A simple google search tells me this is a companion comic to a graphic novel written by Sylvestor Stallone and Chuck Dixon. This is an "official" product that just happens to be crowdfunded.
So what your telling me is that this is a charity job no one really wanted to read.
Why give it to a hack like the Critical Drinker?
I enjoy his stuff but his latest review of Indiana Jones 5 was a miss for me. Sure I agreed with what he said but the review felt uninspired. I suppose if the movies keep being the same old shit then so will the reviews .
Because deep down he's dying, Reviewing this shit over and over just gets fricking tedious and while some brain-dead morons enjoy kicking a dead horse he can tell this is going to be the rest of his career, his books are bleh, and this is the only way he can make money.
No talking about things his likes because the moment he does that he's stuck with having an actual opinion, nope he just has to say all the things that are shit, are shit and all the things that are good, good, just remember to mention all the woke shit like a woman getting the upper hand of a man that's impossible.
>So what your telling me is that this is a charity job no one really wanted to read.
I'm not sure how you're coming to that conclusion, and I'm not interested in this myself. I'm just saying this was done under the direction of Sylvestor Stallone, and I doubt he's suing himself. >Why give it to a hack like the Critical Drinker?
Again, I have only vague ideas who any of these people are and do not care. But if you don't like this because he does hot takes on social media, or he's a youtuber, or he has no prior writing credits, I would submit that this doesn't seem markedly different from what the big 2 have been doing.
The only difference is this is crowdfunded, and it's currently sitting at over $200K. Somebody wants it. Not many, but they're there and they're willing to pay.
The comics industry is practically the Hollywood ghetto. It's for people who either couldn't cut it in Hollywood and settled, or desperately wants to be in Hollywood and hopes to work their way up there.
Depends on the leftist, same with the people on the right.
Like genuinely it's people who think being pro or anti-Israel is anything at all to do with being pro or anti-semetic. I mean the daily show just last year condemned Israel for attacking Palestine.
>John Rambo >Born 1947 >Going to fight in the Korean War, which broke out in 1950
I know there are stories about kids who lied about their age, but 4?
There are absolutely Anti-Semites who use Israel's various crimes against humanity as justification for their biases and bigotries and conspiracy theories.
That they're buttholes and bigots doesn't make Israel's treatment of Palestine anymore acceptable to a person not huffing either propaganda or copium, however.
>There are absolutely Anti-Semites who use Israel's various crimes against humanity as justification for their biases and bigotries
And nothing is wrong that. You don't commit atrocites and don't expected your reputation to be tarnished.
we do. israel is a racist/apartheid state that just so happens to also be a colonial satellite state of the crown. read about the first balfour declaration and how hamas was created by israel to counter the PLO which had leftist tendencies. zionism is a bait and switch for white israelites from europe who are less middle eastern than elizabeth warren is native american
Nobody said this. People took it and there was a lot of Malding to credit Trump for cutting some red tape as if that made up for the insider trading that happened near the start of the pandemic. In general, it was moronic that both parties tried to make the vaccine a win for them rather than the scientists who actually made the damn thing, but there was a lot more Repubs screaming “THANK TRUMP!!!!” when people took their vaccines that they inevitably stopped doing once the pivot was to go full anti-vaxx and claim the shot gives AIDS or whatever.
>Nobody said this
Get out of your tribalistic space you idiot, numerous people REEEEEd about the "Trump vaccine". Either accept "your side" can be fools as well and internalize it healthily (even "very few people said that" would go miles) or opt be a real human instead of a self-made strawman
>Nobody
M8 people smash their wiener and balls with hammers, don't use 'Nobody' because there is 100% a 'nobody' in the world
I can’t remember every single intricate posting etiquette on this site has anymore, I’m tired. You’re both still correct, regardless though, so consider the statement amended to *very few people* were saying this.
See I wouldn't say it's that, it's more he and the rest of his I'll aiming to make this attempt to return to this golden age of Hollywood that exists in their heads but they fail to make it work because they're hacks
>But there’s far, *far* more evidence for “Go Fasch, No Cash” then there ever has been for “Go Woke, Go Broke”. >B-Because I say there is!
Cope, b***h.
>But there’s far, *far* more evidence for “Go Fasch, No Cash” then there ever has been for “Go Woke, Go Broke”.
Name a few high-profile things that have even gone fasch, much less lost cash. Actually, if there's indeed far, far more evidence, you should easily be able to name several dozen.
Anon he said there was far (twice!) more evidence, I'd say you were thoroughly BTFO! idk a single "fasch" piece of content to even use as a comparision, if anon wasn't just being a fool I'd have liked to see his picks
>multiple high-profile IPs taking a hard turn left and losing billions isn't a lot of evidence >multiple grifters, trend chasers, and lolcows taking a hard turn right and losing tens of thousands of dollars tops is a lot of evidence
Daily reminder that all flavors of /misc/homosexualry fry your brain just like hard drugs.
Did they lose billions because they turned hard left? Or were they going to lose billions anyway and some exec thought adding a bit of wokeness would float it and it didn't?
The live-action Disney remakes for example. Obviously bad because they're soulless, nostalgia cash-grabs. Wokeness is there, but ultimately has very little if anything to do with why they flopped. Into the Spiderverse on the otherhand is so woke it might have made turned Gwen Stacy trans, did just fine.
>they were going to lose billions anyways >in a "DAE NOSTALGIA???" market
The live action disney remakes were mostly profitable, even soulless zero-effort shit like Aladdin and Lion King. >multiple hard turns left followed by failure is not enough evidence in favor >a single hard left turn not followed by failure is enough evidence againt
It's all so tiresome.
What? People called Spider-man that all the time, if it wasn't for Paul causing everyone to shout cuckold all the time we'd still have the threads about how the publishers have run out of ideas.
Wow that sounds incredibly uninteresting. It's one of those things where I find it more Amazing that someone spent the time and effort to make and produce this. It's more amazing to me that this is even somehow interesting enough to illicit passion and drive. Maybe I just don't understand.
See the sheriff would have been interesting, but no he's gotta go with the dull answer.
He's a bit too annoying with how he can't stop harping about modern audiences and shit, I mean even when I agree with his review the reason some things are shit can just be way more about the writing in general than anything to do with wokness, and it devalues his points. Like Helena is far from the worst thing in the new Indian Jones, and she is setup as less of a replacement for Jones than fricking Mutt was.
How is she them because I'm usually making fun of c**ts who say woke and even I think she's a little Annoying from what little I've seen.
Because despite being a dick there's an element of tragedy to him.
He's nearing a mental breakdown, he loses someone who he thought as a friend, he getting divorced and his father just died in a stupid accident.
Also he was in the Korean war.
Also does anyone expect a ending as sad as the first Rambo movie or will we get a ending with the colonel getting away stoicly vowing to train more men to fight for America.
She's a bad guy, but that's basically the point. The movie seems to be setting up that the adventure with Jones changes her for the better, but the movie ends so abruptly that we just gotta assume it happens.
I mean she saves his life at the end so I guess it's better.
I think it is a knock-off James Bond series or something to do with spies. I saw a review by a guy that wasn't a fan of him nor alternatively had anything against him, with the conclusion of the review being the book was derivative, run of the mill and waffling.
Derivative isn't the worst review you can get, at least. If weebs can slurp up any trash isekai you throw their way, he can probably find a niche following of military nerds who lap up war stories
My favorite YouTube reviewer is The Critical Drinker. I think his Scottish accent is very funny. I laugh whenever he brings up Tatiana or plays the ‘it’s definitely shite’ clip, or the one with Tyrion throwing up. And when he closes his review with ‘That’s all I have for today. Go away now!’, I say it loudly with him!
He's a bit too annoying with how he can't stop harping about modern audiences and shit, I mean even when I agree with his review the reason some things are shit can just be way more about the writing in general than anything to do with wokness, and it devalues his points. Like Helena is far from the worst thing in the new Indian Jones, and she is setup as less of a replacement for Jones than fricking Mutt was.
He catches all the movie's faults where there's a woman involved, but grossly misses everything else that is glaringly wrong with the movie. Like in the Puss in Boots one, there was not a peep about Perrito being obnoxious and serving no purpose. Not a peep about Death going after Puss despite Puss having 1 life left, which sounds quite unfair.
But if the movie has a female, he jumps on her right away and points out all that's wrong with it.
Don't get me wrong. I agree with everything he says about the strong female leads being cancer to the industry. But rather than a movie critique, it feels like plain woman hating if you dedicate the video just to that and ignore everything else that's wrong with the movie.
He's not a movie critic. He just has mommy issues.
When it comes to this guy I wonder if he has really changed any substantive number of opinions or is he, like so many of these YouTubers, just preaching to the choir?
>When it comes to this guy I wonder if he has really changed any substantive number of opinions or is he, like so many of these YouTubers, just preaching to the choir?
The latter. Most people dont watch videos like his hoping to have their opinions challenged.
>it feels like plain woman hating
Not even that. It feels more like "back in my day" b***hing when he gives a pass to shit like Buffy which is the exact same thing he b***hes about and even helped establish all the absolute worst aspects of modern strong female characters. >and butthurt Whedongays to his defense come in 3... 2... 1..
>there was not a peep about Perrito being obnoxious and serving no purpose.
He did serve a purpose. He was the example of a character who didn't need a wish and already was content enough with his life, which is an important contrast to make in a cast full of wish hunters. He was also there when Puss needed him the most, and Puss definitely needed Perrito because he wouldn't be able to deal with all the shit that was happening to him alone. >Not a peep about Death going after Puss despite Puss having 1 life left, which sounds quite unfair.
No shit it was unfair, Death was being petty because he couldn't stand Puss mocking him. People mistakenly think Death is a fair antagonist but he's still a villain after all.
>‘That’s all I have for today. Go away now!’, I say it loudly with him!
god you're fricking cringe or pretending to be moronic
the replies taking this post seriously are also....something else illtellyawhot
I enjoy his stuff but his latest review of Indiana Jones 5 was a miss for me. Sure I agreed with what he said but the review felt uninspired. I suppose if the movies keep being the same old shit then so will the reviews .
Irrelevant, his status as an eceleb will ensure he makes many thousands of dollars. Quality does not matter, it never has and it never will. I'm sorry you had to learn the hard way like this.
Funny that gators can only make the 50s Hollywood film or comic stories, and the quality of these are definitely nowhere near even the average back then. Whether woke garbage or tradcon trash, American entertainments are no doubt finished. They seriously run out ideas.
This one of this threads that will keep popping up because you want to talk about politics but no one would post the comic, or have read it because it's most likely boring and irrelevant.
As someone who has no idea who this random ass gay eceleb is or why I should give a frick about this book:
Holy mental illness batman. Someone get OP back in his padded cell before he hurts himself and others.
>"Heh? Don't like it, then make your own, chud." >"NO WAIT WAIT YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO ACTUALLY MAKE IT!"
You gays are just as annoying as the people screaming "woke" at shit they don't have to give money or attention to
Creatively bankrupt is the idea to name yourself an alcoholic as a reviewer, its fricking pathetic. Just like calling yourself "The [name] in the [clothes]" or something something Sarcastic or something something Angry.
>conservatard incel who's entire identity revolves around calling everything """"""woke"""""" and bein drunk because drunk funny and if i say something unfathomably stupid i can blame it on the """"character"""" being """"drunk""""" >put in charge of depicting the korean war
Why not just make your own war story at that point
Well that's the thing, despite their b***hing about Hollywood, they're hacks who comic up with the blandestsafest ideas.
You know what really bugs me about Rippa, it's the fact that he just has no ideas, like what reason for Isom have to retire from superheroics.
It wasn't for him.
Fricking nothing.
A simple google search tells me this is a companion comic to a graphic novel written by Sylvestor Stallone and Chuck Dixon. This is an "official" product that just happens to be crowdfunded.
So what your telling me is that this is a charity job no one really wanted to read.
Why give it to a hack like the Critical Drinker?
Because deep down he's dying, Reviewing this shit over and over just gets fricking tedious and while some brain-dead morons enjoy kicking a dead horse he can tell this is going to be the rest of his career, his books are bleh, and this is the only way he can make money.
No talking about things his likes because the moment he does that he's stuck with having an actual opinion, nope he just has to say all the things that are shit, are shit and all the things that are good, good, just remember to mention all the woke shit like a woman getting the upper hand of a man that's impossible.
>So what your telling me is that this is a charity job no one really wanted to read.
I'm not sure how you're coming to that conclusion, and I'm not interested in this myself. I'm just saying this was done under the direction of Sylvestor Stallone, and I doubt he's suing himself.
>Why give it to a hack like the Critical Drinker?
Again, I have only vague ideas who any of these people are and do not care. But if you don't like this because he does hot takes on social media, or he's a youtuber, or he has no prior writing credits, I would submit that this doesn't seem markedly different from what the big 2 have been doing.
The only difference is this is crowdfunded, and it's currently sitting at over $200K. Somebody wants it. Not many, but they're there and they're willing to pay.
>Why give it to a hack like the Critical Drinker?
Same reason most hacks get jobs in the industry; he's willing to work for peanuts.
>Same reason most hacks get jobs in the industry
Because they have connections.
So basically they're like Hollywood.
The comics industry is practically the Hollywood ghetto. It's for people who either couldn't cut it in Hollywood and settled, or desperately wants to be in Hollywood and hopes to work their way up there.
Because he's a proficient war/crime thriller writer and the youtube thing is a side hobby
>proficient war/crime thriller writer
A.K.A He's cheap and fast.
The Rippaverse effect
I'm going to laugh when he gets dmca'd
So can that actually happen, I mean maybe hes baseing it on the book.
Anon-tachi...
>This show those sjws.
I thought leftists hated Israel?
Depends on the leftist, same with the people on the right.
Like genuinely it's people who think being pro or anti-Israel is anything at all to do with being pro or anti-semetic. I mean the daily show just last year condemned Israel for attacking Palestine.
>John Rambo
>Born 1947
>Going to fight in the Korean War, which broke out in 1950
I know there are stories about kids who lied about their age, but 4?
There are absolutely Anti-Semites who use Israel's various crimes against humanity as justification for their biases and bigotries and conspiracy theories.
That they're buttholes and bigots doesn't make Israel's treatment of Palestine anymore acceptable to a person not huffing either propaganda or copium, however.
>There are absolutely Anti-Semites who use Israel's various crimes against humanity as justification for their biases and bigotries
And nothing is wrong that. You don't commit atrocites and don't expected your reputation to be tarnished.
we do. israel is a racist/apartheid state that just so happens to also be a colonial satellite state of the crown. read about the first balfour declaration and how hamas was created by israel to counter the PLO which had leftist tendencies. zionism is a bait and switch for white israelites from europe who are less middle eastern than elizabeth warren is native american
It changes from week to week. Remember how they would never take "the Trump vaccine" back at the beginning of covd?
Nobody said this. People took it and there was a lot of Malding to credit Trump for cutting some red tape as if that made up for the insider trading that happened near the start of the pandemic. In general, it was moronic that both parties tried to make the vaccine a win for them rather than the scientists who actually made the damn thing, but there was a lot more Repubs screaming “THANK TRUMP!!!!” when people took their vaccines that they inevitably stopped doing once the pivot was to go full anti-vaxx and claim the shot gives AIDS or whatever.
>Nobody said this
Get out of your tribalistic space you idiot, numerous people REEEEEd about the "Trump vaccine". Either accept "your side" can be fools as well and internalize it healthily (even "very few people said that" would go miles) or opt be a real human instead of a self-made strawman
I can’t remember every single intricate posting etiquette on this site has anymore, I’m tired. You’re both still correct, regardless though, so consider the statement amended to *very few people* were saying this.
>Nobody
M8 people smash their wiener and balls with hammers, don't use 'Nobody' because there is 100% a 'nobody' in the world
I will totally grant that wokeness won’t save a bad project and there’s some executive types that don’t seem to realize this.
But there’s far, *far* more evidence for “Go Fasch, No Cash” then there ever has been for “Go Woke, Go Broke”.
See I wouldn't say it's that, it's more he and the rest of his I'll aiming to make this attempt to return to this golden age of Hollywood that exists in their heads but they fail to make it work because they're hacks
..Why are you replying to yourself?
>But there’s far, *far* more evidence for “Go Fasch, No Cash” then there ever has been for “Go Woke, Go Broke”.
>B-Because I say there is!
Cope, b***h.
Will, no one likes your books.
That's fine, I'm not Will. He's seems to live in your head, though.
>But there’s far, *far* more evidence for “Go Fasch, No Cash” then there ever has been for “Go Woke, Go Broke”.
Name a few high-profile things that have even gone fasch, much less lost cash. Actually, if there's indeed far, far more evidence, you should easily be able to name several dozen.
Anon he said there was far (twice!) more evidence, I'd say you were thoroughly BTFO!
idk a single "fasch" piece of content to even use as a comparision, if anon wasn't just being a fool I'd have liked to see his picks
>“Go Fasch, No Cash”
Define Fascism in a way that describes that governments founded on Fascism.
>Wrongthink? Go sink!
>multiple high-profile IPs taking a hard turn left and losing billions isn't a lot of evidence
>multiple grifters, trend chasers, and lolcows taking a hard turn right and losing tens of thousands of dollars tops is a lot of evidence
Daily reminder that all flavors of /misc/homosexualry fry your brain just like hard drugs.
Did they lose billions because they turned hard left? Or were they going to lose billions anyway and some exec thought adding a bit of wokeness would float it and it didn't?
The live-action Disney remakes for example. Obviously bad because they're soulless, nostalgia cash-grabs. Wokeness is there, but ultimately has very little if anything to do with why they flopped. Into the Spiderverse on the otherhand is so woke it might have made turned Gwen Stacy trans, did just fine.
>they were going to lose billions anyways
>in a "DAE NOSTALGIA???" market
The live action disney remakes were mostly profitable, even soulless zero-effort shit like Aladdin and Lion King.
>multiple hard turns left followed by failure is not enough evidence in favor
>a single hard left turn not followed by failure is enough evidence againt
It's all so tiresome.
Is creatively bankrupt the current buzzword, I've seen a few threads that began with that and none of them where aimed at the big companies.
You trying to tell me that something like this seems original, using a character that no one cares about to sell a substandard comic?
What? People called Spider-man that all the time, if it wasn't for Paul causing everyone to shout cuckold all the time we'd still have the threads about how the publishers have run out of ideas.
Wow that sounds incredibly uninteresting. It's one of those things where I find it more Amazing that someone spent the time and effort to make and produce this. It's more amazing to me that this is even somehow interesting enough to illicit passion and drive. Maybe I just don't understand.
Kino
Rambo fought in Korea?
It's about the sheriff from First Blood
it will probably be sheriff from first blood since he was a korean vet in the book
It's about Colonel Trautman.
See the sheriff would have been interesting, but no he's gotta go with the dull answer.
How is she them because I'm usually making fun of c**ts who say woke and even I think she's a little Annoying from what little I've seen.
How would the sheriff's backstory be more interesting than the colonel?
Because despite being a dick there's an element of tragedy to him.
He's nearing a mental breakdown, he loses someone who he thought as a friend, he getting divorced and his father just died in a stupid accident.
Also he was in the Korean war.
Also does anyone expect a ending as sad as the first Rambo movie or will we get a ending with the colonel getting away stoicly vowing to train more men to fight for America.
She's a bad guy, but that's basically the point. The movie seems to be setting up that the adventure with Jones changes her for the better, but the movie ends so abruptly that we just gotta assume it happens.
I mean she saves his life at the end so I guess it's better.
Huh, oh well, seeing it anyway.
Isn't he an author of some knock-off Uncharted series
Either way it's probably going to suck balls like every other time an e-celeb writes a comic
I think it is a knock-off James Bond series or something to do with spies. I saw a review by a guy that wasn't a fan of him nor alternatively had anything against him, with the conclusion of the review being the book was derivative, run of the mill and waffling.
Source?
This was a while back so I am not entirely sure but, it could be this
%3D
Derivative isn't the worst review you can get, at least. If weebs can slurp up any trash isekai you throw their way, he can probably find a niche following of military nerds who lap up war stories
My favorite YouTube reviewer is The Critical Drinker. I think his Scottish accent is very funny. I laugh whenever he brings up Tatiana or plays the ‘it’s definitely shite’ clip, or the one with Tyrion throwing up. And when he closes his review with ‘That’s all I have for today. Go away now!’, I say it loudly with him!
He's a bit too annoying with how he can't stop harping about modern audiences and shit, I mean even when I agree with his review the reason some things are shit can just be way more about the writing in general than anything to do with wokness, and it devalues his points. Like Helena is far from the worst thing in the new Indian Jones, and she is setup as less of a replacement for Jones than fricking Mutt was.
I like Doomwiener for his presentation and Itsagundam for his caustic comments back when he could speak his mind.
At least he knows what to avoid.
Ehhhh.
He catches all the movie's faults where there's a woman involved, but grossly misses everything else that is glaringly wrong with the movie. Like in the Puss in Boots one, there was not a peep about Perrito being obnoxious and serving no purpose. Not a peep about Death going after Puss despite Puss having 1 life left, which sounds quite unfair.
But if the movie has a female, he jumps on her right away and points out all that's wrong with it.
Don't get me wrong. I agree with everything he says about the strong female leads being cancer to the industry. But rather than a movie critique, it feels like plain woman hating if you dedicate the video just to that and ignore everything else that's wrong with the movie.
He's not a movie critic. He just has mommy issues.
When it comes to this guy I wonder if he has really changed any substantive number of opinions or is he, like so many of these YouTubers, just preaching to the choir?
The latter, it's why these hacks get funding.
>When it comes to this guy I wonder if he has really changed any substantive number of opinions or is he, like so many of these YouTubers, just preaching to the choir?
The latter. Most people dont watch videos like his hoping to have their opinions challenged.
He's a grifter making good money off stupid people. The ones with issues are his viewers.
>it feels like plain woman hating
Not even that. It feels more like "back in my day" b***hing when he gives a pass to shit like Buffy which is the exact same thing he b***hes about and even helped establish all the absolute worst aspects of modern strong female characters.
>and butthurt Whedongays to his defense come in 3... 2... 1..
>there was not a peep about Perrito being obnoxious and serving no purpose.
He did serve a purpose. He was the example of a character who didn't need a wish and already was content enough with his life, which is an important contrast to make in a cast full of wish hunters. He was also there when Puss needed him the most, and Puss definitely needed Perrito because he wouldn't be able to deal with all the shit that was happening to him alone.
>Not a peep about Death going after Puss despite Puss having 1 life left, which sounds quite unfair.
No shit it was unfair, Death was being petty because he couldn't stand Puss mocking him. People mistakenly think Death is a fair antagonist but he's still a villain after all.
>‘That’s all I have for today. Go away now!’, I say it loudly with him!
god you're fricking cringe or pretending to be moronic
the replies taking this post seriously are also....something else illtellyawhot
I enjoy his stuff but his latest review of Indiana Jones 5 was a miss for me. Sure I agreed with what he said but the review felt uninspired. I suppose if the movies keep being the same old shit then so will the reviews .
>E-celeb thread
He's gonna find out being able to criticize doesn't mean you can create.
Irrelevant, his status as an eceleb will ensure he makes many thousands of dollars. Quality does not matter, it never has and it never will. I'm sorry you had to learn the hard way like this.
Mad he makes more money than you, neetboi?
Funny that gators can only make the 50s Hollywood film or comic stories, and the quality of these are definitely nowhere near even the average back then. Whether woke garbage or tradcon trash, American entertainments are no doubt finished. They seriously run out ideas.
ITT catty industry peons are pissed
That art if from Rambo: First Kill
>Let’s send Rambo back to Nam. That’ll totally cure his mental issues.
What did Troutmann mean by this?
>critic tries to make their own story
Doesn't most of these fail? At least ones by youtuber critics.
Critic is a published writer.
>At least ones by youtuber critics.
Like?
Yes but that doesn't mean it's good, by that standards so is Linkara.
Reverse Moviebob
This one of this threads that will keep popping up because you want to talk about politics but no one would post the comic, or have read it because it's most likely boring and irrelevant.
you sound mad, untalented, and envious
Says the guy complaining and doing nothing about it. Where's your comic so that we can tell you how mediocre your ideas are?
For me, it's Nerdrotic.
What's wrong with this? The movie sucked. Get a life, libshit.
Will, go home you're drunk.
God this is what meth does to you.
>everyone's
Kek. Post replies now, b***h.
Ur a Black person loving homosexual who should kill himself
>haha I replied to everyone's post! Now what?
Engage in coitus
I thought he hated when Hollywood drags out old IPs out for cheap nostalgia bucks and longed for original ideas?
>Some samegay is using this thread as his personal blog
Kek. What's the matter, reddit banned you for some moronic reason?
As someone who has no idea who this random ass gay eceleb is or why I should give a frick about this book:
Holy mental illness batman. Someone get OP back in his padded cell before he hurts himself and others.
>44 posters
>Eceleb thread
Just leave the schizo be next time, please
>"Heh? Don't like it, then make your own, chud."
>"NO WAIT WAIT YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO ACTUALLY MAKE IT!"
You gays are just as annoying as the people screaming "woke" at shit they don't have to give money or attention to
No we're laughing because it's kind of pathetic he writing about a story that's doesn't need to be told.
You can say that about anything.
>we're
Rambo is Nam vet. Why
Creatively bankrupt is the idea to name yourself an alcoholic as a reviewer, its fricking pathetic. Just like calling yourself "The [name] in the [clothes]" or something something Sarcastic or something something Angry.
Addendum: They should all call themselves the fat grooming neckbeard with the Discord.
>"The [name] in the [clothes]"
Is this really so common? The only example I can think of is That Guy with the Glasses lmao
>conservatard incel who's entire identity revolves around calling everything """"""woke"""""" and bein drunk because drunk funny and if i say something unfathomably stupid i can blame it on the """"character"""" being """"drunk"""""
>put in charge of depicting the korean war
this is gonna turn out great
Critical Drinker is a liberal.
With drinking we know.
You are transgender.