silly girl to get mixed up in something like that".
Thelma Pickles said this: >"We were close until around Easter of the following year, 1959. At an art school dance he took me to a darkened classroom. We went thinking we'd have it to ourselves but it was evident from the din that we weren't alone. I wasn't going to have an intimate soirée with other people present. I refused to stay, and he yanked me back and whacked me one. He had aggressive traits, mainly verbal, but never in private had he ever been aggressive – quite the opposite. Once he'd hit me that was it for me, I wouldn't speak to him."
May Pang wrote: >As he was about to pass John the bottle I slipped in between them. My intent was not to stop John from getting the bottle, but it appeared that way to him. He turned and looked at me, a hurt expression on his face. He was drunk and looked very confused. Slowly he reached out, put his hands around my throat, and proceeded to strangle me. As his hands closed tighter I screamed and tried to pull away, but he was incredibly strong. Everything froze. It seemed as if no one could believe what they were witnessing. It couldn’t have been more than a few seconds, but it seemed an eternity with John’s hands around my neck. Harry snapped to life and pulled John off me. I must say I believe Harry Nilsson saved my life that night.
He admitted to hitting women because he hit women, he wasn't playing 3d chess and manipulating the public in doing so.
well it's true they both live at the expense of white men who created for them the most comfy civilization in history times a hundred...and hate them for it
>Rape and kill my ancestors >Treat me like shit in high school destroying me self esteem and subsequently making my life harder in all aspects >Refuse to date me because I'm not eurocentric in looks
Thanks so much white people
Oh boo hoo b***h, I'll bet more of your ancestors were raped by people the same shit color as you
You were treated like shit in high-school because you have shitty character to begin with, your life is only as hard as YOU make it.
People refuse to date you because you are ugly as frick and have a shit personality, your skin color is secondary
What did you expect? These moronic parents deciding to raise their ugly brown children in a white country, of course the child is going to have an inferiority complex.
As soon as I hear someone praise the beatles I know its safe to ignore everything they have to say. They're either a braindead boomer or even worse a gen x or millennial who was so cucked they let their brain be an empty vessel to be filled by what boomers told them was "significant art". Glad the younger generations seem to be free from the boomer chains and beatles fans are rightfully dying out.
As soon as I hear someone praise the beatles I know its safe to ignore everything they have to say. They're either a braindead boomer or even worse a gen x or millennial who was so cucked they let their brain be an empty vessel to be filled by what boomers told them was "significant art". Glad the younger generations seem to be free from the boomer chains and beatles fans are rightfully dying out.
Why? Nobody in the world knows who these boomer fricks are. Go to Africa, Latin America, India or China and ask them if they know the Beatles without a picture. Nobody will
You are proving my point about top 5s being invalid. You just want someone to list a top 5 so you can insult them based on it. Top 5s are just virtue signalling, they aren't a real thing.
3 months ago
Anonymous
You call one of the most acclaimed and influential bands of all times “trash” nad you’re too much of an insecure b***h to even share the music you like, fearing you’ll get ridiculed on an anonymous forum.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No I didn't moron, all I said was that top 5s aren't a real thing.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Being acclaimed doesn't mean shit boomer. You just have a warped perception of them because of how famous they were. Taylor Swift is "acclaimed" too.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Not among critics, she’s just famous, no one who knows anything thinks she actually makes good music. Everyone knew the beatles were making good music.
3 months ago
Anonymous
((Critics))
Are worthless
3 months ago
Anonymous
Not as worthless as anon’s opinion on Cinemaphile. Yeah, literally everyone who matters agrees the beatles made good music but anon knows better, he’s giga-brain, has it all figured out but he won’t even tell you what music he likes.
3 months ago
Anonymous
You're talking to several anons and I told you what I like. If you think the beatles are better than the doors then I'm sorry but you're a confirmed homosexual
Are you insulted because you love to tell other people what your "top 5" is? Did you just get finished updating your social media account with a new list or something?
Billboard did this, they asked hundreds of thousands of people on social media to vote for the best artist of all time
Michael Jackson
45%
Madonna
18%
Mariah Carey
15%
Prince
7%
Taylor Swift
3%
Janet Jackson
2%
The Beatles
2%
Rihanna
2%
Whitney Houston
1%
Elton John
1%
Chicago
1%
Barbra Streisand
1%
Drake
1%
Elvis Presley
<0.9%
Blows my mind because it really feels like MJ hasnt had that much staying power. For how popular he was, you dont really hear his music played a whole lot compared to the Beatles or Elvis and so on. I dont really people who claim to be fans of Michael Jackson anymore.
>Madonna
Do westoids really lmao. 18% think some roastie singing about getting fricked is the best musical artist of all time. Don't even know what to say.
1) ELO
2) Dio
3) The Eagles
4) Kansas
5) Blue Oyster Cult
The Beatles are for women and gays. Their music revolutionized almost nothing besides manufactured hype, which still exists today and stems back to “beatlemania” of which, fans were given pamphlets that told them how to act. Because boomers are moronic, they obeyed a piece of paper. Their entire legacy is built off of peer pressure.
>gay people listen more music on internet than boomers
:O
The Beatles music was also limited online to the point that people were doing their own versions or songs with tracks missing (like orchestration) that people lapped up. The version of I am the Walrus most seen on youtube is an edited track that would only sound weird to a Beatles fan who listened to the master. THe same thing Dylan where a guys cover of Knockin' on Heavens Door falsely listed as Dylans has been viewed over 10 million times (where boomers comment that it sounds just like it did back in their day).
Probably the best candidate for a biopic because of his inner turmoils. All or Nothing At All was great. They have to let his music tell the story. he didnt write the songs so hopefully you dont have that moronic scene where he gets the ideads for songs. HIs mood dictated the album which is great for a movie. MY only thing is that i dont really like the song My Way and that would probably be the big closer.
DiCaprio was supposed to be Frank but Nancy Sinatra put her foot down because Scorcese wanted to focus it more on his mafia/JFK connections than the more interesting aspects of his professional life. He and Bing Crosby were far and away the biggest entertainers of the 20th century.
>He and Bing Crosby were far and away the biggest entertainers of the 20th century
World population tripled and information technology greatly improved in the latter half so I doubt it.
I've seen this same moronic retort on here before and it's easily swatted away with world charting history; touring attendance and box office numbers. I'm sorry you can't accept that a big eared Irish drunk and balding dago crooner were as wildly popular as they were all the way until they died but these things are true rather you want to accept that or not.
>Lifetime sellout rate
99% - Michael Jackson >Concerts with over 100,000 paid attendees
11 - Michael Jackson >Average lifetime tour attendance
4.3 Million - Michael Jackson >Most sold out concerts / tickets per region
Europe - Wembley Stadium - Michael Jackson - 15 times
Asia - Tokyo Dome - Michael Jackson - 20 times
Latin America - Estadio Azteca - Michael Jackson - 5 times
South America - Estadio Monumental - Coldplay - 10 times
South Africa - Michael Jackson - 280,000
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Lifetime sell out rate - 99%
That's fricking insane, will never be duplicated ever
No other band has did what the Beatles did. To release a dozen albums and a single every couple of months in a span of 8 years. IN that time, their music eveolved and embraced and propagated diffrent genres and subgenres. THey did this whilst being the biggest band in the world. mOst bands and artists dont evolve past their current state (and only by increments) and release an album every 4 years now.
I will only be attending Ringo's movie.
Lennongays and McCartneyqueers need not respond to me. Harrisonbros are alright, I just don't want to watch his movie.
It's such a moronic idea to split them in 4 and have them all hit the cinemas no way they aren't going to flop horrendously, not to mention that it's going to be pretty humilliating when Ringo's performs the worst by far.
>lifemogs every other rockstar in history despite dying at 32 >still no biopic
Is it because the movie would have to be 15 hours long to cover all of his major stories?
>was the only surfer in the beach boys >beaten the worse by his father and was the wildest brother in the family >started drumming out of a necessity and for fun >watches his brother become mentally unstable as the group becomes bigger >starts to find himself in the studio >befriends Charles Manson because he wants to help him write songs >feels guilt because he introduced Manson to Terry Melcher whose house was host to the murders >his music becomes more melancholic and deeper >his substance abuse grows out of control and and his wild lifestyle puts him in debt >kicked out of the band >goes out everyday with a jug to fill up on rum at the liquor store >is seen wandering the beach at first unrecognisable to fans and friends >lives day to day sleeping on couches and occasionally by the seaside >goes out on a boat with friend to recover his ex-wifes belongings which he threw in the ocean three years earlier >friend falls asleep whilst wilson was diving drunk and evntually bumped his head on the bottom of the boat >found lying on the seabed in the foetal position
I wouldn't want any more Beach Boys films/documentaries.
Part of the fun of getting into the Beach Boys is that their early stuff is well known and accessible while the post Pet Sounds stuff is a goldmine of professionally made experimental shit and crazy lore that is largely ignored in the mainstream, so it feels like you're discovering it for yourself. If everything about them was cannonised in the same way as the Beatles then it would make them less interesting.
Also Love & Mercy is a great film, I doubt it would be topped.
The Beach Boys music was like a treasure hunt. They literally had a dozen albums worth of unreleased material beyond the Smile era. A lot of it has been released now and it makes you question why some songs were released and others werent. Fans are now making their own albums from that material.
Ringo probably would be the most interesting character if done right. He doesnt struggle with his identity or role in the group and doesnt let the whole thing overwhelm him. MIght be the best way to tell the story.
What a moronic idea. Just make a singular Beatles movie or a TV series or something.
Have you not seen box office numbers lately? Hollywood is desperate for revenue. 4 movies means 4 ticket sales for the same bullshit.
this reminds me of the old variant covers of comic books designed to get needs to buy 4 of the same issue. It was a desperate ploy then, and it still is.
The Beatles are completely irrelevant to anyone but western boomers, so unless hollywood wants to modernize them (make them gay black women) all 4 of these films are going to fail.
So we're all agreed the Ringo movie is going to flop, right?
It really is a fricking awful idea. And, of course, you know they're going to pack 50s/60s Liverpool and London with nogs.
FPWP. I can see how it could lead to bloat (and the concern about, er "wokeshit", for lack of a better word, is valid. However, there are a few considerations that you have failed to grasp, because you're dumb zoomies and aren't fans:
1) In A Hard Day's Night, one of the subtle things that makes it a good movie that's actually interesting to watch, is that although they spend time together as a band and do fun band stuff, the film also spends significant time with each member SOLO, ALONE. One of them goes for a walk by himself and talks to townspeople, another goes to the store, that sort of thing. They're "playing" themselves, but it gives a sense of each member's individual personality, in the film at least.
2) Each member went on to have a successful solo career, which creates a little fodder for the back half/third of each man's biopic. Lennon's assassination is sexy subject matter, and also George was attacked in his house like a year or two before he died (I tend to think that the trauma of that contributed to his death).
SPBP.
Not reading all of that. I still stand by the idea that The Beatles don't deserve four separate movies especially since everyone and their mom already knows their stories. A miniseries makes more sense.
So is the John Lennon movie half as long as the others?
>"life begins at for..aaaaargh"
half as long but with twice as much wife beating
Who would want to watch anything past 1970 anyway.
>he doesn’t want to see john getting kicked out of nightclubs with harry nilsson and asian gf #2
speak for yourself, b***h
Wife beaters... We're so fricking back.
Only John and Ringo were wifebeaters, Paul and George just cheated on them infinitely.
Ever heard of Pauls self named 'Black & White MInstrel Show'?
Paul had two hookers in one room, one of which was black and the other white in the same hotel his girlfriend was sleeping in. The show was trying to hide them from her.
Paul's would be even shorter then. Billy's would be LotR length.
What is wrong with boomers. What is it with this band and them?
Ask the boomers running Tavistock.
The Beach Boys are great American music.
The John Lennon one will be 50% about how he beat his wife and 50% about how he stole everything he ever did from women and minorities.
>be john Lennon
>steal your music from others and make the world's biggest band
>beat your wacky, squawking wife
>start a peace and love brand of communism to spread to the youth for decades to come
>get shot and die
Wew lad. This is why I stick with Ringo.
>This is why I stick with Ringo
>movie is about an alcoholic wife beater who struggles to find his purpose after the collapse of the band
kino
Ringo had the best arc. He's been married to the Bond girl from Spy Who Loved Me for 45 years and will likely have the final word on The Beatles before leaving this world.
you forgot to mention "got BTFO by robin quivers"
?si=G32lVxJJr9S_Qsdl&t=377
They'll just roll in a third Paul and keep the shit going, now that i think about it the current one gotta be the fifth Paul or so.
Whoever it is that replaced the original Paul is much more talented tbh
less handsome doe
>The John Lennon one will be 50% about how he beat his wife
I've never seen any evidence of this actually happening. Other than John himself saying so once. And I literally think he was lying for attention there.
>And I literally think he was lying for attention there.
His ex wife wrote an auto-biograpy confirming some of it but saying it only happened when they were very young. She did confirm that he was very controlling despite sleeping with other women behind her back. He apparently had one of his friends proposition her to help in the divorce proceedings when he was leaving her for Yoko.
>His ex wife wrote an auto-biograpy confirming some of it
The opposite. His highly estranged ex-wife wrote a tell all book that distinctly LACKED any wife beating. And I don't know why she would hold back something so juicy. The one reported incident that comes close is when he got super jealous she was dancing with other men, or something like that, and started getting physical with her as the argument escalated. But this isn't even slapping let alone battered wife punching/kicking. Shook her etc. And rather than being a victim she got so mad at the experience she broke up with him and they didn't get back together till months later when he came back begging and apologising.
Years later I think he drew from that one experience to sell some hippie "I once was lost but now I'm found" male feminist BS guru message. He was lying. He was never a wife beater. Hella emotionally abusive though.
I heard that he used to smack Julian around and emotionally torture him despite adoring Sean.
>And I don't know why she would hold back something so juicy.
Because she doesn't want to be known as the pitiful beaten ex wife of the man she loved? It's a humiliating position to be in, she may have wanted people to know she was treated badly but she would also want people to think that he at least loved her a bit.
There are other sources for for him hitting Cynthia, like in Hunter Davies book.
>"Molly, the cleaning woman, once caught John hitting me, really clowning me. She said I was a silly girl to get mixed up in something like that".
Thelma Pickles said this:
>"We were close until around Easter of the following year, 1959. At an art school dance he took me to a darkened classroom. We went thinking we'd have it to ourselves but it was evident from the din that we weren't alone. I wasn't going to have an intimate soirée with other people present. I refused to stay, and he yanked me back and whacked me one. He had aggressive traits, mainly verbal, but never in private had he ever been aggressive – quite the opposite. Once he'd hit me that was it for me, I wouldn't speak to him."
May Pang wrote:
>As he was about to pass John the bottle I slipped in between them. My intent was not to stop John from getting the bottle, but it appeared that way to him. He turned and looked at me, a hurt expression on his face. He was drunk and looked very confused. Slowly he reached out, put his hands around my throat, and proceeded to strangle me. As his hands closed tighter I screamed and tried to pull away, but he was incredibly strong. Everything froze. It seemed as if no one could believe what they were witnessing. It couldn’t have been more than a few seconds, but it seemed an eternity with John’s hands around my neck. Harry snapped to life and pulled John off me. I must say I believe Harry Nilsson saved my life that night.
He admitted to hitting women because he hit women, he wasn't playing 3d chess and manipulating the public in doing so.
the beatles cinematic universe
>I'm putting together a band
Motherfricker. Best me to it.
Clown world is just the gift that keeps on giving.
>women are the Black folk of gender
He really said that wtf
well it's true they both live at the expense of white men who created for them the most comfy civilization in history times a hundred...and hate them for it
>Rape and kill my ancestors
>Treat me like shit in high school destroying me self esteem and subsequently making my life harder in all aspects
>Refuse to date me because I'm not eurocentric in looks
Thanks so much white people
Ok go back to africa then I'm sure they'll treat you much better
No problem. You go back to Europe and leave America to the Natives then.
No, borderline animals have no special right to land they happen to squat on
You forgot the buck breaking. So much anal rape. And thanks to epigenetics... it stuck
Oh boo hoo b***h, I'll bet more of your ancestors were raped by people the same shit color as you
You were treated like shit in high-school because you have shitty character to begin with, your life is only as hard as YOU make it.
People refuse to date you because you are ugly as frick and have a shit personality, your skin color is secondary
Take personal responsibility or just frickin kys
to date me
Fascinating. Pray tell, why would you want to date somebody who you claim to dislike so much?
I never said I dislike whites. Just don't think they realize how hard being non white is
i'm sorry about those last 2 (and on some level i can relate) but i refuse to believe anyone actually cares about what happened to their ancestors.
You'd be a fricking loser if you were white too.
What did you expect? These moronic parents deciding to raise their ugly brown children in a white country, of course the child is going to have an inferiority complex.
As soon as I hear someone praise the beatles I know its safe to ignore everything they have to say. They're either a braindead boomer or even worse a gen x or millennial who was so cucked they let their brain be an empty vessel to be filled by what boomers told them was "significant art". Glad the younger generations seem to be free from the boomer chains and beatles fans are rightfully dying out.
Black person detected
This, they were always a homosexual boy band for queers and women
Name your top 5 artists gay
Why? Nobody in the world knows who these boomer fricks are. Go to Africa, Latin America, India or China and ask them if they know the Beatles without a picture. Nobody will
>no real answer
Comme on gay. Show us your refined taste, since you seem to know good music.
Ok ok ill be serious, artists with more talent than the beatles:
Herbie Hanwiener
The Doors
Howlin Wolf
Lil B
Pooh Sheisty
The only respectable rapper is MF DOOM.
You are proving my point about top 5s being invalid. You just want someone to list a top 5 so you can insult them based on it. Top 5s are just virtue signalling, they aren't a real thing.
You call one of the most acclaimed and influential bands of all times “trash” nad you’re too much of an insecure b***h to even share the music you like, fearing you’ll get ridiculed on an anonymous forum.
No I didn't moron, all I said was that top 5s aren't a real thing.
Being acclaimed doesn't mean shit boomer. You just have a warped perception of them because of how famous they were. Taylor Swift is "acclaimed" too.
Not among critics, she’s just famous, no one who knows anything thinks she actually makes good music. Everyone knew the beatles were making good music.
((Critics))
Are worthless
Not as worthless as anon’s opinion on Cinemaphile. Yeah, literally everyone who matters agrees the beatles made good music but anon knows better, he’s giga-brain, has it all figured out but he won’t even tell you what music he likes.
You're talking to several anons and I told you what I like. If you think the beatles are better than the doors then I'm sorry but you're a confirmed homosexual
The beatles >> The Who >>> Morrison’s gay band
Normal people don't have a top 5, they just enjoy things. Having top 5s is for homosexuals that like what their choices say about them.
By far the dumbest thing I've read in a thread recently and I've been to Cinemaphile lately
Are you insulted because you love to tell other people what your "top 5" is? Did you just get finished updating your social media account with a new list or something?
Lil B
Lil Wayne
Lil Kim
Lil Durk
Pooh Sheisty
>Likes band of 4 gays who liked to open their mouths to be bukakked by blacks and indians
>Calls anybody else a gay.
Nothing gets through the thick skull of a beatles troony apart from a bullet. Not gonna play your game.
If you asked normies to vote from a pool of Drake, Madonna, Taylor Swift, The Beatles. The Beatles would get the least amount of votes
Yeah normies don’t know good music.
i agree. i was also born in the wrong generation and listen to boyband pop music from the 60s. i'm not gay btw
60s music was the best, but sure stick to your trap or whatever.
Billboard did this, they asked hundreds of thousands of people on social media to vote for the best artist of all time
Michael Jackson
45%
Madonna
18%
Mariah Carey
15%
Prince
7%
Taylor Swift
3%
Janet Jackson
2%
The Beatles
2%
Rihanna
2%
Whitney Houston
1%
Elton John
1%
Chicago
1%
Barbra Streisand
1%
Drake
1%
Elvis Presley
<0.9%
Well at least MJ earned it, he's the only one there who deserves to be
Madonna is great too though, so is Prince, Janet Jackson most of those are good musicians. Only Taylor doesn’t belong of that
MJ, Prince, The Beatles and Elvis, ok
Others are not even top 100 (maybe Elton)
>Ignores the rest of the artists that mogged the Beatles and Elvis
COPE boomer
I'm not black, gay, or a woman so like half that shit is oot the window.
Blows my mind because it really feels like MJ hasnt had that much staying power. For how popular he was, you dont really hear his music played a whole lot compared to the Beatles or Elvis and so on. I dont really people who claim to be fans of Michael Jackson anymore.
>Michael Chads representing
>Prince clapping TayTay
You know what? I think we're gonna be alright
>Madonna
Do westoids really lmao. 18% think some roastie singing about getting fricked is the best musical artist of all time. Don't even know what to say.
1) ELO
2) Dio
3) The Eagles
4) Kansas
5) Blue Oyster Cult
The Beatles are for women and gays. Their music revolutionized almost nothing besides manufactured hype, which still exists today and stems back to “beatlemania” of which, fans were given pamphlets that told them how to act. Because boomers are moronic, they obeyed a piece of paper. Their entire legacy is built off of peer pressure.
>ELO
your bait is showing
It’s not bait, you’re a homosexual with no taste
>no verification needed btw
THE VISION DANCING IN MY MIND!
This will flop so bad
This
For me it's the opposite.
Whenever I hear someone trashing them I know they are just some tryhard midwit. They were a fine band and that's it
Wise take.
kys you zoomer homosexual
based moron filtering himself for chad beatles fans so they dont have to
Imagine the box office threads
the fact that
most relevant reply itt
Great bands don't need biopics, the music speaks for itself
lol
>gay people listen more music on internet than boomers
:O
Wasn't thr Beatles music only added in 2016?
The Beatles music was also limited online to the point that people were doing their own versions or songs with tracks missing (like orchestration) that people lapped up. The version of I am the Walrus most seen on youtube is an edited track that would only sound weird to a Beatles fan who listened to the master. THe same thing Dylan where a guys cover of Knockin' on Heavens Door falsely listed as Dylans has been viewed over 10 million times (where boomers comment that it sounds just like it did back in their day).
Now compare the Beatles/Queen to modern mumble rap shit you fricking homosexual. The numbers will shock you.
Something in the style of Rashomon could be neat, have a separate section for each member showing it from their perspective.
Still the Beach Boys for me. Nothing the Beatles ever made hits like God Only Knows
wasn't there 5 members?
Hopefuly Paul "THE homosexual" McCartney is fricking dead by the time his releases.
Frick you Paul.
The best Beatles biopic is A Hard Days NIght.
Frick Elvis and The Beatles...how about a biopic about Frank? It would be much more interesting and most deserving of multiple films.
Probably the best candidate for a biopic because of his inner turmoils. All or Nothing At All was great. They have to let his music tell the story. he didnt write the songs so hopefully you dont have that moronic scene where he gets the ideads for songs. HIs mood dictated the album which is great for a movie. MY only thing is that i dont really like the song My Way and that would probably be the big closer.
Martin Scorsese had that on the backburner for years but it's cancelled now.
DiCaprio was supposed to be Frank but Nancy Sinatra put her foot down because Scorcese wanted to focus it more on his mafia/JFK connections than the more interesting aspects of his professional life. He and Bing Crosby were far and away the biggest entertainers of the 20th century.
>mafia/JFK connections
This is the least interesting aspect about him. Scorsese also did the Aviator and made Howard Hughes into a cartoon character.
>He and Bing Crosby were far and away the biggest entertainers of the 20th century
World population tripled and information technology greatly improved in the latter half so I doubt it.
I've seen this same moronic retort on here before and it's easily swatted away with world charting history; touring attendance and box office numbers. I'm sorry you can't accept that a big eared Irish drunk and balding dago crooner were as wildly popular as they were all the way until they died but these things are true rather you want to accept that or not.
>Touring attendance
Okay
>Lifetime sellout rate
99% - Michael Jackson
>Concerts with over 100,000 paid attendees
11 - Michael Jackson
>Average lifetime tour attendance
4.3 Million - Michael Jackson
>Most sold out concerts / tickets per region
Europe - Wembley Stadium - Michael Jackson - 15 times
Asia - Tokyo Dome - Michael Jackson - 20 times
Latin America - Estadio Azteca - Michael Jackson - 5 times
South America - Estadio Monumental - Coldplay - 10 times
South Africa - Michael Jackson - 280,000
>Lifetime sell out rate - 99%
That's fricking insane, will never be duplicated ever
>Coldplay
Who?
A hipster band redditors like
>Stupid goomba music
People like you should be strung up and shot for how god damn stupid you are.
Shitalians are the original wetbacks. Go back to Italy and suck off the pope you vile pastaBlack person.
Crooning wasn't a talent, frick this karaoke c**t.
Was raised by a israeli woman. israelite worshipping pathetic buttgoy. Literally smuggled weapons to israel.
Who are they gonna cast?
CAST THEM
Lee Pace would've been a good John twenty years ago.
Depends on when the movies are set. I think Bale could play older George
No other band has did what the Beatles did. To release a dozen albums and a single every couple of months in a span of 8 years. IN that time, their music eveolved and embraced and propagated diffrent genres and subgenres. THey did this whilst being the biggest band in the world. mOst bands and artists dont evolve past their current state (and only by increments) and release an album every 4 years now.
I will only be attending Ringo's movie.
Lennongays and McCartneyqueers need not respond to me. Harrisonbros are alright, I just don't want to watch his movie.
Everyone shits on Ringo but true ones know he is based, redpilled and isn't constantly huffing his own farts unlike the other members.
It's such a moronic idea to split them in 4 and have them all hit the cinemas no way they aren't going to flop horrendously, not to mention that it's going to be pretty humilliating when Ringo's performs the worst by far.
Hopefuly he dies before that.
Boomers are moronic herd animals.
>Sam Mendes
phew!
I was scared for a second. good thing they got this hack involved
>Paul, I am the author of all your pain
>So is the John Lennon movie half as long as the others?
i know you zoomers are ignorant but john lennon has the most cinematic scene all prep'd and ready 2 go
?si=QJARog7QrRv3gPgw&t=160
only question is do we have blanchett reprise her role as dylan...
Why did you quote the John Lennon joke as if it was relevant to your post?
i'm sorry, zoom-zoom. i hope your fee-fee's didn't get hurt too much but if they did i'm sowwy
Autism, he just wanted to post the video but he wasn't sure how
Based Fat John
Ey wot Brucey?
>lifemogs every other rockstar in history despite dying at 32
>still no biopic
Is it because the movie would have to be 15 hours long to cover all of his major stories?
Can't wait for this board to turn into slap fights of people claiming their favorite Beatle had the best movie
>was the only surfer in the beach boys
>beaten the worse by his father and was the wildest brother in the family
>started drumming out of a necessity and for fun
>watches his brother become mentally unstable as the group becomes bigger
>starts to find himself in the studio
>befriends Charles Manson because he wants to help him write songs
>feels guilt because he introduced Manson to Terry Melcher whose house was host to the murders
>his music becomes more melancholic and deeper
>his substance abuse grows out of control and and his wild lifestyle puts him in debt
>kicked out of the band
>goes out everyday with a jug to fill up on rum at the liquor store
>is seen wandering the beach at first unrecognisable to fans and friends
>lives day to day sleeping on couches and occasionally by the seaside
>goes out on a boat with friend to recover his ex-wifes belongings which he threw in the ocean three years earlier
>friend falls asleep whilst wilson was diving drunk and evntually bumped his head on the bottom of the boat
>found lying on the seabed in the foetal position
>you need to buy four tickets to see one movie
lame scam, I'm not going to watch any of it
Rock and Roll Cinematic Universe when?
I will pirate the George and Ringo kinos but the other two can go frick themselves.
A movie about this guy would be much more entertaining
>Beatles... assemble!
Who the frick thought it was a good idea.
I wouldn't want any more Beach Boys films/documentaries.
Part of the fun of getting into the Beach Boys is that their early stuff is well known and accessible while the post Pet Sounds stuff is a goldmine of professionally made experimental shit and crazy lore that is largely ignored in the mainstream, so it feels like you're discovering it for yourself. If everything about them was cannonised in the same way as the Beatles then it would make them less interesting.
Also Love & Mercy is a great film, I doubt it would be topped.
The Beach Boys music was like a treasure hunt. They literally had a dozen albums worth of unreleased material beyond the Smile era. A lot of it has been released now and it makes you question why some songs were released and others werent. Fans are now making their own albums from that material.
A film about their manager would be good.
idk why people rag on lennon for wife beating, think having to deal with ono was enough repentance for that
>Ringo's film is ignored while the three other films are hits
Ringo probably would be the most interesting character if done right. He doesnt struggle with his identity or role in the group and doesnt let the whole thing overwhelm him. MIght be the best way to tell the story.