Critics opinions have no relevance in this day and age. They have been known for a while to be untrustworthy. Just look at any movie that has been politicized by the media, it has a high score from critics if it has any minority.
Marvel movies have positive scores from them even the most forgetable ones like Thor 2.
Most critics are very biased towards a kind of message. Any movie that goes against that message will have negative reviews. Just look at the initial reaction from critics towards Joker. The media painted the movie as a incel white supremacy story so the critics ate it up. It has one of lowest scores for capeshit even tho it is the best comic movie since The Dark knight rises.
A lot of the moronic Anakin/Padme stuff tends to overshadow the better parts of AOTC. That and a whole lot of the CGI in AOTC looks like sun fried dogshit
90% of the movie is lazy green screen and action is fricking horrible. There is literally nothing good about that movie. Other two prequels had some good parts but not AOTC.
Better than the TPM, but that's not saying much. It's an absolute drag that only gets enjoyable once they reach Geonosis and the pew pew starts. A pants on moronic assassination plot and the three memorable things about it are the cringey romance, Yoda's Gummi Bear performance and the clone army marching onto the ships.
You are correct and I completely agree with you. Also, I'm a Pajeet named Rishi who loves pre-Disney Star Wars and I felt very honoured that AOTC contained a dwarf galaxy called the Rishi Maze. I can't believe it's been 20 fricking years since AOTC came out. Stay based, sir!
Nobody on the planet genuinely thinks Obi-wan is 10/10, them rating it that is bombing as well but it's even more embarrassing because you're doing free labor for a billion dollar corporation.
The show is pretty shit but your incredibly naive if you think people don't rate Disney content poorly simply because its Disney content. There are probably people on this board that haven't even watched the show and still left a bad review.
How can anyone can any faith in the critic score?
I used to think them giving their review-based virtue signal points, was a joke, but... I cannot fathom any other reason why they would give STP such a high rating, it is cheap, fails basic storytelling, and Steward is giving minimum effort. It doesn't say even say anything, it betrays everything Gene wanted to do with Star Trek, and even in isolation is incoherent nightmare.
???
Critics rating is still higher and that's the only numbers that matters more than the crying of cis beta racist white males.
AAAAAA HELP ME OBI WAN KENOBI, YOU'RE OUR ONLY HO-
I don't get it
It's a graph of Disney stock losing value.
Value of Disney stock in past year
hard to separate it from the general downward trend but still nice to see
Shut up, you're not subtle.
Critics are going to say it’s good no matter what with a colored protagonist.
>~~*critics*~~
literally irrelevant
israeli movie reviewers don't matter. Go suck some more circumcised israelite wiener, gay. lol
>Verification not required.
86% on a tv show means it's beyond dogshit
Critics opinions have no relevance in this day and age. They have been known for a while to be untrustworthy. Just look at any movie that has been politicized by the media, it has a high score from critics if it has any minority.
Marvel movies have positive scores from them even the most forgetable ones like Thor 2.
Most critics are very biased towards a kind of message. Any movie that goes against that message will have negative reviews. Just look at the initial reaction from critics towards Joker. The media painted the movie as a incel white supremacy story so the critics ate it up. It has one of lowest scores for capeshit even tho it is the best comic movie since The Dark knight rises.
Explains why the new Chris Pratt dinosaur movie got destroyed
How long has it been since professional critics had literally any relevance whatsoever? Like 2010?
You almost got me, you did get me. Those reviews are paid for and we all know it.
Why there is only one review yet it shows 86%?
>I-i-i-ts getting review bombed!
Is AotC really that bad? It has some really kino moments (Kamino, Geonosis, Coruscant at night)
It really isn't
A lot of the moronic Anakin/Padme stuff tends to overshadow the better parts of AOTC. That and a whole lot of the CGI in AOTC looks like sun fried dogshit
90% of the movie is lazy green screen and action is fricking horrible. There is literally nothing good about that movie. Other two prequels had some good parts but not AOTC.
It's complete garbage.
Better than the TPM, but that's not saying much. It's an absolute drag that only gets enjoyable once they reach Geonosis and the pew pew starts. A pants on moronic assassination plot and the three memorable things about it are the cringey romance, Yoda's Gummi Bear performance and the clone army marching onto the ships.
brainlets got filtered by the "politics" in it
That means it's good, doesn't it?
If you are a contrarian moron, sure.
Obiwan isn’t great but it’s better than episodes 1 and 2 pretty clear review bombing by racist chuds
at least episode 1 and 2 had Obi-Wan in them
Episode 4 alone makes Obi-Wan the worst SW product ever made. It was literally 1/10. Probably the worst episode of anything I ever saw.
Even racists don't even bother raiding this anymore
Don’t care what anyone says, AOTC was kino
You are correct and I completely agree with you. Also, I'm a Pajeet named Rishi who loves pre-Disney Star Wars and I felt very honoured that AOTC contained a dwarf galaxy called the Rishi Maze. I can't believe it's been 20 fricking years since AOTC came out. Stay based, sir!
never watched star wars, don't care. Shut it nostalgays
Stop pretending nobody here knows what review bombing is.
You mean the shills like you and your fellow Disney employees who bot the shit out of the good reviews?
>Unironically enjoying something makes you a shill
grow up already.
Oh so you just have shitty terrible taste then? good goy.
Nobody on the planet genuinely thinks Obi-wan is 10/10, them rating it that is bombing as well but it's even more embarrassing because you're doing free labor for a billion dollar corporation.
>huge billion dollar corporation
Huh, I thought Disney's stocks were in the toilet lately.
Indeed and it's only going to get worse, smelly shill.
>shill
see
Autistic people have a hard time understanding differences in opinion.
The show is pretty shit but your incredibly naive if you think people don't rate Disney content poorly simply because its Disney content. There are probably people on this board that haven't even watched the show and still left a bad review.
you mean whats called marketing when a huge corporation does it?
Stop pretending it's a thing. RT has like 20 safeties against review bombing at this point.
How can anyone can any faith in the critic score?
I used to think them giving their review-based virtue signal points, was a joke, but... I cannot fathom any other reason why they would give STP such a high rating, it is cheap, fails basic storytelling, and Steward is giving minimum effort. It doesn't say even say anything, it betrays everything Gene wanted to do with Star Trek, and even in isolation is incoherent nightmare.
You shouldn't expect disney star wars to be good.
It's just content for the sake of content
it gets worse throughout the episodes.
im pretty sure 5 will be worse than 4...
but pretty hard to top the action scenes from episode 4...