>dies ad 33 >christian movement already a problem for the romans by ad 50 >St Pauls Letters date to ad 45-55 >judaism never denied his existence despite the threat to their culture >Network of christian churches already established and thriving by ad 70 and supported by letters and documents
All that just makes it even likelier that it was all made up. In fact you've got whole councils over the years to establish "the canon", with people wanting to introduce that Jesus fought dragons as a child and getting shut down, because Catholics are fricking lame.
Yeah but the existing documents are centuries upon centuries after their death. The earliest surviving papyrus manuscripts of the new testament are arguably AD80 (debated) but at least around 100-150 AD
You do realize ancient Greeks came before Jesus and the lives of their rulers and thinkers is just as well preserved as, supposedly, Jesus', right?
Heres and example. Alexander died 323 BC.
>Bibliotheca historica (Library of world history), written in Greek by the Sicilian historian Diodorus Siculus, from which Book 17 relates the conquests of Alexander, based almost entirely on Cleitarchus and Hieronymus of Cardia. It is the oldest surviving Greek source (1st century BC). Diodorus regarded Alexander like Caesar as a key historical figure and chronological marker.
Yes... yes there would. Bond was just a vehicle for Fleming to tell more romanticised and exciting versions of his own adventures. He didn't need any inspiration from Holmes.
Cocaine addict
Sun wukong is much more influential although certainly not as iconic
the most iconic fiction character is either batman or spiderman
Batman is a Sherlock knock off
that's not Jesus
>dies ad 33
>christian movement already a problem for the romans by ad 50
>St Pauls Letters date to ad 45-55
>judaism never denied his existence despite the threat to their culture
>Network of christian churches already established and thriving by ad 70 and supported by letters and documents
This is a fake person we are talking about?
All that just makes it even likelier that it was all made up. In fact you've got whole councils over the years to establish "the canon", with people wanting to introduce that Jesus fought dragons as a child and getting shut down, because Catholics are fricking lame.
>All that just makes it even likelier that it was all made up.
If thats easier for you to live your life. No other figure from that time has sources within their century backing their existence.
You do realize ancient Greeks came before Jesus and the lives of their rulers and thinkers is just as well preserved as, supposedly, Jesus', right?
Yeah but the existing documents are centuries upon centuries after their death. The earliest surviving papyrus manuscripts of the new testament are arguably AD80 (debated) but at least around 100-150 AD
>No other figure from that time has sources within their century backing their existence.
I guess Alexander the Great wasn't real.
Heres and example. Alexander died 323 BC.
>Bibliotheca historica (Library of world history), written in Greek by the Sicilian historian Diodorus Siculus, from which Book 17 relates the conquests of Alexander, based almost entirely on Cleitarchus and Hieronymus of Cardia. It is the oldest surviving Greek source (1st century BC). Diodorus regarded Alexander like Caesar as a key historical figure and chronological marker.
Historical Jesus is not necessarily the same as the character we get after numerous gospels and letters compiled together over several decades.
Ah I didn't know that real people stopped being real if people write incorrect stories about them.
It's the difference between thinking William Wallace is real and thinking William Wallace as played by Mel Gobson in Braveheart is real.
Jesus was real. God, on the other hand, is not.
Thanos is more influential than this rizzless skibidi
Not even close. That's James Bond. Any person on the street knows infinitely more about Bond than they do Sherlock. Sherlock is not even close.
Is he as influential though? I dont think there would be a bond without Sherlock.
Yes... yes there would. Bond was just a vehicle for Fleming to tell more romanticised and exciting versions of his own adventures. He didn't need any inspiration from Holmes.
Santa is very real tho
>fictional character
What about Jesus Christ?
If Jesus was real, he would've been shot for ringing the wrong doorbell in America already.
The Soviet Sherlock is very good.
The books are extremely kino
There is a reason Sherlock is so popular, the writing is 10/10 for mystery for the most part
>is actually just the first ever police procedural, the worst type of fiction that has ever or will ever exist
>easily mogs the drug addict incel Holmes
HAIL TO THE KING, BABY
Darth Vader was more influential than James Bond and Sherlock Holmes combined, sorry Britanons