sounds kino and Quentin had actual reverence for Fleming unlike Barbara who spits on his work.
The world would be a better place if Cubby Broccoli had a son instead of a daughter
He did, albeit a step son. Michael G Wilson who wrote the two Dalton masterworks and he still gave it to his baby girl. Cubby doomed the series and it's all on him.
nah it's not kino, it's lame. Even Eva's sexy black dress and Mads couldn't save it. I don't even consider it a Bond movie, it's a generic 2000s spy thriller starring English Jack Bauer
This is that movie where her husband dies and is reborn as a little boy right?
I feel like you'd have to be a pedo to want to make a film like this. My reasoning is that a non-pedo would be too embarrassed to put this idea to film, even if he or she only had artistic ideas in mind. A pedo though would be driven by pedolust and thus would not care.
You HAVE to be a pedo/homo/evil person to make it in the movie business, unfortunately.
Casino and Die Another Day were 4 years apart, close to 5.
The last Dalton movie and the first Brosnan movie were even further apart. These things take time anon.
Radically different circumstances. Plus, Barbara publicly came out and said they are not working on anything and haven't even begun work while in those two instances work never stopped on the next installment.
Casino Royale was 75 percent dumb actioner, it wasn't some drama piece you dumbass.
nah it's not kino, it's lame. Even Eva's sexy black dress and Mads couldn't save it. I don't even consider it a Bond movie, it's a generic 2000s spy thriller starring English Jack Bauer
This, anyone who likes that piece of crap is instantly debased as a fellow kino watcher (fake) and I do not talk with him.
I really don't get what people love about it, I want to see Bond womanizing, having a blast, guessing the age of a scotch, slapping b***hes, playing baccarat, not Bond PUTTING THE MISSION FIRST, getting wiener and ball torture, or parkouring through Africa
He was alright as Bond but Craig sold the "action star" part better. Watching Die Another Day as a kid, Pierce is basically some WASP dad who somehow got himself into a pickle.
It's like watching Chis Hansen go around be an MI6 agent. I think it's a boomer appeal first and foremost.
Craig? The homosexual theater actor they wasted millions to get up to shape when they could have just went with Pierce or someone else instead who was more seasoned in action? I swear, this place is just bots.
He was already in decent shape by Tomb Raider, I doubt they spent "millions".
One thing Bond actors have traditionally lacked up until Dalton and going forward was well choregraphed kinetic action that doesn't directly involve car stunts, explosions and shit like that.
A sense of danger to Bond himself. The Dalton movies started leaning into this because they took themselves more seriously, then the Bronsnan movies were a mixture of old and new, and the Craig movies were the most serious of them all.
Craig could have been good IF they went full clean slate and went all the way with the Jason Bourne/post 9/11 aesthetic which only lasted for 2 movies. Then, they made nothing but dumbass nostalgia bait. They tried to make him act like Brosnan or Connery and it didn't work. They never made a movie about Islamic terrorism, financial fraud on a massive scale, African civil war, Colombian drug wars of the 2010's, none of that LE ULTRA REALISM stuff plus recast Judi Dench for frick's sake. If they had the balls to stick with their convinction, I would have liked Daniel Craig's movies but they backtracked massively and made nothing but derivative slop without any of the soul, the worst offender being Spectre.
>Craig could have been good
That's where you're wrong partner. all the angels in heaven couldn't make Craig a good Bond
3 months ago
Anonymous
Exactly what I am saying, at least go all the way with the Jason Bourne shit and maybe some kino can come out of it. They couldn't so they settled for the worst option: be subversive and dark but also have member berries and rip off older Bond movies which created intense tonal dissonance and made for some truly awful movies.
nah pierce was a fat old man by 2007, i also doubt he could pull off the rogueish tone and charm craig can
>craig >charm
3 months ago
Anonymous
>craig >charm
lol good one
>craig >not charm
3 months ago
Anonymous
If he's supposed to be James Bond? No. Otherwise? I liked him in Layer Cake but that's apples and oranges.
3 months ago
Anonymous
he's kino as knives out >inb4 contrarians that say knives out is not kino
3 months ago
Anonymous
Knives Out is not kino.
[...] >*Too old" >Meanwhile he a made better spy thriller in the 2010s than all of Craig's combined
Based. It's nothing but zoomers who defend Craig. None of their points even attempt to hold up.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I liked Craig Bond and I'm not a zoomer. There's something comic book-y to a lot of older Bond flicks that doesn't sit well with me.
As a kid, Moonraker was my favorite one, but as an adult I can't sanction that buffoonery.
3 months ago
Anonymous
You'll grow out of that eventually
3 months ago
Anonymous
>growing up means enjoying more childish films
Good to know
3 months ago
Anonymous
It does. You grow up and drop your pretensions about media and the world and see films like Moonraker as more sincere and enjoyable and once life gets harder, you'll realize the value of escapist fun media like Moonraker than dumb, depressive slop like Craig's shit.
3 months ago
Anonymous
To each their own
3 months ago
Anonymous
Growing up meas not being insecure and obsessed with "ADULTING" you sound like some immature twat in his twenties that still has some ways to go
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Cinemaphile moron that uses "based" and "zoomer" lingo lecturing what it means to be an adult
3 months ago
Anonymous
>moron thinks two different anons are the same person and has no response other than b***hing about meme words
3 months ago
Anonymous
epic greentext bro! you a real big adult boy
3 months ago
Anonymous
lol you are one triggered little b***h, I should tell your mom you need to take your nap early today
3 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah, I get that, but I still know what I prefer. There's multiple ways to portray Bond and I'd rather see takes that are different from the Moore era.
3 months ago
Anonymous
This. When you're in your twenties you burden your heart with this adult nonsense when everyone at the end of it is just an overgrown child. Once you drop that, your life can become bliss.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>another gullible pleb spouting CS Lewis's seethe
he was just struggling to cope with his inferiority to his peers
this quote has been debunked so many times and is the ultimate mark of a very stupid individual
3 months ago
Anonymous
t. moron
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Knives Out is not kino.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>zoomer lingo and response
Way to out yourself.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>"-oomer" >Way to out yourself.
3 months ago
Anonymous
What else you call them, you waste of breath?
3 months ago
Anonymous
the fact you don't even know you out yourself with your own lingo while calling others out is funny to me
3 months ago
Anonymous
A waste of breath.
3 months ago
Anonymous
he looked and acted like a terminal alcoholic old lesbian
Despite his age, the director preferred him because he was more of a clean slate and they could make him look way older. He saw the potential for Henry to be doing Bond movies for 20 years plus. But Barbara was obsessed with Craig and strongarmed Campbell to go with him due to being the boss sadly. He didn't get along with Craig at all and left despite wanting to do more Bond. Cavill could have been Bond into the 2030's.
1. Cast him and alter some of Bond's backstory to make sense of his youth but he'd look older with new regiment and workout
2. Keep the poker angle but cast Phillip Seymour Hoffman as Le Chiffre or Vincent d'nOfrio instead of wasting Mads
3. Keep Eva Green, she and Cavill would have great chemistry
4. Recast Judi Dench with someone else, man or woman (preferably man)
5. don't make Felix Leiter black, cast Josh Lucas or someone else popular at the time
6. Keep it accurate even with changing the game to poker
7. Cut down on the action in the final third act and make it more of a character drama like the novel
8. Don't include Mr. White at all or any of that shit, actually hint at SMERSH
9. Adapt the novels but with different names and updated stories that take inspiration from it, like LALD is about African civil wars, Moonraker is about the modern space race and adapt that story from start to finish in one long continuous arc. You end it with YOLT and maybe cast Mads as a modern Blofeld.
10. You both have a Bond you could use for 20 years and made dark and gritty movies that are one story without pissing off legacy fans
11. don't bring up that Bond and Blofeld are brothers
12. Kick Barbara Broccoli out of EON
fun fact: in an interview, Mikkelsen joked that Craig was the only one in the bunch who had no clue how to play poker. They literally had to teach him the hand rankings and everything.
This was a clear puff piece to boost his name around the time of the casting. It's been debunked years now.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's actually from 2023 but keep coping
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Throwback
3 months ago
Anonymous
>let's pay this woman to say she had sex with a guy, that will get folks to buy movie tickets
3 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, that's what PR is for, anon.
3 months ago
Anonymous
yeah ok moron, great PR
3 months ago
Anonymous
It is, it makes him more popular with men and women. It's the basics of PR, good word of mouth.
It hasn't been debunked, they really dated. She's not as hot as she used to be though, kind of went insane over the years.
Yes but she probably exaggerated to keep up his status as a movie star. Also, she said he kept looking at himself in the mirror for a long time. It sounds a little...you know...
3 months ago
Anonymous
>It sounds a little...you know...
so in other words it's not PR
3 months ago
Anonymous
>multi-reply >"b-b-b-b-bbbut"
craigschizo....
3 months ago
Anonymous
>thinks replying to two posts is a big deal
lmao how new are you?
3 months ago
Anonymous
It hasn't been debunked, they really dated. She's not as hot as she used to be though, kind of went insane over the years.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Throwback
>craigschizo straight up making shit up now
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's true.
3 months ago
Anonymous
cope
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Angry pleb homosexual spamming lame green text responses telling someone to cope
lol
3 months ago
Anonymous
cope
3 months ago
Anonymous
He thinks it's just one guy who dislikes Craig and calls everyone with dissenting opinions Craigschizos. It's astoundingly moronic.
3 months ago
Anonymous
But more than one person has already called you out on your Craig bluff.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It just sounds way too exaggerated, is all. I don't doubt it's true they were together but the fact is the guy is clearly a flamer. Flamers do tend to be guys who are effeminate in their status as in it's easy for them to get puss that they just break and go puff. Craig seems like this plus if he was an animal in bed, it follows he's a tough male, right? Yet, he says he goes to gay bars because he's afraid of fights with normal men.
3 months ago
Anonymous
He also said it's easy to meet women there.
3 months ago
Anonymous
But why would there be women in gay bars? I do not get normalgays. What utter animals.
>craigschizo going on about gay bars again
the main craig schizo is IN THIS THREAD
The only schizophrenic is you by the way you type and reply.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Too have some drinks with their girlfriends and oogle at men while having less dudes approach you.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>go to gay bars >uhhh men approach ME a woman??? I hate this so much oh my god! These sodomites who are not attracted to me are such better company than other people of a more normal class of society >Hmmm that gay guy is so hot
I'm trying so hard to not be overcome with disdain and hatred for women but they make sure I do.
3 months ago
Anonymous
There are at least 2 people that get extremely offended and start a lengthy cope argument any time someone marks they like Daniel Craig as bond, like this poster
This was a clear puff piece to boost his name around the time of the casting. It's been debunked years now.
>Throwback
3 months ago
Anonymous
>2 people
It's clearly the same guy. Either way, I think it's fine to dislike CraigBond but to make shit up is just cope.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Christ man, get over yourself. Who cares this much?
Central to Casino Royale is Craig's Bond being relatively inexperienced. Keeping the script as it basically was and just swapping out Craig for Brosnan would make Brosnan Bond would not fit the mature and experience Bond Brosnan should have become by that point - he has a completely different relationship with M; his approach to Vesper in general and his response to her betrayal would be different. A Brosnan Casino Royale would, or at least should, be a completely different story to the point you may as well not make it be Casino Royale - if anything this could be a film where you explore what it is to be an aging spy. On the related subject, I see people say Cavill would have been better in the role than Craig; it would have made little difference as Cavill would still be working with the same script(s) and approach to Bond by the wider creative team assembled.
Roger was a fun guy behind the scenes, easily the most charming in my book. But I really don't care for most of his Bond movies aside from the last one.
I like them all, especially Moonraker but yeah, Cubby should have taken the hint and cast Dalton after that movie but Roger was too beloved in the role and they didn't feel like risking it. If you've seen The Saint, his James Bond becomes way better if you treat them as Saint movies than James Bond which was the approach Roger preferred. Myself, I'm of course a Daltonchad but hold nothing but love for Sir Roger.
He's about 18 years late, the last Bond movie was like 2 years ago already.
On the other hand, it's a shame we don't have a Heath Ledger schizo to go along with this. I remember both castings were causing butthurt at the time.
His casting and his last movie has permanently destroyed the franchise and left in a state of irrelevance. Obviously, when there's NOTHING else to talk about, people will just revert back to shitting (justifiably) on Craig. Barbara has put the franchise on permanent hold due to Craig not returning for more.
You're absolutely delusional. The franchise is alive and well and the vast majority of people hold it in good regard.
This isn't a Terminator Dark Fate situation where everyone unanimously agrees it did nothing but tarnish its franchise.
No Time To Die lost a 100 million dollars for MGM and EON. It's been 5 years since the last movie wrapped up and no Bond replacement or anything. James Bond was killed in the last movie. The only 007 media to be released since is some game show with the logo slapped on it that no one watched. It's not quite Dark Fate but it's pretty damn close.
Casino and Die Another Day were 4 years apart, close to 5.
The last Dalton movie and the first Brosnan movie were even further apart. These things take time anon.
nttd made the most money any bond ever made and theres crazy hype about whos the next bond. way more than after dad
like
You're absolutely delusional. The franchise is alive and well and the vast majority of people hold it in good regard.
This isn't a Terminator Dark Fate situation where everyone unanimously agrees it did nothing but tarnish its franchise.
Learn how to type like an actual white person and not an Ugandan scammer.
How can the franchise be destroyed when the post-2000 movies were successful both critically and financially?
Seems to me like you're just not fond of the new grounded approach. You might like The Man from U.N.C.L.E. better. It was closer to the Moore Bond formula. But it was also a tremendous box office failure, so you can't really blame Hollywood for not going with that approach.
No Time To Die didn't even come close to breaking even and was a massive failure with the costs it had. Man from UNCLE was poorly marketed and a niche IP. If they released the same movie but made it about James Bond, it'd be massive. Movies now have gone back to fun and adventure even at the cost of pozz so yeah back then it didn't work but now it clearly does which is why they should be making a new James Bond movie ASAP but are not and Babs said they haven't even BEGUN to PLAN the next Bond. If that's not a sign she's completely given up on Bond, nothing is.
>No Time To Die didn't even come close to breaking even
At this point you're just baiting. "Didn't even come close" lmao. I like you anon.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>No Time To Die lost a 100 million dollars for MGM and EON
No it didn't.
MGM of course coped (as would anyone who lost a lot of money) but the losses are there.
3 months ago
Anonymous
The article you linked says this has been debunked
3 months ago
Anonymous
this is like you telling me if I lost money when I am broke and I say 'nahh it's cool bro'
I liked craig too bad he had contempt for the character
he's a good actor
this. he hated James Bond and only took it because it was his ticket to immortality and movie star status due to Barbara being obsessed with him. he's a step above casting couch prostitute.
3 months ago
Anonymous
If every movie that made 700+ million was considered a failure, studios wouldn't invest nearly as much money in these projects. You don't realize how the business works. They want to make a profit first and foremost.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's always the ones who know they're talking nonsense who go all like 'DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW THIS HECKIN WORKS'. It was a failure on release.
How can the franchise be destroyed when the post-2000 movies were successful both critically and financially?
Seems to me like you're just not fond of the new grounded approach. You might like The Man from U.N.C.L.E. better. It was closer to the Moore Bond formula. But it was also a tremendous box office failure, so you can't really blame Hollywood for not going with that approach.
Architect is one of the worst actors i've ever seen in my life. He can only do smug face and forced serious face and that's it. Why Cinemaphile sucks this guy's dick all the time I have no idea.
Lethality isn't just the ability to shoot someone. I could imagine Craig's Bond killing someone with his bare hands. Not so with Brosnan. Though overall I do prefer Brosnan's tenure overall due to the sheer shittiness of the last two Craig films.
You're not wrong. There's nuances to both that are strengths and weaknesses but most of this discussion usually boils down to "old good new bad".
If I were to compile the perfect Bond series, I would cut a few of the movies out entirely, including some of the old ones.
>Dr. Noah turns out to be Sir James's nephew Jimmy Bond, who plans to use biological warfare to make all women beautiful and kill all tall men, leaving him as the "big man" who gets all the girls.
/ourguy/
The world would be a better place if Cubby Broccoli had a son instead of a daughter
quentin wanted to make casino royale in 1960s with pierce brosnan
>Piercekino with Eva Green and Mads Mikkelsen
I hate Barbara.
sounds kino and Quentin had actual reverence for Fleming unlike Barbara who spits on his work.
He did, albeit a step son. Michael G Wilson who wrote the two Dalton masterworks and he still gave it to his baby girl. Cubby doomed the series and it's all on him.
With Eva Green everything is kino
true.
The fact a homosexual chav scouser played James Bond for 20 years makes me doubt reality is even real.
I love Eva but I'd rather watch The Dreamers or Womb. Casino Royale is boring, too long, unsatisfying, and Craig sucks dick.
It's Kino but not perfect. The action sequences drag on like Vesper's drowning, but it's still worth it.
nah it's not kino, it's lame. Even Eva's sexy black dress and Mads couldn't save it. I don't even consider it a Bond movie, it's a generic 2000s spy thriller starring English Jack Bauer
This is that movie where her husband dies and is reborn as a little boy right?
I feel like you'd have to be a pedo to want to make a film like this. My reasoning is that a non-pedo would be too embarrassed to put this idea to film, even if he or she only had artistic ideas in mind. A pedo though would be driven by pedolust and thus would not care.
You HAVE to be a pedo/homo/evil person to make it in the movie business, unfortunately.
Radically different circumstances. Plus, Barbara publicly came out and said they are not working on anything and haven't even begun work while in those two instances work never stopped on the next installment.
I can't imagine them having the same chemistry. Pierce unironically worked best with Halle Berry.
They're both specimens of their respective sex. They would have insane chemistry as he did with another French waifu, Sophie Marceau.
(You)
And quentin would've been 5. Talk about a wunderkind.
Yeah, then Brosnan would actually have 1 good 007 movie.
>GoldenEye doesn't exist
All his movies are good or at the very least enjoyable as frick. Stop with this meme.
Objectively true. Craig is a chav looking neanderthal.
nah
I like Brosnan but no it wouldn't, his movies were campy and he was good at that
Casino Royale was 75 percent dumb actioner, it wasn't some drama piece you dumbass.
This, anyone who likes that piece of crap is instantly debased as a fellow kino watcher (fake) and I do not talk with him.
I really don't get what people love about it, I want to see Bond womanizing, having a blast, guessing the age of a scotch, slapping b***hes, playing baccarat, not Bond PUTTING THE MISSION FIRST, getting wiener and ball torture, or parkouring through Africa
Exactly. Only mindless bugmen like that movie and think it's on the tier of GoldenEye, Goldfinger or any of Moore or Dalton's movies.
...right.
Graig is the best Bond
>Pierce Brosnan
most overrated Bond
post your ranking
Connery > Lazenby > Dalton > Craig > Moore > Brosnan
>Moore that low
Pleb
This. The correct list is
Dalton > Moore > Connery > Brosnan > Lazenby > Craig
He was alright as Bond but Craig sold the "action star" part better. Watching Die Another Day as a kid, Pierce is basically some WASP dad who somehow got himself into a pickle.
It's like watching Chis Hansen go around be an MI6 agent. I think it's a boomer appeal first and foremost.
Craig? The homosexual theater actor they wasted millions to get up to shape when they could have just went with Pierce or someone else instead who was more seasoned in action? I swear, this place is just bots.
He was already in decent shape by Tomb Raider, I doubt they spent "millions".
One thing Bond actors have traditionally lacked up until Dalton and going forward was well choregraphed kinetic action that doesn't directly involve car stunts, explosions and shit like that.
A sense of danger to Bond himself. The Dalton movies started leaning into this because they took themselves more seriously, then the Bronsnan movies were a mixture of old and new, and the Craig movies were the most serious of them all.
Craig could have been good IF they went full clean slate and went all the way with the Jason Bourne/post 9/11 aesthetic which only lasted for 2 movies. Then, they made nothing but dumbass nostalgia bait. They tried to make him act like Brosnan or Connery and it didn't work. They never made a movie about Islamic terrorism, financial fraud on a massive scale, African civil war, Colombian drug wars of the 2010's, none of that LE ULTRA REALISM stuff plus recast Judi Dench for frick's sake. If they had the balls to stick with their convinction, I would have liked Daniel Craig's movies but they backtracked massively and made nothing but derivative slop without any of the soul, the worst offender being Spectre.
>Craig could have been good
That's where you're wrong partner. all the angels in heaven couldn't make Craig a good Bond
Exactly what I am saying, at least go all the way with the Jason Bourne shit and maybe some kino can come out of it. They couldn't so they settled for the worst option: be subversive and dark but also have member berries and rip off older Bond movies which created intense tonal dissonance and made for some truly awful movies.
>craig
>charm
>craig
>not charm
If he's supposed to be James Bond? No. Otherwise? I liked him in Layer Cake but that's apples and oranges.
he's kino as knives out
>inb4 contrarians that say knives out is not kino
Knives Out is not kino.
Based. It's nothing but zoomers who defend Craig. None of their points even attempt to hold up.
I liked Craig Bond and I'm not a zoomer. There's something comic book-y to a lot of older Bond flicks that doesn't sit well with me.
As a kid, Moonraker was my favorite one, but as an adult I can't sanction that buffoonery.
You'll grow out of that eventually
>growing up means enjoying more childish films
Good to know
It does. You grow up and drop your pretensions about media and the world and see films like Moonraker as more sincere and enjoyable and once life gets harder, you'll realize the value of escapist fun media like Moonraker than dumb, depressive slop like Craig's shit.
To each their own
Growing up meas not being insecure and obsessed with "ADULTING" you sound like some immature twat in his twenties that still has some ways to go
>Cinemaphile moron that uses "based" and "zoomer" lingo lecturing what it means to be an adult
>moron thinks two different anons are the same person and has no response other than b***hing about meme words
epic greentext bro! you a real big adult boy
lol you are one triggered little b***h, I should tell your mom you need to take your nap early today
Yeah, I get that, but I still know what I prefer. There's multiple ways to portray Bond and I'd rather see takes that are different from the Moore era.
This. When you're in your twenties you burden your heart with this adult nonsense when everyone at the end of it is just an overgrown child. Once you drop that, your life can become bliss.
>another gullible pleb spouting CS Lewis's seethe
he was just struggling to cope with his inferiority to his peers
this quote has been debunked so many times and is the ultimate mark of a very stupid individual
t. moron
>Knives Out is not kino.
>zoomer lingo and response
Way to out yourself.
>"-oomer"
>Way to out yourself.
What else you call them, you waste of breath?
the fact you don't even know you out yourself with your own lingo while calling others out is funny to me
A waste of breath.
he looked and acted like a terminal alcoholic old lesbian
That's quite aptly put, I agree.
Yeah
damn leoben got ripped
He was good but I think Dalton remains the most underrated.
You mean Timothy Dalton.
nah pierce was a fat old man by 2007, i also doubt he could pull off the rogueish tone and charm craig can
>craig
>charm
lol good one
I agree 100%. The truth is that both simply overstayed their welcome. But by God Casino with Pierce would've been too late into his career.
I saw Cavill could have been in this instead and in fact the director liked him more but he was too young...feels bad man.
Despite his age, the director preferred him because he was more of a clean slate and they could make him look way older. He saw the potential for Henry to be doing Bond movies for 20 years plus. But Barbara was obsessed with Craig and strongarmed Campbell to go with him due to being the boss sadly. He didn't get along with Craig at all and left despite wanting to do more Bond. Cavill could have been Bond into the 2030's.
Henry got asked recently what his favorite spy movies are and he didn't even mention Bond. I think he knows that ship has sailed.
?si=7wMv81NIp61bDFf-&t=166
>three days of the condor
>marathon man
based picks from Sam ngl
>*Too old"
>Meanwhile he a made better spy thriller in the 2010s than all of Craig's combined
Henry Cavill, actually.
1. Cast him and alter some of Bond's backstory to make sense of his youth but he'd look older with new regiment and workout
2. Keep the poker angle but cast Phillip Seymour Hoffman as Le Chiffre or Vincent d'nOfrio instead of wasting Mads
3. Keep Eva Green, she and Cavill would have great chemistry
4. Recast Judi Dench with someone else, man or woman (preferably man)
5. don't make Felix Leiter black, cast Josh Lucas or someone else popular at the time
6. Keep it accurate even with changing the game to poker
7. Cut down on the action in the final third act and make it more of a character drama like the novel
8. Don't include Mr. White at all or any of that shit, actually hint at SMERSH
9. Adapt the novels but with different names and updated stories that take inspiration from it, like LALD is about African civil wars, Moonraker is about the modern space race and adapt that story from start to finish in one long continuous arc. You end it with YOLT and maybe cast Mads as a modern Blofeld.
10. You both have a Bond you could use for 20 years and made dark and gritty movies that are one story without pissing off legacy fans
11. don't bring up that Bond and Blofeld are brothers
12. Kick Barbara Broccoli out of EON
>Brosnan
He doesn't look like he would know how to play poker.
Which I fine since James Bond doesn't play Poker, he plays Baccarat
fun fact: in an interview, Mikkelsen joked that Craig was the only one in the bunch who had no clue how to play poker. They literally had to teach him the hand rankings and everything.
Unironically based if true. Gambling is a sin.
>Craig is a flaming homosexual but gambling is a sin.
>craigschizo having a melty
This was a clear puff piece to boost his name around the time of the casting. It's been debunked years now.
It's actually from 2023 but keep coping
>Throwback
>let's pay this woman to say she had sex with a guy, that will get folks to buy movie tickets
Yes, that's what PR is for, anon.
yeah ok moron, great PR
It is, it makes him more popular with men and women. It's the basics of PR, good word of mouth.
Yes but she probably exaggerated to keep up his status as a movie star. Also, she said he kept looking at himself in the mirror for a long time. It sounds a little...you know...
>It sounds a little...you know...
so in other words it's not PR
>multi-reply
>"b-b-b-b-bbbut"
craigschizo....
>thinks replying to two posts is a big deal
lmao how new are you?
It hasn't been debunked, they really dated. She's not as hot as she used to be though, kind of went insane over the years.
>craigschizo straight up making shit up now
It's true.
cope
>Angry pleb homosexual spamming lame green text responses telling someone to cope
lol
cope
He thinks it's just one guy who dislikes Craig and calls everyone with dissenting opinions Craigschizos. It's astoundingly moronic.
But more than one person has already called you out on your Craig bluff.
It just sounds way too exaggerated, is all. I don't doubt it's true they were together but the fact is the guy is clearly a flamer. Flamers do tend to be guys who are effeminate in their status as in it's easy for them to get puss that they just break and go puff. Craig seems like this plus if he was an animal in bed, it follows he's a tough male, right? Yet, he says he goes to gay bars because he's afraid of fights with normal men.
He also said it's easy to meet women there.
But why would there be women in gay bars? I do not get normalgays. What utter animals.
The only schizophrenic is you by the way you type and reply.
Too have some drinks with their girlfriends and oogle at men while having less dudes approach you.
>go to gay bars
>uhhh men approach ME a woman??? I hate this so much oh my god! These sodomites who are not attracted to me are such better company than other people of a more normal class of society
>Hmmm that gay guy is so hot
I'm trying so hard to not be overcome with disdain and hatred for women but they make sure I do.
There are at least 2 people that get extremely offended and start a lengthy cope argument any time someone marks they like Daniel Craig as bond, like this poster
>2 people
It's clearly the same guy. Either way, I think it's fine to dislike CraigBond but to make shit up is just cope.
Christ man, get over yourself. Who cares this much?
yes, that's what i'm saying.
>38 year old man at the time doesn't know how to play cards or poker
As if it couldn't be more obvious he's a huge flamer.
Solange is best Bond girl
Central to Casino Royale is Craig's Bond being relatively inexperienced. Keeping the script as it basically was and just swapping out Craig for Brosnan would make Brosnan Bond would not fit the mature and experience Bond Brosnan should have become by that point - he has a completely different relationship with M; his approach to Vesper in general and his response to her betrayal would be different. A Brosnan Casino Royale would, or at least should, be a completely different story to the point you may as well not make it be Casino Royale - if anything this could be a film where you explore what it is to be an aging spy. On the related subject, I see people say Cavill would have been better in the role than Craig; it would have made little difference as Cavill would still be working with the same script(s) and approach to Bond by the wider creative team assembled.
This might actually be kino but mostly because I really wanted to see a more serious Bond movie with Moore that isn't Star Wars space lasers.
It can't work. His best movie was written for Dalton (FYEO) and even then, Sir Roger believed in fun and adventure. Not making it serious.
Roger was a fun guy behind the scenes, easily the most charming in my book. But I really don't care for most of his Bond movies aside from the last one.
Correction* FYEO was also not bad
I like them all, especially Moonraker but yeah, Cubby should have taken the hint and cast Dalton after that movie but Roger was too beloved in the role and they didn't feel like risking it. If you've seen The Saint, his James Bond becomes way better if you treat them as Saint movies than James Bond which was the approach Roger preferred. Myself, I'm of course a Daltonchad but hold nothing but love for Sir Roger.
Best Bond
>reddit powers
>craigschizo going on about gay bars again
the main craig schizo is IN THIS THREAD
He's about 18 years late, the last Bond movie was like 2 years ago already.
On the other hand, it's a shame we don't have a Heath Ledger schizo to go along with this. I remember both castings were causing butthurt at the time.
His casting and his last movie has permanently destroyed the franchise and left in a state of irrelevance. Obviously, when there's NOTHING else to talk about, people will just revert back to shitting (justifiably) on Craig. Barbara has put the franchise on permanent hold due to Craig not returning for more.
You're absolutely delusional. The franchise is alive and well and the vast majority of people hold it in good regard.
This isn't a Terminator Dark Fate situation where everyone unanimously agrees it did nothing but tarnish its franchise.
>alive and well
No Time To Die lost a 100 million dollars for MGM and EON. It's been 5 years since the last movie wrapped up and no Bond replacement or anything. James Bond was killed in the last movie. The only 007 media to be released since is some game show with the logo slapped on it that no one watched. It's not quite Dark Fate but it's pretty damn close.
>No Time To Die lost a 100 million dollars for MGM and EON
No it didn't.
Casino and Die Another Day were 4 years apart, close to 5.
The last Dalton movie and the first Brosnan movie were even further apart. These things take time anon.
nttd made the most money any bond ever made and theres crazy hype about whos the next bond. way more than after dad
like
said ur just coping man and ur insane
Learn how to type like an actual white person and not an Ugandan scammer.
No Time To Die didn't even come close to breaking even and was a massive failure with the costs it had. Man from UNCLE was poorly marketed and a niche IP. If they released the same movie but made it about James Bond, it'd be massive. Movies now have gone back to fun and adventure even at the cost of pozz so yeah back then it didn't work but now it clearly does which is why they should be making a new James Bond movie ASAP but are not and Babs said they haven't even BEGUN to PLAN the next Bond. If that's not a sign she's completely given up on Bond, nothing is.
>No Time To Die didn't even come close to breaking even
At this point you're just baiting. "Didn't even come close" lmao. I like you anon.
MGM of course coped (as would anyone who lost a lot of money) but the losses are there.
The article you linked says this has been debunked
this is like you telling me if I lost money when I am broke and I say 'nahh it's cool bro'
this. he hated James Bond and only took it because it was his ticket to immortality and movie star status due to Barbara being obsessed with him. he's a step above casting couch prostitute.
If every movie that made 700+ million was considered a failure, studios wouldn't invest nearly as much money in these projects. You don't realize how the business works. They want to make a profit first and foremost.
It's always the ones who know they're talking nonsense who go all like 'DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW THIS HECKIN WORKS'. It was a failure on release.
How can the franchise be destroyed when the post-2000 movies were successful both critically and financially?
Seems to me like you're just not fond of the new grounded approach. You might like The Man from U.N.C.L.E. better. It was closer to the Moore Bond formula. But it was also a tremendous box office failure, so you can't really blame Hollywood for not going with that approach.
Architect is one of the worst actors i've ever seen in my life. He can only do smug face and forced serious face and that's it. Why Cinemaphile sucks this guy's dick all the time I have no idea.
>so mad he has to resort to racist namecalling while multi replying
lol craigschizo mad
I liked craig too bad he had contempt for the character
he's a good actor
whats interesting about this exercise is you can imagine just how differently the scenes would have been filmed
even brosnan on the water in the beginning, he'd be on a boat or something or working with some scuba gear
every craig shot is 'look at this intense cool looking english brute, dont you want to dress like him'
every brosnan shot is 'goddamn james bond is fly as hell, my god'
Pierce Brosnan IS James Bond. Daniel Craig is some random guy who says he's James Bond.
No. I like Brosnan better than Craig overall but Craig owns CR. Brosnan never pulled off Bond's lethality.
Lethality isn't just the ability to shoot someone. I could imagine Craig's Bond killing someone with his bare hands. Not so with Brosnan. Though overall I do prefer Brosnan's tenure overall due to the sheer shittiness of the last two Craig films.
You're not wrong. There's nuances to both that are strengths and weaknesses but most of this discussion usually boils down to "old good new bad".
If I were to compile the perfect Bond series, I would cut a few of the movies out entirely, including some of the old ones.
He would've been 14 at the time. Was he a child actor?
>Dr. Noah turns out to be Sir James's nephew Jimmy Bond, who plans to use biological warfare to make all women beautiful and kill all tall men, leaving him as the "big man" who gets all the girls.
/ourguy/
That goes without saying.
It really doesn't. It would've felt off.