Best cartoons to play for your sons to ensure they develop a healthy interest in the opposite sex?
 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
|
Best cartoons to play for your sons to ensure they develop a healthy interest in the opposite sex?
Best cartoons to play for your sons to ensure they develop a healthy interest in the opposite sex?
|
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
|
based, bd is the most succulent mother figure i've ever seen.
i want her so fricking bad.
It was a lesson to not get brainwashed by seductive women. They almost lost their home because they were too busy getting a boner.
And then the fat one goes back there after they become leaders of the Roman Empire. Good lesson anon.
Your children are going to develop a natural and healthy attraction to the opposite sex regardless of what you DO give them, even if they never see sexy girls they're still gonna love em at the end unless they land on the 1%~ odds of being gay by nature
The only thing you don't wanna do is let them watch super gay shit to artificially make them think they're gay
And by gay I don't mean something like He-Man where the buff men just sorta... Exist... And homos call it "homoerotic" because they think their attraction is universal. I mean gay flag waving mushy wooby "Hey kids! Be queer!" type of crap like modern Blue's Clues
>it's a woman complaining
pottery
>complaining
It's just a joke
You will see worse after being on tiktok for 5 seconds
>Wakfu
>Dofus
>Totally Spies
>Martin Mystery
>Inspector Gadget
>The Chipmunks
>Winx
>'90s X-Men
>X-Men Evolution
>Batman: The Animated Series
>Teen Titans
>Danny Phantom
>Kim Possible
>Arthur and the Invisibles
>'80s Ninja Turtles
>2012 Ninja Turtles
>Jurassic Park Camp Cretaceous
>Fast & Furious: Spy Racers
>Totally Spies
DO NOT, unless you want them to become fetishists
I watched it and didn't develop any extra fetishes outside of having a thing for redheads. And I'm pretty sure I got that from reading Anne of green gables.
Curious, i don't remember having fetishes from Totally Spies. Dexter's Lab however...
Will only make them weebs which steers them to anime and becoming either soibois or pedos.
Kemono's are the first step towards furhomosexualry.
Spies
What this
said
Mystery
Same as above.
Gadget
Understandable if you graduate out of the crush for Penny.
>>The Chipmunks
Guaranteed to grow up a gay furgay.
>>Winx
The HRT is all that will be waiting for you.
>>'90s X-Men
Good choice.
>>X-Men Evolution
: The Animated Series
Aside from a little sex crave you''ll be fine.
>>Teen Titans
All weeb cartoons only lead to you becoming a pedo.
Phantom
Acceptable.
>>Kim Possible
Acceptable.
and the Invisibles
All them french shits will turn you into a freak in some fashion.
>>'80s Ninja Turtles
>>2012 Ninja Turtles
Both are acceptable.
Park Camp Cretaceous
Acceptable
>>Fast & Furious: Spy Racers
Acceptable.
Phantom
>Acceptable.
becoming a transgender mass shooter is acceptable? think again anon.
Statistically insignificant compared to the number of guys it gave a fetish for goth girls. Of course every time you show sexy girls there will be some fraction of boys who want to be the girl.
the funny part of this "parent" is that it doesn't even know that Asterix and Obelix tells the b***hes to gtfo and the b***hes go full feminist on their ass for it
It's really irrelevant because the impact seeing sexualized women has on kids is working at a primal level. So the text of the cartoon saying "Actually no, that's bad" doesn't really matter. If anything it may just make it a forbidden fruit which makes it hotter.
Also I think anyone who thinks she's upset about this rather than just having a knowing laugh about it is misinterpreting the post.
can confirm.
still have hots for ms. sarabellum years after, even when her professional competence portray her against her sexual physicality.
you sound fricking defective as hell.
In what way? You don't think seeing sexy stuff in cartoons often has an impact on kids? This whole board proves you wrong..
you are barking nonsense with the pretence of intelligence, this is factually how defective people work. It even makes you angry that normal people don't obey that bullshit.
>It even makes you angry that normal people don't obey that bullshit.
Reread both our words and tell me I'm the one who sounds angry.
This whole board likes to have fun and their comments of sexual awakenings aren't honest testimonies of being groomed by content. You can't skim through Cinemaphile posts and youtube comments to draw meaningful conclusions about most things.
It's undeniable that there are large numbers of people with fetishes for things that pretty much only exist in cartoons, and those people will tell you they got those fetishes from watching cartoons at an impressionable age. The only question is how much this also extends to more 'normal' sexual things, like sexual orientation. Personally I think sexual orientation is caused by a mix of factors. Part of it is hormonal in the womb, that creates the potential to be homosexual but I think whether it manifests often depends on formative experiences in childhood, which could include interactions with other people but also media exposure. People are in denial about this mostly because they are worried about it being used to justify censorship, I think.
And we all were exposed to those cartoons yet so few of us have inflation fetishes.
>People are in denial about this mostly because they are worried about it being used to justify censorship, I think.
It's not that it could be used, it's that if there was any real credence to it, it should be used to justify censorship but no one follows it to that logical conclusion because it doesn't make sense at the start.
What's happening is that you're mistaking fetish towards something that has been accessed as that access causing that fetish rather than a general propensity towards sexual fixation. Saying something MADE you have sexual fixation is the implication but that is incorrect. That was already possible within the individual, what that fixation was going to be was up in the air and would manifest in a way that cannot be controlled.
>This whole board proves you wrong..
True, I remember when I developed a fetish for massive breasts after that one episode of the magic school bus.
Miraculous Ladybug
Bonus: also healthy fetishisms.
>random literally who on twitter
why must you always do this?
>nooo you can't use some random person's thoughts on cartoons as a jumping-off point for an interesting and relevant conversation on cartoons
The Road to El Dorado, watched it once as a young kid, Chel was the only part I remember
>americans yet again blame everything for things except themselves
>Europeans yet again blame everything (especially America) for things except themselves
Literally has been Europe's entire history since 1945
case in point
Case in point
This idea of grooming sexuality being as easy as seeing something overtly sexual continues not to make sense because overtly sexual material promoting straight sexuality or just the sexiness of women has always been more widely available with no massively lopsided increase in lesbianism and increase in male heterosexuality. There is nothing to suggest that children are so easily influenced and if they were, there would be more of a concern about media control in general, especially video games.
I mean seriously, people mention MKUltra as proof of the craziest psychological shit, but don't consider that many governments investing in this sort of research would come to the same "groomer theory" conclusion they have and apply it if they're correct. Military service would be up and mundane job simulation games would have been extremely popular in the 80s and 90s. Instead the biggest psyop would be Harvest Moon and that's Japanese; convincing us thriving off farming is easy so starving poor people anywhere deserve to die. If "formative experiences" like this were impactful, we'd see more competition for children's advertising ad space of children's programming blocks and channels as that would be the best time to groom children into ideal consumers, workers, and soldiers. Instead it's a dying industry showing off toys for kids, Zoo Books, and parent specific marketing.
It's all performative, convenient memes. Most of the time people are just joking when they talk about media like in the OP.
>This idea of grooming sexuality being as easy as seeing something overtly sexual continues not to make sense because overtly sexual material promoting straight sexuality or just the sexiness of women has always been more widely available with no massively lopsided increase in lesbianism and increase in male heterosexuality.
It's pretty widely understood that male sexuality tends to be based more on visual stimuli than female sexuality. And just anecdotally I hear way more about guys getting weird fetishes from stuff they saw in cartoons than girls, although that happens too occasionally.
See
Zero cartoons. Make them play sports.
>MY KID SAW CARTOON BOOBS LOL WHAT A LE FORMATIVE EXPERIENCE XD
Only homosexuals and porn addicts consider their first boner to be a significant moment in their lives